Publication Date:
2022-10-26
Description:
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2019. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 20(7), (2019): 3347-3374, doi:10.1029/2019GC008374.
Description:
Subduction is a key component of Earth's long‐term sulfur cycle; however, the mechanisms that drive sulfur from subducting slabs remain elusive. Isotopes are a sensitive indicator of the speciation of sulfur in fluids, sulfide dissolution‐precipitation reactions, and inferring fluid sources. To investigate these processes, we report δ34S values determined by secondary ion mass spectroscopy in sulfides from a global suite of exhumed high‐pressure rocks. Sulfides are classified into two petrogenetic groups: (1) metamorphic, which represent closed‐system (re)crystallization from protolith‐inherited sulfur, and (2) metasomatic, which formed during open system processes, such as an influx of oxidized sulfur. The δ34S values for metamorphic sulfides tend to reflect their precursor compositions: −4.3 ‰ to +13.5 ‰ for metabasic rocks, and −32.4 ‰ to −11.0 ‰ for metasediments. Metasomatic sulfides exhibit a range of δ34S from −21.7 ‰ to +13.9 ‰. We suggest that sluggish sulfur self‐diffusion prevents isotopic fractionation during sulfide breakdown and that slab fluids inherit the isotopic composition of their source. We estimate a composition of −11 ‰ to +8 ‰ for slab fluids, a significantly smaller range than observed for metasomatic sulfides. Large fractionations during metasomatic sulfide precipitation from sulfate‐bearing fluids, and an evolving fluid composition during reactive transport may account for the entire ~36 ‰ range of metasomatic sulfide compositions. Thus, we suggest that sulfates are likely the dominant sulfur species in slab‐derived fluids.
Description:
All isotopic data and analysis locations are detailed in the supporting information accompanying this article. The authors would like to thank B. Monteleone and M. Yates for assistance with SIMS and EPMA analyses, respectively. J. Selverstone is thanked for providing samples and D. Whitney for providing additional field context. The authors would also like to thank J. Alt, C. LaFlamme, and an anonymous reviewer for their thoughtful and thorough reviews, as well as careful editorial handling by J. Blichert‐Toft. This project was funded by National Science Foundation Grant EAR 1725301 awarded to A. M. C. and a Geological Society of America grant to J. B. W.
Description:
2019-12-14
Keywords:
Sulfur isotopes
;
Subduction
;
Sulfur cycle
;
Sulfur
;
Volcanic arc
;
Metamorphism
Repository Name:
Woods Hole Open Access Server
Type:
Article
Permalink
