ISSN:
1365-2427
Source:
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
Topics:
Biology
Notes:
〈list xml:id="l1" style="custom"〉1 The question of whether the diets of twelve abundant macroinvertebrate taxa from the middle and lower reaches of the Buffalo River (eastern Cape, South Africa) were too variable to allow them to be assigned to functional feeding groups (FFGs) was addressed.2 Spatial, temporal and developmental variations in diet were assessed. Foregut content analysis was used as an index to compare diets.3 Foregut contents were compared from early (small) and late (large) instar larvae collected from riffles at thirteen sites in summer, and from riffles, stony backwaters and sediments at four of these sites in spring, summer, autumn and winter, in 1987.4 For all individuals of all taxa, fine amorphous detritus (0.5–250 μm), was the most common dietary item. Differences in diet followed a similar pattern for all taxa. The most frequent differences in dietary content were between large and small larvae. The foreguts of large larvae contained more material, and a wider variety of rare items than small larvae. Neither species nor FFGs could be distinguished on the basis of foregut contents.5 Two dietary types were recognized. The eight mayfly larvae were fine detritivores, having ingested fine detritus almost exclusively. In contrast, the two hydropsychid caddisfly larvae had ingested a mixed diet; their gut contents included chirinous invertebrate remains and other items as well as fine detritus.6 Intra-specific dietary variability was not so great as to prevent these taxa from being assigned to FFGs. On the contrary, inter-specific dietary content was so similar that gut content analysis could not provide a positive basis upon which to identify FFGs.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00778.x
Permalink
