ALBERT

Description: Abstract 3562 Aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of a large series of younger patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) who were enrolled in two subsequent clinical trials of thalidomide-dexamethasone (thal-dex) incorporated into double autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to support high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2). In both studies, thal (100 mg/day for the first 14 days and then 200 mg/day) and pulsed dex (between 480 and 160 mg per cycle), were administered from the onset until the second ASCT. The analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis on a total of 593 patients who were followed for a median of 36 months. The best VGPR and CR rates were 69% and 35%, respectively. The median duration of CR was 66 months. Median TTP and PFS were 53 and 44 months, respectively. The 5-year projected rates of TTP and PFS were 46% and 38%, respectively, while the corresponding value for OS was 67%. More than 80% of the patients were screened at diagnosis for the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities by FISH analysis. Forty-five percent of patients had del(13q), while t(4;14) and del(17p) were found in 16 % and 7 % of patients, respectively. The presence of del(17p) and/or t(4;14) was associated with a significantly shorter 5-year projected TTP, PFS and OS in comparison with the absence of these abnormalities, indifferently from the presence or absence of del(13q) (TTP: 30% vs 53%, respectively P=0.0000; PFS: 28% vs 45%, respectively, P=0.0000; OS: 53% vs 69%, respectively, P=0.0000). OS and PFS curves of patients carrying del(13q) alone were almost superimposable to those of patients without cytogenetic abnormalities, while TTP was significantly shorter for patients with del(13q) alone (5-year projected rates: 40% vs 53%, respectively, P=0.04). Patients carrying del(17p) in the absence of t(4;14) had similar 5-year projected TTP and PFS as compared with t(4;14) positive but del(17p) negative patients. However, OS was significantly shorter for the subgroup with del(17p) and absence of t(4;14) in comparison with that of patients carrying t(4;14) without del(17p) (5 year projected rates: 18% vs 70%, respectively, P=0.03). In a multivariate analysis, presence of del(17p) and high beta2-m at baseline were the most important variables adversely influencing TTP (HR: 2.3, P=0.001 and HR: 1.8, P=0.002, respectively), PFS (HR: 2.0, P=0.001 and HR: 1.9, P=0.001, respectively), and OS (HR: 3.9, P=0.000 and HR: 2.0, P=0.005, respectively). Additional variables predicting for shorter TTP and PFS were the presence of t(4;14) (HR: 1.8, P=0.004) and of del(13q) (HR: 1.6, P= 0.009). Also the quality of best response to the overall treatment program influenced clinical outcomes. In particular, patients achieving CR had a significantly longer PFS and OS than those achieving a VGPR (PFS: median 68 vs 40 months, respectively, P=0.007; 5-year projected OS rates: 84% vs 70%, respectively, P=0.01). In conclusion, incorporation of thal-dex into double autotransplantation failed to overcome the poor prognosis conferred by del(13 q), t(4;14) and del(17p). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, del(17p) and high levels of serum beta2-m at diagnosis were the strongest variables adversely influencing PFS and OS. In comparison with the presence of t(4;14) but absence of del(17p), patients carrying del(17p) without t(4;14) had a significantly shorter OS, possibly due to their worst outcome after relapse. Presence of del(13q) alone conferred a significantly shorter TTP, but did not have an adverse impact on OS due to the favorable role of effective salvage therapies incorporating either bortezomib or lenalidomide. Disclosures: Off Label Use: use of first line thalidomide in preparation for ASCT. Cavo:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, no; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, no; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, no.

Description: Introduction : a formal comparison between Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (Rd) and Lenalidomide-Prednisone plus Melphalan (MPR) or Cyclophosphamide (CPR) has not been performed yet. We compared Rd vs. MPR vs. CPR in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients ≥65 years old in a multicenter phase III trial. Per protocol, upfront dose reductions of Dexamethasone, Melphalan and Cyclophosphamide were performed, according to patients age ( ≤75 years vs. 〉75 years). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Methods : 662 patients with NDMM were randomized to receive nine 28-day cycles of Rd (n=222), MPR (n=218) or CPR (n=222). Rd: lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days; dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,8,15,22 in patients 65-75 years old and 20 mg in those 〉75 years; MPR: lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days; melphalan orally 0.18 mg/Kg for 4 days in patients 65-75 years old and 0.13 mg/Kg in patients 〉75 years; prednisone 1.5 mg/Kg for 4 days; CPR: lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days; cyclophosphamide orally 50 mg/day for 21 days in patients 65-75 years old and 50 mg every other day in patients 〉75 years; prednisone 25 mg every other day. After induction, patients were randomized to receive maintenance with lenalidomide alone (R) or with prednisone (RP). Results : Patients characteristics were well balanced. Eighty-three (37%) patients in the Rd, 86 (39%) in the MPR and 80 (36%) in the CPR groups were older than 75 years. In intention to treat analysis, after a median follow-up of 31 months, no difference in PFS and overall survival (OS) was observed. Median PFS was 23 months in Rd, 27 months in MPR and 23 months in CPR (Rd vs MPR p=0.216; Rd vs CPR p=0.872; MPR vs CPR p=0.148). Median OS was not reached and was 73% in Rd, 67% in MPR and 72% in CPR at 3 years (Rd vs MPR p=0.663; Rd vs CPR p=0.754; MPR vs CPR p=0.448). A subgroup analysis, according to age was performed. No difference in response rate was observed. In patients ≤75 years, median PFS was 23 in Rd, 30 in MPR and 23 months in CPR (Rd vs MPR, p 75 years (MPR vs Rd/CPR p〈 0.0001). No difference was observed in extra-hematologic adverse events: 25% in Rd, 24% in MPR and 25% in CPR patients ≤75 years; 29% in Rd, 35% in MPR, 34% in CPR patients 〉75 years. Conclusion : this trial compared for the first time Rd, MPR and CPR in elderly NDMM. In all patients, the addition of alkylating agent to Lenalidomide-steroid combination did not show any advantage on PFS and OS. In a subgroup analysis, safety and efficacy data suggest that triplet regimens may be indicated in patients ≤75 years, while a doublet regimens for those 〉75 years. The MPR combination showed a PFS advantage in patients ≤75 years, with a higher incidence of hematologic toxicity and SPM. In patients 〉75 years an OS advantage was reported with Rd, mainly due to a higher efficacy of salvage treatments. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Off Label Use: Use of Lenalidomide as off label. Bringhen:Onyx: Consultancy; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen and Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Offidani:Mundipharma: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen and Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Patriarca:Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria; Janssen and Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Hajek:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Boccadoro:Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen and Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Palumbo:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria.

Description: INTRODUCTION. Bortezomib- and/or lenalidomide-based combinations are standard initial approaches in transplant (ASCT) ineligible NDMM. Different studies confirmed the advantages of continuous treatment. Despite the benefits of bortezomib maintenance, the parenteral administration and the risk of peripheral neuropathy (PN) limit its long-term use. The oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) Ixazomib plus Lenalidomide-dexamethasone was effective and well tolerated at diagnosis or relapse. The need for a convenient and well tolerated PI-based frontline therapy for an extended duration with minimal cumulative toxicity remains an unmet need for the elderly. In this prospective, multicenter, phase II randomized study, we assessed Ixazomib in combination with dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide or Bendamustine, followed by Ixazomib maintenance in ASCT-ineligible NDMM. METHODS. NDMM patients (pts) ≥65 years old or younger ASCT-ineligible could be enrolled. Treatment consisted of nine 28-day induction cycles of Ixazomib 4 mg on days 1,8,15 and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,8,15,22 (Id) or combined with Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 orally on days 1,8,15 (ICd) or plus Thalidomide 100 mg/day (ITd) or plus Bendamustine 75 mg/m2 iv on days 1,8 (IBd); followed by maintenance with Ixazomib 4 mg on days 1,8,15 until progression. Because the study included the novel drug Ixazomib, dual stopping rules combining efficacy (at least very good partial response [VGPR] rate), and safety (predefined toxicity possibly related to Ixazomib) were planned and analyzed in a cohort of 5 patients in each arm during the first 4 cycles. Here we report the results of the cohort analysis during the first 4 cycles and the efficacy and safety analysis during induction treatment. RESULTS. In February 2017, the protocol was amended due to a low enrolment and the IBd arm, the only one including an iv drug, was closed. After closing this arm, all the other all oral arms continued the enrolment. Overall, 175 pts were enrolled (Id 42, ICd 61, ITd 61, and IBd 11 pts) and 171 pts started treatment. Median age was 74 years, 20% of pts had high risk cytogenetics, 44% were fit, 30% intermediate and 26% frail, according to the IMWG frailty score. Median follow-up was 13.2 months (IQR 8.9-20.7). During the first 4 cycles, at least VGPR rate was 24% with Id, 33% with ICd, 31% with ITd and 18% with IBd. In March 2018, after the analysis of the 4th cohort, the Id arm was closed due to high risk of inefficacy. Overall response rate (ORR) during induction was 73%, VGPR was 39%. ≥VGPR rates were 24% in Id, 48% in ICd, 43% in ITd and 27% in IBd. Median time to first response was 2.4 and to the best response 4 months. Responses were comparable according to cytogenetics: in high risk pts, ORR was 77%, ≥VGPR 46% and ≥nCR 17% as compared to 71%, 36% and 18% in standard risk pts (p=0.53, p=0.33 and p=1, respectively). Response rates were also comparable according to frailty status: in frail pts, ORR was 73%, ≥VGPR 36% and ≥nCR 11% as compared to 75%, 40% and 17% in intermediate and 70%, 40% and 22% in fit pts (p=0.78, p=0.90 and p=0.32, respectively). Median number of induction cycles was 9 (IQR 5-9); 93 (53%) pts completed induction treatment and 14 (8%) pts are still on induction treatment. During the first 4 cycles, hematologic toxicity was limited, and non-hematologic toxicity manageable. The most frequent G3-4 adverse event (AE) was rash in ITd arm (11%); discontinuation rate due to toxicity was 6%. During induction, the rate of at least 1 hematologic G≥3 AE was 11% and at least 1 non-hematologic G≥3 AE was 44%. The most frequent G≥3 AEs were neutropenia (8%), gastrointestinal (9%), infections (11%), neurologic (11%) and dermatologic (6%). G3-4 thrombocytopenia (3%) and PN (5%) were limited. Ixazomib dose reduction due to AEs was required in 15% of pts. The rate of non-hematologic AEs was slightly higher in ITd arm (37% in Id, 37% in ICd, 53% in ITd, 55% in IBd). Early death rate (

Description: Key Points Efficacy of imatinib in steroid-refractory chronic GVHD was prospectively compared across 3 different response systems, with high agreement. Validity of quantitative-based assessment of response with NIH criteria was confirmed by its prognostic impact on long-term survival.

Description: Abstract 3310 Poster Board III-198 Lymphoma patients relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) have a dismal prognosis. Relapsed disease is often chemorefractory and few therapeutic options are available. Few reports have assessed the efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) for relapse treatment. We conducted a retrospective study to assess whether DLI may improve survival outcomes of relapsed patients as compared to salvage chemotherapy, and to explore the potential benefit of Rituximab as salvage treatment. We collected data of 146 consecutive patients with Hodgkin's (HL) and non-Hodgkin's (NHL) lymphoma allografted with reduced intensity conditioning in 2 Italian hematologic centres between 1999 and 2007. Patients relapsed after alloSCT were the target population of our study, and their treatment and survival outcomes were analyzed. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from first to second relapse or death and the time from first relapse to death, and were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Relapse incidence (RI) was defined as the time from first to second relapse considering non-relapse mortality as competing event, and it was analyzed by Cumulative Incidence method and Gray's test. Multivariate analysis was done with Cox method. Fifty-seven (39%) of all 146 patients relapsed at a median of 545 days, 48 of them (84%) were treated for relapse, 9 (16%) were not treated due to early death for progression (6) or infection (2) or response to cyclosporine withdrawal (1). Treated patients had a median age of 50 years (range 19-65), 18 (38%) were female, 12 (25%) had HL, 13 (27%) indolent and 23 (48%) aggressive NHL. Previous lines of chemotherapy were 3 (range 2-7). Twenty-four (50%) patients had undergone an autologous transplant (autoSCT). All patients were allografted from siblings (32, 67%) or from matched unrelated donors (16, 33%). Twenty-four (50%) had 〉1 comorbidity Sorror score at transplant. Twenty-four (50%) patients received DLI alone or with chemotherapy for relapse treatment, 24 (50%) received chemotherapy alone. Median DLI administered were 2 (range 1-5) with a median of 1×10 7CD3+ per DLI. Ten patients (21%) could not receive DLI because of GVHD (5), progressive disease (3), infection (1), donor's loss of eligibility (1). Seventeen patients (35%) were treated with Rituximab alone or combined with chemotherapy, 10 (21%) received both DLI and Rituximab. One- and 2- years OS (median 720 days) and PFS (median 269 days) were 61% and 50%, 39% and 30%, respectively. One- and 2-years RI were 45% and 65%. Age, sex, pre-transplant disease status, therapy lines, comorbidities, donor type, autoSCT did not influence OS nor PFS or RI. Patients with aggressive NHL had a worse PFS (p=0.01), a higher RI (p=0.01) and a trend to reduced OS (p=0.05). Patients treated with DLI had a better PFS than patients treated with salvage chemotherapy alone (1-year PFS 54% with DLI vs 24% without, p=0.005), a significantly reduced RI (1-year RI 38% with DLI vs 67% without, p=0.007), and a trend towards a better OS (1-year OS 79% with DLI vs 38% without, p=0.06). Rituximab treatment improved OS (1-year OS 82% with Rituximab, 50% without, p=0.009) but did not significantly impact PFS or RI. As compared to chemotherapy alone, patients treated with both DLI and Rituximab had better PFS (1-year PFS 60% vs 37%, p=0.04) and OS (1-year OS 90% vs 50%, p=0.006) and a trend to reduced RI (1-year 30% vs 58%, p=0.05). The multivariate analysis considered as covariates disease (HL vs indolent NHL vs aggressive NHL), age (

Description: Abstract 128 Background. In newly diagnosed myeloma patients the combination of bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone (VMP) was superior to MP. In relapsed-refractory patients the 4 drug combination bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (VMPT) induced a high proportion of complete responses (CR). Aims. This prospective, randomized, phase III trial, compared VMPT with a maintenance regimen including bortezomib and thalidomide with VMP without a maintenance regiment. The primary end point was PFS. Methods. Patients (N=511) older than 65 years were randomly assigned to receive VMPT followed by maintenance with bortezomib and thalidomide (N=254) or VMP (N=257). Initially, patients were treated with nine 6-week cycles of VMPT (induction: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8,11,22,25,29,32 in cycles 1–4 and days 1,8,22,29 in cycles 5–9; melphalan 9 mg/m2 days 1–4; prednisone 60 mg/m2 days 1–4 and thalidomide 50 mg days 1–42; maintenance: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every 15 days and thalidomide 50 mg/day) or VMP (bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone at the same doses and schedules previously described without maintenance). In March 2007, the protocol was amended: both VMPT and VMP induction schedules were changed to nine 5-week cycles and bortezomib schedule was modified to weekly administration (1.3 mg/m2 days 1,8,15,22 in cycles 1–9). Results. All patients have been evaluated in intention-to-treat. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups, median age was 71 years. The response rates were always superior in the VMPT group: at least PR rate (86% vs 79%, p=0.02), at least VGPR rate (55% vs 47%, p=0.07) and CR rate (34% vs 21% p=0.0008), respectively. Maintenance treatment did not increase the best response achieved during VMPT induction. After a median follow-up of 17.8 months, the 2-year PFS was 70.0% in the VMPT group and 58.2% in the VMP group (HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.44–0.88, p=0.008). The achievement of CR significantly prolonged PFS in both VMPT (p

Description: Background: In newly diagnosed myeloma patients the combination of bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone (VMP) was superior to MP. In relapsed-refractory patients the 4 drug combination of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (VMPT) induced a high proportion of complete responses (CR). Methods: Newly diagnosed myeloma patients (N=393) older than 65 years, from 58 centers in Italy, were randomly assigned to receive VMPT (N=193) or VMP (N=200). Initially, patients were treated with nine 6-week cycles of VMPT (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8,11,22,25,29,32 in cycles 1–4 and days 1,8,22,29 in cycles 5–9; melphalan 9 mg/m2 days 1–4; prednisone 60 mg/m2 days 1–4 and thalidomide 50 mg days 1–42, followed by bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every 15 days and thalidomide 50 mg/day as maintenance) or VMP (bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone at the same doses and schedules previously described without maintenance). In March 2007, the protocol was amended: both VMPT and VMP schedules were changed to nine 5-week cycles and bortezomib schedule was modified to weekly administration (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,8,15,22 in cycles 1–9). Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Patient characteristics were similar in both groups: median age was 71 years, 23% of patients were aged 〉 75 years. Patients who received at least 1 cycle were evaluated: 152 patients for VMPT (62 received bortezomib bi-weekly infusion and 90 weekly infusion) and 152 patients for VMP (62 received bortezomib bi-weekly infusion and 90 weekly infusion). Data were analyzed in intention-to-treat. The very good partial response (VGPR) rate was higher in the VMPT group (55% versus 42%, p=0.02), including a CR rate of 31% in the VMPT group and 16% in the VMP group (p=0.003). In the subgroup treated with weekly infusion of bortezomib, VGPR was 59% for VMPT and 37% for VMP (p=0.004), including 28% CR for VMPT and 10% for VMP (p=0.004). Subgroup analyses did not show any statistical difference between responses and either age, B2-microglobulin or chromosomal abnormalities, such as del13, t(4;14), t(14;16) and del17. After a median follow-up of 13.6 months, the 2-year PFS was 83.9% in the VMPT group and 75.7% in the VMP group (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.38–1.42, p=0.35). In patients who received weekly infusion of bortezomib, the 2-year PFS was 86.8% in the VMPT group and 78.1% in the VMP group (HR=0.65, 95% CI 0.24–1.8, p=0.41). In patients who achieved CR after induction, the 2-year PFS was 100% for VMPT and 79% for VMP (p=0.02). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 89.5% in the VMPT group and 88.7% in the VMP group (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.43–2.46, p=0.96). The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) was similar in both groups. In the VMPT patients and in the VMP patients, the more frequent AEs were neutropenia (36% vs 31%), thrombocytopenia (20% vs 19%), peripheral neuropathy (18% vs 12%), infections (14% vs 10%), and gastrointestinal complications (7% vs 8%), respectively. The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly decreased the incidence of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy (9% for VMPT and 3% for VMP). Conclusion: VMPT is superior to VMP in terms of response rates. Longer follow-up is needed to assess their effects on PFS and OS. The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy without influencing outcome. Table. Complete responses, progression-free survival and peripheral neuropathy in all patients and in those who received weekly infusion of bortezomib VMPT group (n=152) VMP group (n=152) All patients (n=152) Subgroup with bortezomib weekly infusion (n=90) All patients (n=152) Subgroup with bortezomib weekly infusion (n=90) CR rate (%) 31 28 16 10 2-year PFS (%) 84 87 76 78 Grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy (%) 18 9 12 3

Description: Background: New agents have been introduced as induction prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and as consolidation/maintenance thereafter to improve complete response (CR) rates. In this trial we evaluate Bortezomib plus Pegylated-lyposomal-doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (PAD) as induction therapy prior to reduced intensity ASCT, followed by consolidation with Lenalidomide and Prednisone (LP) and maintenance with Lenalidomide alone (L). Methods: Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients aged 65–75 years were eligible. Induction regimen consisted of 4 21-day PAD cycles (Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11, Pegylated-lyposomal-doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 4 and Dexamethasone 40 mg days 1–4, 8–11, 15–18). Two cycles of Cyclophosphamide 3 g/m2 plus Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor were used to harvest stem cells. Patients were conditioned with tandem Melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100) followed by stem cell support. After ASCT patients received consolidation with 4 28-day LP cycles (Lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21 plus, Prednisone 50 mg every other day) followed by Lenalidomide alone maintenance (10 mg days 1–21 every 28 day). Primary objectives were safety (grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity 〈 30%) and efficacy (near CR rate 〉 35%). Results: One-hundred and two patients have been enrolled. After PAD cycles at least partial response (PR) rate was 94%, at least very good partial response (VGPR) was 59% including 13% CR. After tandem MEL100, 88% of patients achieved at least VGPR and 41% CR. After LP consolidation all patients obtained PR, 88% at least VGPR and 53% immunofixation negative CR. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 1-year progression free survival (PFS) was 92%, 1 year time to progression was 97% and 1 year overall survival was 92%. PFS was not significantly affected β2-microglobulin levels (p=0.10), presence of chromosome 13 deletion (p=0.5) or t(4;14) (p=0.61). During PAD, grade 3–4 adverse events included thrombocitopenia (13%), neutropenia (11%), infections (18%), gastrointestinal toxicities (12%), peripheral neuropathy (11%) and deep vein thrombosis (6%). During LP consolidation, grade 3–4 toxicities included neutropenia (18%), thrombocytopenia (6%), infections (6%) and deep vein thrombosis (6%). The other grade 3–4 toxicities occurred in less than 5% of patients. Conclusions: Bortezomib as induction regimen prior to reduced intensity ASCT, followed by Lenalidomide as consolidation maintenance is a highly effective regimen in elderly patients. Updated results will be presented at the meeting.

Description: We assessed efficacy, safety, and reversal of renal impairment (RI) in untreated patients with multiple myeloma given bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by bortezomib-thalidomide (VMPT-VT) maintenance or bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP). Exclusion criteria included serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dL. In the VMPT-VT/VMP arms, severe RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≤ 30 mL/min), moderate RI (eGFR 31-50 mL/min), and normal renal function (eGFR 〉 50 mL/min), were 6%/7.9%, 24.1%/24.9%, and 69.8%/67.2%, respectively. Statistically significant improvements in overall response rates and progression-free survival were observed in VMPT-VT versus VMP arms across renal cohorts, except in severe RI patients. In the VMPT group, severe RI reduced overall survival (OS). RI was reversed in 16/63 (25.4%) patients receiving VMPT-VT versus 31/77 (40.3%) receiving VMP. Multivariate analysis showed male sex (P = .022) and moderate RI (P = .003) significantly predicted RI recovery. VMP patients achieving renal response showed longer OS. In both arms, greater rates of severe hematologic adverse events were associated with RI (eGFR 〈 50 mL/min), however, therapy discontinuation rates were unaffected. VMPT-VT was superior to VMP for cases with normal renal function and moderate RI, whereas VMPT-VT failed to outperform VMP in patients with severe RI, although the relatively low number of cases analyzed preclude drawing definitive conclusions. VMPT-VT had no advantage in terms of RI reversal over VMP. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01063179.

Description: Abstract 492 Background. The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is high in newly diagnosed myeloma (MM) patients who receive thalidomide-based regimens. Anticoagulant prophylaxis is recommended. Controversies exist on the best thromboprophylactic regimen to adopt. Aims. In this prospective, multicenter phase III trial we evaluated the safety and the efficacy of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or low-dose aspirin (ASA) or low-fixed dose warfarin (WAR) as anticoagulant prophylaxis. End-points were incidence of VTE, acute cardiovascular events, sudden death, major and minor bleeding. Methods. In a GIMEMA study, 991 newly diagnosed MM patients were randomized to VTD (Velcade 1.3 mg/m2 d 1,4,8,11; Thalidomide 200 mg/d; Dexamethasone 320 mg/21 d) or TD (Thalidomide 200 mg/d; Dexamethasone 320 mg/21 d) or VMPT (Velcade 1.3 mg/m2 d 1,8,15,22; Melphalan 9 mg/m2 d 1-4; Prednisone 60 mg/m2 d 1-4; Talidomide 50 mg/d) or VMP (Velcade 1.3 mg/m2 d 1,8,15,22; Melphalan 9 mg/m2 d 1-4; Prednisone 60 mg/m2 d 1-4). In a sub-study, patients treated with VTD or TD or VMPT were randomly assigned to receive LMWH (Enoxaparin 40 mg/d, N=223) or ASA (Aspirin 100 mg/d, N=227) or WAR (Warfarin 1.25 mg/d, N=223) for the duration of the induction therapy; 61 patients were excluded from sub-study because of indication for anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy or high-risk of bleeding. Patients treated with VMP (N=257) did not receive any prophylaxis and were used as controls. Results. Patient characteristics and distribution of major risk factors were similar in all groups. The incidence of VTE was 5% in the LMWH group, 6% in the ASA group and 8% in the WAR group (p not significant). VTEs were 2% in the VMP group. Median time to onset of VTE for patients who received LMWH or ASA or WAR were 4.7, 2.4 and 2.4 months, respectively. Patients who received higher doses of both steroids and thalidomide (VTD and TD) had a higher VTE incidence (7%) in comparison with those who received lower doses (VMPT, 3%, p=0.06). Patients treated with bortezomib (VTD and VMPT) had a lower VTE incidence (5%) in comparison with patients on TD (8%, p=0.08). The rates of cardiovascular events were 2% in the LMWH group, 1% in the ASA group and 0.5% in the WAR group. The incidence of major and minor bleeding was 2% in the LMWH group, 3% in the ASA group and 1% in the WAR group (p not significant). The incidence of combined thrombosis, bleeding and cardiovascular events was 9% in the LMWH group, 10% in the ASA group and 9% in the WAR group (p not significant). Conclusion. The overall incidence of VTE was less than 10% in all groups and was not superior to that expected during the natural course of MM. The LMWH patients had lower risk of VTE, although no statistical difference was observed. LMWH, WAR and ASA are likely to be effective thromboprophylactic regimens. The final analysis on 991 patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.