ALBERT

Description: Line chill-down is an important process in cryogenic tank propellant management, storage, and usage Complex flow dynamics during these processes: boiling heat transfer (film, transition, and nucleate) Understanding boiling phenomena can lead to efficient line chill-down systems that use less propellant, propellant stored, reducing cost for space missions Line Chill-down heat transfer was modelled using SINDA/FLUINT version 5.8 (SF) Multiple chill-down tests were modelled using: heat transfer correlations readily available in SF using HTN/HTC TIES heat transfer empiricisms developed by the University of Florida (UF) based on a series of liquid nitrogen chill-down tests using SF HTU TIES Chill-down tests modelled: liquid nitrogen tests conducted by the University of Florida horizontal flow, upward flow, and downward flow (Reynolds Numbers ranging 850-231,000)liquid hydrogen tests conducted by NASA Glenn Research Center vertical upward flow (Reynolds Number range of 18,400 - 433,000)The flow rate was measured far downstream of the test section, near the system exit. Where to set the flow rate? SF was highly sensitive, and sometime unstable, setting the test flow rate downstream (the outlet) of the test section model and setting the test pressure upstream (the inlet) of the test section model higher flow rate oscillations at the entrance of the model's test section SF was more stable setting the test flow rate upstream (than the downstream flow rate set case)test pressure was used as an inlet (SF plenum) to set the thermodynamic state (temperature and quality) coming into the system setting the appropriate downstream pressure was the unknown. The pressure drops predicted by SF for the downstream set flow rate boundary condition were much smaller than test section measured pressure drops. The multiphase pressure drop correlations used internally in SF may need to be adjusted. Models with an upstream flow rate set assumed a pressure drop that was small