ALBERT

Description: Background and aim: In the last decade HDT-ASCT has significantly improved progression-free and overall survival of patients with MM. Achievement of CR or good partial response and the tumor reduction attained with the induction pretransplant chemotherapy have been shown to be the most relevant prognostic factors for long-term survival. In recent years, novel drugs such as thalidomide and bortezomib have been introduced in the treatment of MM. Bortezomib (B) (VelcadeÒ) as a single agent, gives a response rate ranging from 35% to 50%, including up to a 9% CR rate in relapsed/refractory patients, and of 40%, with a 10% CR rate in the up-front setting. Thalidomide (T) has been identified as the first independently active agent in MM since the introduction of melphalan and prednisone and currently represent the milestone of initial treatment in elderly patients. Since B and T target different molecular pathways, we started a phase II trial in order to assess efficacy, toxicity and rate of PBSC collection after VTD regimen delivered as induction pretransplant chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Patients and Methods: from June 2007 to July 2008 14 pts (M/F: 11/3) with a median age of 56 years (range: 42–71) were enrolled in the study; six pts (43%) were more than 60 yo and 7 pts had a previous history of M-GUS lasting in median 54 months. At time of treatment there were 71%, 22% and 7% having Durie and Salmon staging III, II and I respectively, while ISS was 1 in 22%, 2 in 50% and 3 in 28% of cases. One pt had renal impairment, extensive bone disease was documented in 78% of cases with 2 pts showing extramedullary disease. Sixty-five percent of pts (9/14) had IgG MM, 14% IgA, 7% light chain, and 14% non secretory myeloma. Unfavourable cytogenetic was recorded in 36% (5/14) of cases. Bortezomib was administered at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1,4, 8, 11 as short IV infusion, thalidomide at daily dose of 100 mg PO and Dexamethasone (40 mg/die PO) the day of bortezomib infusion and the day after (640 mg for each cycle) every 4 weeks for 3–4 courses. All patients received deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis consisting of aspirin 100 mg daily (44%), low molecular weight heparin (28%) and low dose warfarin (28%). Following VTD regimen patients underwent to high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) with G-CSF support and peripheral stem cell harvest. MEL 200 was given as conditioning regimen. All patients received standard dose of zoledronic acid monthly. Results: At present time all patients are evaluable for VTD and PBSC collection while 10 for response after transplant. After 3 courses of VTD 93% of pts achieved more than a partial response including 57% of CR and 36% of VGPR. One pt achieved a PR. VTD regimen resulted well tolerated with main toxicity consisting of WHO grade III peripheral neuropathy recorded in 37 % of pts. There were no pts with relevant hematologic toxicity or other non-hematologic toxicities and there were no chemotherapy reduction or delay because of toxicity. None of pts developed DVT. A sufficient amount of CD34+ cells (median 6.5 × 106/kg; range: 2.7–11.6) was collected in 13 of 14 evaluable pts after a median of 1.4 aphaeresis (range:1–2). One pt failed to collect after CTX and was treated with HD-Ara-C obtaining an adequate number of CD34+ cells for transplant. The median CD 34+ cells infused in the 10 transplanted pts was 3.3 ×106/kg (range: 2.0 – 4.7). Times to platelet (20×109/L) and granulocyte (500×109/L) recovery were 13 and 10 days respectively. After HDC and ASCT 7 of 10 patients presented CR (70%) and 2 (20%) a VGPR with an ORR of 90%. One pt presented progression disease after 6 months from transplant. Conclusion: these very preliminary data suggest that VTD regimen given as pretransplant chemotherapy is effective and well tolerated regimen; the capacity to give high response rate in a short time without to compromise PBSC collection makes VTD regimen a good option for initial treatment of newly diagnosed MM patients although more pts and longer follow-up are needed to assess the real impact on survival of this regimen.

Description: Abstract 3747 Poster Board III-683 Background despite the prognosis of aggressive non-Hodgkin Lymphoma has considerably improved over the past decades, the treatment of elderly patients with NHL is still a difficult challenge for the clinician. A retrospective EORTC study conducted in patients with aggressive NHL and age above 70 years showed that about half of patients received an aggressive treatment and that only 15% of investigators employed full-dose regimens from the first cycle. We here present the preliminary data of CHOP-like regimen delivered as first-line or salvage therapy to elderly or young patients with NHL and not eligible for more aggressive therapy. Patients and methods from July 2006 to January 2009, 27 pts (M/F:11/16) with a median age of 71 years (range: 53-84) were included in the study. Twenty-four pts (88%) were more than 65 yo, 18 (66%) had high-grade and 9 (34%) an indolent lymphoma. Stage III-IV disease according to Ann Arbor staging occurred in 18 pts (66%) whereas aaIPI, evaluated only for pts with aggressive NHL, was 3 2 in 9 pts (18%). ENS involvement ≥ 1 was present in 11 (41%) and BM involvement in 13 pts (48%). Most of pts (60%) had ECOG PS ≥ 1. Twenty out of 27 pts (74%) received COMP±R as first-line treatment and 7 (26%) as salvage therapy; all but one of pre-treated pts had received more than 1 line of chemotherapy (range 2-4). Twenty-five (92%) pts had co-morbidity with more than 1 disease in 44% of cases. Median LVEF was 59% (range: 35-80%). COMP±R regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV d1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV d1 (capped at 2mg), liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (MyocetÒ) at the dose of 50 mg/m2 IV d1 and Prednisone 100 mg/die PO d 1-5 with or without Rituximab at dose of 375 mg/m2 d8 at first course and at d1 of subsequent courses according to B or T-cell lymphoma phenotype respectively. To pts with early stage disease were planned 4 courses of COMP±R±IF-RT while those with advanced stage of disease received six courses of chemotherapy delivered every 3 weeks. Median number of cycles delivered was 5.6 (range: 4-8). All patients completed the planned treatment and most of them (92%) received G-CSF at dose of 300 mg/die as primary (67%) or secondary (25%) prophylaxis. ESA support was need in 8 pts (30%). Results complete response (CR) was achieved in 21 (78%) and partial response (PR) in 3 (11%) of pts with an ORR of 89%; three pts had stable (n=2) or progressive disease (n=1). The regimen was safe and well tolerated with dose reduction occurring in 9 pts (34%). None of pts developed cardiac toxicity. The mainly adverse events recorded was neutropenia occurring in 15% of pts and febrile neutropenia in 6 pts (23%). Extra-haematological toxicity was mild (WHO grade 1-2) and recorded in 18% of pts. There was no treatment-related fatal toxicity. With a median follow-up of 15 months (range 6-33) the OS and EFS was 93% and 89% respectively. Conclusion COMP±R regimen shows to be safe and effective in a group of elderly patients both as first line or salvage therapy. However more patients and longer follow-up is required to assess definitively the role of this regimen in elderly patients with untreated aggressive NHL. A prospective phase II trial is ongoing at our Institution. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.