ALBERT

Description: Introduction: Most of the knowledge about treatments and outcome of CML patients originates from clinical studies. To get new and unbiased insights in the epidemiology, treatment and outcome of CML, the EUTOS population-based registry of newly diagnosed CML patients was established, - as part of the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) for CML. The aim was to collect the data of all adults with newly diagnosed CML, irrespective of treatment and of enrolment in studies. Patients and Methods: The EUTOS population-based registry collected data of newly diagnosed CML patients, 18 years or older, over a specified period of time from 2008 till 2012 living in defined regions. The data were collected by 22 study groups in 20 European countries. Data were gathered via a web-based CRF-system. For comparison we used the already published data from five Company-sponsored registration studies IRIS (O’Brien et.all, NEJM, 2003), TOPS (Cortes et al, JCO, 2009) ENESTnd (Saglio et al, NEJM, 2010), DASISION (Kantarjian et al, NEJM, 2010) and BELA (Cortes et al, JCO, 2012), from three Investigator-sponsored studies GIMEMA (Castagnetti et al, JCO, 2010 and Gugliotta et al, Blood, 2011), French SPIRIT (Preudhomme et al, NEJM, 2010) and German CML IV (Hehlmann et al, JCO, 2011) and from two single referral centers HAMMERSMITH (De Lavallade et al, JCO, 2008) and MDA (Jain et al, Blood, 2013). Results: Till 15.05.2014 2978 patients were registered in the EUTOS Population-based registry. 94.3% of the patients were diagnosed in chronic phase (CP), 3.6% in accelerated phase (AP), and 2.2% in blastic phase (BP). For the calculation of the prognostic scores 361 patients had to be excluded because they were pretreated. For the comparison we used 2350 patients in Chronic Phase with laboratory values before any treatment. 54% of the patients in the EUTOS Population-based registry were male, less than in all studies (56.6 - 60.6%). The median age at diagnosis was 56 years, higher than in all studies (46 - 55). In EUTOS the proportion of patients more than 60 years and more than 65 years old was 40.4 % and 21.9 % respectively. Similar data were rarely reported in all other studies. Median value of the spleen size below costal margin was 0. 46.1% of the patients had a palpable spleen and 15.2% had a spleen size ≥ 10 (spleen size is always reported in cm under costal margin in this abstract). The % of palpable spleen is only reported by IRIS, 25.0% and by the FRENCH Spirit group, 49.8%. The median spleen is only reported by GIMEMA, 2.0. Spleen size ≥ 10 is reported by IRIS, 6.0%, ENESTnd, 12.4% and HAMMERSMITH 25.5%. While the median values for Platelets and Hemoglobin show no big differences, the median WBC in EUTOS is 83.9 x109/l and in the Company-sponsored registration studies: IRIS 18-20 x109/l , in ENESTnd 23-26 x109/l, in DASISION 23-25 x109/l , and in BELA 22-23 x109/l, in the Investigator-sponsored studies: GIMEMA 55 x109/l , in the FRENCH SPIRIT 83-104 x109/l , in the GERMAN CML IV 75-91 x109/l , and in the single referral center study HAMMERSMITH 140 x109/l, clearly indicating that in company-sponsored, registration studies, the reported values of the WBC were not recorded prior to any treatment. The median values for Blasts, Basophils and Eosinophils show also not so big differences. The % of Sokal low risk patients is in EUTOS with 34.5% lower than in all studies (35.2 - 60%) with the exception of HAMMERSMITH 28.9%. Discussion: The EUTOS Population-based registry provides the first European wide real-world series of patients with newly diagnosed Ph+, BCR-ABL+ CML. The age and sex distribution and some baseline characteristics such as Sokal Score as well as median WBC count in the EUTOS population-based registry are different from many prospective studies. This should be taken in due consideration before extrapolating the results of treatment studies to real life. Spleen size, which is known as an important value for prediction, is only very rarely reported in clinical studies. With further follow-up, this registry will provide a population-based insight on treatment, survival, and causes of death. Disclosures Baccarani: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hoffmann:Novartis: Research Funding. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Steegmann:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mayer:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zaritskey:Novartis: Consultancy. Clark:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Porkka:BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hehlmann:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Hasford:Novartis: Research Funding. Lindoerfer:Novartis: Research Funding.

Description: Key Points UDS demonstrated that BCR-ABL KD mutations detectable with conventional methods may just be the tip of the iceberg. The information provided by conventional Sanger sequencing may not always be sufficient to predict responsiveness to a given TKI.

Description: Key Points INTERIM treatment affects cytogenetic and molecular response, but not the outcome. No patients treated with INTERIM progressed to accelerated or blast phase.

Description: Abstract 2291 Background: Nilotinib is a potent and the most selective inhibitor of BCR-ABL. In the phase 3 ENESTnd trial, nilotinib demonstrated superior efficacy vs imatinib with higher and faster molecular responses and a significantly lower rate of progression on treatment to accelerated or blast phases of CML. Nilotinib has been previously shown to prolong the QT interval. The cardiac safety profile of nilotinib was previously described in pts with imatinib-resistant and -intolerant CML-CP enrolled in phase 2 clinical trials. Here, we report cardiac safety data on nilotinib 300 and 400 mg twice daily (bid), and imatinib, in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP from the ENESTnd trial. Methods: A total of 836 pts were included in the safety analysis of ENESTnd (279, 277, and 280 pts in the nilotinib 300 mg bid, nilotinib 400 mg bid, and imatinib arms, respectively) with a median follow-up of 18 months. Pts were excluded from study participation if they had known uncontrolled or medically significant cardiac disease, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 〈 45%, or QTcF interval 〉 450 msec. Prospective cardiac monitoring was conducted throughout the study for QT prolongation (via electrocardiogram) and LVEF (via echocardiogram) at regular intervals. Results: QTcF increases of 〉 30 msec from baseline occurred in 26% of pts in each nilotinib arm and in 18% of pts in the imatinib arm. QTcF increases of 〉 60 msec from baseline were uncommon, occurring in 〈 1% of pts in all three arms (Table). The highest mean changes from baseline in QTcF interval were 10.4, 12.4, and 7.9 msec in nilotinib 300 mg bid, nilotinib 400 mg bid, and imatinib arms, respectively, which occurred between months 3–6 of therapy in all arms. Furthermore, there was a modest linear correlation between nilotinib serum concentration and QTcF change from baseline that was similar to previously reported results. No pt in any treatment arm demonstrated an absolute QTcF interval 〉 500 msec. Analysis was conducted to identify any potential case of clinically symptomatic QT prolongation. Only events of syncope were identified (1 pt in each arm with drug-related events) by this analysis and none of these could be attributed to QT prolongation; there were no episodes of torsades de pointes in any treatment arm. Additionally, there was no decrease from baseline in mean LVEF observed anytime on treatment in any arm (Table). No patient in any treatment arm had a LVEF of 〈 45% on treatment or an absolute reduction from baseline in LVEF of 〉 15%. Importantly, no pt discontinued therapy due to QT prolongation or LVEF change. An analysis of grouped adverse event terms was performed to identify cases consistent with ischemic heart disease (IHD) or left ventricular dysfunction. A total of 11 pts in all treatment arms experienced IHD events after median treatment duration of 18 months: 3 (1%) on nilotinib 300 mg bid, 6 (2%) on nilotinib 400 mg bid, and 2 (〈 1%) on imatinib. Of these 11 pts, 10 had preexisting cardiac disease or risk factors and only 1 pt discontinued treatment due to an IHD event. Nine pts reported angina pectoris. Two pts experienced myocardial infarction (MI) and 1 of these pts died during coronary artery bypass surgery (perisurgical MI). A total of 7 pts in all treatment arms with events consistent with left ventricular dysfunction were identified: 1 (〈 1%) on nilotinib 300 mg bid, 4 (1%) on nilotinib 400 mg bid, and 2 (〈 1%) on imatinib. Of these 7 pts, 4 pts experienced reduction in LVEF (3 were asymptomatic grade 1/2) and 3 pts experienced cardiac failure/congestive failure; 5 of these 7 pts had prior history of cardiovascular disease and/or preexisting cardiovascular risk factors. None of these 7 pts discontinued treatment due to events with left ventricular dysfunction. There were no sudden deaths reported on study. Conclusions: Overall, QT prolongation, changes in LVEF, and clinical cardiac events were uncommon in all arms and seldom led to discontinuation. There was no cumulative effect of nilotinib exposure on cardiac safety with a median of 18 months follow-up. Nilotinib at both doses had a favorable cardiac safety profile that was similar to imatinib in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Disclosures: Larson: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Saglio: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosti: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Lopez: Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Goldberg: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gallagher: Novartis Pharma AG: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hoenekopp: Novartis: Employment. Ortmann: Novartis: Employment. Hughes: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 2196 Poster Board II-173 BACKGROUND: Imatinib (IM) 400 mg daily is the standard treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in early chronic phase (ECP). The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations were designed to help identify ECP CML patients responding poorly to front-line IM, suggesting, at given time points, when the treatment strategy should be changed (”failure”), or when “the long-term outcome of the treatment would not likely be as favourable” (“suboptimal response”). Suboptimal response is a “grey zone”: the patient may still have substantial benefit from continuing IM, but other therapies should be considered. AIM: To assess the outcome of “failure” and “suboptimal responders” Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) CML patients in a large multicentric, nationwide experience. METHODS: Between January 2004 and April 2007, 559 patients were enrolled in an observational study and in 2 independent intervention studies of the GIMEMA CML WP (Clin Trials Gov. NCT00514488 and NCT00510926). Response monitoring was based on conventional cytogenetic examination of bone marrow cell metaphases every 6 months and RT Q-PCR evaluations of blood cells after 3, 6, 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Definitions: major molecular response (MMR): BCR-ABL/ABL ratio 〈 0,1%IS; failure (according to ELN criteria): no hematologic response (HR) at 3 months, no complete HR (CHR) at 6 months, no cytogenetic response (CgR) at 6 months, no partial CgR (PCgR) at 1 year, no complete CgR (CCgR) at 18 months, loss CHR or CCgR, progression or death; suboptimal response (according to ELN criteria): no CHR at 3 months, no PCgR at 6 months, no CCgR at 12 months, no MMR at 18 months ; optimal response: non-suboptimal and non-failure at each time-point; event: failure or treatment discontinuation for any reason. All the calculations have been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The patients who fitted the ELN criteria for failure had a significantly lower probability of subsequently achieving a CCgR and a MMR, and had a significantly lower overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS) and event-free survival (EFS). The patients who fitted the ELN definitions of suboptimal response at 6 months (data not shown) and at 12 months (figure 1) had a significantly lower probability than “optimal” responders of subsequently achieving a CCgR and a MMR, and a significantly poorer FFS and EFS (figure 1), while the OS was not different in the two groups (90% and 95%, p= 0.35). CONCLUSIONS Our data confirms that suboptimal responders at 6 and at 12 months have a poorer outcome with respect to “optimal” responders, comparable to the outcome of failure patients. Acknowledgments: European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, University of Bologna and BolognAIL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Imatinib has now been in use for almost 10 years. Despite this cumulative experience, little is known about its effects on pregnancy; as a result, there are few published data to facilitate the counseling of women who conceive while taking imatinib. The results we now present provide information which may be of use in such circumstances. Of 180 women exposed to imatinib during pregnancy, outcome data are available for 125 (69%). Of those with known outcomes, 50% delivered normal infants and 28% underwent elective terminations, 3 following the identification of abnormalities. There were a total of 12 infants in whom abnormalities were identified, 3 of which had strikingly similar complex malformations that are clearly a cause for concern. It appears that although most pregnancies exposed to imatinib are likely to have a successful outcome, there remains a risk that exposure may result in serious fetal malformations.

Description: Key Points Frontline nilotinib led to fewer, less diverse BCR-ABL mutations than imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis were lower with nilotinib than imatinib in patients with emergent BCR-ABL mutations.

Description: Abstract 2293 Background. Dasatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has 325-fold greater in vitro activity against native BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region-Abelson leukemia virus) compared with imatinib and can overcome primary (intrinsic) and secondary (acquired) imatinib resistance. A phase III dose optimization study showed that in patients with chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), dasatinib at 100 mg once daily improved the safety profile while maintaining efficacy compared with the previously recommended dose of 70 mg twice-daily. Few data exist on the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in elderly CML patients. Aims. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of dose reduction on dasatinib efficacy. Methods. We revised 129 unselected pts with CP CML aged 〉60 yrs treated in 21 Italian haematological Institution, who received dasatinib after being resistant/intolerant to imatinib. Among this group 70 pts were given dasatinib at adjusted-dosage below the standard recommended dose of 100 mg daily for 〉 6 months. In relation to the dose modulation, patients were divide in 2 groups: group-a (21/70, 30%) received a starting dose of 20 mg daily dose excalated to the maximum tolerated dose of 70 mg daily; group-b (49/70=70%) received a starting dose of 100 mg daily, successively adhusted according to tolerance. Sokal score was evaluable for 59/70 patients (low for 16, intermediate for 28, high for 15). All patients were analyzed for haematological, cytogenetic and molecular response. Results. All patients were fully evaluable for response at a median FU time of 25 mos (range 0,7- 56,3 mos). Eight pts (11.4%) discontinued treatment due to intolerance. Response rates were 25,7% (18pts), 24.3% (17 pts), 15.7% (11 pts), 10% (7 pts), 12.8% (9 pts) for complete haematologic response (RHC), complete cytogenetic response (RCyC), major molecular response (RMolM), complete molecular response (RMolC), partial cytogenetic response (RCyP), respectively. Median Cumulative event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21.3 and 27.3 mos respectively. We did not observe any significative difference in term of response between group A and B receiving different doses. Interestingly, 3/9 patients in group A who had a transient loss of molecular response achieved major molecular response after dose escalation to 50 mg. Conclusions: Dasatinib given at a lower dose than currently recommended is still effective in elderly CML patients. However, more close molecular monitoring is advised when lower doses are prescribed. Studies in larger series are warranted to better define optimal dose and schedule of dasatinib in this frail patient population. Disclosures: Rosti: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau.