ALBERT

Description: Introduction: Tenalisib (RP6530) is a novel, highly specific, dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor with nano-molar inhibitory potency at the enzyme and cellular level. PI3K plays a critical role in T-cell development and activation and several studies have validated the PI3K-AKT pathway as a potential therapeutic target in T cell lymphomas. Preliminary results of the ongoing Phase 1/1b T-cell lymphoma (TCL) study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with encouraging clinical activity in relapsed/refractory TCL (Oki, ASCO 2018 and Iyer, ASH 2018). We now present the final results of the study (NCT02567656). Methods: This study comprised of four-dose escalation cohorts, followed by two dose expansion cohorts at MTD enrolling 20 patients each in PTCL and CTCL cohorts. Patients had histologically confirmed TCL, ECOG PS ≤2, and had received ≥1 prior therapy. Patients received Tenalisib [200 mg BID-800 mg BID (fasting), 800 mg (fed only)] orally until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to determine the MTD and pharmacokinetic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Responses were evaluated for PTCL and CTCL based on IWG criteria (Cheson 2007) and mSWAT respectively. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in study, 19 in dose escalation and 39 in dose expansion (28 PTCL and 30 CTCL). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-15). Safety assessment of 58 patients receiving at least one dose of Tenalisib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Treatment related Grade≥3 AEs were elevated ALT/AST (21%), rash (5%), and hypophosphatemia (3%). These events were reversible and managed by withholding study drug. Additionally, in few patients (N=9), steroids were used to manage elevated ALT/AST. There were six treatment related serious adverse events, none of these led to fatal outcome. At end of the study, four (3 CTCL; 1 PTCL) patients who completed minimum 8 cycles of therapy were rolled over to a compassionate use study (NCT03711604) and were followed up. Efficacy assessments demonstrated an ORR of 46% (3 CR and 13 PR) and clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) of 77%. Subset efficacy analysis showed an ORR in PTCL of 47% (3 CR; 4 PR) and in CTCL of 45% (9 PR). The median time to initial response was 1.8 months and was similar in both sub-types. The overall median DOR was 4.91 months (range 0.9-26.6); in PTCL patients the DOR was 6.53 months, (range: 0.97-21.0) and 3.8 months (range: 1.67-25.67) in CTCL patients. In 3 PTCL patients who achieved CR, the median DOR was 19.5 months (range 7.5-21). Conclusion: Tenalisib demonstrated promising clinical activity and an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed/ refractory TCL. Currently, a phase I/II combination study to further evaluate safety and efficacy with romidepsin is ongoing in this target population. Disclosures Iyer: Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Huen:Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Description: Background : DLBCL is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with poor outcomes in the R/R setting; overall survival (OS) is 28% at 1 year and 20% at 2 years in refractory patients (Crump, Blood 2017). Outcomes are particularly poor for patients ineligible for stem cell transplant (SCT). Ibrutinib is the only once-daily inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase and is approved for the treatment of various B-cell malignancies. Based on preclinical models, ibrutinib and lenalidomide, an immunomodulator that downregulates the MYD88 pathway, may synergize when combined (Yang, Cancer Cell 2012). Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, has shown activity combined with ibrutinib in NHL (Wang, Lancet Onc 2016). PCYC-1123 is a multicenter, open-label phase 1b/2 study (NCT02077166) evaluating the combination of ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab (iR2) in R/R DLBCL. Methods : Patients ≥18 years of age with R/R non-GCB DLBCL ineligible for SCT received lenalidomide 20 or 25 mg orally on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle plus ibrutinib 560 mg orally once daily and rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1-6. Treatment was continued until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed by central laboratory per the Hans algorithm. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were complete response (CR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. Response was determined by investigator assessment per Cheson (J Clin Oncol 2014) every 3 treatment cycles for the first 24 months (mos) and then every 6 cycles thereafter. Results: In total, 89 patients were enrolled and treated in phase 2 (n=55 and n=34 in the lenalidomide 20 mg and 25 mg cohorts, respectively). The median patient age was 64 years; 58% were male. At study entry, 53% of patients were refractory to their last therapy and 16% were primary refractory, 47% had relapsed, and 63% had stage IV disease. Median number of prior DLBCL therapies was 2 (range 1-5), with the most common being R-CHOP (73%), RICE (26%), and R-DHAP (13%). Twenty patients had prior SCT. All patients were non-GCB by IHC; for the 47 patients with tumor tissue available for nanostring testing by GEP, there was 84% concordance in non-GCB status (activated B-cell [ABC] or unclassified). The median time on study was 16 mos (range 30% of patients) were diarrhea (53%), fatigue (42%), neutropenia (40%), cough (34%), anemia (33%), peripheral edema (33%), and maculopapular rash (31%). The most common Grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (36%) and maculopapular rash (18%); Grade 3/4 atrial fibrillation occurred in 2% of patients. Grade 5 TEAEs occurred in 12 patients; of these, 7 were due to worsening of DLBCL, and 5 were not related to PD (pneumonia [n=3], sepsis [n=1], and cardiac arrest [n=1]). AEs led to discontinuation in 17% of patients (n=15) overall (those occurring in ≥2 patients were worsening of DLBCL [n=4], pneumonia [n=2], and thrombocytopenia [n=2]). Conclusions : The iR2 combination of ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab showed an ORR of 47% in patients with follow-up response assessment, with 28% CRs, including durable CRs of up to 22 mos. The safety profile was manageable in this phase 2 study of patients with R/R non-GCB DLBCL ineligible for SCT. Further evaluation of the iR2 regimen is ongoing. Disclosures Ramchandren: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sandoz-Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an Abbvie company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Johnson:Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Genmab: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria. Ghosh:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SGN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ruan:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy. Ardeshna:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Johnson:Takeda: Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cunningham:Clovis: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; 4SC: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merrimack: Research Funding. de Vos:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Radford:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morgan:Biogen: Equity Ownership; Eli Lilly: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Equity Ownership; Johnson and Johnson: Equity Ownership; Merck: Equity Ownership; Novo Nordisk: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Vertex: Equity Ownership; Zoetis: Equity Ownership. Munoz:Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics /Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Ping:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Kwei:Gilead: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Eckert:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Neuenburg:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Employment, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses. Goy:University of Nebraska: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants outside of the submitted work, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants outside of the submitted work, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Other: Grants outside of the submitted work, Research Funding; Hackensack University Medical Center, RCCA: Employment; Hakensackumc: Research Funding; COTA: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: leadership role for profit healthcare company; Takeda: Other: Grants outside of the submitted work; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants outside of the submitted work; Astrazenca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab is not approved by the FDA for treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)

Description: Introduction: As previously reported, the combination of brentuximab vedotin with doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (A+AVD) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in modified progression free survival (modified PFS) compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) in patients with newly diagnosed Stage III or IV classical HL in the phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial (NCT01712490). The benefit of A+AVD in the ITT population observed in the primary analysis was maintained at 3-years median follow-up [3-year PFS: A+AVD: 83.1% (79.9-85.9), ABVD: 76% (72.4-79.2)] and appears independent of interim PET status, disease stage, and prognostic risk factors. Here we present the efficacy and safety results of longer follow-up at a median 43.3 months. Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with Stage III or IV cHL were randomized 1:1 to receive A+AVD (n=664) or ABVD (n=670) intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint of the study was modified PFS per independent central review. The present follow-up PFS analysis is exploratory and per investigator assessment, with a cutoff date of June 17th, 2019. Patients with ongoing peripheral neuropathy (PN) at end of treatment were followed for resolution or improvement (defined as improved by ≥1 grade from worst grade as of the latest assessment) during the post-treatment follow-up period. Results: With a median follow-up of 43.3 months, the 42-month PFS per investigator for all patients was 82.4% (95% CI, 79.1-85.2) on the A+AVD arm and 76.2% (95% CI, 72.6-79.4) on the ABVD arm [overall HR 0.697 (95% CI, 0.547-0.890)]. Exploratory subgroup analyses of PET2(+) and PET2(-) patients showed a treatment effect in favor of A+AVD. The 42-month PFS in PET2(-) patients was 85.0% (95% CI, 81.6-87.7) for A+AVD and 79.6% (95% CI, 75.9-82.8) for ABVD [overall HR 0.695 (95% CI, 0.526-0.919)]; in PET2(+) patients 42-month PFS was 68.3% (95% CI, 54.5-78.7) for A+AVD and 51.5% (95% CI, 38.2-63.4) for ABVD [overall HR 0.552 (95% CI, 0.308-0.989)]. Upon continued follow-up, 81% (356/442) of patients with PN in the A+AVD arm had either complete resolution (64%, 283/442) or improvement (17%, 73/442) of their PN events compared with 83% (236/286) with either complete resolution (74%, 212/286) or improvement (8%, 24/286) in the ABVD arm. Among patients with ongoing PN after continued follow-up, the majority were Grade 1/2 events, with 89% (141/159; 59% Grade 1) and 95% (70/74; 65% Grade 1) on the A+AVD and ABVD arms, respectively. Overall survival data are not yet mature; per protocol, the final analysis will be performed after 112 deaths have occurred. Additional follow-up at an estimated median of ~4 years, including data from prespecified subgroups, will be presented. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of 43.3 months, A+AVD continues to provide a robust, durable benefit for patients with previously untreated Stage III or IV cHL compared with ABVD; the benefit is evident regardless of patient status at interim PET [PET2(+) or PET2(-)] and without the need for treatment intensification. PN continued to completely resolve or improve in patients on the A+AVD and ABVD arms. Together, these data further support the clinical advantages of A+AVD versus ABVD as treatment for patients with previously untreated Stage III or IV cHL. Disclosures Bartlett: Affimed Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Dynavax: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Straus:Elsevier (PracticeUpdate): Consultancy, Honoraria; Hope Funds for Cancer Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dlugosz-Danecka:Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenomics: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Illes:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feldman:Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Viracta: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Portola Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Smolewski:Roche: Other: Travel Expenses. Savage:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS, Merck, Novartis, Verastem, Abbvie, Servier, and Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Walewski:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: Travel Expenses; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zinzani:Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hutchings:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding. Radford:AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Equity Ownership. Munoz:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Kim:Roche: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding. Advani:Cell Medica, Ltd: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Infinity Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Celmed: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agensys: Research Funding; Stanford University: Employment, Equity Ownership; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Developments, Inc.: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc./Kite Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ansell:Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment. Younes:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Curis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Biopath: Consultancy; Xynomics: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; HCM: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding. Gallamini:Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Miao:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Takeda: Employment. Fenton:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Description: Introduction Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) MYC-altered DLBCL have poor outcomes, and other than for a subset of patients who may benefit from chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, no treatment has shown a significant durable benefit or impact on survival outcomes. Fimepinostat is a first-in-class, well-tolerated, oral small molecule inhibitor of HDAC and PI3K enzymes. There is particular interest in evaluating fimepinostat in patients with MYC-dependent tumors as nonclinical studies demonstrated that fimepinostat inhibits transcription of MYC and a subset of MYC-associated genes. Additionally, MYC protein levels were downregulated by fimepinostat in part through inhibition of PI3K-mediated ubiquitination. Pharmacodynamic inhibition of HDAC and PI3K has also been demonstrated in human studies. Here we report the outcome of R/R DBLCL patients treated with fimepinostat in a Phase 1 and Phase 2 study, with an emphasis on outcomes for patients with MYC-altered disease. Patients and Methods A total of 105 R/R DLBCL patients were enrolled on the Phase 1 study CUDC-907-101 (n = 37) and the Phase 2 study CUDC-907-201 (n = 68). In CUDC-907-101, 14 patients were found to have MYC-altered disease, defined as presence of MYC rearrangement by either central or local testing by fluorescent in situ hybridization or MYC protein expression ≥40%) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In CUDC-907-201, 46 patients had confirmed MYC-altered disease by central IHC testing. Across both studies, patients without available tissue or prior test results were deemed as MYC-status unknown (n = 23). Results A total of 19 responses (9 CR, 10 partial responses [PR]) were reported across both studies. The objective response rate (ORR) in MYC altered patients was 23.3% (14/60). Responses showed encouraging durability with a median duration of response of 13.6 months (range: 2.8 to Not Calculable [NC]). Five MYC-altered responses were ongoing as of the data-cut. Two MYC-altered patients achieving CR discontinued treatment early to pursue stem cell transplantation. Responses associated with fimepinostat often require multiple cycles of treatment to manifest (median time to first response = 2.5 months for MYC-altered patients), and of patients who were treated for ≥2 months, a large proportion (17/33; 52%) achieved a response. Patients with low disease burden at screening (tumor lesions diameters ≤ 5 cm and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] 〈 1.5 x upper limit of normal [ULN]) generally continued treatment longer and were most likely to derive clinical benefit (Table 2). Conclusions The biologic rationale, tolerable safety profile, and evidence of durable anti-tumor activity in MYC-altered R/R DLBCL support the continued development of fimepinostat in this poor-prognosis patient population. Patients with low disease burden features may be more likely to have sufficient duration of drug exposure to allow clinical benefit. Future enrollment will focus on patients with screening characteristics most likely to derive the greatest benefit from fimepinostat treatment. Disclosures Landsburg: Takeda: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ramchandren:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lugtenburg:Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy. Younes:Takeda: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; J&J: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding. Tuck:Curis, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barta:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck, Takeda, Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Bayer: Research Funding.

Description: Background: Outcomes to salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are suboptimal. Checkpoint blockade therapy (CBT) has been explored in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) NHL population, but response rates to single agent CBT therapy are modest. To date, there is no literature on whether treatment with CBT may sensitize NHL patients to subsequent therapy. We investigated the outcome of subsequent treatment in patients with R/R NHL who had received CBT in a large multicenter international retrospective analysis. Methods: Seventeen centers across the US and Canada are participating in this study to date. Medical records of each institution were queried to identify lymphoma patients who received CBT and were subsequently treated with an additional line of therapy. The primary aim of the current analysis was to determine the best response to post-CBT treatment in patients who discontinued CBT due to progression of disease (PD) or toxicity. Patients who discontinued CBT due to a complete response (CR), or patients whose best response to post-CBT therapy could not be determined due to death from another cause, were excluded from analysis. Responses were assessed using Lugano criteria. Survival status to date was analyzed for the entire study population and stratified by post-CBT treatment regimen categories and disease subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for patients with at least stable disease (SD) to post-CBT treatment. Log rank tests were performed to test for statistical significance. Two-sided P

Description: Background : Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) typically have poor treatment outcomes, especially patients who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation (SCT). Ibrutinib, a first-in-class, once-daily inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is approved in the US for various B-cell malignancies. Preclinical data suggest potential synergy when combining ibrutinib with lenalidomide, a thalidomide analogue that disrupts signaling downstream of B-cell receptor and MYD88. An open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study (NCT02077166) was initiated to evaluate the iR2 regimen of ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab in R/R DLBCL. Results from the ongoing phase 2 portion of the study evaluating the safety and activity of the iR2 regimen in SCT-ineligible adults aged ≥18 y with R/R non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL per Hans method are presented here. Methods : The iR2 regimen was administered at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of once-daily 560 mg PO ibrutinib with 20 mg PO lenalidomide on Days 1-21 and 375 mg/m2 IV rituximab on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6 in 28-day cycles (additional 25-mg cohort ongoing). The primary phase 2 efficacy endpoint was ORR; the null hypothesis of an ORR of 40% will be tested against the alternative hypothesis of an ORR 〉60%. Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Response was based on investigator assessments and performed using CT or MRI scans after every 3 treatment cycles for the first 24 mo and every 6 mo thereafter. For rash and neutropenia, if clinically indicated, study medication was withheld until resolution or improvement to grade 1, and treatment with oral corticosteroids and antihistamines (for rash) or hematopoietic growth factors (for neutropenia) was initiated. Results : A total of 55 patients were enrolled and treated at the RP2D with 20 mg PO lenalidomide in phase 2. The median age was 63 y; 58% were male; 64% had stage IV disease; 24% had primary refractory disease; 53% were refractory to the last therapy. Patients had received a median of 2 (range: 1-5) prior systemic therapies for DLBCL; the most common regimens were R-CHOP (71%), RICE (29%), and R-DHAP (16%). Among the 44 response-evaluable patients with follow-up imaging, the ORR was 55% (95% CI: 39%-70%; n=24) and included CR in 30% (n=13) and PR in 25% (n=11); 5 patients (11%) had stable disease. The median DOR was 9 mo for all responders and 10 mo for those who achieved a CR. The median maximum percent change from baseline in the size of the target lesion(s) was −61%. Among all 55 treated patients, the median duration of iR2 treatment was 4 mo (range: 0-13), and almost half (45%) of patients were still receiving iR2 treatment at the time of analysis (Figure 1A). Progressive disease was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation (45%). Median PFS was 5 mo (95% CI: 3-12; Figure 1B), with 6-mo and 12-mo PFS rates of 44% and 28%, respectively. Median OS was 17 mo (95% CI: 8-17), with 6-mo and 12-mo OS rates of 85% and 58%, respectively. For the 24 responders, median PFS was 12 mo (95% CI: 6-12), and median OS was 17 mo (95% CI: not evaluable). The majority (85%) of patients experienced a grade 3-4 TEAE; events reported in ≥5% of patients included neutropenia (33%), maculopapular rash (15%), anemia (11%), diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, and hypokalemia (5% each). Neutropenia, maculopapular rash, and anemia were the only grade 3-4 TEAEs in 〉2 patients considered related to either ibrutinib or lenalidomide. Of the 8 patients with grade 3/4 maculopapular rash, 7 received concomitant corticosteroids. Grade 5 TEAEs were experienced by 6 patients and included worsening of DLBCL (n=3), pneumonia (n=2), and sepsis (n=1). Doses of study treatment were temporarily interrupted or reduced due to TEAEs in 62% and 29% of patients, respectively. Discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in 11% of patients (worsening of DLBCL [5%], pneumonia [4%], and sepsis [2%]). No cases of febrile neutropenia were reported. Conclusions : The iR2 combination regimen of 560 mg ibrutinib, 20 mg lenalidomide, and 375 mg/m2 rituximab demonstrated promising activity with a manageable safety profile in these difficult-to-treat R/R non-GCB DLBCL patients ineligible for SCT. Evaluation of the iR2 regimen using a dose of 25 mg lenalidomide and biomarker analyses, including GEP, are ongoing. Disclosures Ramchandren: Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Johnson:Genmab: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Travel, accommodations, expenses; Zenyaku Kogyo: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Boeringher Ingelheim: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Eisai: Research Funding. Ghosh:Forty seven Inc: Research Funding; SGN: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; PCYC: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics, an Abbvie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Ardeshna:ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Johnson:Takeda Pharma: Other: Funded an educational place for me to attend the Lugano Lymphoma conference in June 2017. Cunningham:Roche pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kassam:AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Radford:Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bailly:Abbvie: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Takeda: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Munoz:Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an ABBVIE Company: Consultancy. Ping:Pharmacyclics, an Abbvie company: Employment; Abbvie: Equity Ownership. Co:Abbvie: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Neuenburg:Pharmacyclics, an Abbvie company: Employment.

Description: Abstract 905 Introduction: Though dose-intensive strategies using chemoimmunotherapy have significantly improved mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) outcomes with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), most patients still relapse over time. In the relapsed setting, MCL patients often develop chemoresistance and have a poor overall prognosis. The immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide has demonstrated tumoricidal and antiproliferative effects in MCL and clinical activity and safety in multiple phase II studies in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The objective of the MCL-001 “EMERGE” study was to examine the safety and efficacy of single-agent lenalidomide in subjects with MCL who relapsed or were refractory to bortezomib. Methods: This phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study examined single-agent lenalidomide administered at 25 mg/d PO on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or voluntary withdrawal. The subjects were required to have had prior treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide and anthracycline (or mitoxantrone), and to have relapsed or progressed (

Description: Abstract 2740 Background: Historically, treatment options for the approximately 30% of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who have primary refractory disease or relapse after experiencing initial response have been limited to high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). Development of novel therapeutic options is needed to improve outcomes in patients whose disease is refractory to or relapses after initial chemotherapy or subsequent high-dose chemotherapy with AHSCT. The oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus showed promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in 19 patients with heavily pretreated HL enrolled in a phase 2 study of everolimus monotherapy for relapsed, rare lymphomas (Johnston et al. Am J Hematol 2010;85:320-4). To confirm the efficacy and safety of everolimus monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory classical HL, we conducted a multicenter, open-label, 2-step, phase 2 study. Methods: Adults with classical HL that progressed after high-dose chemotherapy with AHSCT or a gemcitabine-, vinorelbine-, or vinblastine-containing regimen received everolimus 10 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every 12 weeks via computed tomography with contrast or integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography with contrast. The primary study endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) evaluated according to the modified response criteria for malignant lymphoma (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:579-86). Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), duration of overall response, duration of disease control, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled in this study; 57.9% were women, the median age was 32.0 years, 57.9% were pretreated with AHSCT, and 100% were pretreated with gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or vinblastine. Overall, 66.7% of patients experienced disease progression during previous therapies or discontinued previous treatment due to progression. At the time of analysis, 48 patients discontinued study treatment, most commonly due to disease progression (n = 25). The ORR and DCR were 42.1% and 77.2%, respectively (Table). The median time to response was 57 days. Median PFS was 9.0 months. Adverse events experienced by 〉25% of patients were fatigue (56.1%), thrombocytopenia (47.4%), cough (38.6%), rash (38.6%), pyrexia (31.6%), anemia (29.8%), dyspnea (28.1%), back pain (26.3%), and diarrhea (26.3%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 33 patients (57.9%); the most common were thrombocytopenia (21.1%) and anemia (12.3%). Stomatitis was experienced by 14 patients (24.6%) and was of grade 3 severity in 2 patients (3.5%). Pneumonitis was observed in 6 patients (10.5%) and was of grade 1 severity in 2 patients (3.5%) and grade 2 severity in 4 patients (7.0%). Conclusions: In this phase 2 study, everolimus monotherapy demonstrated favorable efficacy and a short time to response in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed/refractory classical HL. The overall safety profile was consistent with that previously observed for everolimus in patients with HL and other cancers. The results of this study confirm previous results and support the further evaluation of everolimus in patients with classical HL. Disclosures: Johnston: Novartis: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Everolimus is an mTOR inhibitor indicated in the US for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in combination with letrozole after failure of letrozole or anastrozole; adults with progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors that are unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic; adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib; adults with renal angiomyolipoma and tuberous sclerosis complex not requiring immediate surgery; and adults and children aged 3 years or greater with subependymal giant cell astrocytoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex who require therapeutic intervention but are not candidates for curative surgical resection. Pinter-Brown:Millennium: Consultancy. Rogerio:Novartis: Employment; Novartis: Equity Ownership. Warsi:Novartis: Employment; Novartis: Equity Ownership. Chau:Novartis: Employment. Ramchandren:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria.

Description: Introduction Tenalisib (RP6530) is a next generation, oral, selective, PI3Kδ/g inhibitor with nanomolar inhibitory potency. Besides its apoptotic and anti-proliferative activity, Tenalisib modulates the tumor microenvironment resulting in reprogramming of tumor associated-macrophages (TAMs) from a protumor M2 phenotype to an antitumor M1 phenotype and a marked reduction of angiogenesis in pre-clinical models. Tenalisib has demonstrated activity in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies (Carmelo, ASH 2016 and Oki, ASCO 2018). Since there are concerns over long-term safety of PI3K δ or PI3K dual δ/g inhibitors with respect to immune-mediated toxicities (e.g. transaminitis, colitis and pneumonitis), cytopenias, and infections, a pooled safety analysis across two Phase I studies in patients treated with Tenalisib was performed. Methods Safety data was pooled from two Phase I Tenalisib monotherapy trials (NCT02017613 and NCT02567656) with similar key eligibility criteria. Patients had R/R lymphoid malignancies with ≥1 prior therapy. Responses were evaluated in lymphoid malignancies using IWG criteria (Cheson et al., 2007) and in CTCL using the modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT). Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results A total of 93 patients were included in the analysis. Among these patients, 34% were PTCL, 32% CTCL, 16% HL, 6% DLBCL and 12% were other lymphomas. Patients received a median of 5 prior therapies. 53 % of patients received Tenalisib for ≤ 3 months, 21% for 3-6 months and 26% for 〉 6 months. The overall incidence of related AEs and ≥G3 AEs were 58% and 29% respectively (Table 1). Very few AEs were seen with exposures 〉6 months and mainly included single cases of diarrhea, anemia, edema, and abdominal pain. There were no incidences of late onset toxicities such as colitis and pneumonitis and most of the AEs happened during the initial three months of therapy. No treatment discontinuations due to AE's were seen in patients exposed to 〉 6 months of treatment. Efficacy response assessments of the 66 evaluable patients demonstrated an ORR of 45% in TCL (44% in PTCL (8/18, 3 CR, 4 PR) & 45% in CTCL (9/20, 9 PR)), 29% (4/14; 1CR; 3PR) in HL, and 13% (1/6; 1CR) in DLBCL. Conclusion In this pooled safety analysis with long term follow-up, Tenalisib exhibited an improved safety profile when compared to other investigational/marketed PI3K inhibitors. The incidence of transaminitis was low and occurred within the first two to three cycles of therapy. In particular, there were no occurrences of pneumonitis or colitis in patients that had been on treatment for 〉 3 months and beyond. Incidence of neutropenia/thrombocytopenia and infections was limited. Tenalisib can therefore be safely combined with a diverse array of other agents active in lymphoid malignancies. Tenalisib is currently being studied in combination with Pembrolizumab and Romidepsin and as a monotherapy in a Phase II trial in indolent NHL. Disclosures Haverkos: Viracta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ramchandren:Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Devata:Affimed: Research Funding. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment. Carlo-Stella:Boehringher Ingelheim Italia: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; MSD Italia: Speakers Bureau; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Genenta Science: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau.