Publication Date:
2005-12-24
Description:
Carbon sequestration strategies highlight tree plantations without considering their full environmental consequences. We combined field research, synthesis of more than 600 observations, and climate and economic modeling to document substantial losses in stream flow, and increased soil salinization and acidification, with afforestation. Plantations decreased stream flow by 227 millimeters per year globally (52%), with 13% of streams drying completely for at least 1 year. Regional modeling of U.S. plantation scenarios suggests that climate feedbacks are unlikely to offset such water losses and could exacerbate them. Plantations can help control groundwater recharge and upwelling but reduce stream flow and salinize and acidify some soils.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Jackson, Robert B -- Jobbagy, Esteban G -- Avissar, Roni -- Roy, Somnath Baidya -- Barrett, Damian J -- Cook, Charles W -- Farley, Kathleen A -- le Maitre, David C -- McCarl, Bruce A -- Murray, Brian C -- New York, N.Y. -- Science. 2005 Dec 23;310(5756):1944-7.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Author address: 〈/span〉Department of Biology, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, and Center on Global Change, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-1000, USA. jackson@duke.edu〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16373572" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
Keywords:
Carbon/*metabolism
;
Climate
;
Conservation of Natural Resources
;
Ecosystem
;
*Environment
;
Rivers
;
Soil
;
Trees/*metabolism
;
Water/*metabolism
Print ISSN:
0036-8075
Electronic ISSN:
1095-9203
Topics:
Biology
,
Chemistry and Pharmacology
,
Computer Science
,
Medicine
,
Natural Sciences in General
,
Physics
