ALBERT

Description: Background: CD is a rare entity characterized by unicentric or multicentric clinical presentation. Three histologic variants (hyline vascular, plasmacell and mixed) have been described. Coexistence of CD and non-Hodgkin (NHL) and Hodgkin’s (HL) lymphomas is well documented in literature; however the last type of association is a rare event. When it occurs, the most frequent association is between interfollicular subtype of HL and plasmacell variant of CD, while there is no agreement regarding a more common combination of HL and either the multicentric or the localized form of CD. Methods and Results: On July 2000, a 33-years-old woman HIV-negative was found to be affected by NS grade I of BNLI cHL diagnosed on a supraclavear nodal biopsy. The final stage was IIIA. After 6 cycles of ABVD and mediastinal radiotherapy, the patient obtained a CR (January 2001). One year later (May 2002) she complained asthenia, but not other clinical signs or symptoms. Laboratory tests revelead increased ERS (49 mm/h) and only mild anemia (11,7 mg/dl). Computerized tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US) and positron emission tomography (PET) showed multiple subdiaphgramatic enlarged lymphnodes in celiac tripod region, haepatoduodenal ligament and interaortocaval zone (2–3 cm of diameter). However, the biopsied nodes obtained by laparoscopy reveled a mixed reactive lymphoadenopathy, but not recurrent HL. During the following 13 months of observation, a further reduction in the hemoglobine value (10.9 mg/dl), increased ERS (87 mm/h) and a very slowly progressive increase in the dimension (4–5 cm diameter) of the abdominal enlarged nodes were documented in the absence of others clinical signs or symptoms. A second nodal biopsy (paracaval lymphnode) was performed in October 2003. Histology showed some lymphoid follicles with small germinal centers(GC), which presented prominent hyalinized vessels and politypical plasmacell component in interfollicular areas indicative of CD (mixed hyaline-vascular and plasmacell subtype). Rare Reed-Stenberg and lacunar cells were found in this background. After the second course of chemoterapy (6 cycles of ABVD) a rapid normalization of ERS and anemia were documented. The CT findings showed a reduction of size and numbers, but no disappereance of abdominal lymph nodes (4 residual nodes of 1–2 cm of diameter). A further nodal biopsy was performed, which confirmed the persistence of HL in the background of CD. Only after RT, the patient obtained a second CR as documented by two subsequent negative CT and PET scans. On July 2005, even if laboratory tests were normal, a single ipogastric superficial lymphadenopathy was detected on phisical examination and confirmed by US: so, a new diagnostic work-up, consisting of PET-SCAN and escixional biopsy is ongoing. Conclusion: After cHL sclero-nodular type, the diagnosis of recurrent HL probably arising on a preexisting multifocal CD, both caracterized by a particularly indolent course, was documented. The two pathogenetic mechanisms hypothized for CD and HL association are: secretion of IL-6 by Hodgkin’s RS cells and/or histiocytes or manifestation of an abnormal immune state associated with Hodgkin’s disease.

Description: In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the combination melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide (MPT) induces a fast tumor response with a high response rate, but evidence that this translate into improved outcome is limited. This multicenter trial compared the efficacy and the toxicity of oral MPT with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) in previously untreated patients. From January 2002 to December 2004, we randomised 255 patients, who were older than 65 years of age (median age 72). Data analysis was performed on July 2005. The MPT regimen included oral melphalan (4 mg/m2 for 7 days) and prednisone (40 mg/m2 7 days) for six four week cycles plus thalidomide (100 mg per day continuously until any sign of relapse or progressive disease) The MP regimen was as MPT without thalidomide. Patients who were not assigned to receive thalidomide were permitted to cross over to receive thalidomide after relapse or disease progression. Patients treated with MPT experienced higher response rates and a longer time to progression (primary end points) than patients who did not receive thalidomide. The overall response rate was 76% for MPT and 48% for MP alone (P

Description: Introduction: Continous improving results have been obtained during last two decades in the control of Ph’positive chronic myeloid leukemia(CML). However the final goal of molecular remission remains difficult to obtain even in the STI age. Aims : Evaluation of the rate of molecular response to IFNα,IFNα based treatment,to STI or to STI-INFα combination was analized in 100 consecutive Ph+ CML patients observed in a single Institution over a period of 20 years. Patients, Methods and Results All patients were treated at the time of diagnosis (87) or late (13) during the course of their disease. Distribution according to treatment was: INFα,63pts (late or early:13,50);INFα-ARA-C combination,20pts;STI,14 pts;STI-INFα association, 3 pts. Two pts, both initially assigned to INFα-ARA-C combination, were crossed-over to STI, one because relapsing off-therapy after a long lasting continous (25 mths) molecular remission and the other in cytogenetic response because intolerant to the initial treatment. In addition, other 3 pts patients, with persistent complete cytogenetic, but not molecular remission to INFα or INFα-ARA-C combination were subsequentially trated with the STI-IFNα association. At present,99/100 pts are evaluable. The median times of follow-up for the entire group and form the different treatment subgroups are: late IFNα 154 months(42–263); early IFNα, 71 months(1–197); IFNα-ARA-C, 61 months(5–203); STI- IFNα,78 mths(11–47), STI,31 mths(3–41). A complete kariotypic remission(CKR) was observed in 15/63 IFNα treated pts, in 10/20 IFNα-ARA-C pts group, in 10/13 cases of STI group and in 3 /3 pts who received STI-IFNα. A molecular response(RT-nested PCR, JQ Guo, Leukemia: 2002,15,2447–53) was observed in 4/15,2/10,5/10 and in 2/3 CKR pts initially trated with the different modalities listed above. Response was confirmed from 2 to 7 consecutive or not consecutive times in the 2/4 cases responsive to INFα, in the 2 cases responsive to INFα-ARA-C combination,4/5cases responsive to STI and in 2/3 cases responsive to STI-IFNα association. The 2nd and the 3rd molecular remission to STI were obtained in the patient molecularly and cytogenetically relapsed off-therapy and, for the first time from the diagnosis, in the other patient in CKR to IFNα-ARA-C combination and crossed to STI treatment. Furthermore, all 3 cases, in CKR, but not molecular response to other treatments at the time of cross-over to STI-IFNα combination, achieved a persistent (in 2 to 3 tests over a period ranging from 6+ to 12+ mths) molecular remission. The first interval between the start of the treatment and the first molecular response varied from 12 to 52, from 3 to 22, from 11 to 24, from 5 to 11 mths in the groups initially treated with IFNα, IFNα-ARA-C, STI or STI-IFNα respectively. The 2 pts, crossed-over to STI alone, both, obtained a response after 29 mths of therapy. In addition in the 3 pts crossed-over to STI-IFNα therapy, the molecular response was obtained after 14,23 and 25 mths from the start of last treatment. Conclusion It is not possible to achieve any conclusion regarding the treatment effect on molecular response duration because of the different length of follow-up of various groups of patients. However in responsive patients to IFN alone or combined to ARA-C or STI, consecutive negative RT-PCR tests were observed more frequently than in patients receving STI alone.