ISSN:
0947-6539
Keywords:
azo compounds
;
cycloadditions
;
hydropyridazines
;
pyrazolines
;
rearrangements
;
Chemistry
;
General Chemistry
Source:
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
Topics:
Chemistry and Pharmacology
Notes:
The two isomeric [4+2] cyclo-adducts from two different 1,3-dienes may result from direct cycloadditions as well as from Cope rearrangements (Scheme 1). This general question is tackled by employing two energetically different types of dienes, protonated pyrazolines (1H+, 2H+) or dihydropyridazines (3H+), prepared in situ from their trimers and alicyclic (4-6) or aliphatic (7-9) 1,3-dienes. Depending on structural features and conditions (amount of acid, reaction time), various ratios of the two isomeric [4+2] cycloadducts A and B are obtained; A and B are azo compounds 10, 14, 16, 20, 22, 24, 27, 32, 34, 36-39, 41, 42, pyrazolines endo-11, endo-13, endo-15, endo-endo-17, endo-18, endo-19, 21, 23, 25, 26, 28, and hydropyridazines 31, endo-33, endo-35, 40 and 43 (Schemes 3, 4). These results were backed by others from acid-catalyzed isomerizations, trapping experiments, and calculations of the equilibria (ΔΔH) between the isomers (by analogy with the corresponding olefins). A critical discussion reveals: a) Azo compounds 20, 22, 24, 27, 34, 38, and 42 must result from a [4++2] cycloaddition with inverse electron demand, whereas hydropyridazines endo-33, endo-35, 40, and 43 originate from a [4+2+] cycloaddition with normal electron demand. b) All isomerizations occur by a [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement; [4+2] cycloreversion is energetically disfavored. c) A clear-cut distinction between the [4++2] or [4+2+] cycloaddition reaction routes to the energetically well-balanced systems 10→endo-11 and 12→endo-13 is not possible. d) The two cycloadditions may well favor a nonconcerted reaction through an allylic cationic intermediate which also governs the [3,3] rearrangements (Scheme 8).
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.19970031008
Permalink
