ISSN:
0934-0866
Keywords:
Chemistry
;
Industrial Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Source:
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
Topics:
Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science, Production Engineering, Mining and Metallurgy, Traffic Engineering, Precision Mechanics
,
Process Engineering, Biotechnology, Nutrition Technology
Notes:
The modelless (ML) and micropore (MP) methods for the pore structure analysis of porous particles have been studied. Concerning the ML method, it has been shown that the Kiselev equation can only be used to describe condensation and evaporation in capillaries, but cannot be used to describe the increase and decrease of the thickness of the adsorption layer. Strictly speaking, therefore, the ML method is not modelless even for the pore core size distribution. A comparison between the ML method and methods using an equivalent pore model is given. The results of using the ML method in conjunction with a certain pore model are little less accurate than those obtained by adopting the equivalent pore model straightaway. The parameters required for the calculation of both the pore core size and the pore size distribution as well as the conversion between these two calculations are given.Concerning the MP method, it has been shown that the three types of v-t curves, the theoretical foundation of the MP method, are not in one to one correspondance to the three kinds of adsorption mechanism. From the viewpoint of accuracy, the MP method has no advantage over the methods which are based on the condensation mechanism, both have their own merits.
Additional Material:
6 Ill.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.19860030207
Permalink
