Publikationsdatum:
2021-04-14
Beschreibung:
Groundhog Day is a widespread North American ritual that marks the oncome of spring, with festivities centered around animals that humans believe have abilities to make seasonal predictions. Yet, the collective success of groundhog Marmota monax prognosticators has never been rigorously tested. Here, we propose the local climate-predicted phenology of early blooming spring plants (Carolina Spring Beauty Claytonia caroliniana, which overlaps in native range with groundhogs) as a novel and relevant descriptor of spring onset that can be applied comparatively across a broad geographical range. Of 530 unique groundhog-year predictions across 33 different locations, spring onset was correctly predicted by groundhogs exactly 50% of the time. While no singular groundhog predicted the timing of spring with any statistical significance, there were a handful of groundhogs with notable records of both successful and unsuccessful predictions: Essex Ed (Essex, CT, USA), Stonewall Jackson (Wantage, NJ, USA) and Chuckles (Manchester, CT, USA) correctly predicted spring onset over 70% of the time. By contrast, Buckeye Chuck (Marion, OH, USA), Dunkirk Dave (Dunkirk, NY, USA), and Holland Huckleberry (Holland, OH, USA) made incorrect predictions over 70% of the time. The two most widely recognized and long-tenured groundhogs in their respective countries – Wiarton Willie (CAN) and Punxsutawney Phil (USA) – had success rates of 54% and 52%, respectively, despite over 150 collective guesses. Using a novel phenological indicator of spring, this study determined, without a shadow of a doubt, that groundhog prognosticating abilities for the arrival of spring are no better than chance.
Print ISSN:
1948-8327
Digitale ISSN:
1948-8335
Thema:
Geologie und Paläontologie
,
Physik
Permalink
