ALBERT

Description: Introduction: Most of the knowledge about treatments and outcome of CML patients originates from clinical studies. To get new and unbiased insights in the epidemiology, treatment and outcome of CML, the EUTOS population-based registry of newly diagnosed CML patients was established, - as part of the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) for CML. The aim was to collect the data of all adults with newly diagnosed CML, irrespective of treatment and of enrolment in studies. Patients and Methods: The EUTOS population-based registry collected data of newly diagnosed CML patients, 18 years or older, over a specified period of time from 2008 till 2012 living in defined regions. The data were collected by 22 study groups in 20 European countries. Data were gathered via a web-based CRF-system. For comparison we used the already published data from five Company-sponsored registration studies IRIS (O’Brien et.all, NEJM, 2003), TOPS (Cortes et al, JCO, 2009) ENESTnd (Saglio et al, NEJM, 2010), DASISION (Kantarjian et al, NEJM, 2010) and BELA (Cortes et al, JCO, 2012), from three Investigator-sponsored studies GIMEMA (Castagnetti et al, JCO, 2010 and Gugliotta et al, Blood, 2011), French SPIRIT (Preudhomme et al, NEJM, 2010) and German CML IV (Hehlmann et al, JCO, 2011) and from two single referral centers HAMMERSMITH (De Lavallade et al, JCO, 2008) and MDA (Jain et al, Blood, 2013). Results: Till 15.05.2014 2978 patients were registered in the EUTOS Population-based registry. 94.3% of the patients were diagnosed in chronic phase (CP), 3.6% in accelerated phase (AP), and 2.2% in blastic phase (BP). For the calculation of the prognostic scores 361 patients had to be excluded because they were pretreated. For the comparison we used 2350 patients in Chronic Phase with laboratory values before any treatment. 54% of the patients in the EUTOS Population-based registry were male, less than in all studies (56.6 - 60.6%). The median age at diagnosis was 56 years, higher than in all studies (46 - 55). In EUTOS the proportion of patients more than 60 years and more than 65 years old was 40.4 % and 21.9 % respectively. Similar data were rarely reported in all other studies. Median value of the spleen size below costal margin was 0. 46.1% of the patients had a palpable spleen and 15.2% had a spleen size ≥ 10 (spleen size is always reported in cm under costal margin in this abstract). The % of palpable spleen is only reported by IRIS, 25.0% and by the FRENCH Spirit group, 49.8%. The median spleen is only reported by GIMEMA, 2.0. Spleen size ≥ 10 is reported by IRIS, 6.0%, ENESTnd, 12.4% and HAMMERSMITH 25.5%. While the median values for Platelets and Hemoglobin show no big differences, the median WBC in EUTOS is 83.9 x109/l and in the Company-sponsored registration studies: IRIS 18-20 x109/l , in ENESTnd 23-26 x109/l, in DASISION 23-25 x109/l , and in BELA 22-23 x109/l, in the Investigator-sponsored studies: GIMEMA 55 x109/l , in the FRENCH SPIRIT 83-104 x109/l , in the GERMAN CML IV 75-91 x109/l , and in the single referral center study HAMMERSMITH 140 x109/l, clearly indicating that in company-sponsored, registration studies, the reported values of the WBC were not recorded prior to any treatment. The median values for Blasts, Basophils and Eosinophils show also not so big differences. The % of Sokal low risk patients is in EUTOS with 34.5% lower than in all studies (35.2 - 60%) with the exception of HAMMERSMITH 28.9%. Discussion: The EUTOS Population-based registry provides the first European wide real-world series of patients with newly diagnosed Ph+, BCR-ABL+ CML. The age and sex distribution and some baseline characteristics such as Sokal Score as well as median WBC count in the EUTOS population-based registry are different from many prospective studies. This should be taken in due consideration before extrapolating the results of treatment studies to real life. Spleen size, which is known as an important value for prediction, is only very rarely reported in clinical studies. With further follow-up, this registry will provide a population-based insight on treatment, survival, and causes of death. Disclosures Baccarani: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hoffmann:Novartis: Research Funding. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Steegmann:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mayer:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zaritskey:Novartis: Consultancy. Clark:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Porkka:BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hehlmann:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Hasford:Novartis: Research Funding. Lindoerfer:Novartis: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 292 Introduction: CLL cells derive essential cues from their microenvironment, that may be targets for therapy. To this end the immunomodulatory drug Lenalidomide has shown remarkable clinical activity in monotherapy trials in CLL. However, tumor lysis and tumor flare have been major obstacles in development and marked and unexplained differences in the individual tolerance of the substance remains an unsolved problem. Furthermore, the potential for interaction with standard treatment for CLL is unknown. We employed the combination of Fludarabine and Rituximab for early reduction of tumorload and used it as a backbone to establish a tolerable Lenalidomide dose in combination. Study design: In the induction phase a maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of Lenalidomide in combination with FR was to be determined during 6 cycles of Fludarabine (40mg/m2 po d1-3 q28d) and Rituximab (375mg/m2 iv d4 cycle 1; 500mg/m2 iv d1 cycles 2–6, q28d). In cycle 1 Lenalidomide was added day 7–21 at 2,5 mg. Toxicity permitting, Lenalidomide dose was escalated to 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25mg d1-21 over cycles 2–6. Data from this phase are presented in this planned analysis. Data from a 6 month Lenalidomide/Rituximab maintenance phase will be presented later. Results: The median age of the 45 recruited patients was 66 years (range 43–79). Half of the patients were in stages Rai III/IV and the median β2-MG was 4.4 mg/l. At least one high risk feature from CD38, FISH analysis and mutation status was present in 64% of patients. Five patients stopped treatment during induction (Two due to rashes, two as patient's choice and one due to early Richter's transformation). No systematic toxicity determining an MTD, the primary study endpoint, was found. In striking contrast to a small previous report, 34% of our patients proceeded through dose escalation steps as planned to receive a dose of 25mg of Lenalidomide with their last cycle of FR. The individual MTD was equal or higher than 10mg in 73% of ITT patients and 71% in this group were dose-limited due to individual differences in myelotoxicity. In ITT analysis 27% of patients had an MTD of less than 10mg. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was expected in this combination and observed in 88% of patients in any cycle. While it was not used as a dose limiting toxicity per se, 42% of patients were dose-limited due to myelotoxicity at some level. Infectious episodes of grade 3 severity were observed in 5 patients (11%), resulting in a relatively mild rate given the observed myelotoxicity and the phase I/II design. Surprisingly, 1/3 of the patients experienced greater than G2 skin toxicity and this was deemed dose-limiting in nine patients. No tumor lysis or greater than G2 flare reactions were observed. Full response assessment for induction treatment is available for 39 patients. Complete responses were observed in 49% and partial responses in 38% of the ITT population. In 35 patients flow MRD is available and 10 patients have reached MRD negativity. Response quality was not associated with risk factors, age or with lenalidomide dose in those receiving 6 cycles of treatment. Remarkably, one of three patients with deletion 17 achieved an MRD negative CR. Since we could not define a clinical predictor for the patients' tolerance of lenalidomide, we performed extensive immunophenotyping of T cells in pretreatment samples, using markers for functional T cells subsets, their Th polarity and for suppressive or exhausted T cell subsets. Employing a combined endpoint including non-hematological dose-limiting events or MTD 〈 10mg as a comparator, we identified a fraction of non-exhausted memory CD4 cells as highly significant predictor of dose-limiting non-hematologic events (p

Description: Abstract 4272 The incidence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Europe is still difficult to estimate, due to insufficient information. Currently, it is believed to range between 8 and 22 cases per million people per year, age adjusted. Prior to the introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib the annual death rate was about 10% for the first 2 to 3 years, and about 20% from the 4th year on, with less than 10% of patients alive after 10 years. Interferon-alfa treatment and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were very effective treatments but only in a minority of patients. Following the introduction of IM, and of the second generation TKI nilotinib and dasatinib the annual death rate has decreased to less than 5%, and more than 75% of patients are projected to be alive 10 years after diagnosis. Based on these figures, the prevalence of the disease is expected to double every 5 years and the management of the disease will rapidly become an important social and pharmacoeconomic issue. To govern this progress it is necessary to improve the level of information on the epidemiology of CML, on the treatment of CML in clinical practice, and on the outcome of treatment outside prospective, controlled clinical trials on which current outcome estimates are based. With that purpose, the European Leukemia Network (ELN) has established a registry of all new cases of Ph+ CML. In a public private partnership with Novartis Oncology Europe this registry has been expanded to also include treatment and quality controlled outcome (European Treatment and Outcome Study [EUTOS] for CML). The infrastructure of the registry is based on a EUTOS Central Scientific Headquarter (Dpt. Hematology-Oncology “L. and A. Seràgnoli”, University of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy) and a EUTOS Central Data Center (Dpt. For Medical Informatics, Biometric and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany), interacting with each national hub. Registry is population-based, covers completely most European countries with less than 12 millions inhabitants (Portugal, Belgium, Sweden, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Hungary, Austria, Greece, Cyprus), and covers partially (for larger countries, only sub-regions with roughly 10 millions inhabitants have been selected) most of the countries with more than 12 millions inhabitants, including Spain, the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Germany, Poland, France, Romania, Russia and Italy. About 2500 newly diagnosed cases are planned to be registered over one year and to be followed for treatment and outcome including cytogenetic response, molecular response, and BCR-ABL KD mutations. Moreover, flanking projects have been implemented in the EUTOS frame: a network of standardized laboratories across Europe, to provide a molecular monitoring with quality controlled data, a central facility for imatinib blood level testing, soon in many European countries, and an educational effort (symposia, training workshops, internet platform). The EUTOS registry joins epidemiological and outcome data: its implementation requires considerable efforts and resources, but in the long run CML could become a model for epidemiologi and management of other cancers. Disclosures: Hasford: Novartis Pharma: Research Funding.

Description: Induction of long lasting complete remission is currently widely viewed as a potentially beneficial new goal in untreated CLL with indication for therapy. We devised a protocol for remission induction based on the FCR regimen, used for an initial 3 cycles to break potential resistance with an intensive regimen (phase I), followed by 3 cycles of FR (phase II), to limit toxicities of the induction phase. With the aim to maintain remissions longer we added a 2 year maintenance phase with rituximab in 3 monthly intervals. Here we report preliminary results from this non-randomized phase II study in previously untreated patients with CLL. Primary objective was the analysis of complete response rates, according to NCI-WG response criteria. Secondary goals included overall response rates, toxicity and remission quality using 4-color flow cytometric MRD analysis. Forty-three patients with a median age of 63 years (range 36 to 81) were recruited for the study. Median lymphocyte counts were 92 G/I and the median for bone marrow infiltration was greater than 80%. For this interim analysis 23 patients are evaluable for response after induction phase I and 16 patients for induction phase II. After 3 cycles of FCR we observed an 83% CR rate that was increased to 94% after addition of 3 cycles of FR. After 3 cycles of FCR 13/31 (42%) patients evaluable for MRD analysis showed less than 10−3 G/I CLL cells detectable (defined as a complete MRD response). After 6 cycles of therapy 10/17 (59%) were MRD negative. Of 12 patients evaluable after 6 months of maintenance 100% were in CR. However, in all stagings we observed about 25% of patients that clearly had no residual measurable disease (including CT scan and bone marrow biopsies) but had persistent cytopenias leading to their designation as CR with toxicity-associated cytopenias (CRtox). Scoring maximally observed toxicities across all cycles, we observed 28% grade 3 and 15% grade 4 hematotoxicities as main toxicity. Thirteen percent grade 3 infections were observed. One case of fatal herpes encephalitis was observed and occurred about one year after initiation of therapy. Two deaths were reported as not therapy related (malignant melanoma, one in the screening phase). Forty-one serious adverse events were reported, among which 10 led to a drop-out from the study. We present here a cohort of CLL patients in a multi-center setting receiving 3×FCR followed by 3×FR. We found excellent responses to initial treatment with close to 100% complete responses after 6 cycles of therapy. However, we also note an almost 25% drop-out rate, a not insignificant number of SAEs and a number of patients in CR that display long-lasting hematotoxic effects after the end of this treatment. This happened despite a de-escalation from the original FCR regimen, potentially indicating that such a dose reduction in late therapy may prevent additional toxicities without compromising efficacy. Still the efficacy of the induction regimen seems to generate a good starting point for the maintenance phase. Preliminary MRD analyses during the maintenance phase will be presented.

Description: Achieving a complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) is a major target in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with interferon-α (IFN-α), but CCgRs are rare. The mean CCgR rate is 13%, in a range of 5% to 33%. A collaborative study of 9 European Union countries has led to the collection of data on 317 patients who were first seen between 1983 and 1997 and achieved CCgRs with IFN-α alone or in combination with hydroxyurea. The median time to first CCgR was 19 months (95% CI, 17-21; range, 3-84 months). At last contact, 212 patients were still alive and in continuous CCgR; 105 patients had lost CCgR, but 53% of them were still alive and in chronic phase. IFN-α treatment was discontinued permanently in 23 cases for response loss, in 36 cases for chronic toxicity (15 are still in unmaintained continuous CCgR), and in 8 cases because it was believed that treatment was no longer necessary (7 of these 8 patients are still in unmaintained continuous CCgR). The 10-year survival rate from first CCgR is 72% (95% CI, 62%-82%) and is related to the risk profile. High-risk patients lost CCgR more frequently and more rapidly and none survived more than 10 years. Low-risk patients survived much longer (10-year survival probability 89% for Sokal low risk and 81% for Euro low risk). These data point out that a substantial long-term survival in CCgRs is restricted mainly to low-risk and possibly intermediate-risk patients and occurs significantly less often in high-risk patients.

Description: Earlier evaluation of therapy effect in patients with CML would assist in optimal use of available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Single cell analysis by mass cytometry has enabled the quantification of up to 46 antibody epitopes, making it ideally suited for exhaustive immunophenotyping of the haematological hierarchy, and evaluation of associated dynamic signal transduction events, in a clinical setting. By integrating time resolved single cell signalling data with clinical parameters, we searched for prognostic and efficacy-response mass cytometry biomarkers within a month of TKI therapy. We report data from experiments used to validate the custom panels of antibodies, highlighting the power of mass cytometry in the analysis of primary patient material obtained on clinical studies. Peripheral Blood (PB) samples were collected before, 3 hours, 7 days and 28 days, after start of nilotinib (300 mg BID) treatment in a subset of patients (n=55) enrolled in the ENEST1st trial. PB cells were stained with two panels of antibodies, allowing a comprehensive immunophenotyping of numerous cellular subsets, and also the evaluation of intracellular phosphorylation status of several epitopes. Moreover, using a straightforward barcoding scheme, the time-resolved samples from each individual patient were pooled after barcoding and stained with the antibody panels to minimize sample variation. In a pilot study, 7 and 10 cell subsets were identified in PB samples from 4 untreated healthy donors and 2 complete sets of 4 patients enrolled in this sub study, respectively. Furthermore, a robust signal was measured for pCrkL, pStat5, pStat3, pCreb, pAbl Y412 and pAbl Y245. The two sets of samples from study patients showed substantial changes in activation status over the course of therapy. Some changes, such as pStat3 alterations are only detectable in neutrophils and monocytes, while the activity of others i.e. pCreb was found to be ubiquitous. CD34+ cells indicated decreased phosphorylation of CrkL, Stat5, and Abl Y412/245. To increase the immunophenotyping resolution of the myeloid lineage, 3 additional cell surface markers were incorporated into the cell surface panel. In 1 healthy donor, and in diagnostic samples from three patients enrolled in this sub study, this allowed the identification of 13 cell subsets: CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), monocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC's), neutrophils, basophils, B cells, hematopoietic stem cells (Lin- CD34+ CD38-) and progenitor cells (Lin- CD34+ CD38-) (Figure 1 A,B). With respect to the relative number of cells identified for each cell type, the three diagnosis samples differed from the single healthy control. In the patients, we observed an expansion of the granulocytic compartment, as well as the emergence of CD34+ progenitor and stem cells in the peripheral blood. In conclusion, the here presented developed assay is able to resolve most of the cell subpopulations found in the hematopoietic tree, and also robustly measure the activity of central signalling substrates known to be involved in CML pathogenesis. With the addition of new phospho-specific antibodies, the methodology may facilitate the detailed characterization of CML in an immunological context, and may shed new light on both the disease and therapeutic mechanism. Analysis of variation in signal responses and immune profile are now in progress in the subset of patients (n=55) in the ENEST1st trial. Figure 1. Manually annotated SPADE tree from healthy donor and patient (3581_0002). With the incorporation of additional cell surface markers, the protocol was able to identify 13 cellular subsets in healthy donors (A) and a typical CML patient (B): CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), monocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC's), neutrophils, basophils, B cells, hematopoietic stem cells (Lin- CD34+ CD38-) and progenitor cells (Lin- CD34+ CD38-). Figure 1. Manually annotated SPADE tree from healthy donor and patient (3581_0002). With the incorporation of additional cell surface markers, the protocol was able to identify 13 cellular subsets in healthy donors (A) and a typical CML patient (B): CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), monocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC's), neutrophils, basophils, B cells, hematopoietic stem cells (Lin- CD34+ CD38-) and progenitor cells (Lin- CD34+ CD38-). Disclosures Thaler: AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Lang:Celgene: Consultancy. Hjorth-Hansen:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hellmann:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: funding of travel, accomodations or expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Other: funding of travel, accomodations or expenses, Speakers Bureau. Giles:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Janssen:ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Porkka:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Ossenkoppele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mustjoki:Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation: Research Funding; Finnish Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Sigrid Juselius Foundation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; the Finnish Cancer Societies: Research Funding; Academy of Finland: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gjertsen:Bergen University Hospital: Research Funding.

Description: Background Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (AOP2014/P1101) is a novel long-acting pegylated IFN-alpha-2b, composed of mainly one isoform, resulting in longer half-life and exposure time. Reduced dosing frequencies, better tolerability, improved compliance and more favorable long-term treatment outcomes in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) are expected. The drug has Orphan designation by EMA and FDA and is currently in the phase III stage of development. Study design Efficacy and safety data are being collected in the follow-up extension stage of the study (collecting the data of both Phase I and Phase II portions of the study), after the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ropeginterferon alfa-2b, administered subcutaneously every 14 to 28 days, has been defined earlier. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of PV, age ≥18 years, both naïve and cytoreductively pre-treated were eligible. After establishing the MTD, an extended cohort of 25 additional patients has been planned to be recruited. Complete hematological response (CR) is defined by hematocrit (Hct) 50% mutant allele burden. The present analysis was focused on long-term tolerability and safety in correlation with the dose of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in PV. Results Data on treatment as by July, 24, 2015, are covered by the current analysis. Baseline characteristics of the study cohort during short-term treatment were already presented earlier (Gisslinger et al, ASH 2013). The full analysis set and efficacy set were composed of 51 and 47 patients, respectively. Currently, the median reported treatment duration is 138 weeks, 33 patients completed their follow up for two years, 19 for three years. Starting with the week 10, Hct-level, platelet- and WBC-counts could be constantly maintained within normal range in the majority of patients. In a group of patients with the mean administered dose of 300 µg, n=11) group of 8 (73%) and 3 (27%) respectively. However, no statistical significance can be observed if correlation between the dose and response status was analyzed. 30 patients are still being treated in the study. Similarly, no association between the dose and occurrence of adverse events in the study could be observed. Complete molecular response as best individual response was observed more frequently in the high dose group 4 (36%) compared to 8 (23%) in the low dose group, while partial molecular responses were equally frequent in both dose groups (in 6/55% and 20/57%, respectively). 21 patients discontinued the study, 18 being treated with AOP2014 doses corresponding to low, and 3 to the high dose arms, corresponding to the drop-out rate of 50% and 27% in the respective arms. Interestingly, all discontinuations in the high dose group occurred within the first year of treatment (at weeks 16, 18 and 32), while the drop-outs in the low dose group (6 patients, 33%) discontinued the study after completion of their first year of treatment. Conclusions Efficacy and safety profile remain in line with expectations from other (pegylated) interferons. Overall response rate of 〉80% with cumulative CRs in 45-50%, accompanied by phlebotomy independence, normalization of hematological parameters and spleen size reduction in majority of patients have been observed. Significant and sustained JAK2 allelic burden decrease, starting from week 28 of treatment, was seen. No significant difference between the two mean dose levels regarding response rates or adverse events even during long-term treatment and observation could be observed. These finding are to be further verified in a larger prospective setting. Disclosures Gisslinger: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AOP ORPHAN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Buxhofer-Ausch:AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Thaler:AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Schlögl:AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Gastl:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Ban:AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Egle:AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Melchardt:AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Burgstaller:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Willenbacher:COMET Center ONCOTYROL: Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Research Funding. Kralovics:AOP Orphan: Research Funding; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zörer:AOP Orphan: Employment. Ammann-Mwathi:AOP Orphan: Employment. Kadlecova:AOP Orphan: Consultancy. Zagrijtschuk:AOP Orphan: Employment. Klade:AOP Orphan: Employment. Greil:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; AOP Orphan: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ratiopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria; Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche, Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Description: Background In the Phase III trial (AML-001; NCT01074047) that assessed azacitidine (AZA) vs conventional care regimens (CCR; intensive chemotherapy, low-dose cytarabine or best supportive care as preselected by the treating physician) in older patients (≥65 years) with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 〉30% bone marrow (BM) blasts, AZA was associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) vs CCR.1Patient registry data, if performed with adequate quality control, can complement and be of additional value to data generated in clinical trials. The Austrian Azacitidine Registry (AAR; NCT01595295) was initiated to gain a comprehensive view of the use, safety and efficacy of AZA in patients with AML in a 'real world' clinical practice setting.2,3 No formal exclusion criteria existed, as the aim was to include all AML patients treated with AZA, irrespective of age, comorbidities, and/or previous lines of treatment.2,3 Aims and methods The aim of this analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of 1st -line AZA in patients with AML who were included in the AAR and who fulfilled the BM blast percentage and white blood cell (WBC) count entry criteria of the AML-001 trial (BM blasts 〉30% and WBC

Description: In this study we compare the efficacy and toxicity of double T with M 200 with triple T using M 100 in newly diagnosed pts with MM. 175 pts have as yet been enrolled and 135 have been randomized after VAD induction treatment and stem cell collection to either tandem or triple transplantation. Reasons for non-randomization were too early for T (n=22), PD after induction (n=5), early death (n=3), toxicity (n=3), pt. refusal (n=3), and others (n=4). Median age of the 135 pts randomized was 59 years (range: 27–70 years). Stage I: 8%, stage II: 17%, stage III: 75%, Paraprotein Isotypes: IgG: 55%, IgA: 25%, IgD: 2%, IgM: 1%, Light chain: 17%. Induction treatment: 3 cycles of VAD; stem cell priming: IEV (ifosfamide (2g/m2)-etoposide (150mg/m2), d1–3; epirubicin (50mg/m2), d1) and G-CSF (5mg/kg) from d4. Conditioning regimen: M 200 mg/m2 or M 100 mg/m2 plus G-CSF; day 5 until WBC 〉2000/ml. Pts with ≥ SD after T were subsequently randomized to interferon 3MU, TIW (Schering Plough) plus prednisone (25mg, po., TIW), or interferon alone. QoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ C30 instrument. Chi2 test for trend was used for comparison of response and survival endpoints were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Response rates after VAD were CR: 11%, PR: 65%, SD: 22% and PD: 2%. Median time from start of VAD to start of T was 137 in the double and 139 days in the triple T arm. Response rates did not differ between pts treated with double or triple T (CR: 47% vs. 43%, PR: 47% vs. 47%, SD 2% vs. 6%, PD: 4% vs. 4%, p=0.60, respectively). Median PFS for both groups combined was 36 mos, but showed a tendency for shorter PFS in pts on triple T (23 mos. vs. 37.5 mos; HR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.72–2.23, p=0.21). Median of OS has not been reached yet, but did not differ between both groups. Hematological toxicity was similar in both groups. There was a tendency for more grade 2–4 mucositis and for grade 3–4 vomiting, nausea, and fatigue in the double T group. Global QoL (questions 29 and 30) was comparable between both groups, before (5 (2.5–6.5) vs. 5 (4.5–6)) and after double (5.8 (3–8.5) or triple T (6 (2.5–7)). In conclusion, triple T with intermediate dose M resulted in similar response rates, slightly shorter PFS but similar OS and was associated with less mucositis and slightly less vomiting, nausea and fatigue. Progression-free survival by randomization group Progression-free survival by randomization group