ALBERT

Description: Background Ixazomib is the first oral proteasome inhibitor to be investigated clinically for the treatment of MM. Phase 1 studies have shown single-agent activity and manageable toxicities in RRMM (Kumar et al. Blood 2014) and phase 1/2 studies have suggested the feasibility and activity of weekly oral ixazomib plus Rd in previously untreated MM (Kumar et al. ASH 2012; Richardson et al. ASH 2013). These findings have led to ongoing phase 3 trials of weekly ixazomib 4 mg + Rd in RRMM and previously untreated MM. However, the early-phase studies were conducted in Western pts. This phase 1, open-label multicenter study aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of weekly ixazomib alone or with Rd in Japanese pts with RRMM (Japic Clinical Trials Information no. 121822). Methods Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs), and the PK of ixazomib alone or with Rd. A secondary objective was evaluation of antitumor activity. Japanese pts aged ≥20 years with RRMM who had received at least 2 prior regimens, which must have included bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide, and corticosteroids, were eligible. All had measurable disease and ECOG performance status of 0–2. Pts with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or grade ≥2 diarrhea at study entry were excluded. Pts received ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles, alone or with Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1–21, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22), per the regimen used in the ongoing phase 3 trials. AEs were graded per NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Blood samples for PK analysis were taken at multiple time points prior to and after dosing on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1. Responses were assessed per IMWG uniform response criteria. Results Fourteen pts were enrolled; 8 (57%) were male, median age was 62.5 yrs (range 53–71), 4 pts were aged ≥65 yrs, median number of prior therapies was 7. Seven pts received single-agent ixazomib and 7 received ixazomib + Rd. One pt in each cohort was excluded from the DLT-evaluable population. Two patients experienced DLTs in cycle 1: 1 pt receiving single-agent ixazomib had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea, hypertension, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and nausea; 1 pt in the ixazomib + Rd cohort had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. All events were considered treatment-related. At data cut-off (Jan 6 2014), 6 pts remained on treatment and 8 had discontinued due to: progressive disease (PD; n=3), AEs (n=3), symptomatic deterioration, and protocol violation (each n=1). At data cut-off, pts (n=14) had received a median of 6 cycles of ixazomib (range 1–21); the 7 pts in the ixazomib + Rd cohort had received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–12) of ixazomib + Rd. Thirteen (93%) pts experienced treatment-related AEs; the most common were neutropenia (71%), thrombocytopenia (71%), leukopenia (64%), lymphopenia (57%), and diarrhea (50%). There were no cases of peripheral neuropathy. Nine (64%) pts had grade ≥3 AEs; the most common were lymphopenia (50%), neutropenia (43%), and thrombocytopenia (36%). Two (14%) pts (single-agent cohort) had serious AEs (grade 2 bronchitis in 1 pt, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 hypokalemia in 1 pt). Three pts discontinued due to AEs; 1 due to diarrhea in the single-agent cohort, and 1 due to neutropenia and 1 due to thrombocytopenia in the ixazomib + Rd cohort. There were no deaths. PK data showed ixazomib was rapidly absorbed with a Tmax at 1.08–1.83 hrs. Terminal half-life (geometric mean) was 5.7 days for single-agent ixazomib and 5.2 days for ixazomib + Rd. There were no substantial differences in the ixazomib PK profile between the two cohorts. Thirteen pts were response-evaluable. One pt (ixazomib + Rd cohort) had a partial response; at data cut-off, this pt remained in response with a 100% M-protein reduction (unconfirmed VGPR) and duration of response of ~10.8 months. Seven pts had stable disease (including 3 with M-protein reductions of 25–50%), 2 had PD, and 3 were not assessable. Conclusions These data suggest that ixazomib 4 mg alone or with Rd is feasible and tolerable in Japanese pts with RRMM. The AEs were manageable, reflecting the AE profile seen in Western populations, supporting the use of this dose and schedule in Japanese pts. Disclosures Handa: Celgene: Research Funding; Yakult: Research Funding; Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Investigational agent ixazomib for the treatment of Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.. Matsushima:Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited : Employment.

Description: Myeloma (MM) cells grow and expand almost exclusively in the bone marrow while creating a cellular microenvironment suitable for MM cell growth and survival (MM niche). In pursuing the molecular mechanisms whereby MM cells gain drug resistance in the “MM niche”, we have found that the serine/threonine kinase Pim-2 is constitutively over-expressed in MM cells, and further up-regulated by co-cultures with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) as well as osteoclasts (Leukemia, 2011), and that Pim-2 is an important therapeutic target in MM for the progression of MM tumor and bone disease (Leukemia, 2014). The ABC transporter BCRP is preferentially expressed in drug resistant MM cells as well as in MM progenitors or stem cells. BCRP has been demonstrated to be phosphorylated by Pim kinases to trigger its dimerization and function; Pim inhibition may suppress the BCRP function to sensitize BCRP-expressing MM cells to chemotherapeutic agents. In the present study we therefore explored whether Pim inhibition is able to target and impair BCRP-expressing drug-resistant MM cells and MM progenitors. We analyzed an ABC transporter activity in BCRP-expressing RPMI8226 and KMS11 cells by intracellular accumulation and retention of BCRP substrates with auto-fluorescence emission, mitoxantrone and doxorubicin, in flow cytometry. Treatment with Pim inhibitors, SMI-16a or SMI-4a, increased the incorporation of these drugs into the MM cells and enhanced their subsequent intracellular retention after 6-hour incubation without these drugs, although BCRP expression on their surface was only marginally affected by the Pim inhibition. Interestingly, acidic conditions up-regulated Pim-2 expression while reducing the accumulation and retention of these drugs in BCRP-expressing RPMI8226 and KMS11 cells. However, the Pim inhibitors efficaciously restored the drug accumulation and retention reduced by extracellular acidification, and enhanced the cytotoxic activity of the BCRP substrate doxorubicin against RPMI8226 cells rather preferentially in acidic conditions. Furthermore, the Pim inhibition minimized the sizes of “side populations”, highly drug-resistant fractions with enhanced BCRP activity, and the ability of colony formation in RPMI8226 and KMS11 cells, which was more marked in acidic conditions. We previously demonstrated the in vivo effects of the Pim inhibitors in human INA-6 cell-bearing SCID-rab MM models and syngeneic mouse MM models with an intra-tibial inoculation of 5TGM1 MM cells (Leukemia, 2014). To further examine the acid-tropism of anti-tumorigenic activity of Pim inhibition, we pretreated murine 5TGM1 MM cells in vitro with or without SMI16a at pH6.8 for 24 hours, and transplanted to the tibiae in mice the same numbers of viable MM cells remaining in each treatment group. Treatment with SMI16a at pH6.8 almost completely abrogated in vivo tumorigenic capacity of 5TGM1 cells, while MM cells without the treatment rapidly grew and expanded in and outside of the tibiae, suggesting targeting clonogenic MM cells by Pim inhibition preferentially in acidic conditions. Taken together, Pim-2 may become an important therapeutic target of drug-resistant BCRP-expressing MM cells and their progenitors which appear to gain more drug resistance in acidic bone lesions. Combinatory treatment with Pim inhibitors warrants further study to overcome drug resistance in MM cells, including their tumorigenic cancer stem cells. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a devastating bone marrow (BM) cancer characterized by clonal proliferation of plasma cells. Despite the emergence of novel therapeutics MM remains a fatal disease. The tumor microenvironment plays a critical role in promoting MM growth. We have recently demonstrated that a population of BM myeloid-derived suppressor cells is involved in regulation of MM progression. These cells abundantly produce the pro-inflammatory protein S100A9. Tasquinimod (ABR-215050, Active Biotech/IPSEN) is a quinoline-3-carboxamide derivative that binds to S100A9 and blocks its interaction with receptors TLR4, RAGE, and CD147. Here we investigated whether pharmacological inhibition of S100A9 with tasquinimod inhibits MM progression. A panel of MM murine (DP42) and human (RPMI-8226, H929, and U266) cell lines was cultured in the presence of tasquinimod or vehicle control and cell viability was determined using MTT assay. Treatment with tasquinimod did not affect MM cell viability. We then evaluated the anti-tumor effect of tasquinimod in vivo in a MM syngeneic model. In this model, murine MM DP42 cells are injected i.v., home to the BM, and grow as MM that closely resembles the human disease. On day 2 after tumor cell injection mice were randomly assigned to the treatment or control groups. Treatment group received tasquinimod at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day in drinking water for 28 days. We found that tasquinimod significantly improved survival of MM-bearing mice (p

Description: Introduction: Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and measurement of total immunoglobulins (total Ig) are standard techniques for the identification and quantification of monoclonal immunoglobulins (M-Ig). Heavy/light chain (HLC) pair analysis allows discrimination between Igκ and Igλ and as a result allows measurement of both the monoclonal involved and polyclonal uninvolved HLC pair. We compared measurement of M-Ig by CZE and total Ig to HLC levels. Methods: 93 samples from 8 patients with IgA intact immunoglobulin multiple myeloma (MM) were analysed. M-Ig was measured using CZE Sebia Capillarys 2 system, total IgA (tIgA) and IgAκ and IgAλ HLC concentrations on a SPAPLUS analyser. IgA HLC levels were measured with Hevylite® and compared to published normal ranges (IgAκ (g/L): 0.57-2.08, IgAλ (g/L): 0.44-2.04, IgAκ/IgAλ: 0.78-1.94). Passing and Bablok fit analysis was used to determine correlation between the assays. Results: Measurement of the involved HLC pair (iHLC) (median: 12.45g/L; range: 0.64-44.71g/L) compared well with CZE (n=34; median: 11.04g/L; range: 1.24-37.71g/L.; y= 1.2x + -2.65, R2= 0.94). Measurement of iHLC (median: 0.88. range: 0.05-21.55g/L) also compared well with tIgA measurement (n=65 median=1.44g/L; range: 0.227-21.11g/L, y=0.85x + -0.26, R2=0.98). Percent changes in iHLC concentrations from baseline through treatment compared well with CZE (n=28; y=1.59x + 0.15 R2=0.93) and tIgA (n=57; y=1.06x + 0.01, R2=0.96). Of the 34 samples with quantifiable M-protein by CZE, 32(94%) had an abnormal HLC ratio. The two discrepant samples were follow up samples from the same patient, where HLC normalised alongside total IgA entering the normal reference range. In addition, all 15 samples (15/65; 23%) where tIgA concentration was above the normal reference range all had abnormal HLC ratios. M-Ig was not detected by CZE in 48/82 (57%) samples, 46/48 of the samples (96%) had a normalised HLC ratio. In 38/65 (58%) samples, tIgA concentrations were within the normal reference range, and 34 (90%) had a normalised HLC ratio. HLC ratio for all patient samples normalised in subsequent samples following treatment. Conclusion: The measurement of M-Ig is comparable between Hevylite® and both CZE and tIgA. The presented data indicate that Hevylite® is a more sensitive test for detecting residual disease and warrants prospective studies on larger cohorts of patients. Acknowledgments:This work was partially supported by the National Science Fund (D02-35/2009). Disclosures Guenova: Novartis Pharma Sevices Bulgaria: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche Bulgaria: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Bulgaria: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis Bulgaria: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Description: Background We have a poor understanding of the vaccination immune response and outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM). As MM patients (Pts) are living longer and therapies are immunomodulatory there is an unmet medical need to further characterize the role of the immune system. A common reason for hospitalization or death in MM Pts is infection. As an initial step in MM Cancer Care Delivery Research (CCDR), we evaluated the current vaccination practice patterns in MM Pts at Aurora Health Care using the EMR and data analytics. Methods An IRB approved study reviewed MM Pts from 5/15/2012 to 5/15/2014. Data collected included demographics, influenza (FV) and pneumonia vaccination (PV) history, hospitalization episodes, cost associated with hospitalization, and admission and discharge diagnoses. Pts were considered PV positive if vaccinated within 5 years prior to study with any PV type. FV was none (no FV in 2012-2014), optimal [FV in 2012 and (2013 or 2014)], or suboptimal [FV in 2012 or (2013 or 2014)]. Data was analyzed using SAS and STATA 12. Results A total of 1131 MM Pts were identified. Race included 70% white, 13% black, and 17% mixed, other or information not available. MM median age at diagnosis was 71 and only 4% (47) had prior autologous stem cell transplantation. PV rate was 30%. FV was 55% none, 24% suboptimal and 20% optimal. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of PV and FV when stratified vs age, gender, and race. Over two years there were a total of 662 hospitalization events involving 317 MM Pts. The total cost of hospitalization was approx $35M. The average charge per hospitalized patient was $110K (range: $2K -1.3M) with an average $52K per hospitalization encounter (range: 2K – 648K). The rate of PV and FV vaccination among Pts with index hospitalization is significantly higher than non-hospitalized patients. There was no difference in hospitalization cost based on vaccination status. (See Table 1) Discussion Vaccination rates were low and did not correlate with hospital outcomes. This may be explained as a limitation for a retrospective EMR analysis without accounting for temporal relationship of vaccines – i.e. possible vaccination after admission. Alternatively, this may indicate that our current methods of vaccination in MM are not effective. Other limitations include need for a more granular review of treatment regimens and infectious complications. Additional surrogate markers are needed to understand the effect of vaccines and the immune system on health care outcomes such as hospitalizations, cost, and survival. This will be addressed in prospective registries and immunologic studies at our center and may be queried at other health systems. Table 1 – Vaccination Status and Hospitalizations Vaccination Status % Hospitalization Events, % Hospitalization Charge, $ PV – No 70% 20% $16M PV – Yes 30% 52% $18M FV – None 55% 16% $9M FV – Suboptimal 24% 42% $13M FV - Optimal 20% 43% $12M Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: The combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) is still currently regarded as the standard regimen for treatment of physically fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This therapy can be associated with significant toxicity, and patient adherence to the protocol may often be difficult outside of clinical trials. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCR therapy in the real life setting, with particular focus on the influence of dose reduction on treatment outcome. A total of 132 CLL patients (≤70 years of age) treated with FCR as frontline therapy from 10 medical centers, were reviewed. The majority of patients were males (73.5%, n=97) and younger than 60 years (78%, n=103). Eleven patients had Binet stage A (8.3%), 72 (54.5%) were stage B and 49 (37.1%) had Binet stage C. Results of FISH analysis were available for 99 patients, with high risk cytogenetics of del(11q) in 21 patients (21.2%) and del(17p) in 9 cases (9.1%). The majority (56.5%, n=74) received rituximab at a dose of 500mg/m2 and the rest 375mg/m2. Almost half of the patients (49.2%, n=65) were given a reduced dose of chemotherapy (

Description: Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical course. Several studies have been conducted to predict outcome in patients with CLL and also have been going on. A proliferation inducing ligand (APRIL) has been shown to involve in survival and resistance to apoptosis in CLL, and APRIL molecule has been investigated as a prognostic marker in CLL patients. However, there are limited and controversial data regarding APRIL and its impact on prognosis in CLL. We aimed to compare serum APRIL levels in CLL patients with those of age and gender matched healthy subjects, and to investigate the relationship between APRIL and the other common prognostic factors, and to determine whether serum APRIL levels predict time to first treatment in CLL. Methods: After ethical approval and informed consent were obtained, between May and December 2012, venous blood samples were driven from 96 CLL patients’ and 25 healthy controls’, and serum APRIL levels were measured by ELISA. Demographic data and the prognostic markers were obtained from the patients’ files, and patients have been followed for a minimum of 12 months. We tested the correlation between APRIL with the, clinical and biological parameters, and used the log rank test to compare their Kaplan Meier curves. Results: Patients were divided into three groups: Treatment naive (group A, n=49), chemotherapy receiving (group B, n=25) and who had previously received chemotherapy (group C, n=22). Median APRIL level was higher in group A (2.78 vs 1.29; p=0.034) and group C (3.54 vs 1.29; p=0.001) when compared to healthy controls, but was not different in group B (1.56 vs 1.29; p=0.3) (Figure 1). Serum APRIL level in group A was negatively correlated with hemoglobin levels (r=-0.298; p=0.037) and platelet counts (r=-0.321; p=0.025) whereas no correlation with age, Rai and Binet stages, lymphocyte counts, β2-microglobulin and CD38 levels were detected. Group A patients were also divided into 2 subgroups (APRIL levels low, n=20 and APRIL levels high, n=29) using median natural logarithm of serum APRIL level as cut off. April low and high subgroups were similar with respect to demographic data and prognostic factors. Median time to first treatment was not reached in the APRIL low group, but was 104 months in the APRIL high group (p=0.13, log-rank test). Conclusions: Among the treatment naive patients, serum APRIL levels only negatively correlate with hemoglobin levels and platelet counts. These correlations seem to be associated with tumor burden rather than the prognosis, because APRIL levels were not different in chemotherapy receiving patients compared to healthy controls. Since a median survival time could not be reached in the APRIL low group, short follow up time might be an explanation why the APRIL levels did not predict the time to first treatment. In conclusion, our findings let us to think APRIL levels are not a useful marker to predict prognosis in patients with CLL. Figure 1. Median APRIL levels of CLL patients and healthy controls (ng/mL) Figure 1. Median APRIL levels of CLL patients and healthy controls (ng/mL) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Bendamustine has been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of CLL, either alone compared with chlorambucil (Knauf et al, JCO 2009 and BJH 2012) or in combination with monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab both in second or more lines (Fischer et al, JCO 2011) and in first line treatment (Fischer et al, JCO 2012). However, the relationship between its activity with clinical and biological prognosticators has been addressed only in few studies. For this purpose, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of bendamustine, in a real-life contest, on 56 patients, median age 66 years (41-80), median number of previous regimens 1 (0-3, 32% previously untreated). Bendamustine was given for a median number of 6 cycles (70-90 mg/m2), in 82% of cases with rituximab at conventional doses. Overall (ORR) and complete response (CRR) rates were 73% and 44.6%, respectively. Obviously, CRR was higher (83.3%) for 18 patients treated in first line. A significant correlation was found between lower ORR and lymphocyte doubling time 30%) of alpha-4 integrin CD49d (OR 13.0; P=0.018), an important marker of bad prognosis in CLL (Bulian et al, JCO 2014). On the other hand, no significant correlations were found between ORR and CD38, ZAP-70 or IGHV mutational status. Similarly, no significant correlations were noted between ORR and FISH cytogenetics, excluding del(17)p, or NOTCH1 mutations, thus confirming the independence of response to bendamustine from some well-known important biologic prognostic factors. In fact, multivariate analysis confirmed a significant relationship only between ORR and TP53/del(17)p (OR 0.020; P=0.0015) and concomitant rituximab (OR 0.019; P=0.0074). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS were 57% and 86%, respectively. Side effects included grade 3-4 neutropenia, infections, thrombocytopenia and anemia which occurred in 21%, 12%, 12% and 5% of patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity, including infusion-related reactions, heart or kidney or liver failure were found almost exclusively in elderly patients treated with bendamustine after two or more lines of therapy (12.5%). In multivariate analisys of OS, calculated from the end of treatment with bendamustine, only response to bendamustine (P=0.008) was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor, while both the number of previous therapies and the concomitant use of rituximab demonstrated no statistical significance. These our results confirm both the activity and safety of bendamustine, particularly in combination with rituximab, also in the setting of elderly patients, often affected by two or three comorbidities. Noteworthy, this effectiveness appears to be present also in patients with unfavorable clinical and biological features, excluding del(17)p or TP53 mutations, in which the employment either of modern oral BCR inhibitors or of BH3 mimetics anti-Bcl-2 will be definitely active, also in combination with the same bendamustine. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: BACKGROUND: Chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been the standard of care for initial treatment. A randomized demonstrated both a progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) advantage when rituximab was added to fludarabine (F) and cyclophosphamide (C). Alemtuzumab (Campath) (CAM), an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, is an effective therapy for patients with both previously untreated and relapsed CLL. Its role in combination with chemotherapy is less certain. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter phase II clinical trial of FC followed by subcutaneous CAM in previously untreated CLL. Patients were eligible if they met standard criteria for initiating therapy, or if they were asymptomatic with the prognostically adverse immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) gene unmutated status. Patients received fludarabine (25 mg/m2/day, days 1-3) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2/day, days 1-3) every 28 days for six treatment cycles, followed by a 3-8 week rest period. Disease response was assessed, including minimal residual disease (MRD) status by sensitive flow cytometry in those in complete remission (CR). Patients who achieved less than a CR were eligible to receive standard dose CAM (30 mg thrice weekly for 12 weeks); those who were in CR but MRD positive could receive reduced dose CAM (30 mg weekly for 12 weeks). The primary outcome was duration of response (DOR). Secondary outcomes included the response rates after FC and after the addition of CAM, as well as the safety profile of the regimen. RESULTS: We enrolled 25 patients from November 2004 to June 2007 at 3 centers. The median age of the participants was 62 years (range 42-75). Detailed information was available for 17 patients pre-treatment: high risk Rai stage in 9, IGHV unmutated in 9 including 4 patients who were IGHV unmutated as their indication for treatment. Five patients had trisomy 12, 4 had 13q deletion, 1 each had 17p deletion and 11q deletion, and 6 had no abnormality. One patient was excluded from the analysis due to a diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma after eligibility review. Four patients had no response evaluation and were considered treatment failures. Seventeen (71%) patients had a CR after 6 cycles of FC, including 11 who were MRD negative, one had a partial response (PR), and two had progressive disease (PD). Four of the 6 patients who were MRD positive received CAM after FC. Two required only a single dose to become MRD negative, and 2 received 12 weekly doses. One of these patients became MRD negative. The median DOR for those achieving CR was 38 months (range 12-105 months). There were no treatment related deaths. Five patients experienced a SAE including one with febrile neutropenia, two with pneumonia, and two with autoimmune hemolytic anemia. There were ten additional treatment emergent adverse events including two that were grade 3 (mucositis and fever) and one CMV reactivation while receiving CAM. Two patients developed treatment related myelodysplasia, one died and the other underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant. There were two deaths due to Richter’s transformation. During long term follow up, there have been five additional deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The CR rate after FC was higher than that reported in prior trials of previously untreated patients and the incidence of MRD negative CR was surprisingly high. The DOR was consistent with prior experience with FC. Too few patients received CAM to draw any conclusions about its role as a consolidative therapy given subcutaneously on a weekly schedule. Both the FC and CAM therapies were well tolerated, with few adverse events associated with their use. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Background Many studies have examined the disparities in cancer diagnosis, treatment and survival among different subgroups classified based on race, socioeconomic status and age. Not as many studies have examined disease characteristics in rural populations, perhaps because of the lack of a consensus in the United States regarding the definition of "rural". In these few studies, many disparities were reported in association with rural residence such as lower levels of utilization of cancer screening tests, lower likelihood of receiving guideline-appropriate therapy and shorter survival. Objectives To examine multiple myeloma disease characteristics and survival in rural patients of southern New Mexico in comparison to their urban counterparts. Methods Patients presented to Memorial Medical Center (MMC) and its associated cancer center from January 2003 to December 2013 with multiple myeloma were enrolled in the study. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The charts were also examined for evidence of offering or discussing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) as a treatment option with patients, and whether it was actually performed. Patient staging at diagnosis according to International Staging System (ISS) for myeloma was determined, if possible. Urban vs. rural classification was based on the Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes (RUCA) version 2.0; a census tract-based classification scheme that utilizes the standard bureau of census urban definition in combination with work commuting information. Categorization D of RUCA was chosen. It defines urban as all places that have 30% or more of their workers going to a Census Bureau-defined Urbanized Area. Results A total of 87 patients were initially enrolled in the study. Four patients were excluded because sufficient evidence to establish the diagnosis could not be verified. Two additional patients who had solitary plasmacytoma with no evidence of systemic involvement were excluded as well. Patients were classified based on their residence at the time of diagnosis as rural (29 patients) and non-rural (52 patients). There was no difference between the mean age at diagnosis between the two groups with mean being 66.20 for non-rural group and 67.77 for the rural group. The type of heavy chain protein was generally similar for both groups with 55.74 % of patients diagnosed with Immunoglobulin G heavy chain disease. The average duration of initial presenting symptom prior to diagnosis was 7.36 weeks for the whole sample, 13.6 week for the rural group, and 4.56 weeks for the non rural group, which suggests that non-rural patients were more likely to seek medical attention sooner than their rural counterparts (p=0.0037). Tobacco consumption was higher among patients in the rural group compared to non-rural group. Nearly half (47.37%) of rural patients were diagnosed at stage 3 according to ISS staging system, while only 31.03% of non-rural patients were diagnosed at the same stage. Rural patients were more likely to be diagnosed at a more advanced disease stage (p=0.063). The nature of the chief presenting problem was generally similar in both groups with the exception of the higher likelihood of patients in non-rural group to be diagnosed at an asymptomatic stage. In the whole sample, 33.33% of patients had evidence of being offered or educated about ASCT as a treatment option, and 18.52% of patients actually receiving it. There was no different between the two groups in this regard. Median survival time for the whole sample was 57 months. Patients in the rural group had a median survival of 39.03 months (95% CI 18.96- 57.99), while non-rural patients had a median survival of 68.99 months (95% CI 25.95-90.02) ( p