ALBERT

Description: In the context of climate change, both climate researchers and decision-makers deal with uncertainties, but these uncertainties differ in fundamental ways. They stem from different sources, cover different temporal and spatial scales, might or might not be reducible or quantifiable, and are generally difficult to characterize and communicate. Hence, for adaptation strategies and planning to progress, mutual understanding between current and future climate researchers and decision-makers needs to evolve. Iterative two-way dialogue can help to improve the decision-making process and bridge current top-down and bottom-up approaches. One way to cultivate such interactions is by providing venues for these actors to interact and exchange about the uncertainties they face. We use a workshop-seminar series including academic researchers, students, and decision-makers as an opportunity to put this idea into practice and evaluate it. Seminars, case studies and a round table allowed participants to reflect upon and experiment with uncertainties. An opinion survey conducted before and after the workshop-seminar series allowed us to qualitatively evaluate its influence on the participants. We find that the event stimulated new perspectives on communication processes and research priorities, and suggest that similar events may ultimately contribute to the mid-term goal of improving support for decision-making in a changing climate. Therefore, we recommend integrating interdisciplinary bridging events into university curriculum with the goal of exposing researchers, decision-makers and students to these concepts.