ALBERT

Description: Triplet regimens combining an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and a steroid are used to treat newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Although ixazomib (Ix), an oral PI with single agent activity, can be combined with lenalidomide (LEN), patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM are often LEN-refractory. Pomalidomide (POM) has single agent activity in LEN-refractory disease, and both POM and Ix also show activity in poor cytogenetic risk pts. Methods: Primary objectives: 1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Ix in combination with standard dose POM and dexamethasone (DEX), and 2) evaluate the anti-tumor activity of the triplet. The treatment regimen included two dose levels (3 mg and 4 mg) of Ix on days 1, 8, 15; POM 4 mg days 1-21; and DEX 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, 22, of a 28 day cycle. Eligibility: R/R MM after 〉1 prior therapy, LEN-refractory, and ≤ grade(gr) 1 peripheral neuropathy (PN). Pts were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Design: Phase I study utilizing a standard 3+3 design; dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) defined during cycle 1. Results: 32 pts treated, 31 evaluable for toxicity and response. Pts received a median 4 cycles (range 1-13); median follow-up is 5.5 months (range 1.8-21.1). Six pts treated on DL1, 25 treated on DL2, the MTD/Phase II dose (P2D). Median age: 62 years (range 38-84); median time from diagnosis: 3.7 years (range 1.0-8.9); median number prior therapies: 3 (range 1-5); prior transplant: n = 23 (74%); double (LEN/Bortezomib[BOR]) or triple (LEN/BOR/Carfilzomib[CFZ]) refractory: 19 (61%). Phase I: DL1 expanded to n=6 after 1/3 pts experienced DLT (gr3 lung infection); no further DLT seen on DL 1 or 2. Adverse events (AEs) related to POM and/or Ix: ANC decrease Gr1/2 n=11 (35%), Gr3/4 n=10 (32%), platelet decrease Gr1/2 n=9 (29%), lymphocyte decrease Gr1/2 n=8 (26%), Gr3/4 n=11 (35%), PN Gr1/2 n=9 (29%), no Gr3/4. Response: Phase I and II, n=31 pts treated. ORR: 45% (6 VGPR, 8 PR); Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): 81% (6 VGPR, 8 PR, 3 MR, 8 SD). In the pts with high risk cytogenetics (7[23%] 1q, 3[10%] 17p, 2[6%] t(4;14)) an ORR of 58% (3 VGPR, 4 PR) was seen, and the CBR was 83%. In the double or triple refractory pts, an ORR of 26% and CBR of 79% (1 VGPR, 4 PR, 3 MR, 7 SD) were observed. Conclusions: Ix/POM/DEX is a well-tolerated oral combination therapy, and responses were seen even at DL1 and in high risk patients, including those with poor-risk cytogenetics or advanced refractory disease. Disclosures Kapoor: Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lonial:Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Nathwani:Carevive Systems, Inc.: Research Funding. Forman:Mustang Therpapeutics: Other: Construct licensed by City of Hope. Berdeja:Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen, Bluebird, BMS, Calithera, Celgene, Constellation, Curis, Epizyme, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kesios, Novartis, Onyx, Takeda, Tragara: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 3403 Poster Board III-291 Autologous PSCT remains standard treatment in younger patients (pts) with multiple myeloma. However, relapse is the major cause of treatment failure. Several studies have reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) and possibly overall survival with thalidomide alone or in combination with steroid and chemotherapy as maintenance/consolidation therapy post autologous PSCT. We performed a phase II study investigating the role of sequential velcade/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) as maintenance therapy post single PSCT. The objectives were to examine the toxicities of prolonged course of sequential VTD, CR rate, PFS and overall survival following single autologous PSCT. Within 4-8 weeks of autologous PSCT using melphalan 200mg/m2, pts received weekly velcade (vel) at 1.3mg/m2 /wk x 3 weeks with 1 week rest and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/d x 4 d for 6 months, followed by thalidomide (thal) at 50 -200mg/d and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/dx4 d for 6 more months. Single agent thalidomide was then continued until disease progression. Twenty-eight pts have been enrolled. Median age is 54 years (29-66). Median time from diagnosis is 7.9 mo. (4.2 – 145). Disease stage at diagnosis; by Salmon-Durie (II/III 6/22) and by ISS (I/II/III 11/9/7/missing data in 1 pt). Pts received induction treatment with thal/dex (14), velcade based (15) and revlimid based regimens (7). Median B2M at enrollment is 1.75 mg/L (1.14 -5.3). Disease status at enrollment; CR (7) VGPR (9), PR (11), SD (1). Three pts have chromosome 13 abnormalities (1 pt by karyotype and 2 pts by FISH). Results: All pts have undergone transplant. Four pts were unable to start planned maintenance therapy due to development of grade II or more neuro toxicities (3), and persistent thrombocytopenia (1) after PSCT. Twenty-four pts started maintenance vel/dex within 4-8 weeks of PSCT. Nine pts have completed 6 months of vel/dex. Two pts stopped vel/dex because of low WBC (1) or PN (1). With a median F/U of 5.2 mo. (1.2 -17.3) nine of 28 pts (33%) have achieved CR post PSCT and six out of 11 evaluable pts (55%) have achieved CR after vel/dex. Six out of 9 pts (66%) who have completed 6 mo. of vel/dex achieved CR. Two out of 9 pts (22%) have upgraded their response with vel/dex. Four pts have completed 6 month of thal/dex and are beyond 1 year post PSCT. Two out of 4 pts remain in CR at one year post PSCT. One pt is in PR and 1 pt has progressed. Two pts could not complete thal/dex phase of therapy because of relapse (1) and grade III GI toxicity (1). Three pts have relapsed of whom 1 pt died of relapsed myeloma (leptomeningeal disease). No grade IV toxicity has been noted. Grade III toxicities have occurred in 4 pts; low platelet (1), fatigue (1), mood alteration (1), GI (severe constipation) (1). Thirteen pts have peripheral neuropathy (PN). Ten pts had PN grade I at enrollment. Only 3 pts have developed PN on the study and all are grade I - II. Median velcade dose is 1.3 mg /m2/wk and thalidomide dose is 100mg /d. Conclusion: Prolonged sequential velcade/thalidomide/dexamethasone maintenance therapy post single autologous PSCT is well tolerated with no severe peripheral neuropathy. Fifty-five percent of pts have achieved CR and 22% have upgraded their response after six months of velcade/dexamethasone therapy suggesting this is an active and well tolerated maintenance strategy post PSCT. Disclosures: Sahebi: Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of bortezomib(Velcade)in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone is investigated as maintenance therapy post autologuous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.

Description: Background Despite the advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma using new targeted therapies and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) the disease remains largely incurable. Recent efforts in using reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT have been hampered by increased allograft-related morbidity and mortality. Several prospective studies comparing single or tandem autologous HSCT with planned tandem autologous-reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT (auto-allo) have shown no overall survival advantage despite improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and lower relapse rates with reduced intensity allograft, mainly due to increased non-relapse related mortality (NRM) rates. However, two of these prospective studies; the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation NMAM 2000 and the Italian group study with long term follow-up reported PFS and overall survival (OS) benefits in favor of the auto-allo arm. Currently allogeneic HSCT is recommended within the context of clinical trials and only in high risk multiple myeloma patients who continue to have a very poor outcome with autologous HSCT. While such clinical trials are ongoing there remains a need to address the role of autologous HSCT prior to reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT. The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the role of upfront cytoreductive autologous HSCT prior to allograft in the outcomes of patients who have undergone allograft following induction therapy. Study We performed a retrospective analysis of the EBMT database comparing the outcomes of patients who were planned to receive auto-allograft to those who underwent reduced intensity allograft (early RIC) without a prior autologous HSCT within one year from diagnosis. The data in 504 patients were previously reported at the ASH meeting 2010 (abstract 3512). We subsequently included additional patients and requested more information from the participating EBMT centers and updated the study. From 1996 to 2013 a total of 689 patients were registered as reduced intensity allograft. 517 patients were registered as planned auto-allograft; however, 73 did not receive the planned allograft. A total of 172 patients received reduced intensity allograft after induction treatment without prior auto-HSCT. Median age at first transplant was 53 years (range 20-72) in the auto-allo and 51 years (range 31-77) in the early RIC group. Median time from diagnosis was 6.6 months (range 2-156 months) in the auto-allo and 7.7 months (2.8-12.0) in the early RIC group. The disease status at the time of first transplant for the auto-allo group was CR - 8%, PR - 67%, other or missing - 25%; and for the RIC group was CR - 15%, PR - 62%, other or missing - 23%. Donors were HLA matched siblings in 88% and matched unrelated in 12% for the auto-allo group, and 84% siblings and 16% matched unrelated in the RIC group with no significant differences between the two groups. Results With a median follow-up of 93 months in the auto-allo and 84 months in RIC groups, PFS rates were significantly better at 3 and 5 years in the auto-allo group (45.6% and 34.2%) as compared to the RIC group (33.9% and 22.0%, p

Description: Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) followed by nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT (auto/alloHCT) provides cytoreduction and graft-versus-myeloma effects. We report on long-term outcomes of 102 patients with multiple myeloma who received auto/alloHCT with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Treatment consisted of high-dose melphalan and autograft followed by 2-Gy total body irradiation, with or without fludarabine, and alloHCT from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings. Postgrafting immunosuppressive agent was cyclosporine or tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Forty-two percent of patients developed grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and 74% extensive chronic GVHD. Five-year nonrelapse mortality after allografting was 18%, 95% related to GVHD or infections. Among 95 patients with detectable disease, 59 achieved complete remissions. Median time to progression was 5 years. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 years. Five-year OS and PFS were 64% and 36%, respectively. Seventy-three patients receiving autoHCT within 10 months from treatment initiation had 5-year OS of 69% and PFS of 37%. In multivariate analysis, β-2-microglobulin of more than 3.5 μg/mL at diagnosis and auto/alloHCT more than 10 months after treatment initiation correlated with shorter OS (P = .03 and P = .02) and PFS (P = .04 and P = .03), whereas Karnofsky scores less than 90% at allotransplantation correlated with shorter PFS only (P = .005). Long-term disease control and GVHD remain key issues.

Description: Abstract 2399 The quality and depth of response particularly achievement of complete remission (CR) have been associated with significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. Achievement of CR is considered a valid surrogate endpoint for survival in clinical trials for patients with multiple myeloma. We performed a phase II study investigating the role of sequential bortezomib/dexamethasone followed by thalidomide/dexamethasone as maintenance therapy post single autologous PSCT. The objectives were to examine the feasibility, toxicities, CR, PFS and overall survival rates. Within 4–8 weeks of autologous PSCT using melphalan 200mg/m2, pts received weekly bortezomib (bor) at 1.3mg/m2 /wk × 3 weeks with 1 week rest and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/d × 4 d for 6 months, followed by thalidomide (thal) at 50 –200mg/d and dexamethasone (dex) at 40mg/dx4 d for 6 more months. Single agent thalidomide was then continued until disease progression. Between March 2008 and June 2010, forty-five pts were enrolled. Median age was 54 years (29-71). Median time from diagnosis was 6.1 mo. (3.5 – 145.9). Disease stage at diagnosis; by Salmon-Durie (I/II/III 2/8/34/1 not available) and by ISS (I/II/III 18/14/8/ 5 not available). Pts received prior induction treatment with thal/dex (15), bortezomib based (27) and lenalidomide based regimens (10). Median B2M at enrollment was 1.8 mg/L (1.05 -5.3). Disease status at enrollment included complete remission (CR) (11), very good partial response (VGPR) (11), partial response (PR) (23). Six pts had chromosome 13 abnormalities (1 pt by karyotype and 5 pts by FISH), 2 pts had t 4;14 (one with concurrent ch 17 p del) and 3 pts had complex cytogenetic abnormalities. Results: Forty-five pts have been enrolled and undergone transplant. Five pts were unable to start planned maintenance therapy due to development of grade II or more neuro toxicities (4), and persistent thrombocytopenia (1) after PSCT. Thirty nine pts started maintenance bor/dex within 4–8 weeks of PSCT. One pt is too early for maintenance therapy. Twenty-five pts have completed the planned 6 months of bor/dex. Ten pts stopped bor/dex because of low WBC (2), PN (4), diagnosis of adrenal cancer (1), myocardial infarction (MI) (1), and relapse (2). Six pts are still receiving maintenance bortezomib. With a median F/U of 8.5 mo. (0.2 -24.0) twelve of 44 evaluable pts (27%) have achieved CR post PSCT and 17 of 33 evaluable pts (51%) have achieved CR after bor/dex on an intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Fifteen of 25 pts (60%) who have completed 6 months of bor/dex have achieved CR. Nine of 25 pts (36%) have upgraded their response with bor/dex. Eight pts (24%) could not complete bortezomib due to toxicities. At one year post PSCT fourteen of 28 evaluable pts (50%) remain in CR. Six pts have relapsed of whom 2 died of relapsed myeloma (leptomeningeal disease 1 pt). One pt experienced MI while receiving bortezomib (grade IV). Grade III toxicities have occurred in 17 pts; low platelet (1), asthenia (2), mood alteration (1), GI (severe constipation due to partial bowel obstruction on thalidomide) (1), skin rash (1), hyperglycemia (1), lymphopenia (10), sinus bradycardia (1), elevated triglyceride (1), DVT (1), low phosphate (3), leukopenia (1), edema (1). Sixteen pts had peripheral neuropathy (PN) grade I prior to start of bortezomib. Only 8 pts have developed new PN on the study and all are grade I-II. No patient has experienced grade III-IV PN. Median bortezomib dose is 1.3 mg /m2 per week. Conclusion: Prolonged weekly bortezomib maintenance therapy is well tolerated and can upgrade response post single autologous PSCT with no severe peripheral neuropathy. Fifty one percent of pts have achieved CR and 36% have upgraded their response after six months of bortezomib/dexamethasone therapy suggesting this is an active maintenance strategy post PSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF). Outcomes utilizing fully myeloablative conditioning regimens have been disappointing in large part due to transplant related mortality in this generally older pt population. Recently, there have been encouraging results reported with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens followed by allogeneic HCT. Most of the reports have focused on HLA matched siblings as the stem cell donors. We have treated nine patients with MF (7 idiopathic, 1 secondary to essential thrombocythemia, 1 secondary to polycythemia vera) with RIC HCT utilizing matched unrelated donors (MUD) for 7 of the 9 patients, and sibling donors for 2 patients. The median age was 54 yrs (range 46 to 68); 4 female and 5 male. (See Table) The time interval from diagnosis to HCT ranged from 8 to 156 mos (median 41 mos). By the Lille classification, 4 pts were characterized as high risk, 4 as intermediate, and 1 as low risk. All 9 pts had significant splenomegaly, and 5/9 underwent splenectomy prior to HCT. Eight of the nine pts had ≥ 1% blasts in the PB at the time of HCT; 3 pts had abnormal cytogenetics (although none had +8 or 12p-); and 4 pts had constitutional symptoms. Seven of the 9 pts were RBC transfusion dependent. The RIC regimen consisted of fludarabine (Flu) and a single dose of total body irradiation (TBI) for Pt 1, and Flu/melphalan (Mel) for the subsequent 8 pts. G-CSF primed peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were used for all patients, except for Pt 6 who received a total of 3 products because of graft failure. The number of CD34+ cells X 106 /kg ranged from 0.97 to 17.1 (median 2.8). Prophylaxis against graft vs. host disease (GVHD) consisted of cyclosporin/mycophenolate +/− methotrexate. Seven pts successfully engrafted WBC with ANC 〉 500 by a median of day +15 (range 10 to 21). Pt 6 never engrafted WBC, and the nadir for Pt 1 was 〉500. Five pts achieved platelet engraftment (〉25k) from 15 to 594 days (median 32), 3 pts never engrafted platelets (Pts 2,6,7), and the nadir for Pt 1 was 〉25k. At the time of the latest FISH and/or STR analysis, 8/9 pts were chimeric with 96 to 100% donor cells and/or DNA. All but 1 pt developed acute GVHD that was ≥ grade III in 4/8 pts. Four of 6 evaluable pts had extensive chronic GVHD. Six of the 9 pts are alive at the time of last contact with follow-up for the living pts ranging from 3.4 to 48.5 mos (median 11.8). The 3 deaths were from: septic shock due to primary graft failure on day +125 (Pt 6), sepsis related to severe acute GVHD on day + 51 (Pt 4), and sepsis with secondary graft failure related to severe acute GVHD on day +45 (Pt 2). The probability of overall and disease free survival was 64.8% (30.8 to 88.4%, 95% CI). These results demonstrate that MUD HCT utilizing PBSC can be an effective treatment for older pts with MF. Treatment Summary Pt Number Age/Gender Dx Donor Cell Material Regimen GVHD Prophylaxis 1 68/M MF MUD PBSC Flu/TBI CSA/MMF 2 58/F MF MUD PBSC Flu/Mel CSA/MMF 3 54/F MF MUD PBSC Flu/Mel CSA/MMF 4 64/F ET to MF Bro PBSC Flu/Mel CSA/MMF 5 46/M MF MUD PBSC Flu/Mel CSA/MMF/MTX 6 53/M MF MUD #1 BM Flu/Mel CSA/MMF/MTX 6 MUD #1 PBSC Flu/ATG 6 MUD #2 BM Flu/Mel 7 63/M PV to MF MUD PBSC Flu/Mel CSA/MMF/MTX 8 54/M MF Bro PBSC Flu/Mel CSA/MMF 9 63/F MF MUD PBSC Flu/Mel CSA/MMF/MTX

Description: Current CGVHD prognostic and staging systems are still undergoing development and have identified plt count; CGVHD types progressive(P), quiescent(Q), de novo(DN); KPS, and GI involvement as significant risk factors affecting outcome. A simple reproducible staging system such as used for AGVHD to apply in clinical trials is still lacking. We evaluated whether the PSE dose required to control CGVHD at 3 months from diagnosis would have a prognostic effect on survival and in and of itself serve as a criteria for secondary intervention or investigational therapy. We hypothesized that by 3 months from start of treatment patients would be on the lowest dose dictated by medical necessity rather than by physician driven dose preference. A retrospective analysis of charts from 109 patients diagnosed with CGVHD between 6/2000 and 6/2003 was done. Data collected included age, donor type(mud/sib), plt count, CGVHD type(P/Q/DN), KPS, GI involvement. Outcome analysis included survival and cause of death. PSE dose was calculated in mg/kg at 3 months from first diagnosis of CGVHD. With a median follow up of 47.2 months(range 6.6–67.2) relapse censored survival of patients on a 3 month PSE dose of more than .3 mg/kg was 53% compared to all lower doses 86%(P.03). In a univariate analysis only PSE dose (P .05) and KPS (P

Description: Median ages of pts with most hematological malignancies are beyond 60 years. The advent of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens has extended the use of allogeneic HCT to these older pts. Here, we retrospectively investigated outcomes among 280 pts aged ≥60 years, given HCT between 1998 and 2006. Results were broken down in 3 age groups 60–64 (n=166), 65–69 (n=90), and ≥70 (n=24) years old, respectively. Pts aged ≥70 years had less preceding chemotherapy, less often failed autologous HCT, more often had related grafts, and had higher comorbidity scores compared to pts in the other two age groups (table 1). Acute leukemias were more frequent and lymphoma/multiple myeloma were less frequent among pts aged ≥70 years old, resulting in higher risk for relapse (Table 1). After HCT, non-relapse mortality, relapse, and progression free survivals at 5-years for all pts were 26%, 41%, and 32% respectively. Five-year Kaplan Meier rate of overall survival was 35%, of those 12% vs. 23% were with vs. without chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppressive therapy, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes among the three age groups except for more infections and days of hospitalization among pts aged 65–69 years compared to the other two age groups (Table 2). In multivariate analyses of risk factors, high HCT-comorbidity index (1–2 and ≥3) independently predicted higher NRM (HR: 2.84 and 3.0, respectively, p=0.01) and, not surprisingly, previously defined high relapse risk predicted relapse (HR: 2.17, p=0.06); both predicted worse OS (p=0.005 and p=0.0009, respectively) and PFS (p=0.01 and p=0.02, respectively). Pts given unrelated grafts did as well as recipients of related grafts. In conclusion, nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT can be curative among pts older than 60 years with resolution of chronic GVHD among a majority of pts. Comorbidities and relapse risk rather than age should be used for benefit-risk assessment. Continued enrollment of elderly pts in prospective studies including unrelated donors is warranted. Table 1: Pt characteristics Age groups, years (60–64) (n=166) (65–69) (n=90) (70–74) (n=24) Median Interval from Dx to HCT, months 19 15 8 Median (range) # of prior regimens 3 (0–14) 3 (0–13) 2 (0–10) Median CD34+ cell number x 106/kg 6.7 6.7 6.5 Median CD3+ cell number x 108/kg 2.9 3.1 3.4 % Prior radiotherapy 18 11 13 Prior HCT Failed 19 12 4 Planned 8 6 4 Positive patient CMV sero-status 58 65 79 HLA-matched related 54 53 83 Donor HLA-matched unrelated 41 44 17 HLA-mismatched unrelated 5 3 0 Conditioning 2 Gy TBI 12 13 21 2 Gy TBI + FLU 88 87 79 HCT-CI scores 0 27 27 15 1–2 30 39 25 3–4 30 17 40 ≥5 13 17 20 Diagnoses Acute leukemia 35 47 62 Chronic leukemia 15 13 13 Lymphoma/myeloma 21 23 8 Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative 16 16 17 Others 3 1 0 Disease status at HCT CR 46 41 38 PR 15 30 21 Refractory 28 21 33 Relapse 11 8 8 Relapse risk Low 19 17 8 Standard 48 51 38 High 33 32 54 Table 2: Outcomes per age groups HCT Outcomes Age groups, years P* (60–64) (n=166) (65–69) (n=90) (70–74) (n=24) FUO indicates fever of unknown origin *Test for trend μBased on hazard ratio analysis Bacterial 1.4 2.3 1.7 .0004 Rates of Infection episodes per person Viral 0.7 1.1 0.7 NS within 100 days FUO 0.3 0.4 0.1 NS Fungal 0.3 0.2 0.3 NS Median (range) days of hospitalization 1 (0–60) 4.5 (0–179) 0.5 (0–47) NS % Acute GVHD Grades II–IV 52 49 54 NSμ Grades III–IV 16 12 13 NSμ Chronic extensive GVHD 39 45 54 0.05μ NCI-CTC criteria grades III–IV non-hematological toxicities 42 57 50 NSμ Pts with Full donor chimerism at 1-year CD3/CD33/BM 68/ 84/ 80 66/ 83/ 77 67/ 79/ 71 NSμ CR at 2-years 40 47 63 NSμ 5-years Relapse/progression 38 46 46 NSμ 5-years NRM 28 22 29 NSμ 5-years OS 37 36 23 NSμ 5-years PFS 34 31 25 NSμ Patients alive and off all immunosuppression 24 25 5 NSμ

Description: Abstract 3450 Objective: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) following a variety of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens has been reported to produce encouraging results in patients with AML. In these studies disease relapse was the main cause of treatment failure, with 2–4 year relapse rates ranging between 32–61% resulting in overall survivals of 28–45% at 2–4 years. Our goal here was to examine whether pre-HCT variables could identify patients at high risk for relapse following nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT, who thus would become candidates for additional interventions to reduce the risk of AML relapse. Methods: The data were derived from 274 consecutive Seattle Consortium patients (median age: 60 years) with de novo or secondary AML who underwent allogeneic HCT from related or unrelated donors after conditioning with 2 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) with or without fludarabine (90 mg/m2) as recently reported (Gyurkocza et al., JCO 2010 Jun 10;28(17):2859–2867). Cox regression was used to perform multivariate analysis of risk factors for relapse in a subset of 231 patients in morphologic leukemia-free state (defined as less than 5% marrow blasts) with (n=134) or without (n=97) peripheral blood cell count recovery (defined as platelets 〉 100,000/ml and neutrophils 〉 1,000/ml) at the time of HCT. In this multivariate model, AML beyond 1st complete remission (CR1), unfavorable cytogenetics (according to SWOG criteria), incomplete peripheral blood cell count recovery before HCT, and shorter time between diagnosis and HCT were associated with statistically significantly higher risk of relapse (Table 1). From this multivariate model we developed a relapse risk score that summarizes the contribution of multiple risk factors by assigning weights based on the relative magnitude of the log hazard ratios associated with the principal risk factors. From a starting score of 0, points were added or subtracted based on the following factors: 2nd CR: +1 point; 3rd or later CR: +2 points; unfavorable cytogenetics: +1 point; absence of pre-HCT peripheral blood cell count recovery: +0.5 points; time from diagnosis to HCT 〉 18 months, -2 points (Table 2). Patients were then stratified into 2 relapse risk groups according to whether the total risk score was ≤0 (low-risk) or 〉0 (high-risk). Results: Stratification of patients according to the proposed Relapse Risk Score resulted in a clear separation of the two risk groups, with 5-year relapse rates of 50% and 17% in the high- and low-risk groups, respectively (Figure 1A). Five-year overall survival rates were 26% and 50% in the high- and low-risk groups, respectively (Figure 1B). Conclusion: Our Relapse Risk Score may be a useful tool to identify patients with AML at high risk for relapse, who could potentially benefit from additional interventions to reduce the risk of relapse following allogeneic HCT. We are currently attempting validation in an independent cohort of patients with AML to make this Risk Score more generalizable. Relapse/Progression (A) and Overall Survival (B) rates stratified by Relapse Risk Score. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off label usage of fludarabine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil is discussed.

Description: Abstract 4562 Analysis of Risk Factors and Outcome for Extramedullary Relapses post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Relapse after both autologous and allogeneic hematopietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is common in multiple myeloma (MM). Unusual sites of relapse have been reported after allogeneic HSCT in the form of isolated extramedullary (EM) lesion or light chain escape. It is hypothesized that these EM relapses are due to changes in the marrow microenvironment or selection of resistant subclones from therapy with novel agents and or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Several case reports have shown that EM relapse is associated with dismal prognosis compared to medullary or bone marrow (BM) relapse. To study the relapse patterns and outcome, we performed a retrospective analysis of 56 pts who underwent tandem autologous-nonmyeloablative allogeneic HSCT (auto-allo) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic transplant. Between January, 2000 to March 2008, 38 pts received planned auto-allo HSCT using melphalan (200 mg/m2) prior to auto-HSCT and TBI (200 cGy) prior to allo-HSCT and 18 pts received RIC allo-HSCT following fludarabine (125mg/m2) and melphalan 140mg/m2. Donors included 52 HLA matched siblings and 4 matched unrelated donors.Table 1.Patients characteristicsParametersPts without relapse (n)BM relapse (n)EM relapse (n)P-valueTotal number of patients33167.Age at transplant (median, yr.)50.85154.10.84Interval between diagnosis-transplant (median, mo.)11.79.414.60.12B2-micr (median)2.06 (1.18-10)1.67 (1.28-2.15)2.08 (0.79- 9.05)0.15Median f/u for alive pts (yr.)6.88.79.6.Type of transplant....Auto- allo graft70% (23)69 % (11)57 % (4)0.84RIC30% (10)31% (5)43% (3)Response before allograft....CR/PR64% (21)56% (9)71% (5)0.79MR/SD/RE/refractory36% (12)44% (7)29% (2)Stage III disease at the time of transplant78% (25)81% (13)100% (7)0.94Ch 13 del at dx18% (6)12% (2)29% (2)0.69Novel agent prior to transplant45% (15)38% (6)57% (4)0.74 RESULTS After a median follow up of 7.8 years; there were 16 BM and 7 EM relapses. There was no correlation between either relapse or the pattern of relapse (BM and EM) and development of acute and chronic graft vs. chronic disease (GVHD). The risk ratio for BM relapse in 5 year is 0.27 for patients with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and 0.15 for patients without cGVHD (P=0.69). The risk ratio for EM relapse in 5 year is 0.12 for patients with cGVHD and 0.25 for patients without cGVHD (P=0.10) (Figure 1). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole group (N=56) is shown in figure 1. Four year OS was 43% in EM group and 88% in BM group (P=0.005) (Figure 3). There were no significant differences between age, B2 microglobulin, numbers of treatment before HSCT, use of novel agents before HSCT, cytogenetics, stage, transplant regimen and development of GVHD and pattern of relapse (BM vs. EM). In conclusion our data suggest that EM relapse can occur post allogeneic HSCT and is associated with shorter overall survival. The development of GVHD does not prevent against EM relapse. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.