ALBERT

Description: Background:Novel insights into the biology of myeloma cells have led to the identification of relevant prognosis factors.Cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) has become one of the most important prognostic factors, and the presence of t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p) are associated with poor prognosis. Although there are some reports indicating that 1q gains may be considered as a poor-risk feature, the information is not uniform. Furthermore, there are important controversies about whether or not novel agents-based combinations are able to overcome the poor prognosis of CA. In the relapse setting, the combinations including proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs have shown to improve, and some of them to overcome, the outcome of patients with high-risk CA. Here we report a preplanned analysis, in a series of elderly newly diagnosed myeloma patients included in the Spanish GEM2010 trial and receiving VMP and Rd, in a sequential or alternating approach, in order to evaluate the influence of CA by FISH on the response rate and outcome. Patients and methods: 242 pts were randomized to receive a sequential scheme consisting of 9 cycles of VMP followed by 9 cycles of Rd or the same regimens in an alternating approach (one cycle of VMP alternating with one Rd, up to 18 cycles. VMP included the IV administration of weekly bortezomib (except in the first cycle that was given twice weekly) at 1.3 mg/m2 in combination with oral melphalan 9 mg/m2 and prednisone 60 mg/m2once daily on days 1-4. Rd treatment consisted on lenalidomide 25 mg daily on days 1-21 plus dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. FISH analysis for t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p) and 1q gains was performed at diagnosis according to standard procedures using purified plasma cells. Results: In 174 out of the 233 patients evaluable for efficacy and safety, FISH analysis at diagnosis were available and two groups were identified: high-risk group (n= 32 patients with t(4;14) and/or t(14;16) and/or del(17p)) and standard-risk group (n=142 patients without high-risk CA). The rates of CA was similar in both treatment arms. Response Rates (RR) were no different in the high-risk vs standard-risk groups, both in the sequential (74% vs 79% RR and 42% vs 39% CR) and alternating arms (69% vs 86% RR and 39% vs 38% CR). After a median follow-up of 51 months, high-risk patients showed shorter PFS as compared to standard risk in the alternating arm (24 versus 33 months, p=0.03) and this also translated into a significantly shorter OS (38.4m vs not reached, p=0.002). However, in the sequential arm, high-risk and standard-risk patients showed similar PFS (29.5 months vs 31.5 months, p=0.9) and OS (46m vs 63m, p=0.1). This beneficial effect observed in the sequential arm applied to both t(4;14) or del(17p). As far as 1q gains is concerned, 151 patients had 1q information and 76 of them had 1q gains (50.3%), defined as the presence of more than 3 copies in at least 10% of plasma cells. The rate of 1q gains was well balanced in both sequential and alternating arms. The ORR was similar in patients with or without 1q gains (83% vs 80%) as well as the CR rate (45% vs 31%), and no differences were observed between sequential and alternating arms. Patients with or without 1q gains had a similar PFS (36 months vs 29 months) and 4-years OS (63% vs 68%) in the whole series and no differences were observed between the sequential and alternating arms. This effect has been observed in patients with 1q gains as isolated CA and the outcome was slightly but not significantly worse when 1q gains were present plus either t(4;14) and/or del17p. Conclusions: The total therapy approach including VMP and Rd administered in a sequential approach is able to overcome the poor prognosis of the presence of high-risk CA in elderly patients with newly diagnosed MM. The presence of 1q gains has no impact in the PFS and OS of elderly patients treated with VMP and Rd. Disclosures Mateos: Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, BMS: Honoraria. Martínez-López:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Oriol:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paiva:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; EngMab: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Binding Site: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction:SMM is an asymptomatic and heterogeneous plasma cell disorder. The Spanish Myeloma Group demonstrated that patients at high risk of progression benefit from early treatment with Rd. In addition, our preliminary results of the curative approach (GEM-CESAR) showed encouraging results (Mateos ASH 2017). Aim: The primary end-point was to evaluate the Minimal Residual Disease negative (MRD-ve) rate by next generation flow (NGF) after induction and ASCT and the sustained MRD-ve rate at 3 and 5 yrs after ASCT as secondary end-points. Our aim was to increase the MRD -ve rate from 34% (reported in NDMM patients after VTD and ASCT) to 50%. As all patients have completed induction and ASCT, we report the results of the primary end point, efficacy and safety after induction and ASCT. Methods: In this phase II single arm trial, 90 SMM patients at high-risk of progression (〉50% at 2 yrs), younger than 70 yrs and transplant candidates were included. The high risk was defined by the presence of both ≥PC 10% and MC ≥3g/dL (Mayo criteria) or ifonly one criterion was present, patients must have a proportionof aberrant PCs within the total PCsBM compartment by immunophenotypingof 95% plus immunoparesis (Spanish criteria). Asymptomatic MM patients with any of the three biomarkers recently included into the definition of active MM were allowed to be included. Induction therapy consisted on six 4-weeks cycles of KRd in which K was given at dose of 36 mg/m2twice per week plus R at dose of 25 mg on days 1-21 and dexamethasone at dose of 40 mg weekly. Melphalan at dose of 200 mg/m2followed by ASCT was given as intensification therapy and three months later, patients received two KRd consolidation cycles followed by maintenance with R at dose of 10 mg on days 1-21 plus dex at dose of 20 mg weekly for up to 2 yrs Results: Between June 2015 and June 2017, the 90 SMM patients at high risk of progression were recruited. Twenty-eight pts (32%) shared at least one of the new biomarkers predicting imminent risk of progression to MM. The primary end point of the trial was met, since 55% of the patients who completed induction and ASCT achieved MRD -ve by NGF (sensitivity 3 x 10-6). Upon analyzing the results after induction, 88 patients completed the 6 induction cycles and were evaluable for response (two patients early discontinued): the ORR was 98% including 41% of ≥CR (32% sCR and 9% CR) and 41% of VGPR rate. Two patients were mobilization failures and one patient rejected ASCT. Two additional patients experienced biological progression before ASCT and went off the study. Eighty-three patients, therefore, proceeded to HDT-ASCT and were evaluable at day +100: the ORR was 100% including ≥CR in 63% of the patients (51% sCR and 12% CR) and VGPR rate in 23%. The MRD-ve rate increased from 31% after induction to 55% with the ASCT. No differences in outcome have been observed according neither to the definition of high risk (Mayo or Spanish model) nor ultra high risk SMM. Concerning toxicity, during induction, G3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 5 (6%) and 10 pts (11%), respectively. G3-4 infections were the most frequent non-hematological AE observed in 16 pts (18%), followed by skin rash in 8 pts (9%). One patient reported G1 atrial fibrillation and another cardiac failure secondary to respiratory infection. Three patients reported hypertension (G2 in two and G3 in one). Thirteen patients required lenalidomide dose reduction whilst carfilzomib was not reduced in any patient. In four patients, dexamethasone was reduced. In all but two of the pts, PBSC collection was successful with a median of 4.10 x 106/Kg CD34 cells collected. All patients engrafted. Consolidation and maintenance phases are ongoing. After a median follow-up of 17 months (5-36), 94% of patients remain alive and free of progression and 97% of them alive. Three patients experienced biological progression and discontinued the study: one of them was refractory to the rescue therapies and died and the other two are receiving rescue therapies. One additional patient died early during induction due to a massive ischemic stroke unrelated to the treatment. Conclusions: Although longer follow-up is required, this "curative strategy for high risk SMM" continues being encouraging with an acceptable toxicity profile. The study has met its primary endpoint. The depth of response improved over the treatment: 63% of patients who completed induction and ASCT achieved ≥CR with a MRD-ve rate of 55%. Disclosures Mateos: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rodriguez Otero:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Clínica Universidad de Navarra: Employment. Ocio:AbbVie: Consultancy; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. Rosinol:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Alegre:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Puig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. De La Rubia:Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. García Mateo:Binding Site: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Bladé:Janssen: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Description: Introduction : Daratumumab (DARA) is a human, CD38-targeted, IgGκ monoclonal antibody. In the CASTOR study, D-Vd reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 68% and induced higher rates of deeper responses vs Vd in relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts (Spencer, A. ASH 2017. Abs. 3145). Overall, in phase 3 studies in RRMM and newly diagnosed MM, DARA-based regimens reduced disease progression or death risk by ≥50%, doubled complete response (CR) rates, and tripled minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative rates. While progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of D-Vd vs Vd were observed regardless of the number of prior lines (PLs) of therapy, the benefit was most pronounced in pts receiving 1 PL of therapy. Here, we examine updated (2 y after interim analysis) efficacy and safety of D-Vd vs Vd in CASTOR, with a primary focus on pts with 1 PL of therapy. Method: Pts in CASTOR were randomized to receive 8 cycles (21 d/cycle) of V (1.3 mg/m2, SC) on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and dexamethasone (20 mg, PO or IV) on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 with or without DARA (16 mg/kg, IV) given weekly for Cycles 1-3, Q3W for Cycles 4-8, and Q4W thereafter. Cytogenetic risk was evaluated centrally by next generation sequencing; high risk was defined as having t(4;14), t(14;16), and/or del17p abnormalities. MRD was assessed at the time of suspected CR and at 6 and 12 mo following the first treatment dose, and an additional MRD evaluation was required every 12 mo post-CR. MRD was evaluated using clonoSEQ® V2.0 (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA). Sustained MRD negativity was defined as maintenance of MRD negativity at 10-5 for ≥6 or ≥12 mo. Results: At the clinical cutoff date of January 11, 2018, 498 pts were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (D-Vd, n = 251; Vd, n = 247). Pts received a median of 2 (1-10) PLs of therapy including 235 pts that received 1 PL (D-Vd, n = 122; Vd, n = 113). In the ITT population, 61% received prior ASCT, 66% V, 42% lenalidomide (R), and 32% were refractory to their last PL of therapy. Among 1 PL pts, 60% received prior ASCT, 51% V, 20% R, and 18% were refractory to their last PL of therapy. After a median follow-up of 31.3 mo, PFS was significantly prolonged with D-Vd compared with Vd in the ITT population (median: 16.7 vs 7.1 mo; HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.25-0.40, P

Description: BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed and/or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), especially those with aggressive lymphomas, have overall poor prognosis. Novel targets and therapies are under investigation. Molibresib (GSK525762) is a potent and specific inhibitor of the bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) family of proteins, the inhibition of which prevents transcriptional complex assembly and the subsequent expression of oncogenic drivers. Molibresib inhibits growth in NHL cell lines, both in vitro and in vivo. Study BET116183 was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of molibresib in relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. Here we report the results from the NHL dose escalation cohort. METHODS: Eligible subjects were adults with relapsed or refractory NHL. An accelerated dose titration was employed with one subject per dose level until the occurrence of a ≥Grade 2 drug-related toxicity; thereafter, subjects were enrolled in a standard 3+3 design. A Neuenschwander continual reassessment method (N-CRM) model was used to provide guidance for the next dose level. Dose escalation continued until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was identified. All data, including safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy, were used to identify the recommended part 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: From 14 May 2014 to the data cutoff date of 24 June 2018, 27 NHL subjects were enrolled and received at least one dose of study drug. Of these, 19 (70%) had B-cell lymphomas (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, follicular lymphoma , and Burkitt's lymphoma); eight subjects (30%) had T-cell lymphomas (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [CTCL], anaplastic T-cell lymphoma [ATCL], peripheral T-cell lymphoma, and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma). The median age was 64 years (range 24 to 76); 20 subjects (76%) were male and 7 subjects (24%) were female. The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range 1 to 〉 4). From the starting dose of 10 mg molibresib orally once daily (QD), the dose was escalated to 80 mg QD. The median time on study was 1.4 months (range 0.2 to 20 months). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were identified in subjects treated at 60 mg QD, though one was subsequently determined not to be a DLT. One subject experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia related to study drug. A second subject experienced a Grade 2 mechanical fall; this event was later revised to unrelated to study drug. Across all dose levels, all subjects experienced an adverse event (AE); 25 subjects (93%) experienced at least one AE that was deemed to be related to molibresib treatment. The most common related AEs across all dose levels were thrombocytopenia (n = 21 [78%]), fatigue (n = 6 [22%]), nausea (n = 6 [22%]), diarrhea (n = 4 [15%]), and rash (n = 4 [15%]). Blood bilirubin was increased in 3 subjects (11%), and prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time were prolonged in 2 subjects each (7%). Common Grade 3 and Grade 4 related events included thrombocytopenia (n = 19 [70%]), as well as anemia, asthenia, and increased blood bilirubin (n = 2 [7%] each). No Grade 5 related AEs were reported. Among all subjects, 11 (41%) required dose reduction for toxicity: 7 subjects at the 60 mg dose level (39% treated at that dose) and 4 at the 80 mg dose level (57% treated at that dose). PK analyses showed dose-proportionality after single and repeat dosing, with large variability between subjects. One subject with DLBCL achieved a complete remission that was durable through week 54 on study. Four additional subjects (one DLBCL and 3 CTCL) achieved partial remission, for an objective response rate (ORR) of 5/27 (18.5%). Five more subjects had stable disease as best response. Of six CTCL/ATCL subjects enrolled, three subjects had partial response for an ORR of 50% in this sub-population. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the BET inhibitor molibresib in NHL subjects. Overall, thrombocytopenia and other AEs were monitorable, manageable and reversible. The RP2D was identified as 60 mg QD. Single-agent activity was observed across multiple NHL subtypes at both 60 mg and 80 mg doses; most notable was a 50% response rate in subjects with CTCL. Because of the promising data, Part 2 of the BET116183 study is currently open and enrolling subjects with CTCL to better define the clinical activity of BET bromodomain inhibition in this histology. Disclosures Dickinson: GSK: Consultancy. Kamdar:Genentech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Mateos:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alegre:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Martín:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses. Horner:GSK: Employment. Winnberg:GSK: Employment. Mathew:GSK: Employment. Botbyl:GSK: Employment. Karpinich:GSK: Employment. Kremer:GSK: Employment. Dhar:GSK: Employment. Karadimitris:GSK: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 3045 Background: Lenalidomide is an oral IMiD® immunomodulatory compound with a dual mechanism of action, namely tumoricidal and immunomodulatory activity, and established clinical efficacy and safety in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Len + Dex) was well tolerated and demonstrated significant improvements in response and favorable overall survival (OS) compared with Placebo + Dex in 2 pivotal phase 3 registration trials in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM; Weber et al, NEJM 2007; Dimopoulos et al, NEJM 2007). Previously, in a phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, expanded-access study (MM-018), Len + Dex demonstrated a predictable safety profile that can preserve patient quality of life (QoL) (Yong et al Haematologica 2010 [abstract #0944]). Here we report efficacy, safety, and QoL data for patients enrolled in the Spanish cohort of MM-018. Methods: Patients with progressive disease after 〉 2 cycles of antimyeloma treatment, or after relapse from treatment, with ECOG performance status ≤ 2 received 28-day cycles of Len (25 mg/day, D 1–21) plus Dex (40 mg/day, D 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 for cycles 1–4; D 1–4 in subsequent cycles). Endpoints included overall response (≥ partial response [PR] by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria) and QoL assessments measured by EORTC QLQ C-30 and EORTC QLQ MY-20 questionnaires at baseline and week 24. All prophylaxis was administered at the investigator's discretion. Results: Sixty-three patients receiving ≥ 1 dose of Len + Dex were evaluated for efficacy, safety, and QoL. Median age was 62 years (21 [33.3%] were 〉 65 years). Prior therapies included thalidomide (n = 15, 24%) and bortezomib (n = 37, 59%). Additionally, 5 (8%) patients had a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and 23 (37%) had a history of peripheral neuropathy. A PR or better was observed in 49 (78%) patients, including complete response (CR) in 13 (21%), very good partial response (VGPR) in 13 (21%), and PR in 23 (37%) patients. Median time to first response and best response was 2.7 and 4.5 months, respectively. Median duration of response was 18.4 months. Response depth improved after long-term treatment with Len + Dex, and 32/63 (51%) patients received 〉12 cycles of therapy. Beyond 12 cycles of therapy, 8 patients achieved VGPR and 12 patients achieved CR; compared with 5 patients and 1 patient, respectively, prior to 12 cycles. Median time to progression and progression-free survival were both 13.3 months; median OS has not yet been reached. Forty-two (67%) patients remained on study at 6 months. Compliance to QoL assessment questionnaires was ≥ 80%. Patient-reported improvements in QoL and disease symptoms measured by both questionnaires were observed in nearly all scales. EORTC QLQ C-30 scores revealed clinically meaningful improvement (〉 5 points) for global QoL (n = 15, 40%), fatigue (n = 16, 42%), emotional function (n = 15, 40%), physical function (n = 12, 32%), role function (n = 11, 29%), social function (n = 11, 29%), cognitive function (n = 10, 26%), and pain (n = 9, 24%) at 6 cycles compared with baseline. Preservation of QoL in role function, emotional function, social function, and pain scores was observed at 6 cycles when compared with baseline in responders (≥ PR). EORTC QLQ MY-20 results revealed no relevant median change (〉 5 points) from baseline in all scales for all patients completing questionnaires at baseline and 6 cycles, except for a meaningful improvement in future perspective scores (median 11.1-point change). Adverse events observed in this study were consistent with those previously reported with Len + Dex. Grade 3/4 hematologic events were experienced by 40 (64%) patients, and included neutropenia (n = 32, 51%), thrombocytopenia (n = 11, 17%), anemia (n = 10, 18%), and febrile neutropenia (n = 4, 6%). DVT (all grades) was experienced by 5 (8%) patients, and only one grade 3/4 new-onset peripheral neuropathy was observed after 6 cycles of treatment. Conclusions: Len + Dex treatment in this expanded-access study demonstrated efficacy and predictable safety, consistent with that of previously published trials for patients with RRMM. More patients achieved VGPR and CR after long-term therapy compared with those receiving 〈 12 cycles of therapy. Furthermore, QoL assessments at baseline and 6 months revealed that patients treated with Len + Dex showed meaningful improvements in certain QoL and symptom scores. Disclosures: Oriol-Rocafiguera: Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. García-Laraña:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy. Mateos:Celgene: Honoraria. Cibeira:Celgene: Honoraria for Lectures; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria for Lectures; Pharmion: Honoraria for Lectures. Knight:Celgene: Employment. Rosettani:Celgene Corporation: Employment.

Description: In MM patients relapsing after MRD-negativity, the disease could reemerge from immature cells or from undetectable MRD. However, it remains unknown if immature cells have the same genetic background as MM plasma cells (PCs), as well as the amount of MRD that persists below the limit of detection (LOD) of next-generation techniques. To obtain further insight, we compared the biological landscape of MM PCs at diagnosis to that of CD34 progenitors, B cells and normal PCs isolated from patients with negative MRD by next-generation flow (NGF) after treatment. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES, mean depth: 90x) with the 10XGenomics Exome Solution for low DNA-input as well as deep NGS of B-cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) gene rearrangements (mean, 69,975 sequences), in a total of 68 cell-samples isolated from the bone marrow (BM) of 7 MM patients with MRD-negativity by EuroFlow NGF after induction with VRD and auto-transplant (GEM2012MENOS65 trial). Patients with negative MRD were intentionally selected to avoid contamination with MM PCs during sorting of CD34 progenitors, B-cell precursors, mature B cells and normal PCs after induction and transplant. We investigated in these populations the presence of somatic mutations and clonotypic BcR Ig rearrangements detectable in MM PCs sorted at diagnosis, using peripheral blood T cells as germline control. We also performed WES in matched diagnostic MM PCs and MRD cells persisting after VRD induction in 14 cases as control. In another 6 patients with untreated MM, we performed single-cell RNA and BcR IG sequencing (scRNA/BcRIGseq) of total BM B cells and PCs (n=16,380) to investigate before treatment, if the clonotypic BcR IG sequence of MM PCs was detectable in other B cell stages defined by their molecular phenotype. We used multidimensional flow cytometry (MFC) to investigate the frequency of B cell clonality in BM samples from a larger series of 195 newly-diagnosed MM patients, prospectively enrolled in the GEM-CLARIDEX trial. Somatic mutations present in diagnostic MM PCs were detectable in the lymphopoiesis of 5/7 patients achieving MRD-negativity after treatment. In one case, out of 55 mutations present in diagnostic MM PCs, a single mutation in PCSK1N (VAF: 0.30) was detectable in normal PCs. In the other four patients, a total of 85 mutations were present in MM PCs and up to 10 (median VAF, 0.16) were found all the way from CD34 progenitors into B-cell precursors, mature B cells and normal PCs, but not in T cells. Of note, most mutations were reproducibly detected in each cell type after induction and after transplant. All somatic mutations shared by MM PCs and normal cells were non-recurrent, and genes recurrently mutated in MM (eg. ACTG1, ATM, DIS3, FAM46C, KRAS, LTB, MAX, TRAF3) were found in MM PCs but never in normal cells. Copy number alterations (CNA) were found only in MM PCs. By contrast, up to 513/827 (62%) mutations and 48/67 (72%) CNA were detectable in matched diagnostic MM PCs and persistent MRD cells, indicating that the few somatic variants present in normal cells were unlikely related to contaminating MRD below NGF's LOD. Accordingly, MM clonotypic BcR IG rearrangements were detectable in normal PCs (4/7patients) and in immature B cells (5/7 patients) but at much lower frequencies (mean of 0.02% in both). Of note, 9 additional clonotypes (mean 8.4%) were found in MM PCs of 5/7 patients (range, 1-3). scRNR/BcRIGseq unveiled that clonotypic cells were confined mostly but not entirely within PC clusters, and that in 1 patient another clonotype was detectable in mature B cells. Accordingly, using MFC we found in a larger series that 25/195 (13%) of newly-diagnosed MM patients display B-cell clonality (median of 0.7% BM clonal B cells, range 0.02%-6.3%). In conclusion, we show for the first time that MM patients bear somatic mutations in CD34 progenitors that specifically differentiate into the B cell lineage, likely before the disease onset. Because diagnostic, MRD (and relapse) MM PCs display great genetic similarity, these results suggest that undetectable MRD

Description: Multiple myeloma (MM) pathogenesis has been explained for many years by the cancer biology dogma introduced by Peter Nowell: first, a single plasma cell would be immortalized by an error in the immunoglobulin genes rearrangement process; then, a progressive stepwise acquisition of somatic cell mutations would induce a sequential selection and domination by the fittest clone. In line with this idea of “myeloma stability”, SNP arrays studies in diagnostic-relapse paired samples have revealed the presence of common clonal characteristics. Biologically, the M-protein remains usually constant across MM evolution and further, the variable domain of the rearranged immunoglobulin heavy chain genes (or CDR3 region) has been used as a patient-specific myeloma fingerprint in minimal residual disease (MRD) studies. However, massive genome studies with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) have challenged this concept, showing a significant intraclonal heterogeneity at diagnosis with the possible presence of several clonal progenitors or tumor-initiating cells. In this study, we have characterized and compared the CDR3 region in 52-paired samples from 26 MM patients aiming: 1) to assess mono-clonality in MM evolution through the analysis of the CDR3 sequence and, 2) to validate ASO RQ-PCR approaches for MRD in MM, based on the constancy and specificity of the CDR3 region. Samples were obtained at diagnosis and progression (19 pairs) or at 2 different timepoints of progressive disease (7 pairs). Median time between sampling was 2 years. M-protein subtype remained stable in all pairs but 1, associated with a light-chain escape phenomenon. All samples proceeded from bone marrow (BM) except for 2 pairs, composed by BM and extramedullary disease (spleen and testes). Two major cytogenetic changes were identified: increased 13q14 deletion (from 7 to 54%) in 1 pair and increased 17p (p53) deletion (from 5 to 87%) in a further one. Treatments administered between sampling included most of the current approaches used in MM (data not shown). Genomic DNA isolation, PCR amplification and sequencing were performed following conventional methods. Germline VH, DH and JH segments were identified by comparison with public databases. CDR3 region was first identified in all samples and then compared between the two samples in the 26 pairs: the sequence of nucleotides was constantly identical in each pair, including those associated with major cytogenetic changes, a light-chain escape, extramedullar vs. BM infiltration and relapsed (and therefore, treatment selected) vs. refractory disease. Therefore, we can first conclude that the main tumor clone in MM retains a specific signature across all stages of disease evolution that allows the identification of samples as evolutionary related. This major clone signature is not modified by clinical or biological changes in the disease nor under different treatment pressures and would thus identify disease relapse and progression. Our results have also a clear impact on the validity of molecular MRD techniques. The high rate of complete responses (up to 50-60%) currently achieved in MM has prompted the use of new techniques for disease assessment. Today, ASO RQ-PCR, based on the use of specific primers and probes complementary of the VDJH rearrangement, continues to be the most sensitive approach. One pitfall of this technique would be the potential instability of PCR targets over time, which would induce false negative results. In B-cell precursor ALL, this is estimated to happen in 30-40% of cases but has not been deeply evaluated in MM yet. With the present study, we can also conclude that the junction region of the VDJH rearrangement in MM constantly identifies the myeloma cells responsible for relapse and therefore can be used as a reliable target for MRD assessment by ASO RQ-PCR and more recently, by NGS methods. If the CDR3 region remains stable, the novel concept of clonal tiding in MM should not be interpreted as a poly- or oligoclonal but subclonal. In MM, tides can be subclonal, but the ocean remains monoclonal. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Background: The advent of immunotherapy renewed the interest in immune monitoring to identify determinants of treatment response. Flow cytometry is widely adopted in immunotherapy-based clinical trials, but manual analysis of multiparameter files poses a challenge to capture full cellular diversity and to provide unbiased reporting in large datasets. Methods: Here, we developed a semi-automated pipeline named "FlowCT" which, starting from compensated data obtained with standardized protocols, allows simultaneous analyses of multiple files and automated cell clustering. FlowCT starts with quality control and data normalization followed by an analytical stage with clustering algorithms, dimensional reduction techniques and cluster identification based on antigen expression. Statistical tools are included for immediate analysis of results. Results: As proof-of-concept, we used FlowCT in three different datasets. First, we applied FlowCT to bone marrow (BM) samples from three multiple myeloma (MM) patients stained with 17-color flow cytometry, to determine the increment in the complexity of analyzing 8 and 17 markers, chosen to characterize T cells. Of note, a single combination of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD56, CCR7, PD1 and TIGIT, allowed the identification of 31 lymphocyte subsets using FlowCT, which increased to 39 different clusters with 17 markers and unveiled a novel population of CD3- CD56- CD8+ CD16+ lymphoid cells in the MM immune microenvironment. Secondly, we applied FlowCT to matched peripheral blood (PB) and BM samples from 10 patients with smoldering MM, to objectively assess if PB represents a good surrogate of T-cell distribution in the BM. Using an 8-color combination to characterize CD4 T cells, up to 26 different subsets were identified, including several CD4 T helper (Th) type subsets. Of note, their distribution within PB CD4 T cells was similar to that found in BM, except for CD4 T CXCR3+CCR4+ effector memory and Th17 central memory subsets that decreased in the BM tumor immune microenvironment. Thirdly, we analyzed 30 BM samples from 10 MM patients studied every year during maintenance therapy, monitored with CD4, CD8, CD25, CD45RA, CD127, CCR7, PD1, and TCRγδ to characterize T cells. FlowCT identified 29 different T-cell populations, including 9 CD4 subsets, 14 CD8 subsets, 4 Tγδ cell subsets and 2 distinct Treg subsets. Longitudinal, semi-automated and unbiased analysis unveiled a significant fluctuation of CD4 naïve and transitional memory cells during maintenance, as well as a significant decrease of CD8 CD127- effector memory and transitional effectors cells after 2 years of maintenance. Conclusions: Here, we presented FlowCT, a pipeline optimized for the analysis of large flow cytometry datasets that could be easily implemented by research laboratories to unveil full cellular diversity, singular patterns of antigen expression, and to provide unbiased reporting in large studies, like clinical trials. Disclosures Puig: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; The Binding Site: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Borrello:WindMIL Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Aduro: Patents & Royalties: intellectual property on allogeneic MM GVAX; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rosinol Dachs:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen and Takeda: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, GSK, Abbvie, EDO, Pharmar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Adaptive: Honoraria; Amgen Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc: Other: Data and Monitoring Committee; Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Takeda Oncology.: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biotech Inc, Mundipharma EDO, PharmaMar, Roche Laboratories Inc, Takeda Oncology: Other: Advisory Committee. Lahuerta:Takeda, Amgen, Celgene and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bladé:Jansen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen and Oncopeptides: Honoraria. San-Miguel:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Paiva:Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Abstract 1811 Poster Board I-837 The prognostic significance of achieving complete remission (CR) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) has finally been accepted. However, available studies have been based on series with a median follow-up around 5 years. This time period is insufficient according to the current life expectation of MM. Aim To establish the real effect of prognosis of the different response categories in a cohort of MM patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after long term follow up. Patients and methods Follow-up from diagnosis of 344 MM patients transplanted between 1989 and 1998 has been updated. These patients were previously included in a study aimed at establishing the post-ASCT response significance in MM and to validate the EBMT classification (Br J Haemat 2000;109:438-46). It was possible to update the follow up of 322 patients as at April 2009. At this date 99 patients were alive with a median follow-up form diagnosis of 12.5 years. Response categories and evaluated cases were: i) Complete Response (IF-) (CR), n= 84 ii) near Complete Response (EF-/IF+) (nCR), n= 66 iii) Very good partial response (VGPR) (

Description: Background A lack of objective data exists on differences in treatment practices and outcomes for MM between countries. The EMMOS study aimed to document and describe current treatment regimens and disease progression patterns of MM pts at different stages of the disease in real-world medical practice. Methods Adult pts initiating any new MM therapy, irrespective of treatment line at study entry or therapy type received, were eligible for inclusion in the EMMOS registry. A multi-staged pt/site recruitment model was applied to minimize selection bias; enrollment was stratified by country, region, and practice type. Pts' medical/disease features, treatment history, and remission status were recorded at baseline. Prospective data on treatment, efficacy, and safety were collected electronically every 3 mos until 2 yrs after the last pt enrolled. Responses were investigator-assessed (no predefined criteria). Here we report data from the final analysis of EMMOS. Pts were grouped according to receipt of high-dose chemotherapy/stem cell transplantation in any treatment line (SCT pts, non-SCT pts). Within a given line, pts may have received induction, SCT, consolidation, and/or maintenance therapy; if multiple drug combinations were used within a line, the line grouping was based on the combination received in cycle 1. Results 2358 pts were enrolled between Oct 2010-Oct 2012 in 22 countries in Europe and Africa; the last pt completed follow-up in Oct 2014. Of these, 775 pts had undergone SCT in any treatment line. Baseline characteristics in the prospective phase by starting line are shown in the Table. As expected, there was a higher proportion of younger pts (≤65 yrs) in the SCT vs non-SCT group across all treatment lines, and in both groups a higher proportion of pts in 4th + vs earlier lines with ISS stage III disease. While cytogenetics were evaluated in a small number of pts overall (670/2358 [28%]), these assessments were performed significantly more frequently in SCT vs non-SCT pts (p