ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Taxonomy  (3)
  • BioMed Central  (2)
  • Instituto de Oceanología  (1)
  • American Institute of Physics (AIP)
  • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
  • 2010-2014  (3)
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: © The Author(s), 2014. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in BMC Research Notes 7 (2014): 79, doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-79.
    Description: As biological disciplines extend into the ‘big data’ world, they will need a names-based infrastructure to index and interconnect distributed data. The infrastructure must have access to all names of all organisms if it is to manage all information. Those who compile lists of species hold different views as to the intellectual property rights that apply to the lists. This creates uncertainty that impedes the development of a much-needed infrastructure for sharing biological data in the digital world. The laws in the United States of America and European Union are consistent with the position that scientific names of organisms and their compilation in checklists, classifications or taxonomic revisions are not subject to copyright. Compilations of names, such as classifications or checklists, are not creative in the sense of copyright law. Many content providers desire credit for their efforts. A ‘blue list’ identifies elements of checklists, classifications and monographs to which intellectual property rights do not apply. To promote sharing, authors of taxonomic content, compilers, intermediaries, and aggregators should receive citable recognition for their contributions, with the greatest recognition being given to the originating authors. Mechanisms for achieving this are discussed.
    Keywords: Scientific names ; Taxonomy ; Copyright ; Intellectual property rights ; Name-based infrastructure ; Big data
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2022-05-25
    Description: © The Author(s), 2013. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in BMC Bioinformatics 14 (2013): 16, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-16.
    Description: The digitization of biodiversity data is leading to the widespread application of taxon names that are superfluous, ambiguous or incorrect, resulting in mismatched records and inflated species numbers. The ultimate consequences of misspelled names and bad taxonomy are erroneous scientific conclusions and faulty policy decisions. The lack of tools for correcting this ‘names problem’ has become a fundamental obstacle to integrating disparate data sources and advancing the progress of biodiversity science. The TNRS, or Taxonomic Name Resolution Service, is an online application for automated and user-supervised standardization of plant scientific names. The TNRS builds upon and extends existing open-source applications for name parsing and fuzzy matching. Names are standardized against multiple reference taxonomies, including the Missouri Botanical Garden's Tropicos database. Capable of processing thousands of names in a single operation, the TNRS parses and corrects misspelled names and authorities, standardizes variant spellings, and converts nomenclatural synonyms to accepted names. Family names can be included to increase match accuracy and resolve many types of homonyms. Partial matching of higher taxa combined with extraction of annotations, accession numbers and morphospecies allows the TNRS to standardize taxonomy across a broad range of active and legacy datasets. We show how the TNRS can resolve many forms of taxonomic semantic heterogeneity, correct spelling errors and eliminate spurious names. As a result, the TNRS can aid the integration of disparate biological datasets. Although the TNRS was developed to aid in standardizing plant names, its underlying algorithms and design can be extended to all organisms and nomenclatural codes. The TNRS is accessible via a web interface at http://tnrs.iplantcollaborative.org/ webcite and as a RESTful web service and application programming interface. Source code is available at https://github.com/iPlantCollaborativeOpenSource/TNRS/ webcite.
    Description: BJE was supported by NSF grant DBI 0850373 and TR by CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Australia,. BB and BJE acknowledge early financial support from Conservation International and TEAM who funded the development of early prototypes of taxonomic name resolution. The iPlant Collaborative (http://www.iplantcollaborative.org) is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (#DBI-0735191).
    Keywords: Biodiversity informatics ; Database integration ; Taxonomy ; Plants
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Format: application/pdf
    Format: application/vnd.ms-excel
    Format: text/csv
    Format: text/plain
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2021-05-19
    Description: Se presenta la lista actualizada de los hidrozoos tecados de Cuba (Leptothecatae), su distribución horizontal y una clave de identificación de las familias señaladas. Este grupo es el mejor representado dentro de la fauna de hidrozoos cubanos y constituye el 64% del total conocido para Cuba. Está compuesto por 11 familias, 34 géneros y 72 especies. De ellos, 36% está presente en el Mar Caribe, 30 % en el Océano Atlántico, 12,24% en el océano Pacífico, 7,2 % están citados para el Mar Mediterráneo y 5% son cosmopolitas. En la actualidad la fauna de hidrozoos tecados cubanos es conocida principalmente en la Región Occidental del país y un 13,5 % fue colectada entre 0 y 50 m.
    Description: This work shows the check list of thecatae hydrozoa with polyp known phase of Cuba (Leptothecate), its horizontal distribution and one identification key of the thecatae families known these days. This group is the best represented of cuban hydroids fauna of shallow waters. They are the 64 % of all known hydroids of Cuba and are composted by 11 families, 34 genera and 72 species. The 36% it is present in the Caribbean Sea, the 30 % are confined to the Atlántic Ocean, the 12,24 % are in the Pacific Ocean, the 7,2 % are registered for the Mediterránean Sea and the 5% are cosmopolitans. At present the Tecate fauna of Cuba is known mainly from the Western part of the Country and 13, 5 % are collected between 0 to 50 m.
    Description: Published
    Description: Hidrozoos, Leptothecatae, pólipo, Hydrozoas, Leptothecatae, polyp.
    Keywords: Taxonomy ; Taxonomy
    Repository Name: AquaDocs
    Type: Journal Contribution
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...