ALBERT

Description: INTRODUCTION. Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare indolent B-cell malignancy, mainly characterized by peripheral cytopenias and splenomegaly. The current standard of treatment for HCL are Nucleoside Analogs (NA) cladribine and pentostatin, which produce remarkably high remission rates and durable responses. Aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy, short- and long-term toxicity of NA in HCL pts treated outside clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We retrospectively analyzed 86 HCL patients (pts) treated with NA between 1996 and 2015 in two Hematologic Centers in Italy. The study was conducted in accordance to the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2000. Cladribine and pentostatin were administered according to standard schedules. Response criteria published by Jones et al. (Br J Haematol 2012) were retrospectively applied. Molecular assessment of BRAF-V600E mutation before and after NA therapy using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)-based allelic discrimination assay (sensitivity 0.1%) was performed in 10 pts. RESULTS. The median follow-up of pts (71 males and 15 females, median age 53 years) was 5.8 years (range 0.5-28). During the disease course, 86 pts were treated with NA (cladribine n=76, 88%; pentostatin n=10, 12%); 59 pts received NA front-line (cladribine in 56/59 pts, 95%). Among the other 27 pts, receiving NA as second or subsequent line of therapy, 25 had been previously treated with interferon. Median time from diagnosis to the first NA was 3.3 months (range 0-315). Hematological toxicity was observed in 53 of 77 evaluable pts (69%), and was not significantly different with cladribine (72%) or with pentostatin (37%) (p=0.1). Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 50 (65%), 7 (9%) and 7 (9%) pts respectively. Extra-hematological toxicity was reported in 48 of 79 evaluable pts (61%). The incidence of extra-hematological toxicity with cladribine (63%) and pentostatin (37%) was not statistically different (p=0.2). Grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia was observed in 24 pts (30%); 9 pts (11%) had grade 3-4 infections; 4 pts (5%) had grade 3-4 skin toxicity, 1 pt (1%) had grade 3 hepatic toxicity. Four of 86 pts (5%) developed a second malignancy (prostatic adenocarcinoma n=2, colon adenocarcinoma n=1, diffuse large B cell lymphoma n=1). The median time from NA to second malignancy was 58 months (range 49-111). Four of 86 pts (5%) developed a skin cancer (basal-cell carcinoma n=3, squamous cell carcinoma n=1), after a median time of 59 months (range 16-126). Response was assessed at a median time of 3 months after the end of therapy. Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Complete Remission (CR) Rate were respectively 93% and 63% in the entire cohort, and 98% and 72% in pts treated with NA front-line. The allelic burden of BRAF before and after therapy with NA was available in 10 cases; none of the pts in clinical CR after NA achieved a complete molecular response (Table 1). The median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) for pts treated with NA frontline was 6.5 years. There was a trend toward a longer PFS in pts receiving NA as first-line therapy as compared to those treated in second or subsequent lines (p=0.05). PFS curves according to type of NA and line of therapy are shown in Figure 1. The 5- and 10-year Overall Survival (OS) rates were 96% (95% CI: 85% - 99%) and 90% (95% CI 76%-96%) respectively. OS was similar in pts treated with cladribine orpentostatin (p=0.49). CONCLUSIONS. This study shows that: i) NA are associated with an acceptable toxicity, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia being the main complications of therapy; ii) timing of response assessment may account for a CR rate that is slightly lower than reported in the literature, confirming the importance of waiting at least 4 months for response evaluation as recommended by current guidelines; iii) the persistence of molecular disease also in pts achieving a clinical CR supports the implementation of consolidation strategies aimed at eradicating minimal residual disease to prolong disease-free survival. Table 1. BRAF allelic burden before and after therapy Patient Age (years) Sex Line of Therapy Allelic Burden (%) Clinical Response Pre- Post- 1 33 F 1 21,8 0,1 CR 2 36 M 2 5,4 0,4 CR 3 39 M 1 24,2 0,7 CR 4 54 M 1 10,8 0,3 PR 5 42 F 1 44 1,2 CR 6 53 F 1 7,9 0,2 NV 7 56 M 1 6,5 0,3 CR 8 54 M 1 12,2 0,2 CR 9 32 M 1 35,8 9,5 PR 10 38 M 2 54,4 12,2 PR Figure 1. Progression-free survival according to type of NA and line of therapy Figure 1. Progression-free survival according to type of NA and line of therapy Disclosures Arcaini: Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board.

Description: The oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in oncologic patient is often problematic because both the haemorragic risk and the thrombotic risk, i.e. the recurrence of venous thromboembolism, are increased. Many studies have been conducted in patient with solid neoplasms; it remains still unclear whether these results could be entirely extrapolated to patients with haematological malignancies. Our aim was to analyse the clinical outcomes and the control of anticoagulation, measured as % time in target INR range, in the patients with cancer compared to patients without cancer; moreover we focused on patients with haematological neoplasms. A total of 500 patients were recruited in 6 years, regardless of the indication for OAT; 146 (29%) of them were affected by cancer (47 haematological and 99 solid neoplasms); those being treated with warfarin for less than 1 month were excluded from this analysis. It resulted that patients affected with cancer had a worse anticoagulation control, compared to those without cancer (55% vs 60%; p

Description: Abstract 3072 Thromboembolic disease (TE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Essential Thrombocythemia (ET). Recently JAK2V617 mutational status and allele burden seem to add prognostic significance to standard risk factors; furthermore it was reported an interesting but not confirmed association between baseline leukocytosis and thrombosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate such factors in a series of patients with ET. Study subjects were recruited from the Ancona Hematology Clinic database of ET patients; clinical and laboratory data were collected at time of diagnosis and correlated with the occurrence of TE. In addition, qualitative and quantitative PCR for JAK2V617F was performed on stored samples of peripheral blood or bone marrow in a subset of study patients. Qualitative JAK2V617F analysis was done according to standard PCR-based methods and quantitative JAK2V617F was determined with a commercially available Taqman assay. Standard statistical methods were applied to test significance of associations between thrombosis and other variables. A total of 218 ET patients were included in the study (median age 59, range 18–90; 71 males and 147 females). At diagnosis the median of platelets, hemoglobin and leukocytes were 776×109/L, 13.9g/dL, and 8.4 ×109/L respectively. At diagnosis a history of remote thrombosis was recorded in 27 patients (12,4%). Of the 122 patients analysed for JAK2 mutational status, 70 (57.4%) were JAK2 wild-type and 52 (42.6%) were JAK2V617F positive. Quantitative analysis was carried out in 48 cases: 6 patients (11.5%) were homozygotic and 42 (80.8%) were heterozygotic. At diagnosis, a total of 17 patients (7.8%) had TE: 8 (3.7%) arterial thrombosis (AT) and 9 (4.1%) venous thrombosis (VT). the AT included acute coronary syndromes (ACS; n=4), transient ischemic attack/cerebrovascular accidents (TIA/CVA; n=3), and peripheral arterial thrombosis (PAT; n=1). The VT included deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE; n= 4), abdominal vein thrombosis (AVT; n=4) and dural sinus thrombosis (n=1). During follow-up 25 patients experienced TE: 13 VT (6%) and 12 AT (5.5%). Post diagnosis VT included.: DVT/PE (n= 4), AVT (n=4), superficial vein thrombosis (TVS; n=3), retinal vein thrombosis (n=1) and dural sinus thrombosis (n=1). Post diagnosis AT included TIA/CVA (n=6), ACS (n=3) and PAT (n=3). Gender, age, hemoglobin, platelets, leucocyte count, splenomegaly, increased cellularity of bone marrow, bone marrow fibrosis and common vascular risk factors did not affect the probability of thrombotic events at diagnosis and during follow-up. On univariate analysis a significant increase of thrombosis as presenting manifestations, was registered in patients with a history of remote thrombosis (OR= 10.0, 95% CI 4,1-24,5; p

Description: Abstract 3953 Oral bexarotene, a novel retinoid that selectively activates retinoid × receptors, is approved for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations of refractory or relapsed cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL) as monotherapy. Phase II/III trials have demonstrated a greater than 50% response rate in patients with all stages of CTCL who were refractory or intolerant to the previous therapy but the recommended bexarotene dose of 300 mg/m2/day is associated with significant side-effects. Novel studies are looking for synergistic therapies combining lower bexarotene doses in order to reach the same or even better outcomes while avoiding a negative impact on the quality of life. Early studies with bexarotene and psoralen plus ultraviolet A photochemotherapy (PUVA) show promise. Synergy between bexarotene and PUVA may derive from retinoid-induced reductions in epidermal thickness, which consequently improves UVA penetrations, and/or from retinoid-specific enhancement of immune functions. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a 2 stage-protocol (induction and maintenance) with low dose bexarotene (Targretin) and PUVA in refractory and/or resistant patients with Mycosis Fungoides (MF) and Sézary Syndrome (SS). A prospective, phase 2 clinical study was conducted between February 2007 and May 2010 by two Italian academic hospital centers. We enrolled 15 patients with stages I through IV MF/SS; all patients had failed PUVA or several systemic regimens. Response to treatment was assessed with clinical endpoints such as remission of symptoms (pruritus, pain, sleep disturbance) and signs (erythema, scaling, thickness of plaques, presence of nodules, tumours, peripheral lymphadenopathy). Complete remission (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease for at least 4–6 weeks, partial remission (PR) as 50% or more decrease in extent or severity of disease. Overall response (OR) rate was defined as the combination of CR/PR. Patients with MF/SS were started with bexarotene (150 mg/day) and PUVA (three times weekly). Increments of bexarotene to a maximum of 300 mg/day were scheduled. Patients who achieved CRs and PRs during the induction remained on the same dose in the maintenance period, whereas the frequency of PUVA was gradually reduced. A preventive therapy to lower triglycerides and elevated thyroid hormone levels in the blood, was administered in all cases; therapeutic dietary and lifestyle changes were often recommended. Primary endpoint were OR rate at the end of induction and maintenance; secondary endpoints were safety and event-free survival (EFS). Kaplan-Meyer method and long-rank test was used for statistical analysis. All 15 patients (8 M and 7F) were evaluable for response; ten patients had early-stage (IB) and 5 had advanced stage (2 IIB, 1 IIIA, 1 IIIB, 1 IV). The median age was 68 years (34-81). The OR rate was 93% with 33% CR after induction period and 93% with 47% CR at the end of the protocol. A response was observed even in 1 case with SS and in 2 cases with MF in large cell transformation. Significantly, patients treated previously with PUVA monotherapy achieved better and faster CR compared with those treated with more than one systemic therapy (83% and 22% respectively; χ2 test, P=0.041; median time to maximal response 4 weeks and 8 weeks respectively, P=0.007). Median EFS at 37 months, for the whole group was 27 months. All patients have been closely monitored for adverse events during treatment; 2 of 15 patients (13%) had mild grade I-II asthenia, hypercholesterolemia and central hypothyroidism, 2 patients developed elevations of CPK (grade 3). With regard to hematologic toxicity, leukopenia was mild (grade I) and occurred in 3 patients (20%). In conclusion, our study have demonstrated a greater than 90% response rate in patients with all stages of CTCL refractory or intolerant to the previous therapies; the efficacy is more pronounced in patients previously treated with PUVA monotherapy. Starting treatment at lower dose of bexarotene followed by dose escalation may improve the efficacy and safety of both bexarotene and PUVA. Moreover the additional maintenance phase seems to improve the OR and length of remissions. Disclosures: Leoni: Celgene: Honoraria.

Description: Introduction Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) and bendmaustine rituximab (BR) combinations have both been evaluated as salvage regimens in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. FCR exerts good quality of responses but there are some concerns regarding its use mainly for tardive myelosuppression and long term toxicity. BR showed to be effective with an excellent short term toxic profile but in literature there are no data on long term follow-up and toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate long term outcome and long term toxicity of patients treated with FCR and BR. Patients and Methods We analyzed 87 relapsed and refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobuklinemia patients enrolled in two retrospective Italian multicenter studies in which FCR or BR were administered as salvage regimens. Patients treated with both bendamustine and fludarabine were excluded from the study. For each treatment group we compared: clinical and disease characteristics, Progression free survival (PFS) defined as progression or death for any cause from the beginning of salvage treatment; Event free survival (EFS) defined as progression or development of major infection, solid tumor, secondary MDS/AML, DLBCL, or death due to any cause. Results Of the 87 patients, 37 had received FCR and 50 BR. The two groups of patients did not differ in sex, median age, median number of prior treatments, previous therapy with alkylating agents, disease status, median IgM level, presence of adenopathies and/or splenomegaly at CT performed before salvage treatment. The significant differences between the two groups were: higher number of patients 〉70 years in the BR group (P=0.01) and lower number of patients previously treated with monoclonal antibody in the FCR population (P

Description: Introduction: Accordingto National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and ESMO guidelines on Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) bendamustine may be considered as a therapeutic option in first line treatment or in relapsed refractory disease. Even though there are only two clinical trials including a limited number of patients addressing the role of bendamustine and rituximab (BR) treatment in WM. Patients and Methods: To define the efficacy and tolerability of BR combination as salvage regimen in WM patients, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of symptomatic refractory relapsed patients treated with BR in 14 Italian centres. All patients receiving at least one day of treatment were included in the study. Treatment consisted of: R 375 mg/sqm iv day 1 and B iv days 1, 2. Therapy was administered every 4 weeks up to 6 courses. Results: Seventy-one patients are included in the study. As regards B dosage; 45 patients (63%) received the highest dose of 90 mg/sqm while 22 (31%) were treated with 70 mg/sqm. The 4 patients (6%) with a cumulative illness rating scale ≥ 6, received the lowest dose of 50 mg/sqm. At treatment, median age was 72 years (49-88), sex ratio M/F 46/25. Mediannumber of prior regimens was 2 (range 1-6). Twenty-four patients (34%) presented with refractory disease. The majority (90%) of patients had been previously treated with alkylating agents, 30% had also received purine analogues based treatments. Previous R was administered in the 77% of cases. The main reason (62%) for starting treatment was anemia followed by adenopathy and/or splenomegaly (35%). Median IgM level at treatment was 3815 mg/dL.Overall 361 courses of BR treatment were administered, median number 6 (range 1-6) with 47 (66%) of patients completing the 6 planned courses. Toxicity was discontinuation cause in 10 patients (14%): 4 infection, 1 fatal, 6 myelosuppression. In the remaining 14 treatment was discontinued for clinical clinical decision after disease reassessment. No difference in terms of treatment discontinuation was observed according to B dosage and age. Overall response rate (ORR) was 80.3% including: 7% complete remissions (CR), 15.5 % very good partial remissions (VGPR), 52.2% partial remissions (PR) and 5.6% of minor responses. A stable disease was observed in 16.9% of patients. One (1.4%) disease progression and one death were recorded. A progressive decrease of IgM level was observed during follow-up leading to an amelioration of response in 4 cases leading to a final ORR of 84.5%. None of the clinical and biological characteristics considered (age, sex, disease status, previous lines of treatment, previous fludarabine, bulky disease, Hb and IgM level, beta 2 microglobulin, B dosage) had an impact on ORR achievement. A better quality of response (CR plus VGPR) was observed in patients with an IgM level 〈 3000 mg/dL and in those treated with the higher dosage of B (90 mg/sqm). After a median follow-up of 19 months (3-54) 11 of the 57 responding patients met the criteria for disease progression. No difference was observed when patients were stratified according to the quality of response. B dosage did not impact disease progression. Considering that most of the patients received prophylactic growth factors, grade 3-4 neutropenia developed in only 13% of courses, 36% of patients. Dose modification or delayed treatment administration was necessary in 4 and 10% of courses respectively. During treatment we recorded 14 episodes of FUO and 5 major infections, leading death in one case. After a median follow up of 19 months none of the patients developed secondary myelodisplastic syndrome, acute leukemia or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In 3 cases a solid cancer was observed. Conclusion: BR combination showed to be as effective as more intensive salvage regimens in pretreated WM patients. Treatment showed to be well tolerated even in elderly patients with limited episodes of myelosuppression and infections when compared to purine analogues including regimens. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: In this study we investigated the role of CB1 receptor signaling in angiogenesis and the therapeutic exploitation of CB1 inactivation as an antiangiogenic strategy. We started from the observation that CB1 receptor expression is induced during angiogenesis and that the endocannabinoid anandamide stimulated bFGF-induced angiogenesis in the nanomolar physiologic range. To define the functional involvement of CB1 receptor signaling during angiogenesis, 2 different strategies have been carried out: siRNA-mediated knockdown and pharmacologic antagonism of CB1 receptors. CB1 receptors inactivation resulted in the inhibition of bFGF-induced endothelial proliferation, migration, and capillary-like tube formation, through prosurvival and migratory pathways involving ERK, Akt, FAK, JNK, Rho, and MMP-2. To corroborate the potential therapeutic exploitation of CB1 blockade as an antiangiogenic strategy, we performed in vivo assays founding that CB1 blockade was able to inhibit bFGF-induced neovascular growth in the rabbit cornea assay. A relevant finding was the ability to reduce ocular pathologic neo-vascularization in mouse oxygen-induced retinopathy. These results demonstrate that CB1 signaling participates to the proliferative response elicited by proangiogenic growth factors in angiogenesis and that for this reason CB1 receptor could represent a novel target for the treatment of diseases where excessive neoangiogenesis is the underlying pathology.

Description: Combination therapy is commonly used in the treatment of advanced and aggressive cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL), like Mycosis Fungoides (MF) and Sézary Syndrome (SS). Alemtuzumab, the humanized anti-CD52 antibody primarily developed for the treatment of B-CLL, has been also administered effectively in patients with CTCL as monotherapy, but it might be an ideal candidate for combination therapy either with a biological immune response modifier like interferon (IFN)-α, or with a drug known to be particularly active in CTCL like gemcitabine. No data on the activity of combination schemes including alemtuzumab in CTCL seem to be available. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical activity of alemtuzumab in two combination modalities, including either IFN-α or gemcitabine. We enrolled 5 patients, 4 males and 1 female, affected by SS/erythrodermic MF, with a median age of 57 yrs (43–74) and a median disease history of 21 mo.s (9–95). Two patients were treated with both combination schemes. Before starting therapy, all patients except one had a rapidly progressive disease, relapsed or refractory to previous treatments, and had previously received three or more systemic chemotherapy regimens. Most patients had reduced performance status and all had severe itching. Four patients received alemtuzumab in combination with IFN-α: subcutaneous alemtuzumab was administered at 3 mg on day 1, 10 mg on day 3, followed by 15 mg on alternating days for 7 total doses; after a further 3 months of treatment with IFN-α (3 MU three times weekly) the patients received reinduction with alemtuzumab (10 mg weekly for another month). Three patients received alemtuzumab in combination with gemcitabine: subcutaneous alemtuzumab was given at 10 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day schedule in combination with gemcitabine at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 intravenously (median number of cycles=4). Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (twice daily 2 times per week) and valacyclovir (500 mg twice daily) were administered from day 2 until at least 2 months after alemtuzumab discontinuation. The response (complete/CR, partial/PR, stable disease/SD) was assessed in skin, lymph nodes and peripheral blood, by using the SWAT criteria and by comparing the absolute number of circulating Sezary cells (SC) detected by flow-cytometry before and after treatment. The overall response (OR) was determined as the worse result obtained in the different sites. The OR rate was 57.1% (4 PR vs 3 SD), higher in the group treated with alemtuzumab and gemcitabine (66.7%: 2 PR vs 1 SD) than in the group treated with alemtuzumab and IFN-α(50%, 2 PR and 2 SD). The better response rate obtained in the group treated with gemcitabine was due to the higher activity in the skin (2 CR, 1 SD vs 2 PR, 2 SD) and in the lymph nodes (3 PR vs 3 PR, 1 SD). The circulating SC count was low at the end of therapy (median, 164, range, 24–530), with a lower median value in the group treated with gemcitabine (131), than in the group treated with IFN-α (303). Itching, self-assessed on a 0 to 10 visual analog scale, was significantly reduced from a median score of 9 before treatment, to 1 at the end of therapy. Both combination treatments were well tolerated. Infusion-related adverse events were not reported. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity was observed only in one case treated by alemtuzumab and gemcitabine (grade 3 leukopenia). One patient from the group treated with alemtuzumab and IFN-α had infectious complications (CMV pneumonitis and pulmonary aspergillosis). Two patients treated with gemcitabine showed CMV detectable viral load in peripheral blood without any occurrence of complications. All patients treated with alemtuzumab and IFN-α experienced a progressive disease, respectively at 5, 9, 11, 12 months, whereas the 3 patients treated with alemtuzumab and gemcitabine are still in PR at 4, 10, 12 months (median overall PFS: 9 mo.s). At last follow-up, 3 patients are still alive with disease, while two had died, one for unrelated causes and the other for progressive disease. Although the present series is small, our observations point towards a potential role of alemtuzumab in combination schemes in heavily pretreated CTCL patients, as the response rate (57%) appears better than that reported in the literature for alemtuzumab alone (OR 33%), and the toxicity profile of both combination seems to be fairly acceptable. Moreover, gemcitabine might be a better candidate than IFN-α for combination therapy with alemtuzumab, since the progression-free survival seems to be prolonged.