ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2020-2024  (4)
Collection
Publisher
Years
Year
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: Highlights • Inherent & added tracers were tested for CO2 leakage attribution & quantification. • Additionally, CO2 leakage was quantified directly by the inverted funnel-technique. • All tracers except 18O were capable of attributing the CO2 source. • In total, ∼43 % of total injected CO2 leaked across the seabed. To inform cost-effective monitoring of offshore geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2), a unique field experiment, designed to simulate leakage of CO2 from a sub-seafloor storage reservoir, was carried out in the central North Sea. A total of 675 kg of CO2 were released into the shallow sediments (∼3 m below seafloor) for 11 days at flow rates between 6 and 143 kg d-1. A set of natural, inherent tracers (13C, 18O) of injected CO2 and added, non-toxic tracer gases (octafluoropropane, sulfur hexafluoride, krypton, methane) were used to test their applicability for CO2 leakage attribution and quantification in the marine environment. All tracers except 18O were capable of attributing the CO2 source. Tracer analyses indicate that CO2 dissolution in sediment pore waters ranged from 35 % at the lowest injection rate to 41% at the highest injection rate. Direct measurements of gas released from the sediment into the water column suggest that 22 % to 48 % of the injected CO2 exited the seafloor at, respectively, the lowest and the highest injection rate. The remainder of injected CO2 accumulated in gas pockets in the sediment. The methodologies can be used to rapidly confirm the source of leaking CO2 once seabed samples are retrieved.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed , info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: text
    Format: archive
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: Highlights • Approaches for CO2 leakage detection, attribution and quantification monitoring exist. • Many approaches cover multiple monitoring tasks simultaneously. • Sonars and chemical sensors on ships or AUVs can cover large areas. • Newer, more specific technologies can detect, verify and quantify smaller, localised leaks. Environmental monitoring of offshore Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) complexes requires robust methodologies and cost-effective tools to detect, attribute and quantify CO2 leakage in the unlikely event it occurs from a sub-seafloor reservoir. Various approaches can be utilised for environmental CCS monitoring, but their capabilities are often undemonstrated and more detailed monitoring strategies need to be developed. We tested and compared different approaches in an offshore setting using a CO2 release experiment conducted at 120 m water depth in the Central North Sea. Tests were carried out over a range of CO2 injection rates (6 - 143 kg d−1) comparable to emission rates observed from abandoned wells. Here, we discuss the benefits and challenges of the tested approaches and compare their relative cost, temporal and spatial resolution, technology readiness level and sensitivity to leakage. The individual approaches demonstrate a high level of sensitivity and certainty and cover a wide range of operational requirements. Additionally, we refer to a set of generic requirements for site-specific baseline surveys that will aid in the interpretation of the results. Critically, we show that the capability of most techniques to detect and quantify leakage exceeds the currently existing legal requirements.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed , info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: text
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: Highlights • Surface sediments react quickly with leaking CO2 and release cations into porewaters. • Both carbonate and silicate mineral dissolution lead to neutralization of CO2 in the sediments. • During short-term exposure to CO2 no toxic substances were released from North Sea surface sediments. • Porewater composition can be used as a diagnostic indicator of CO2 leakage from storage reservoirs. Abstract Sub-seabed geological CO2 storage is discussed as a climate mitigation strategy, but the impact of any leakage of stored CO2 into the marine environment is not well known. In this study, leakage from a CO2 storage reservoir through near-surface sediments was mimicked for low leakage rates in the North Sea. Field data were combined with laboratory experiments and transport-reaction modelling to estimate CO2 and mineral dissolution rates, and to assess the mobilization of metals in contact with CO2-rich fluids and their potential impact on the environment. We found that carbonate and silicate minerals reacted quickly with the dissolved CO2, increasing porewater alkalinity and neutralizing about 5% of the injected CO2. The release of Ca, Sr, Ba and Mn was mainly controlled by carbonate dissolution, while Fe, Li, B, Mg, and Si were released from silicate minerals, mainly from deeper sediment layers. No toxic metals were released from the sediments and overall the injected CO2 was only detected up to 1 m away from seabed CO2 bubble streams. Our results suggest that low leakage rates of CO2 over short timescales have minimal impact on the benthic environment. However, porewater composition and temperature are effective indicators for leakage detection, even at low CO2 leakage rates.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed , info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: text
    Format: archive
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: Highlights • All known observations for Area of Particular Environmental Interest 6 presented. • Assess morphology, sediments, nodules, oceanography, biogeochemistry and ecology. • APEI-6 partially representative of nearby exploration areas yet clear differences. • Present scientific synthesis and management implications for Clarion Clipperton Zone. To protect the range of habitats, species, and ecosystem functions in the Clarion Clipperton Zone (CCZ), a region of interest for deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining in the Pacific, nine Areas of Particular Environmental Interest (APEIs) have been designated by the International Seabed Authority (ISA). The APEIs are remote, rarely visited and poorly understood. Here we present and synthesise all available observations made at APEI-6, the most north eastern APEI in the network, and assess its representativity of mining contract areas in the eastern CCZ. The two studied regions of APEI-6 have a variable morphology, typical of the CCZ, with hills, plains and occasional seamounts. The seafloor is predominantly covered by fine-grained sediments, and includes small but abundant polymetallic nodules, as well as exposed bedrock. The oceanographic parameters investigated appear broadly similar across the region although some differences in deep-water mass separation were evident between APEI-6 and some contract areas. Sediment biogeochemistry is broadly similar across the area in the parameters investigated, except for oxygen penetration depth, which reached 〉2 m at the study sites within APEI-6, deeper than that found at UK1 and GSR contract areas. The ecology of study sites in APEI-6 differs from that reported from UK1 and TOML-D contract areas, with differences in community composition of microbes, macrofauna, xenophyophores and metazoan megafauna. Some species were shared between areas although connectivity appears limited. We show that, from the available information, APEI-6 is partially representative of the exploration areas to the south yet is distinctly different in several key characteristics. As a result, additional APEIs may be warranted and caution may need to be taken in relying on the APEI network alone for conservation, with other management activities required to help mitigate the impacts of mining in the CCZ.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed , info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: text
    Format: text
    Format: text
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...