Publication Date:
2015-11-26
Description:
ABSTRACT A between-groups experimental design examined public acceptance for managed aquifer recharge of stormwater for indirect potable and non-potable reuse; acceptance was based on five policy-related variables (fairness, effectiveness, trust, importance of safety assurances, and importance of communication activities). Results showed that public acceptance (N = 408) for managed aquifer recharge of stormwater was higher for non-potable applications, as was the importance of safety assurances. Analyses of variance also showed that perceptions of fairness and effectiveness were higher for a non-potable scheme, but not trust. A three-step hierarchical regression (Step 1: age, gender, education, income; Step 2: type of use; Step 3: fairness, effectiveness, trust, safety assurance, communication activities) demonstrated that type of stormwater use and the policy related factors accounted for 73% of the variance in acceptance of stormwater ( R 2 = .74, adjusted R 2 = .74, F (10, 397) = 113.919, p 〈 .001). Age, type of use and three of the five policy-related factors were also significant individual predictors of acceptance. The most important predictors were perceptions of trust in water authorities, perceptions of effectiveness, and perceptions of fairness. Interestingly, while safety assurance was important in attitudinal acceptance of managed aquifer recharge based on type of use, safety assurance was not found to be significant predictor of acceptance. This research suggests that policy-makers should look to address matters of greater public importance and drive such as fairness, trust and effectiveness of stormwater programs and advocate these at the forefront of their policies, rather than solely on education campaigns. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN:
0043-1397
Electronic ISSN:
1944-7973
Topics:
Architecture, Civil Engineering, Surveying
,
Geography
