ALBERT

Description: Background Duvelisib, an oral dual PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. In multiple phase 1-3 studies that included patients with iNHL, duvelisib was shown to be efficacious, with a favorable risk-benefit profile. This study will evaluate whether duvelisib efficacy at the approved 25 mg twice daily (BID) dose can be achieved and maintained with an acceptable or improved safety profile by the inclusion of prespecified 2-week drug holidays in patients with R/R iNHL. Study Design and Methods TEMPO is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, international, phase 2 study of duvelisib in adult patients with R/R iNHL in whom ≥ 1 line of prior therapy has failed. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of duvelisib administered with prescribed drug holidays, with the primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) by the 2007 revised International Working Group criteria. Key secondary endpoints include ORR by the 2014 Lugano criteria, progression-free survival, overall survival, time to treatment failure, duration of response, lymph node response rate, time to the first response, adverse event profile, and determination of pharmacokinetics parameters. Exploratory objectives include assessment of quality of life and biomarkers of treatment response and toxicity. Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed FL grades 1 to 3a, marginal zone lymphoma (splenic, nodal, or extranodal) or small lymphocytic lymphoma, radiological evidence of disease progression and ≥ 1 bidimensionally measurable lesion ≥ 1.5 cm, adequate organ function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2. Key exclusion criteria include prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; previous treatment with a PI3K inhibitor; history of drug-induced colitis or drug-induced pneumonitis; ongoing treatment for systemic infection; central nervous system NHL; prolonged QT interval; history of tuberculosis treatment within the 2 past years; history of stroke, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmia requiring medication or mechanical control within the past 6 months; history of or concurrent interstitial lung disease of any severity and/or severely impaired lung function; ongoing treatment with chronic immunosuppressants; and any unstable or severe uncontrolled medical condition. A total of 102 patients are planned to be enrolled. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to 2 arms and stratified by number of prior therapies (1 or 〉 1), bulky disease status (longest diameter of baseline lesion 〈 5 cm or ≥ 5 cm), and time since last recurrence (≥ 24 months or 〈 24 months). In arm 1, patients will receive duvelisib 25 mg BID for one 10-week (W) cycle followed by 25 mg BID on W3 and W4 of each subsequent 4-week cycle. In arm 2, patients will receive duvelisib 25 mg BID on W1, W2, W5, W6, W9, and W10 of one 10-week cycle and then on W3 and W4 of each subsequent 4-week cycle. Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. This study will test the null hypothesis that the ORR in each arm is ≤ 30% against the alternative that the ORR is ≥ 55%. The study has a 2-stage design. In stage 1, 15 patients will be enrolled in each arm, with response assessment after ≥ 3 cycles. If there are fewer than 6 partial or complete responses, consideration may be given to terminating the arm. Otherwise, in stage 2, 36 additional patients will be enrolled, for a total of 51 per arm. Enrollment is planned to be initiated in August 2019. Approximately 50 sites will be open for enrollment across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Disclosures Karmali: Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution; Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau. Youssoufian:Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Sprott:SMOC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership; Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weaver:FemtoDx: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Inventor; Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Inventor; Hillstream Biopharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Narasimhan:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:Verastem: Employment. Patrick:Verastem Oncology: Employment. Zalutskaya:Verastem Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gordon:Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board. OffLabel Disclosure: Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-delta,gamma inhibitor, is US FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after at least 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after at least two prior systemic therapies.

Description: Background The efficacy and safety of subsequent TKIs in pts who have experienced failure of dasatinib is not fully known. Ponatinib, a pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor, was evaluated in a phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial (PACE). This post-hoc analysis explored the efficacy and safety of ponatinib following failure of dasatinib in CP-CML pts in the PACE trial. Methods The PACE trial enrolled 449 pts, including 270 with CP-CML. Pts had to be resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib, or they had to have the T315I mutation at baseline. The primary endpoint in CP-CML was major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 months after treatment initiation. The trial is ongoing. Data as of 1 April 2013 are reported, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months for pts remaining on study. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg QD) in 107 CP-CML pts following failure of dasatinib as the most recent prior therapy, irrespective of other TKI therapy, is presented (Group D). Eighteen pts who experienced failure of dasatinib but received ≥1 anticancer therapy, other than hydroxyurea or anagrelide, prior to ponatinib treatment were excluded from the analyses. Data are also presented for 2 subsets of Group D: 52 pts whose only TKI therapy was imatinib followed by dasatinib (Group I-D), and 46 pts whose only TKI therapy was imatinib, then nilotinib, and then dasatinib (Group I-N-D). An analysis of cross-intolerance was also conducted in 69 pts with prior dasatinib treatment at any time who discontinued dasatinib due to intolerance. Results Baseline characteristics are shown in the table. Group I-D tended to be younger, with less time since diagnosis versus Group I-N-D. At the time of analysis, 60%, 65%, and 54% of pts in Groups D, I-D, and I-N-D remained on study. The most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; 16%, 15%, 17%) and progressive disease (9%, 6%, 11%) in Groups D, I-D, and I-N-D. Efficacy end points are shown in the table. In Group D, MCyR was seen in pts with the following dasatinib-resistant mutations at baseline: V299L, 3/4 (75%); T315I, 17/23 (74%); F317L, 3/10 (30%). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%, 37%, 57%), rash (39%, 39%, 39%), and dry skin (39%, 29%, 52%) in Groups D, I-D, and I-N-D. Serious cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular AEs occurred in 6%, 3%, and 3% of pts in Group D (treatment-related: 3%, 1%, 0%). Seventy-three of 217 pts receiving prior dasatinib at any time discontinued dasatinib due to intolerance. Of these 73 pts, 27 experienced the same AE(s) with ponatinib that led to dasatinib intolerance; 12 pts had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, 6 pts had other grade 3/4 AEs (3 with neutropenia, 1 each with pleural effusion, dyspnea, pulmonary hypertension), 8 pts had grade 1/2 AEs. Six of these 27 pts discontinued ponatinib due to the same AE that led to dasatinib intolerance. Thrombocytopenia was the primary AE involved in cross-intolerance (4 pts); congestive cardiac failure (grade 5) and pleural effusion each occurred once. Conclusions Ponatinib has substantial activity in pts with CP-CML following failure of dasatinib, with a safety profile reflective of this heavily pretreated population. Cross-intolerance between dasatinib and ponatinib was infrequent. Disclosures: Hochhaus: Ariad, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Cortes:Ariad, Pfizer, Teva: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Research Funding. Kim:BMS, Novartis,IL-Yang: Consultancy; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer,ARIAD,IL-Yang: Research Funding; BMS, Novartis,Pfizer,IL-Yang: Honoraria; BMS, Novartis,Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis, Ariad, BMS and Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis: Research Funding; Novatis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD, BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Chuah:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Ariad and Teva: Consultancy; Novartis & Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Teva, Pfizer, Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis, BMS, Teva: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Ariad, Teva, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria. Talpaz:Ariad, BMS, Sanofi, INCYTE: Research Funding; Ariad, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ariad, Sanofi, Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. DeAngelo:Araid, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy. Rea:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Ariad, Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:Ariad, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy; Ariad, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Müller:Novartis, BMS, Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer, BMS: Honoraria. Lustgarten:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Turner:ARIAD: Employment. Haluska:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Deininger:BMS, ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Consultancy; BMS, NOVARTIS, CELGENE, GILEAD: Research Funding; ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Ariad: Honoraria. Shah:Ariad, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:RIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Research Funding.

Description: Background Ponatinib is a potent oral pan–BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has demonstrated significant clinical activity in heavily pretreated CP-CML pts. A multivariate analysis of CP-CML pts in the PACE trial found significant associations between major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and higher dose intensity; however, dose reductions and/or interruptions (DR/I) of ponatinib occur often in pts who experience adverse events (AEs). The clinical significance of such DR/I are not well known. Objectives To assess the impact of DR/I and dose intensity of ponatinib on clinical outcomes in pts with CP-CML enrolled in the PACE trial. Methods A total of 270 CP-CML pts were enrolled in this ongoing, phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. The efficacy population (N=267) was included in this post hoc analysis. Dose reductions were defined as any reduction below the standard 45 mg daily dose; interruptions were defined as a period in which ponatinib was held for ≥3 consecutive days between non-missing doses. Up to 2 reductions (to 30 or 15 mg/day) were permitted for managing AEs. To assess the impact of dose modification on response, pts were grouped according to tertiles of average dose intensity (mg/day), calculated as the cumulative dose divided by treatment exposure. All variables were calculated within 12 mos of the first dose to correspond to the primary outcome measure of MCyR by 12 mos. Secondary efficacy endpoints included complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR). Responses were assessed every 3 mos. The Cochran–Armitage trend test was used to assess whether response rates increased with higher average dose intensity tertiles; all P-values were 2-sided. Data are as of 01 Apr 2013, with a median follow-up of 20 (0.1–28) mos. Minimum follow-up for pts still on study was 18 mos. Results A total of 209 (78%) pts required DR/I at least once within 12 mos: 172 pts (64%) had at least 1 dose reduction (median time to first dose reduction was 64 days). In pts with 〉1 dose reduction (n=75, 28%), the median time between the first and second reduction was 91 days. Among pts with a dose reduction at any time, 35% re-escalated to 45 mg daily. Dose interruption was experienced by 199 (75%) pts (median total duration of 35 days). The most common reason for DR/I was thrombocytopenia (33%). For pts with average dose intensity ≤27 mg/day (N=89), 〉27 to ≤42 mg/day (N=88), and 〉42 mg/day (N=90), respectively, the median age was 62, 62, and 56 yrs; median time since initial diagnosis was 11, 7, and 6 yrs; each group had received a median of 3 prior TKIs. Among these tertiles, the best response to the most recent dasatinib- or nilotinib-containing regimen was MCyR or better in 21%, 22%, and 35%; CCyR or better in 11%, 14%, and 23%; MMR or better in 1%, 2%, and 6%, respectively. Within 12 mos of the first dose, median duration of treatment exposure was 356 (26–366), 366 (51–366) and 366 (3–366) days, respectively. Twenty-nine pts had 27 to ≤42 mg/day and 〉42 mg/day. Response rates were lower in pts with average dose intensity ≤27 mg/day; however, these pts still achieved MCyR, CCyR, and MMR rates that substantially exceeded those reported with the most recent dasatinib- or nilotinib-containing regimen. Conclusions Higher dose intensity of ponatinib was associated with higher response rates in this heavily pretreated CP-CML population, but lower dose intensity still led to positive clinical outcomes. It should be noted that higher responses to the most recent dasatinib- or nilotinib-containing regimen were also seen in pts with higher average dose intensity. In summary, these data indicate that although optimal responses were seen with average ponatinib dose intensity 〉42 mg/day, pts can be effectively managed with dose reduction or interruption if clinically indicated. Disclosures: Pinilla-Ibarz: Novartis, Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis, Ariad, BMS and Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Ariad, Pfizer, Teva: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Research Funding. Kim:BMS, Novartis, IL-Yang: Consultancy; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, ARIAD, IL-Yang: Research Funding; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, IL-Yang: Honoraria; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Le Coutre:Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Paquette:Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Honoraria; Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Chuah:Novartis, BMS: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, ARIAD, Teva: Consultancy; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Teva, Pfizer, ARIAD: Honoraria; Novartis, BMS, TEva: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, ARIAD, Teva, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria. DeAngelo:Araid, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy. Rea:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Ariad, Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Speakers Bureau. Muller:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Consultancy; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer, BMS: Honoraria. Lustgarten:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Rivera:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Other, Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Turner:ARIAD: Employment. Haluska:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Deininger:BMS, ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Consultancy; BMS, NOVARTIS, CELGENE, GILEAD: Research Funding; ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other. Hochhaus:Ariad, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:ARIAD: Honoraria. Shah:Ariad, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Phizer: Research Funding. Talpaz:Ariad, BMS, Sanofi, INCYTE: Research Funding; Ariad, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ariad, Sanofi, Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Abstract 915 Background: Many patients (pts) with advanced Ph+ leukemias experience failure of all currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting BCR-ABL and have limited treatment options. Ponatinib is a potent pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor that is active against native and mutated forms of BCR-ABL, including the TKI resistant T315I mutant. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg orally once daily) in pts with AP-CML, BP-CML, or Ph+ ALL were evaluated in a phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. Methods: The PACE trial enrolled 449 pts, including 85 AP-CML, 62 BP-CML, and 32 Ph+ ALL. Pts were resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib, or had the T315I mutation at baseline. AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL pts were assigned to 1 of 4 cohorts: AP-CML R/I, AP-CML T315I, BP-CML/Ph+ ALL R/I, BP-CML/Ph+ ALL T315I. Two AP-CML pts were not assigned to a cohort (post-imatinib, did not have T315I at baseline) and were excluded from efficacy analyses and included in safety analyses. The primary endpoint was major hematologic response (MaHR) at any time within 6 mos after treatment initiation. Data as of 23 July 2012 are reported, with a minimum follow-up of 9 mos (median 13 [4 to 21], 6 [0.1 to 18], and 6 [0.1 to 16] mos for AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL, respectively). Results: The median age for AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL pts was 60, 53, and 62 yrs, respectively. Median time from initial disease diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 7, 4, and 1.5 yrs, respectively. Pts were heavily pretreated: 94% received prior imatinib, 88% dasatinib, 61% nilotinib; 8% received 1 prior approved TKI, 39% received 2, and 53% received 3. Sixteen percent had undergone prior stem cell transplant. In pts previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib (N=171), 94% had a history of resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib, 6% were purely intolerant. Reported MaHR rates with the most recent dasatinib or nilotinib therapy were 35% AP-CML, 16% BP-CML, 43% Ph+ ALL. At the time of analysis, 59% of AP-CML, 8% of BP-CML, and 9% of Ph+ ALL pts remained on study. Overall, the most common reasons for discontinuation were progressive disease (19%, 50%, and 53%, respectively) and adverse events (AEs; 11%, 16%, and 6%, respectively). Hematologic and cytogenetic response rates are shown in the table; MaHR and MCyR were observed across cohorts. MMR was achieved by 14% of AP-CML pts (14% R/I, 17% T315I). There was a trend for higher response rates among pts who received fewer prior approved TKIs. In AP-CML pts, the differences in MaHR rates by number of prior approved TKIs (1: 3/4 [75%]; 2: 20/33 [61%]; 3: 24/46 [52%]) were not significant (Fisher's Exact); differences in MCyR rates (1: 4/4 [100%]); 2: 13/33 [39%]; 3: 15/46 [33%]) were significant for pts treated with 1 vs 2 (p=0.0360) and 1 vs 3 prior approved TKIs (p=0.0168). Of pts achieving MaHR, 42% of AP-CML and 35% of BP-CML/Ph+ ALL pts were projected (Kaplan-Meier) to remain in MaHR at 1 yr. In AP-CML, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated (Kaplan-Meier) as 80 (range 6 to 88) wks; the probability of maintaining PFS at 6 mos and 1 yr was estimated as 80% and 57%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) had not yet been reached; the probability of OS at 6 mos and 1 yr was estimated (Kaplan-Meier) as 96% and 85%, respectively. In BP-CML/Ph+ ALL, median PFS was estimated as 18 (range 0.1 to 74) wks; the probability of maintaining PFS at 6 mos and 1 yr was estimated as 34% and 20%, respectively. Median OS was estimated as 30 (range 0.4 to 77) wks; the probability of OS at 6 mos and 1 yr was estimated as 54% and 34%, respectively. Ponatinib was generally well-tolerated; the most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (29%), rash (25%), and neutropenia (22%). The most common serious treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (3%) and pancreatitis (3%). Rash was generally grade 1 or 2 in severity. Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and pancreatitis were typically reported early in treatment and were manageable with dose modification. Conclusions: Ponatinib was generally well-tolerated and had substantial activity in pts with AP-CML, BP-CML, or Ph+ ALL, regardless of mutation status or prior therapy. Data with a minimum follow-up of 12 mos will be presented Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Off Label Use: ponatinib. Kim:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD, and Il-Yang: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis and BMS: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD: Consultancy. Chuah:Novartis and Bristol Myers-Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Talpaz:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rea:Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis, and Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Muller:ARIAD: Consultancy. Wong:MolecularMD Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guilhot:ARIAD: Honoraria. Hochhaus:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, and MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen: Honoraria. Shah:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Cortes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD, Pfizer, and Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 163 Background: Despite progress in Ph+ leukemia therapy, patients who experience failure of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and those with the T315I BCR-ABL mutation have limited treatment options. Ponatinib is an oral TKI developed using computational and structure-based design with optimal binding to the BCR-ABL active site. At clinically achievable concentrations, ponatinib demonstrated potent in vitro activity against native BCR-ABL and all BCR-ABL mutants tested, including T315I. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg orally once daily) in patients with Ph+ leukemia were evaluated in a phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. Methods: 449 patients resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the T315I mutation confirmed at entry were enrolled and assigned to 1 of 6 cohorts: chronic phase (CP)-CML R/I (N=203), CP-CML T315I (N=64), accelerated phase (AP)-CML R/I (N=65), AP-CML T315I (N=18), blast phase (BP)-CML/Ph+ALL R/I (N=48), BP-CML/Ph+ALL T315I (N=46). Five patients (3 CP-CML, 2 AP-CML) without confirmed T315I and not R/I to dasatinib or nilotinib were treated, but not assigned to a cohort; they were included in safety analyses. The primary endpoint was major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 months for CP-CML and major hematologic response (MaHR) at any time within 6 months for advanced Ph+ leukemia. The trial is ongoing. Data as of 23 July 2012 are reported: median follow-up 11 (0.1 to 21) months; minimum follow-up 9 months. Results: Median age was 59 (18–94) yrs; 53% were male. Median time from diagnosis to ponatinib was 6 (0.3–28) yrs. Patients were heavily pretreated: 96% received prior imatinib, 84% dasatinib, 65% nilotinib; median number of prior TKIs was 3, with 53% exposed to all 3 approved TKIs. In patients previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib (N=427), 88% had a history of resistance and 12% were purely intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib. Best prior response to most recent dasatinib or nilotinib was 26% MCyR or better in CP-CML, and 23% MaHR or better in advanced Ph+ leukemia. Frequent BCR-ABL mutations confirmed at entry were: 29% T315I, 8% F317L, 4% E255K, 4% F359V, 3% G250E. No mutations were detected in 44%. The primary endpoint response rates (see Table) in each cohort exceeded the prespecified statistical criteria for success. In CP-CML and AP-CML R/I (the 3 largest cohorts), 95% CIs exceeded the prespecified response rate. Median time to response (for responders) was 84 days in CP-CML, 112 days in AP-CML, 55 days in BP-CML/Ph+ALL. Responses were durable; the estimated (Kaplan-Meier) probability of responders maintaining the primary endpoint at 1 yr was 91% in CP-CML, 42% in AP-CML, 35% in BP-CML/Ph+ALL. In CP-CML, 46% had complete cytogenetic response and molecular response rates were 32% MMR, 20% MR4, and 12% MR4.5. Response rates were higher in patients exposed to fewer prior TKIs and those with shorter disease duration. Similar response rates were observed in patients with and without BCR-ABL mutations. In CP-CML, response rates were higher in those with T315I; however, a post hoc analysis found that presence of T315I was not a predictor of response. Instead, the difference in response rate was explained by T315I patients' younger age, shorter duration of leukemia, and exposure to less prior therapy. At the time of analysis, 52% of patients remained on therapy (66% CP-CML). The most frequent reasons for discontinuation were progression (18%) and AEs (12%). The most common drug-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (36%), rash (33%), and dry skin (31%). Pancreatitis was the most common drug-related SAE (5%); however, it occurred early and was managed with dose modification (1 patient discontinued due to pancreatitis). Conclusions: Ponatinib has substantial activity and is generally well tolerated in these heavily pretreated Ph+ leukemia patients who have limited available treatment options. Data with a minimum follow-up of 12 months will be presented. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis, BMS, ARIAD, Pfizer, and Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, ARIAD, Il-Yang: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis and BMS: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD: Consultancy. Chuah:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Talpaz:Deciphera: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rea:Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis, and Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Muller:ARIAD: Consultancy. Wong:MolecularMD Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guilhot:ARIAD: Honoraria. Hochhaus:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Amgen: Honoraria. Shah:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Briston-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Description: Background: In Jan 2014, ponatinib was reintroduced to the US market after an 11 week withdrawal to review data on arterial thrombotic events, revise US prescribing information (USPI) and implement a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS). The USPI was revised to narrow the indicated population and recommend a starting dose of 45 mg, with consideration of 1) lower doses in patients with selected comorbidities or to manage adverse events, 2) dose reduction in chronic phase (CP) and accelerated phase (AP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients achieving major cytogenetic response, and 3) discontinuation if response has not occurred at 3 months. In the US, ponatinib is available exclusively through a specialty pharmacy that maintains prescribing data for all US ponatinib-treated patients since reintroduction. Examining these data provides insight into practitioners' patient selection and prescribing patterns, and real-world ponatinib outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients starting treatment with ponatinib between 01 January 2014 and 25 March 2015 using data from referring physicians, patient intake forms and pharmacy dispensing records. Patient and prescriber characteristics, and dosing and dose modifications were documented. Clinical, demographic and physician characteristics were examined as predictors of initial dose and dose modification using logistic regression; therapy duration was assessed using Kaplan-Meier techniques and proportional hazard regression. Results: 758 US patients initiated treatment with ponatinib over this 15-month period, (58% male; median age 55 years [range: 11-98]). Among 730 patients with a specified diagnosis, 80% had CML and 4% Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL); the remainder had unspecified ALL (10%), other hematologic malignancies (3%), and solid tumors (3%). Of 411 CML patients reporting disease phase, 61% were in CP, 18% AP and 21% blast phase (BP). 12% of CML and 8% of Ph+ ALL patients had a reported T315I mutation. 21% of CP, 34% of AP, 12% of BP and 31% of Ph+ ALL patients were receiving ponatinib as 2nd-line therapy, with the remainder in 3rd line or later. Most recent prior TKI was dasatinib for 48%, nilotinib for 23%, bosutinib for 17%, and imatinib for 12% of patients in all therapy lines. 50% received 45 mg as their initial dose, 33% 30 mg and 17% 15 mg. Prescribers' practice setting was 49% community and 51% academic. Most prescribers (82%) had only 1 ponatinib patient; only 7% had 3 or more. Prescribers with 〉1 ponatinib patient were less likely to prescribe 45 mg starting dose (OR=0.53 for those with 2 patients; OR=0.25 for 3+ patients.) 23% of patients had at least one dose adjustment, including 17% with dose reduction. Among CP patients initially on 45 mg, with at least 6 months of therapy, 42% reduced dose (29% to 30 mg; 13% to 15 mg). Dose reduction decreased significantly for later therapy lines in CP, but did not differ by disease phase. Median time on therapy was 〉15 months for CP, 10.6 months for AP, 7.0 months for BP, and 〉14 months for Ph+ ALL. CP patients' time on therapy was longer for those started on 15 mg, although this difference was not significant (p=0.14) (Figure.) Reasons for dose adjustment and discontinuation were not well documented, but they appeared to occur at a relatively constant rate over time rather than at time points recommended for response monitoring. Conclusions: Real-world US data shows ponatinib is prescribed across disease phase, therapy line, and mutation status. While a majority of patients were in their 3rd line of therapy or later, a substantial proportion of patients, especially in AP CML and Ph+ ALL, received ponatinib as 2nd line therapy. Physicians appear to be selecting patients who are younger than those enrolled in registrational trial for ponatinib (55 years vs. PACE trial median age, 64 years), and mitigating against potential risk using lower starting doses and dose reduction. Most prescribers have only 1 ponatinib patient, but physicians with 〉1 ponatinib patient favor lower starting doses. Dose reduction and discontinuation occurred steadily over time rather than clustered at routine response milestone time points. CP CML Patients starting at 15 mg appear to have similar or better treatment duration compared with those started at higher doses. Disclosures Mauro: Ariad: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. McGarry:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Stock. Huang:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Description: Background: Ponatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory CML or Ph+ ALL and those with the BCR-ABL T315I mutation, which is uniformly resistant to other TKIs approved for the treatment of CML and Ph+ ALL. Prior to the availability of ponatinib, resistant pts with the T315I mutation (T315I+) had worse outcomes than those without the mutation; in a matched pair analysis in chronic phase (CP)-CML pts, median overall survival (OS) was 48.4 mos after development of resistance in T315I+ pts versus not reached in those without the mutation (Nicolini FE, et al. Haematologica 2013). Methods: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ponatinib in a pooled analysis of a subgroup of CP-CML pts with the T315I mutation (detected in a central laboratory by Sanger sequencing at baseline) from the phase 1 (NCT00660920) and pivotal phase 2 PACE (NCT01207440) trials. In addition, we evaluated the impact of continuation of ponatinib treatment at a 2-yr landmark time point on OS at 1-yr past the landmark in T315I+ CP-CML pts in PACE. The phase 1 trial is an open-label, dose escalation study of ponatinib (starting dose 2-60 mg once daily) in 81 adults with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. PACE is an open-label, single-arm trial of ponatinib (starting dose 45 mg daily) in 449 adults with CML or Ph+ ALL resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the T315I mutation. Dose reductions were instructed in Oct 2013 in response to an accumulation of arterial occlusive events (AOEs) reported with longer follow-up across the ponatinib clinical program. Response assessments included major cytogenetic response (MCyR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR; assessed in a central laboratory), and molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5). OS and progression-free survival (PFS) data were only collected in PACE; 3-yr outcomes were examined for all evaluable T315I+ CP-CML pts, along with a log-rank test for OS by treatment status as of the 2-yr landmark time point. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of new AOEs are reported as number of events/100 pt-yrs. Pooled data as of February 2, 2015 is reported here. Results: There were 76 T315I+ CP-CML pts included in this analysis (phase 1, n=12; PACE, n=64). At the time of analysis, median duration of follow-up in T315I+ CP-CML pts was 40 (range: 1.5-74) mos; 37 pts (49%) remain on study. Median baseline ponatinib dose intensity was 33 (range: 5-56) mg daily; 25/37 (68%) ongoing pts were receiving 15 mg daily as their current dose as of the data cut-off. Primary reasons for discontinuation in T315I+ CP-CML pts were disease progression [10/76 (13%)], adverse events [AEs; 9/76 (12%)], consent withdrawn [5/76 (7%)], physician/administrative decision [4/76 (5%)], death [3/76 (4%)], lack of efficacy [2/76 (3%)], and other [6/76 (8%)]; criteria for disease progression included death, development of advanced phase CML, loss of CHR (in absence of cytogenetic response) and loss of MCyR. Cumulative response rates in T315I+ CP-CML pts (n=76) were: MCyR, 75%; CCyR, 72%; MMR, 61%, and MR4.5, 37%. In PACE, estimated 3-yr PFS/OS rates for 64 T315I+ CP-CML pts were 60%/78% (medians not reached). One yr post-landmark outcomes for T315I+ CP-CML pts by treatment status at the 2-yr landmark time point are displayed in the table. Most common treatment-emergent AEs (≥40%) in the pooled group of T315I+ CP-CML pts (n=76 phase 1 and PACE) were: rash, 55%; dry skin, 49%; headache, 46%; abdominal pain, 43%; nausea, 41%; and fatigue, 41%. Among these pts, the cumulative incidence of any AOE (grade 3/4) was 32% (20%); by subcategory: cardiovascular 20% (15%), cerebrovascular 12% (5%), and peripheral vascular 13% (8%) events. Two T315I+ CP-CML pts had grade 5 AOEs. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate of new AOEs in T315I+ CP-CML pts was 12/100 pt-yrs. Conclusions: Ponatinib continues to provide deep and durable responses with 〉3 yrs median follow-up in T315I+ CP-CML pts. Survival outcomes with ponatinib treatment in these highly refractory pts were high overall and compare favorably with those observed in T315I+ CP-CML pt populations prior to the availability of ponatinib. Although pt numbers are limited for the landmark analysis, continuation of ponatinib treatment at 2 yrs was associated with a trend for improved OS, where data continue to mature. Updated data in all T315I+ pts will be presented. Study sponsor: ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Disclosures Jabbour: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Talpaz:Incyte Corporation: Other: Travel expense reimbursement, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Other: Expense reimbursement, travel accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: travel accomodation expenses, Research Funding. Baccarani:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses , Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses , Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mauro:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Guilhot:ARIAD: Honoraria. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:ARIAD: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Plexxikon: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Santillana:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Amgen: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: Ponatinib is a potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for use in patients with refractory CML and Ph+ ALL, including patients with the resistant BCR-ABLT315I mutation. To evaluate whether patient characteristics and outcomes with ponatinib differed by extent of pretreatment with other TKIs, this post hoc analysis examines results among CP-CML patients enrolled in the phase 2 PACE trial (NCT01207440) according to the number of TKIs received prior to study entry. Updated data with 4 years of follow-up will be presented. Methods: Patients with CML or Ph+ ALL who were resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib or who had the T315I mutation were enrolled (N=449). Ponatinib was initiated at 45 mg once daily. CP-CML patients were evaluated based on previous treatment with 1, 2, 3, or 4 prior TKIs approved for use in CP-CML (ie, imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib). Data reported in this abstract are as of February 2, 2015. Results: Overall, 270 CP-CML patients were enrolled and treated in PACE. Patient characteristics and disposition varied by number of prior TKIs (Table 1). Both median age and median time from diagnosis increased with number of prior TKIs; median dose intensity was highest in patients who had received only 1 prior TKI. The most common reasons for discontinuation across groups were adverse events (AEs) and withdrawal by patient request. Responses by number of prior TKIs are shown in Table 2. Rates of cytogenetic and molecular response to ponatinib were higher with fewer prior TKIs. While the frequency of individual AEs did not follow a consistent trend, the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs appeared to increase with the number of prior TKIs received (68%, 86%, 89%, and 100%, respectively); grade ≥3 AEs in ≥10% of CP-CML patients overall were thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (17%), hypertension (13%), increased lipase (12%), and abdominal pain (10%). A similar frequency pattern was observed for serious AEs, which occurred in 58%, 53%, 62%, and 92% of patients who had previously received 1, 2, 3, and 4 approved TKIs, respectively. Serious AEs in ≥5% of CP-CML patients overall were pancreatitis (7%), angina pectoris (5%), and pneumonia (5%). The frequency of arterial occlusive events (AOEs) was 32% (6/19), 26% (25/98), 28% (39/141), and 42% (5/12) by increasing number of prior TKIs; exposure-adjusted incidence rates of new AOEs were 11.75, 10.4, 12.6, and 33.3 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Conclusions: With 4 years of follow-up, ponatinib continues to provide benefit to ongoing CP-CML patients in the PACE trial. Analysis by treatment history indicates that patients who had received fewer TKIs prior to study entry appear to exhibit better efficacy and safety profiles. However, treatment decisions should be primarily guided by individual patient and disease factors, including mutation status, and physicians should weigh both the benefits and risks of prescribing ponatinib. Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Disposition by Number of Prior TKIs 1 TKI (n=19) 2 TKIs (n=98) 3 TKIs (n=141) 4 TKIs (n=12) Median age at baseline, years 52 58 63 67 Median time from diagnosis to first dose, years 2.8 5.2 7.9 12.4 Median dose intensity, mg/d 34.0 28.7 29.9 31.0 Mutations detected at baseline, % 68 51 43 75 T315I mutation detected at baseline, % 63 31 16 0 Prior TKI exposure, %, imatinib/dasatinib/nilotinib/bosutinib 68/21/5/5 97/66/36/1 100/96/96/7 100/100/100/100 Remain on study, % 53 48 40 8 Discontinued, % 47 52 60 92 Primary reason for discontinuation, % AE 16 18 17 33 Withdrawal by patient request 5 11 11 25 Disease progression 16 5 13 0 Lack of efficacy 0 2 9 8 Death 0 2 3 17 Othera 11 13 8 8 Median follow-up, months 42.3 42.9 42.1 28.2 aIncludes noncompliance, physician decision, protocol violation, and other reasons Table 2 Responses to Ponatinib by Number of Prior TKIs 1 TKI (n=16a) 2 TKIs (n=98) 3 TKIs (n=141) 4 TKIs (n=12) MCyR 12 (75) 69 (70) 69 (49) 7 (58) CCyR 12 (75) 63 (64) 63 (45) 4 (33) MMR 10 (63) 41 (42) 51 (36) 1 (8) MR4 6 (38) 30 (31) 38 (27) 1 (8) MR4.5 4 (25) 22 (22) 34 (24) 1 (8) All responses are n (%) a16/19 patients were evaluable for efficacy Disclosures Hochhaus: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cortes:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Other: Consulting & Advisory Role, Research Funding. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Consulting & Advisory Role, Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Consulting & Advisory Role, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Consulting & Advisory Role, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Consulting & Advisory Role, Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Chuah:Children International: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Apperley:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Talpaz:Pfizer: Other: CONSULTING OR ADVISORY ROLE; Novartis: Other: CONSULTING OR ADVISORY ROLE; ARIAD Pharmaceutical Inc.: Other: CONSULTING OR ADVISORY ROLE; Pfizer: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceutical Inc.: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; Incyte: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. DeAngelo:Incyte: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Pfizer: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Novartis: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; BMS: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Other: Consulting & Advisory Role; Amgen: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role. Abruzzese:BMS: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Other: Consulting & Advisory Role; Novartis: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Pfizer: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role. Rea:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria. Baccarani:Pfizer: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; BMS: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Novartis: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; ARAID Pharmaceutical Inc.: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Consulting or Advisory Role, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Consulting or Advisory Role, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceutical Inc.: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Muller:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Other: Consulting & Advisory Role, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Consulting or Advisory Role, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Consulting or Advisory Role, Research Funding. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Stock. Conlan:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Other: Stock. Rivera:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment, Other: Full-time Employee & Shareholder (self-managed). Guilhot:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: CONSULTING OR ADVISORY ROLE; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Deininger:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; ARIAD Pharmaceutical Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Consulting or Advisory Role, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Consulting & Advisory Role, Research Funding. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shah:Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Plexxikon Inc.: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction Despite major advances in treatment, resistance and intolerance (R/I) continue to be a significant challenge in the management of CP-CML, with failure of commonly used 2G TKIs (dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib) occurring in 〉50% of patients over the course of treatment in the post-imatinib setting. Treatment options for patients who developed R/I to these 2G TKIs often had been limited to stem cell transplant or clinical trials. The availability of the new pharmacologic treatments has provided more options for patients in this setting. Ponatinib is the only TKI recommended to treat all TKI-resistant mutations listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines, including the T315I mutation for which no other TKI is effective. However, the comparative efficacy of using ponatinib versus switching to a different pharmacologic treatment after 2G TKI failure has not been systematically examined. Methods A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Libraries (2002-2012) as well as 3 conferences (ASH, ASCO, and EHA) over 5 years (2008-2012). Studies were included if they enrolled 10 or more adult patients and presented results for CP-CML patients who were R/I following 2G TKI treatment. All study designs were considered and no restriction was applied with respect to therapy dose, due to incomplete reporting of doses in the available studies. Reported cumulative response rates (regardless of time period of reporting) and derived confidence intervals from individual studies were plotted, with node size determined by number of patients in study arm. In addition, Bayesian methods were used to synthesize major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) from individual studies and estimate the overall response probability with 95% credible interval (CrI) for each treatment. Bayesian analysis also was used to estimate the likelihood that each treatment offers the highest probability of CCyR/MCyR based on available evidence. Response probabilities for ponatinib were estimated using individual patient data from the phase 2 PACE study and published phase 1 study data. For the PACE study, only patients who had received 2 prior TKIs were included in the analysis, to provide an appropriate comparison to the published 2G TKI studies which included predominantly 3rd line patients. The base case analysis includes patients both with and without the T315I mutation; a sensitivity analysis focused on the subset of studies without substantial numbers of enrollees with the T315I mutation and those that presented subgroup results excluding patients with the mutation. Results 13 clinical trials and observational studies were included in the analysis. All studies reported CCyR and 8 reported MCyR. CCyR data from each study, with derived confidence intervals, are presented in Figure 1. Synthesized treatment-specific probabilities of CCyR across 2G TKIs ranged from 22.0% (bosutinib) to 26.9% (nilotinib) compared to 60.5% (95% CrI 52.1% to 68.6%) for ponatinib. Treatment-specific probabilities of MCyR across 2G TKIs ranged from 29.7% (bosutinib) to 49.9% (dasatinib or nilotinib) compared to 70.2% (62.1% to 77.7%) for ponatinib. CCyR and MCyR rates for omacetaxine were lower than those observed for both the 2G TKIs and ponatinib (9.9% and 19.8% respectively). The probability of ponatinib providing superior response to all other included treatments was estimated at 99.9% for CCyR and 97.4% for MCyR. Results in patients without the T315I mutation were similar: the probability of CCyR with ponatinib was 52.1% (41.9% to 62.4%) compared to 22.1% to 26.9% across 2G TKIs. The probability of MCyR with ponatinib was 64.2% (54.1% to 73.6%) compared to 29.7% to 50.0% across 2G TKIs. Conclusions The analysis suggests that CP-CML patients who are resistant or intolerant to prior 2G TKI therapies have higher complete (33.6 to 38.5 percentage points higher) and major (20.3 to 40.5 percentage points higher) cytogenic response with ponatinib compared with the 2G TKIs included in this analysis. Based on available data, ponatinib appears to provide a higher probability of treatment response compared to all other pharmacologic treatments commonly used in this indication. This observation was consistent both for the overall patient population and among the subset of patients without the T315I mutation. Disclosures: Lipton: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bryden:Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Sidhu:Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Huang:Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. McGarry:Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; GSK: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen (J&J): Consultancy. Lustgarten:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Woods:Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Hawkins:Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.

Description: Background: Ponatinib is an approved potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against native and mutant BCR-ABL. Ponatinib had substantial clinical activity in the phase 2 PACE trial in patients (pts) resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the T315I mutation. In the frontline setting, positive associations between achieving response at an early time point (landmark) and long-term outcomes have been shown for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in CML pts. Since landmark analyses have not been reported for a heavily pretreated population, in particular 3rd line and beyond, this retrospective analysis investigated the impact of achieving early landmark responses with ponatinib on long-term outcomes in PACE pts. Methods: Ponatinib treated CP-CML pts in PACE with valid cytogenetic and molecular assessments were included. Pts who met response criteria at entry, were missing assessments or not evaluable (10%) and cytogenetic status (MCyR, 10%). Furthermore, pts who achieved MCyR or CCyR at 3 months were significantly more likely to have improved PFS after 2 years compared with those who did not. This trend was similar for OS: achievement of MCyR or CCyR at 3 months was associated with an increased likelihood of OS after 2 years (Table). Similar trends were observed for 6-month molecular and cytogenetic landmark analyses (Table). Conclusions: In these refractory CML pts, the rapid and deep reduction in BCR-ABL levels achieved with ponatinib translated into improved long-term outcomes. These data validate the usefulness of assessing BCR-ABL levels at early time points as a goal of therapy with ponatinib since achieving early landmark response appears to be a strong predictor of better long-term outcomes. Table Impact on 2-Year Outcomes* 3-month Molecular n ≤10% BCR-ABL IS n 〉10% BCR-ABL IS P-valuea 82 PFS = 76% 79 PFS = 57% 0.0366 86 OS = 85% 89 OS = 86% 0.6182 ≤1% BCR-ABLIS 〉1% BCR-ABLIS 75 PFS = 84% 133 PFS = 59% 0.0001 77 OS = 90% 148 OS = 84% 0.0507 MMR No MMR 32 PFS = 96% 180 PFS = 64% 0.0035 33 OS = 96% 197 OS = 84% 0.0402 3-month Cytogenetic n MCyR n No MCyR P-valuea 97 PFS = 85% 97 PFS = 52% 10% BCR-ABL IS P-valuea 84 PFS = 83% 55 PFS = 51% 0.0012 88 OS = 94% 73 OS = 84% 0.0274 ≤1% BCR-ABLIS 〉1% BCR-ABLIS 95 PFS = 84% 86 PFS = 55% 0.0001 101 OS = 93% 106 OS = 87% 0.1415 MMR No MMR 57 PFS = n/a 128 PFS = 60% 0.0002 61 OS = 95% 150 OS = 87% 0.0580 6-month Cytogenetic n MCyR n No MCyR P-valuea 116 PFS = 72% 57 PFS = 51%