ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Collection
Keywords
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2015-10-20
    Description: We present ProCS15: a program that computes the isotropic chemical shielding values of backbone and Cβatoms given a protein structure in less than a second. ProCS15 is based on around 2.35 million OPBE/6-31G(d,p)//PM6 calculations on tripeptides and small structural models of hydrogen-bonding. The ProCS15-predicted chemical shielding values are compared to experimentally measured chemical shifts for Ubiquitin and the third IgG-binding domain of Protein G through linear regression and yield RMSD values of up to 2.2, 0.7, and 4.8 ppm for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen atoms. These RMSD values are very similar to corresponding RMSD values computed using OPBE/6-31G(d,p) for the entire structure for each proteins. These maximum RMSD values can be reduced by using NMR-derived structural ensembles of Ubiquitin. For example, for the largest ensemble the largest RMSD values are 1.7, 0.5, and 3.5 ppm for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. The corresponding RMSD values predicted by several empirical chemical shift predictors range between 0.7–1.1, 0.2–0.4, and 1.8–2.8 ppm for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen atoms, respectively.
    Electronic ISSN: 2167-8359
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Published by PeerJ
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    PANGAEA
    In:  Supplement to: Bradford, Benjamin Z; Huseth, Anders S; Groves, Russell L (2018): Widespread detections of neonicotinoid contaminants in central Wisconsin groundwater. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0201753, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201753
    Publication Date: 2023-01-13
    Description: Neonicotinoids are a popular and widely-used class of insecticides whose heavy usage rates and purported negative impacts on bees and other beneficial insects has led to questions about their mobility and accumulation in the environment. Neonicotinoid compounds are currently registered for over 140 different crop uses in the United States, with commercial growers continuing to rely heavily on neonicotinoid insecticides for the control of key insect pests through a combination of in-ground and foliar applications. In 2008, the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) began testing for neonicotinoids in groundwater test wells in the state, reporting detections of one or more neonicotinoids in dozens of shallow groundwater test wells. In 2011, similar detection levels were confirmed in several high-capacity overhead center-pivot irrigation systems in central Wisconsin. The current study was initiated to investigate the spatial extent and magnitude of neonicotinoid contamination in groundwater in and around areas of irrigated commercial agriculture in central Wisconsin. From 2013-2015 a total of 317 samples were collected from 91 unique high-capacity irrigation wells and tested for the presence of thiamethoxam (TMX), a neonicotinoid, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. 67% of all samples were positive for TMX at a concentration above the analytical limit of quantification (0.05 µg/L) and 78% of all wells tested positive at least once. Mean detection was 0.28 µg/L, with a maximum detection of 1.67 µg/L. Five wells had at least one detection exceeding 1.00 µg/L. Furthermore, an analysis of the spatial structure of these well detects suggests that contamination profiles vary across the landscape, with differences in mean detection levels observed from landscape (25 km), to farm (5 km), to individual well (500 m) scales.
    Keywords: Date/Time of event; Event label; Latitude of event; Longitude of event; Sample ID; Sampling Well; Thiamethoxam; WELL; Wisconsin_Well-01_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-02_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-02_20140626; Wisconsin_Well-02_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-02_20150804; Wisconsin_Well-02_20150902; Wisconsin_Well-02_20151017; Wisconsin_Well-03_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-03_20140709; Wisconsin_Well-03_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-03_20150725; Wisconsin_Well-03_20150902; Wisconsin_Well-04_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-04_20140709; Wisconsin_Well-04_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-04_20150725; Wisconsin_Well-04_20150902; Wisconsin_Well-05_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-05_20140709; Wisconsin_Well-05_20150618; Wisconsin_Well-05_20150727; Wisconsin_Well-05_20151021; Wisconsin_Well-06_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-06_20140706; Wisconsin_Well-06_20150710; Wisconsin_Well-06_20150727; Wisconsin_Well-07_20140626; Wisconsin_Well-07_20150511; Wisconsin_Well-07_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-07_20150725; Wisconsin_Well-08_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-08_20140626; Wisconsin_Well-08_20150511; Wisconsin_Well-08_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-08_20150725; Wisconsin_Well-08_20151019; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150518; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150529; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150615; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150623; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150702; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150710; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150717; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150725; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150805; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150813; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150826; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150902; Wisconsin_Well-09_20150917; Wisconsin_Well-09_20151019; Wisconsin_Well-10_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-10_20140701; Wisconsin_Well-10_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-10_20150725; Wisconsin_Well-10_20151017; Wisconsin_Well-11_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-11_20140726; Wisconsin_Well-11_20150702; Wisconsin_Well-11_20150727; Wisconsin_Well-12_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-12_20140701; Wisconsin_Well-12_20150512; Wisconsin_Well-12_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-12_20150814; Wisconsin_Well-13_20150504; Wisconsin_Well-13_20150618; Wisconsin_Well-13_20150721; Wisconsin_Well-13_20150916; Wisconsin_Well-14_20150514; Wisconsin_Well-14_20150618; Wisconsin_Well-14_20150723; Wisconsin_Well-14_20150915; Wisconsin_Well-15_20150506; Wisconsin_Well-15_20150618; Wisconsin_Well-15_20150721; Wisconsin_Well-15_20150916; Wisconsin_Well-16_20150506; Wisconsin_Well-16_20150618; Wisconsin_Well-16_20150723; Wisconsin_Well-16_20150916; Wisconsin_Well-17_20150506; Wisconsin_Well-17_20150618; Wisconsin_Well-17_20150721; Wisconsin_Well-17_20150916; Wisconsin_Well-18_20150506; Wisconsin_Well-18_20150618; Wisconsin_Well-18_20150721; Wisconsin_Well-19_20140722; Wisconsin_Well-19_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-19_20150520; Wisconsin_Well-20_20140722; Wisconsin_Well-20_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-21_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-21_20150505; Wisconsin_Well-21_20150602; Wisconsin_Well-21_20150702; Wisconsin_Well-21_20150905; Wisconsin_Well-22_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-22_20150501; Wisconsin_Well-22_20150522; Wisconsin_Well-22_20150701; Wisconsin_Well-22_20150905; Wisconsin_Well-23_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-23_20140722; Wisconsin_Well-23_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-23_20150522; Wisconsin_Well-23_20150602; Wisconsin_Well-23_20150701; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150527; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150603; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150610; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150617; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150624; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150701; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150708; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150715; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150722; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150729; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150909; Wisconsin_Well-24_20150916; Wisconsin_Well-25_20140721; Wisconsin_Well-25_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-26_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-26_20140721; Wisconsin_Well-26_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-26_20150507; Wisconsin_Well-26_20150523; Wisconsin_Well-26_20150704; Wisconsin_Well-27_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-27_20140721; Wisconsin_Well-27_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-28_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-28_20150511; Wisconsin_Well-28_20150602; Wisconsin_Well-28_20150701; Wisconsin_Well-29_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-29_20140722; Wisconsin_Well-29_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-30_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-30_20150522; Wisconsin_Well-30_20150702; Wisconsin_Well-30_20150917; Wisconsin_Well-31_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-31_20140710; Wisconsin_Well-32_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-32_20140710; Wisconsin_Well-33_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-33_20140710; Wisconsin_Well-34_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-34_20140710; Wisconsin_Well-35_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-35_20140710; Wisconsin_Well-36_20140722; Wisconsin_Well-36_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-36_20150501; Wisconsin_Well-36_20150523; Wisconsin_Well-36_20150704; Wisconsin_Well-37_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-37_20140710; Wisconsin_Well-38_20140721; Wisconsin_Well-38_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-38_20150508; Wisconsin_Well-38_20150522; Wisconsin_Well-38_20150706; Wisconsin_Well-39_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-39_20150501; Wisconsin_Well-39_20150522; Wisconsin_Well-39_20150702; Wisconsin_Well-40_20130911; Wisconsin_Well-40_20140722; Wisconsin_Well-40_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-40_20150508; Wisconsin_Well-40_20150522; Wisconsin_Well-40_20150702; Wisconsin_Well-41_20140807; Wisconsin_Well-41_20150518; Wisconsin_Well-41_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-41_20150922; Wisconsin_Well-42_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-42_20140801; Wisconsin_Well-42_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-43_20150511; Wisconsin_Well-43_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-43_20150922; Wisconsin_Well-44_20140807; Wisconsin_Well-44_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-44_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-44_20150922; Wisconsin_Well-45_20140807; Wisconsin_Well-45_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-46_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-47_20150512; Wisconsin_Well-47_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-47_20150922; Wisconsin_Well-48_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-48_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-48_20150709; Wisconsin_Well-48_20150922; Wisconsin_Well-49_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-50_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-50_20140807; Wisconsin_Well-50_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-51_20140807; Wisconsin_Well-51_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-51_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-51_20150709; Wisconsin_Well-51_20150922; Wisconsin_Well-52_20140807; Wisconsin_Well-52_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-52_20150511; Wisconsin_Well-52_20150703; Wisconsin_Well-52_20150709; Wisconsin_Well-52_20150922; Wisconsin_Well-53_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-53_20140801; Wisconsin_Well-53_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-54_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-54_20140807; Wisconsin_Well-54_20140909; Wisconsin_Well-55_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-55_20140724; Wisconsin_Well-55_20140828; Wisconsin_Well-55_20150716; Wisconsin_Well-55_20150923; Wisconsin_Well-56_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-56_20140724; Wisconsin_Well-56_20140828; Wisconsin_Well-56_20150716; Wisconsin_Well-56_20150923; Wisconsin_Well-57_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-57_20140724; Wisconsin_Well-57_20140828; Wisconsin_Well-57_20150716; Wisconsin_Well-58_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-58_20140724; Wisconsin_Well-58_20140828; Wisconsin_Well-58_20150716; Wisconsin_Well-58_20150923; Wisconsin_Well-59_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-59_20140724; Wisconsin_Well-59_20140828; Wisconsin_Well-59_20150716; Wisconsin_Well-59_20150923; Wisconsin_Well-60_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-60_20140724; Wisconsin_Well-60_20140828; Wisconsin_Well-60_20150716; Wisconsin_Well-60_20150923; Wisconsin_Well-61_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-61_20140724; Wisconsin_Well-61_20140828; Wisconsin_Well-61_20150716; Wisconsin_Well-61_20150923; Wisconsin_Well-62_20130830; Wisconsin_Well-62_20140724; Wisconsin_Well-62_20140828; Wisconsin_Well-62_20150716; Wisconsin_Well-62_20150923; Wisconsin_Well-63_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-63_20150723; Wisconsin_Well-63_20151005; Wisconsin_Well-64_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-65_20150522; Wisconsin_Well-65_20150617; Wisconsin_Well-65_20150723; Wisconsin_Well-65_20150914; Wisconsin_Well-66_20140708; Wisconsin_Well-67_20140626; Wisconsin_Well-68_20150523; Wisconsin_Well-68_20150617; Wisconsin_Well-68_20150721; Wisconsin_Well-69_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-70_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-71_20130910; Wisconsin_Well-72_20140708; Wisconsin_Well-73_20140626; Wisconsin_Well-74_20140626; Wisconsin_Well-75_20140708; Wisconsin_Well-76_20150519; Wisconsin_Well-76_20150617; Wisconsin_Well-76_20150721;
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 951 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    PANGAEA
    In:  Supplement to: Henriksson, Anders S (1996): Calcareous nannoplankton productivity and succession across the Cretaceous - Tertiary boundary in the Pacific (DSDP Site 465) and Atlantic (DSDP Site 527) Oceans. 17(4), 451-477, https://doi.org/10.1006/cres.1996.0028
    Publication Date: 2023-06-27
    Description: The global extinctions linked to the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary severely affected marine pelagic organisms. The K-T boundary intervals at Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) Site 527 (Leg 74) in the South Atlantic Ocean and Site 465 (Leg 62) in the Pacific Ocean were studied for changes in calcareous nannofossil assemblages from the late Maastrichtian to the early Paleocene. The sections analysed cover 180 kyr of the terminal Cretaceous and 200 kyr of the earliest Tertiary. Absolute and relative abundances of calcareous nannoplankton were calculated for both the entire flora and for individual species. No decrease in the number of species occurs towards the K-T boundary; relative and absolute abundances of different species are fairly stable throughout the terminal 180 kyr of the Cretaceous. At the K-T boundary the calcareous nannoflora shows a drastic and instantaneous decrease in absolute abundance. Typical Cretaceous species became extinct at the K-T boundary, but are present in the lowermost Tertiary as a result of bioturbation and reworking of the sediments. Very few species survived the K-T boundary. The species that occur sporadically in extremely low numbers in the Cretaceous, exhibit stable relative and absolute abundances through the lower Tertiary. Evolving Tertiary species appeared at the boundary and vary only moderately in absolute abundance through the lowermost Paleocene. The productivity of calcareous nannoplankton is determined here as the nannofossil accumulation rate (NFAR), which is suggested as an estimate of surface-water primary productivity. The terminal Cretaceous NFAR values were high and stable. At the K-T boundary the calcareous nannoflora suffered a 70-150-fold decrease in NFAR, indicating a catastrophic event. The Tertiary NFAR values remained low and fairly constant through the first 200 kyr. The productivity of calcareous nanno- plankton in the earliest Tertiary was dominated by the calcareous dinoflagellate Thoracosphaera sp.
    Keywords: 62-465; 74-527; Age, relative; Comment; Deep Sea Drilling Project; DEPTH, sediment/rock; DRILL; Drilling/drill rig; DSDP; DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation; Event label; Glomar Challenger; Leg62; Leg74; North Pacific/CONT RISE; Sample code/label; South Atlantic
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 70 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Amsterdam : Elsevier
    Physica C: Superconductivity and its applications 235-240 (1994), S. 3179-3180 
    ISSN: 0921-4534
    Source: Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002
    Topics: Physics
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    ISSN: 1365-2958
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: A met4 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was unable to transcribe a number of genes encoding enzymes of the methionine biosynthetic pathway. The sequence of the cloned MET4 gene allowed the previously sequenced flanking LEU4 and POL1 genes to be linked to MET4 into a 10 327 bp contiguous region of chromosome XIV. From the sequence and mapping of the transcriptional start points, MET4 is predicted to encode a protein of 634 amino acids (as opposed to 666 amino acids published by others) with a leucine zipper domain at the C-terminus, preceded by both acidic and basic regions. Thus, MET4 belongs to the family of basic leucine zipper trans-activator proteins. Disruption of MET4 resulted in methionine auxotrophy with no other phenotype. Transcriptional studies showed that MET4 was regulated by the general amino acid control and hence by another bZIP protein encoded by GCN4. GCN4 binding sequences are present between the divergently transcribed MET4 and LEU4 genes. Over-expression of MET4 resulted in leaky expression from the otherwise tightly regulated MET3 promoter under its control. The presence of consensus sequences for other potential regulatory elements in the MET4 promoter suggests a complex regulation of this gene.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    ISSN: 1365-2958
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    ISSN: 1476-4687
    Source: Nature Archives 1869 - 2009
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine , Natural Sciences in General , Physics
    Notes: [Auszug] The arrangement of spins at interfaces in a layered magnetic material often has an important effect on the properties of the material. One example of this is the directional coupling between the spins in an antiferromagnet and those in an adjacent ferromagnet, an effect first discovered ...
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    [S.l.] : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    Journal of Applied Physics 76 (1994), S. 3223-3223 
    ISSN: 1089-7550
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    [S.l.] : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    Journal of Applied Physics 76 (1994), S. 1656-1664 
    ISSN: 1089-7550
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics
    Notes: Plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition is a novel process for surface modification. By combining plasma deposition and ion implantation and using filtered vacuum arc plasmas, thin film formation, direct and recoil ion implantation, and ion-beam-assisted intermixing of the film and substrate can be accomplished simultaneously. The implications of this technique in tribology of magnetic recording media have been investigated experimentally. Surfaces of Al2O3-TiC heads were modified with silver, carbon, and titanium ions at doses of 3×1016 ions/cm2 and mean implantation energies between 2.0 and 4.2 keV. Simulation results indicated that the modified regions exhibited high concentrations of implanted species in the top 2–3 nm, atomically mixed interfaces, and thicknesses between 10 and 25 nm. Surface imaging with an atomic force microscope and nanoindentation testing revealed that the modified heads possessed smoother topographies and increased hardnesses. Contact start-stop and continuous sliding experiments with modified heads and carbon-coated magnetic rigid disks and microscopy observations demonstrated that significant enhancement of the friction and wear characteristics can be achieved with the present surface modification technique. The possible reasons for the improved tribological behavior and the predominant mechanisms during contact start-stop and continuous sliding are interpreted in light of the obtained experimental results.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    ISSN: 1089-7550
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics
    Notes: Diamond nucleation on unscratched silicon substrates was investigated using a conventional microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition system. Silicon substrates were coated with thin films of amorphous carbon using a vacuum arc technique. The carbon-coated silicon substrates were pretreated with a methane-rich plasma at relatively low temperatures and were subsequently exposed to the diamond nucleation conditions. The significance of the pretreatment on the diamond nucleation density was examined by varying the methane concentration, chamber pressure, and exposure time. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated that densely packed spherical nanoparticles on the pretreated surfaces played the role of diamond nucleation seeds. Raman spectroscopy analysis showed that the nucleation seeds consisted of nonhydrogenated carbon and that their structure was influenced by the pretreatment conditions. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the nucleation seeds comprised disordered graphitic carbon and ultrafine diamond crystallites. Submicrometer films of good quality diamond possessing significantly higher nucleation densities (∼5×1010 cm−2) were grown from nanoparticles produced under optimum pretreatment conditions. The enhancement of the diamond nucleation density is mainly attributed to the formation of a large number of nanoparticles, which provided sufficient high-surface free-energy sites for diamond nucleation, in conjunction with their high etching resistance to atomic hydrogen stemming from the significant percentage of sp3 atomic carbon configurations, as evidenced by the presence of nanocrystalline diamond in the nanoparticle structure. © 1996 American Institute of Physics.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...