ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Articles  (5)
  • Taxonomy
  • BioMed Central  (2)
  • Wiley-Blackwell  (2)
  • Instituto de Oceanología  (1)
  • American Chemical Society
  • Nature Publishing Group
  • 2020-2023
  • 2010-2014  (3)
  • 1990-1994  (2)
  • 1945-1949
Collection
  • Articles  (5)
Years
  • 2020-2023
  • 2010-2014  (3)
  • 1990-1994  (2)
  • 1945-1949
  • 1995-1999  (4)
Year
Topic
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    New York, NY [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell
    Molecular Reproduction and Development 30 (1991), S. 232-240 
    ISSN: 1040-452X
    Keywords: Endangered species ; Normal sperm ; Taxonomy ; Life and Medical Sciences ; Cell & Developmental Biology
    Source: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Sperm were obtained via electro-ejaculation from Domestic ferret, (Mustela putorius furo), Siberian ferret (M. eversmanni), Black-footed ferret (M. nigripes), and a hybrid between Siberian and Domestic, called the Fitch ferret (M. sp.). Comparisons of sperm were made by four different microscopy techniques to determine whether differences exist among species. First, Nomarski differential interference microscopy could be used to distinguish domestic ferret sperm from the others on the basis of the structure of the posterior part of the acrosome. Second, both silver staining, which demonstrates argentophilic protein distribution, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), revealed differences among the morphology of sperm for each species; variation in the unique appearance of the acrosome in ferret sperm was detected especially well by SEM. To quantify differences in morphology, five sperm head parameters were measured using image analysis; light microscopy produced significantly larger values than did SEM (all parameters and all species but Fitch), and there were significant differences owing to species for all parameters but one. Generally, our data demonstrate the value of complementary techniques to distinguish among sperm of closely related species and more specifically may help establish evolutionary relationships among the ferret species studied. In addition, they provide baseline data important for the captive breeding of the endangered Black-footed ferret.
    Additional Material: 5 Ill.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    New York, NY [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell
    Molecular Reproduction and Development 25 (1990), S. 263-271 
    ISSN: 1040-452X
    Keywords: Spermatozoa ; Acrosome ; Taxonomy ; Morphology ; Archaeogastropoda ; Life and Medical Sciences ; Cell & Developmental Biology
    Source: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Sperm of Oxystele are of the primitive type, which is typical of molluscs using external fertilization. They comprise a head, which is composed of a barrel-shaped nucleus and large conical acrosome; a midpiece of five or six spherical mitochondria; and a tail, with a 9 + 2 arrangement of microtubules. The morphology of the sperm broadly resembles that of the sperm of other trochids as well as that of the sperm of the Pleurotomariidae, Haliotidae, and Fissurellidae but differs considerably from that of the Patellidae. Each of the five species examined was found to have a different sperm morphology. Our results support the suggestion of Heller and Dempster (in preparation) that Oxystele variegata Anton actually consists of two sympatric species. The morphological changes that occur during spermatogenesis are very similar in all species and resemble descriptions given for other molluscs with primitive sperm.
    Additional Material: 14 Ill.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2021-05-19
    Description: Se presenta la lista actualizada de los hidrozoos tecados de Cuba (Leptothecatae), su distribución horizontal y una clave de identificación de las familias señaladas. Este grupo es el mejor representado dentro de la fauna de hidrozoos cubanos y constituye el 64% del total conocido para Cuba. Está compuesto por 11 familias, 34 géneros y 72 especies. De ellos, 36% está presente en el Mar Caribe, 30 % en el Océano Atlántico, 12,24% en el océano Pacífico, 7,2 % están citados para el Mar Mediterráneo y 5% son cosmopolitas. En la actualidad la fauna de hidrozoos tecados cubanos es conocida principalmente en la Región Occidental del país y un 13,5 % fue colectada entre 0 y 50 m.
    Description: This work shows the check list of thecatae hydrozoa with polyp known phase of Cuba (Leptothecate), its horizontal distribution and one identification key of the thecatae families known these days. This group is the best represented of cuban hydroids fauna of shallow waters. They are the 64 % of all known hydroids of Cuba and are composted by 11 families, 34 genera and 72 species. The 36% it is present in the Caribbean Sea, the 30 % are confined to the Atlántic Ocean, the 12,24 % are in the Pacific Ocean, the 7,2 % are registered for the Mediterránean Sea and the 5% are cosmopolitans. At present the Tecate fauna of Cuba is known mainly from the Western part of the Country and 13, 5 % are collected between 0 to 50 m.
    Description: Published
    Description: Hidrozoos, Leptothecatae, pólipo, Hydrozoas, Leptothecatae, polyp.
    Keywords: Taxonomy ; Taxonomy
    Repository Name: AquaDocs
    Type: Journal Contribution
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2022-05-25
    Description: © The Author(s), 2013. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in BMC Bioinformatics 14 (2013): 16, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-16.
    Description: The digitization of biodiversity data is leading to the widespread application of taxon names that are superfluous, ambiguous or incorrect, resulting in mismatched records and inflated species numbers. The ultimate consequences of misspelled names and bad taxonomy are erroneous scientific conclusions and faulty policy decisions. The lack of tools for correcting this ‘names problem’ has become a fundamental obstacle to integrating disparate data sources and advancing the progress of biodiversity science. The TNRS, or Taxonomic Name Resolution Service, is an online application for automated and user-supervised standardization of plant scientific names. The TNRS builds upon and extends existing open-source applications for name parsing and fuzzy matching. Names are standardized against multiple reference taxonomies, including the Missouri Botanical Garden's Tropicos database. Capable of processing thousands of names in a single operation, the TNRS parses and corrects misspelled names and authorities, standardizes variant spellings, and converts nomenclatural synonyms to accepted names. Family names can be included to increase match accuracy and resolve many types of homonyms. Partial matching of higher taxa combined with extraction of annotations, accession numbers and morphospecies allows the TNRS to standardize taxonomy across a broad range of active and legacy datasets. We show how the TNRS can resolve many forms of taxonomic semantic heterogeneity, correct spelling errors and eliminate spurious names. As a result, the TNRS can aid the integration of disparate biological datasets. Although the TNRS was developed to aid in standardizing plant names, its underlying algorithms and design can be extended to all organisms and nomenclatural codes. The TNRS is accessible via a web interface at http://tnrs.iplantcollaborative.org/ webcite and as a RESTful web service and application programming interface. Source code is available at https://github.com/iPlantCollaborativeOpenSource/TNRS/ webcite.
    Description: BJE was supported by NSF grant DBI 0850373 and TR by CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Australia,. BB and BJE acknowledge early financial support from Conservation International and TEAM who funded the development of early prototypes of taxonomic name resolution. The iPlant Collaborative (http://www.iplantcollaborative.org) is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (#DBI-0735191).
    Keywords: Biodiversity informatics ; Database integration ; Taxonomy ; Plants
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Format: application/pdf
    Format: application/vnd.ms-excel
    Format: text/csv
    Format: text/plain
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: © The Author(s), 2014. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in BMC Research Notes 7 (2014): 79, doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-79.
    Description: As biological disciplines extend into the ‘big data’ world, they will need a names-based infrastructure to index and interconnect distributed data. The infrastructure must have access to all names of all organisms if it is to manage all information. Those who compile lists of species hold different views as to the intellectual property rights that apply to the lists. This creates uncertainty that impedes the development of a much-needed infrastructure for sharing biological data in the digital world. The laws in the United States of America and European Union are consistent with the position that scientific names of organisms and their compilation in checklists, classifications or taxonomic revisions are not subject to copyright. Compilations of names, such as classifications or checklists, are not creative in the sense of copyright law. Many content providers desire credit for their efforts. A ‘blue list’ identifies elements of checklists, classifications and monographs to which intellectual property rights do not apply. To promote sharing, authors of taxonomic content, compilers, intermediaries, and aggregators should receive citable recognition for their contributions, with the greatest recognition being given to the originating authors. Mechanisms for achieving this are discussed.
    Keywords: Scientific names ; Taxonomy ; Copyright ; Intellectual property rights ; Name-based infrastructure ; Big data
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...