ALBERT

Description: Introduction: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is a CD19+ B-cell malignancy that accounts for approximately 25% of adult leukemia diagnoses in the developed world. While conventional therapies have some efficacy, there are few curative therapeutic options and many patients ultimately progress to relapsed or refractory disease. CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has provided some hope, but induces complete remission in only 26% of patients. This suboptimal response rate is believed to be due to T cell dysfunction and immune-suppression by CLL cells, the mechanisms of which are poorly understood. Results: To understand the causes of CAR T cell dysfunction in CLL we investigated the defects that CLL cells induced in normal donor CD19-targeting CAR T cells. CAR T cells were repeatedly stimulated at 5-day intervals with either primary CLL cells from patients or a CD19-expressing control cell line (aAPC). Repeat stimulation of CAR T cells with aAPCs resulted in 5.36 ± .94 population doublings after three stimulations, whereas CLL cells only evoked 2.39 ± .92 population doublings. We performed phenotyping, proliferation analysis, and cytokine analysis of stimulated CAR T cells. CLL-stimulated T cells appeared un-activated, with low levels of PD-1, LAG3, and TIM3, low levels of cytokine production, and a high proportion of non-cycling cells as measured by Ki67 staining. We first hypothesized that CLL cells induce an altered epigenetic program that prevents effector function and is stabilized by successive stimulations. To test this, we stimulated CAR T cells with CLL cells or aAPCs as indicated in Fig. 1A. CLL-stimulated CAR T cells failed to proliferate or produce cytokines, but subsequent stimulation with aAPCs rescued these functions (Fig. 1B). Further, CLL-stimulated CAR T cells did not differentiate, suggesting that CLL cells do not induce stable defects but rather insufficiently activate CAR T cells (Fig. 1C). These cells also appeared un-activated as indicated by low levels of PD-1 and Ki67. We then used flow cytometry to assess expression of costimulatory and inhibitory molecules on the primary CLL samples. We found that the levels of co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules, namely CD80/CD86 and CD54/CD58 respectively were found at low frequencies, and where present were expressed at low levels. This suggested that one mechanism behind the lack of CAR T cell effector responses may be that a lack of co-stimulation prevents proper CAR T cell targeting of these cells. Towards this, we incubated CLL cells with a murine fibroblast line expressing CD40 ligand for 24 hours with IL-4 to activate the CLL cells. We found that this activation significantly increased expression of CD80, CD86, CD54, and CD58 on the CLL cells. We then used these cells to stimulate CAR T cells in our re-stimulation assay and found that CAR T cells were able to proliferate in response to these activated CLLs (Fig. 1D). In addition, CAR T cells stimulated with activated CLL cells formed more cell-to-cell conjugates than those stimulated with un-activated CLL cells. These data suggest not only that insufficient activation of CAR T cells may be responsible for the poor response rates to CAR T cell therapy in CLL, but also implicate a need for additional co-stimulation in this CAR T cell setting. Another contributing factor may be immune suppression by CLL cells. To determine if CLL cells are immune-suppressive, we used a co-culture assay to stimulate CAR T cells with aAPCs and CLL cells mixed at known ratios. Interestingly, all mixed cultures proliferated similarly, suggesting that CLL cells did not prevent T cell activation in the presence of a strong activation signal. We also found that CLL cells are responsive to IL-2, as addition of this cytokine to culture media prolongs survival of CLL cells out to 10 days depending on the dose. This suggests that CLL cells express a functional IL-2 receptor and may be taking up IL-2 from the culture media, further impairing T cell activation. In support of this, supplementing IL-2 into our CLL/CAR T cell co-cultures rescued T cell proliferative capacity. Taken together, these data suggest that T cell dysfunction in CLL is the result of insufficient activation rather than true functional defects. Disclosures June: Novartis: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: scientific founder, for which he has founders stock but no income, Patents & Royalties. Melenhorst:National Institutes of Health: Research Funding; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; IASO Biotherapeutics, Co: Consultancy; Simcere of America, Inc: Consultancy; Shanghai Unicar Therapy, Co: Consultancy; Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Stand Up to Cancer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding.

Description: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is a B cell malignancy that accounts for nearly 1/3rd of adult leukemia diagnoses in the Western world. Conventional chemo-immunotherapies initially control progression, but in the absence of curative options patients ultimately succumb to their disease. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is potentially curative, but only 26% of CLL patients have a complete response. CLL-stimulated T cells have reduced effector functions and B-CLL cells themselves are believed to be immunosuppressive. Our work demonstrates that insufficient activation of CAR T cells by CLL cells mediates some of these effects and that the results are conserved between ROR1- and CD19-targeting CARs. Results: In this study we used an in vitro system to model the in vivo anti-tumor response in which CAR T cells serially engage with CLL cells. Multiple stimulations of CD19 or ROR1-targeting CAR T cells with primary CLL cells recapitulated many aspects of known T cell dysfunction including reduced proliferation, cytokine production, and activation. While the initial stimulation induced low level proliferation, subsequent stimulations failed to elicit additional effector functions. We further found that these functional defects were not permanent, and that CAR T cell function could be restored by switching to a stimulus with an aAPC (artificial Antigen Presenting Cell) control cell line. The aAPCs are well-characterized as potent stimulators of CAR T cell effector responses. Flow cytometry revealed that CLL-stimulated CAR T cells retained a non-activated, baseline differentiation profile, suggesting that CLL cells fail to stimulate CAR T cells rather than rendering them non-functional. One mechanism that could dampen activation is immune suppression. We assessed this at a high level by stimulating CAR T cells with CLL cells and aAPCs mixed at known ratios. However, even cultures containing 75% CLL cells stimulated proliferation and cytokine production. Extensive immune-phenotyping revealed high level expression of the IL-2 Receptor on 90% (18/20) of the B-CLL cells tested. Since cytokine sinking via IL-2 receptor expression is a well-known mechanism of regulatory T cell suppression, we hypothesized that CLL cells similarly sink IL-2, blunting T cell activation. To test this, we supplemented IL-2 into CLL/CAR T cell co-cultures and showed that this rescued proliferation but only partially restored cytokine production. In contrast to our hypothesis, analysis of cytokine production by flow cytometry showed that CLL-stimulated CAR T cells did not produce IL-2 following a 6- or 12-hour stimulus, but TNFα was expressed after 12-hours. Similarly, CAR T cell degranulation, a prerequisite for target cell lysis was triggered after CLL recognition. These data again suggested that CLL cells insufficiently stimulate CAR T cell cytokine production, but also showed that cytolytic activity against CLL cells is intact. We further proposed that CLL cells express insufficient levels of co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules to activate CAR T cells. Flow cytometry showed that most CLL cells expressed co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules at low levels; we hypothesized that up-regulating these molecules would enhance CAR T cell targeting of CLL cells. CLL cells were activated with CD40L and IL-4, which increased expression of CD54, CD58, CD80, and CD86. Stimulating CAR T cells with activated CLL cells enhanced CAR T cell proliferation and induced cell conjugate formation, indicating cell activation. Therefore, improving CLL stimulatory capacity can rescue T cell dysfunctions. To assess whether IL-2 addition and CD40 ligation were synergistic, we combined the two assays; however, we saw no additional improvement over IL-2 addition alone, suggesting that the two interventions may act upon the same pathway. Importantly, we also showed that rescue of CAR T cell function via IL-2 addition or CD40 ligation was not CAR-specific, as we observed the functional defects and subsequent rescue with both a ROR1-targeting CAR and the gold standard CD19-targeting CAR. Conclusions: Together, these data show that CAR T cell "defects" in CLL are actually insufficient activation, and improving the stimulatory capacity of CLL cells may enable better clinical responses. Further, this effect is not CAR-specific and these results may therefore be broadly applicable to multiple therapies for this disease. Disclosures Melenhorst: IASO Biotherapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Speaker, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Other: Speaker; Simcere of America: Consultancy; Poseida Therapeutics: Consultancy.