ALBERT

Description: Introduction : Depending on the conditioning intensity and graft source, mosthematopoietic stem cell transplant(HSCT) patients invariably experience a cytopenic phase of at least 2-3 weeks and require transfusion support until engraftment. All transfused blood components post-transplant need to be gamma irradiated to prevent transfusion associated graft versus host disease (TA-GVHD). Platelet component (PC) manufacturing methodologies differ around the globe. Currently, Hong Kong HSCT patients are supported with individual platelet rich plasma (PRP) PCs without leukocyte filtration (NLF), tested by short-term aerobic cultures for bacterial contamination (STABC), and gamma irradiated. When new PC manufacturing methodologies are considered for adoption, it is important to assess the immediate and longer term effects on transfused patients. Amotosalen+UVA light (A-UVA) pathogen reduction technology (INTERCEPT™ Blood System, Cerus Corporation, Concord, CA) inactivates bacteria, viruses, parasites and leukocytes by efficient covalent adduct modification of DNA and RNA. Treatment with A-UVA prevents TA- GVHD in an animal model, inhibits clonal T cell proliferation, prevents allogeneic antigen stimulation in mixed lymphocyte reactions, and inhibits transcription mediated cytokine production and early activation antigen expression (Corash et al, BMT 2004). The common strategy of prescribing gamma irradiated PC only for suspected "high risk" patients is sub-optimal, as failure to identify recipients at risk for TA-GVHD was responsible for 50% of reported cases (Kopolovic et al. Blood 2016). Treatment of PC with A-UVA addresses two key issues for HSCT patients: bacterial contamination, and universal prevention of TA-GVHD. Here, we compared the clinical support of HSCT patients with conventional PCs (C-PC) vs. an equivalent HSCT group supported with A-UVA PCs (I-PC) using a sequential patient cohort design within a single HSCT clinical center. Methods : I-PCs were prepared from 5 pooled ABO-matched, NLF buffy coat PCs in platelet additive solution and treated with A-UVA replacing gamma irradiation and bacterial detection. C-PCs were prepared from 5 ABO-matched, STABC-negative, NLF PRP PCs, and treated with gamma irradiation. Each patient could receive up to 5 PC transfusions. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 1-hour corrected count increment (CCI) and the primary safety endpoint was the proportion of patients (P) with acute transfusion reactions (ATR). Follow-up data on mortality, hematopoiesis engraftment, and immune status were collected up to 100 days post HSCT. Results: Patient demographics and type of HSCT were similar between patient cohorts. 33 patients received 76 A-UVA PCs and 31 patients received 89 C-PCs. The mean days of platelet support (p=0.618) and mean 1-hour CCIs per patient averaged for all transfusions were comparable (p=0.296) between the I- PC and conventional C-PC cohorts (Table). The proportion of patients with AEs was lower (p=0.021) for the I-PC group (Table), and no related SAEs were observed during the entirety of trial. Survival at 100 days post HSCT and rates of remission were similar between the cohorts (Table). The ATR rate trended lower, although not significantly different (p=0.296), in the I- PC group (Table). Follow-up data showed that the patients had comparable neutrophil and platelet engraftment (Table) with comparable immune system reconstitution by 100 days post HSCT. No cases of TA-GVHD were observed in either cohort. Conclusions: A-UVA-treated PCs prepared without LF, gamma irradiation, and bacterial detection can replace C-PCs for support of HSCT patients resulting in comparable post transfusion CCI responses and short and intermediate term clinical outcomes, while offering additional protection against transfusion transmitted bacteria and emerging or untested pathogens. Table Table. Disclosures Sim Pui Yin: Cerus Corporation: Other: Investigator sponsored trial. Leung Yuk Yan:Cerus Corporation: Other: Investigator sponsored trial. Lam Chun Kit:Cerus Corporation: Other: Investigator sponsored trial. Tsoi Wai:Cerus Corporation: Other: Investigator sponsored trial. Lee Cheuk:Cerus Corporation: Other: Investigator sponsored trial. Lie Kwok Wai:Cerus Corporation: Other: Investigator sponsored trial. Huang:Cerus Corporation: Employment. Rico:Cerus Corporation: Employment. Lin:Cerus corp: Employment. Corash:Cerus Corporation: Employment. Stassinopoulos:Cerus Corporation: Employment.

Description: Introduction: HSCT patients require platelet components (PC) for support of thrombocytopenia. Donors are tested for selected viruses to prevent transfusion-transmission infection (TTI), and PC are screened for bacteria and irradiated to prevent transfusion associated graft versus host disease (TA-GVHD). Leukocyte reduction (LR) is commonly, but not universally, used to mitigate the risks of acute transfusion reactions (ATR), allo-immunization, clinical refractoriness, and CMV TTI. However, donor testing, PC bacterial screening, and LR do not provide complete protection from ATR, transfusion related sepsis (TRS), refractoriness, CMV TTI, or residual risks of window period and emerging pathogen TTI. Amotosalen-UVA pathogen reduction treatment (A-PRT) inactivates a broad spectrum of pathogens (e.g. Zika), inhibits leukocyte antigen presentation and cytokine synthesis, and inhibits T-cell proliferation. A-PRT with LR has replaced bacterial screening, CMV serology, and gamma irradiation. Objective: To control cost, the Hong Kong Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service (HKRCBTS) has used whole blood platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) PC without LR. Based on data showing effective leukocyte inactivation by A-PRT, the HKRCBTS evaluated use of A-PRT buffy coat PC (BC PC) in platelet additive solution (PAS) without LR, bacterial screening, and gamma irradiation to manage costs, salvage more donor plasma, reduce TTI risk, and simplify production. Study Design and Methods : An open-label, prospective, sequential, two cohort study at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong enrolled HSCT patients for up to 30 days of PC support with 100-day follow up. Cohorts were comparable for primary disease and type of HSCT. The first cohort received PRP PC prepared from CPD whole blood, a current HKRCBTS standard PC (Control-C). Five ABO-matched PRP PCs in 100% plasma were pooled without LR to yield ≥ 3 x 1011 platelets. C-PCs were screened for bacteria, gamma irradiated (2,500 cGy), stored up to 5 days at 22- 24 °C; and contained ~ 5 x 109 leukocytes. For the 2nd cohort, buffy coat PCs (BC PC) were prepared from CPD whole blood in PAS (SSP+, Macopharma, France). Five ABO-matched BC PC in 35% plasma-65% PAS were pooled, and prepared with A-UVA PRT to yield ≥ 3 x 1011 platelets (Test-T). T-PCs were not LR, not screened for bacteria, not gamma irradiated, stored for up to 5 days at 22- 24 °C; and contained ~ 5 x 108 leukocytes. HSCT patients ≥ 18 years expected to require PC were included. Exclusion criteria were: history of clinical refractoriness to platelet transfusion (2 successive 1-HR corrected count increments (CCI) 〈 5.0 x 103), immune thrombocytopenia, or disorders confounding 1-HR CCI determination. For both cohorts, a transfusion threshold of 10 x 109/L was specified for stable patients unless adjusted to 20 x 109/L for sepsis. Patients were not screened for HLA antibody at study entry. The efficacy outcome was the 1-hour (HR) count increment (CI), and the safety outcome was ATR incidence. Secondary (post-hoc) outcomes were the 1-HR CCI and the incidence of clinical refractoriness (two successive CCI 〈 5x103 per patient and transfusions with CCI 〈 5x103). Results: 64 patients were transfused (31 Control and 33 Test). Demographics were similar between cohorts (Table). The majority of patients had allogeneic HSCT from related donors. Mean pre-transfusion platelet counts were 〈 16 x 109/L. The mean PC dose and storage duration were similar between cohorts (Table). The 1-HR count increments (CI) and 1-HR CCI responses were within therapeutic ranges for both cohorts (Table). The proportion of transfusions with CCI responses 〈 5.0 x 103 and the proportion of patients with clinical refractoriness were less in the Test cohort (Table). ATRs trended lower with A-PRT (Test = 9.1%, Control = 19.4%, p=0.296).No patients had TRS or TA-GVHD reported during the active transfusion period. Day-100 engraftment (Table), HSCT-GVHD, mortality, and infectious disease complications were similar between cohorts. Conclusions: This exploratory study of A-PRT PC without LR demonstrated therapeutic 1-HR CCI responses, safety, and conserved HSCT engraftment. The proportions of transfusions with CCI 〈 5.0x103 and the proportion of patients with clinical refractoriness were less for A-PRT PC than conventional PC. A-PRT of pooled whole blood BC PC without LR offers the potential to improve PC supply, and to reduce the net cost of PRT PC by replacing other interventions. Table Table. Disclosures Corash: Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huang:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vermeij:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stassinopoulos:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Benjamin:Cerus Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Description: To compare the clinical and serological outcomes of patients receiving donors' marrow positive or negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), we studied 18 patients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation receiving HBsAg-positive marrow (group 1) and 18 receiving HBsAg-negative marrow (group 2). The recipients of the 2 groups were matched for hepatitis B virus (HBV) serology, sex, age, underlying hematological diseases, conditioning regimen, and prophylaxis against graft-versus-host diseases. Eight (44.4%) recipients in group 1 and 2 (11.1%) in group 2 suffered from HBV-related hepatitis posttransplant (P = .03). Furthermore, HBV-related hepatic failure was seen in 6 group 1 patients, but in none of the group 2 patients (P = .007). Five of the 9 (55.5%) HBsAg-negative recipients in group 1 became positive after receiving HBsAg-positive marrow. Serum HBV DNA was positive in all 5 donors of these patients, but in none of the donors of recipients who remained HBsAg negative (P = .008). Group 1 patients developing HBV-related hepatitis posttransplant were more likely to have a donor carrying a precore A1896 and/or core promoter T1762/A1764 HBV variant (62.5% versus 0%, P = .007). This study has demonstrated that a high incidence of HBV-related hepatitis was associated with the use of HBsAg-positive marrow for transplant, and a high viral load in the donor appeared to predispose recipients to the development of HBV-related hepatitis posttransplant. Further clinical trials will be necessary to determine the optimal management approach to this problem, including the use of the antiviral agents in the donors and the recipients.

Description: To compare the clinical and serological outcomes of patients receiving donors' marrow positive or negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), we studied 18 patients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation receiving HBsAg-positive marrow (group 1) and 18 receiving HBsAg-negative marrow (group 2). The recipients of the 2 groups were matched for hepatitis B virus (HBV) serology, sex, age, underlying hematological diseases, conditioning regimen, and prophylaxis against graft-versus-host diseases. Eight (44.4%) recipients in group 1 and 2 (11.1%) in group 2 suffered from HBV-related hepatitis posttransplant (P = .03). Furthermore, HBV-related hepatic failure was seen in 6 group 1 patients, but in none of the group 2 patients (P = .007). Five of the 9 (55.5%) HBsAg-negative recipients in group 1 became positive after receiving HBsAg-positive marrow. Serum HBV DNA was positive in all 5 donors of these patients, but in none of the donors of recipients who remained HBsAg negative (P = .008). Group 1 patients developing HBV-related hepatitis posttransplant were more likely to have a donor carrying a precore A1896 and/or core promoter T1762/A1764 HBV variant (62.5% versus 0%, P = .007). This study has demonstrated that a high incidence of HBV-related hepatitis was associated with the use of HBsAg-positive marrow for transplant, and a high viral load in the donor appeared to predispose recipients to the development of HBV-related hepatitis posttransplant. Further clinical trials will be necessary to determine the optimal management approach to this problem, including the use of the antiviral agents in the donors and the recipients.

Description: Vasovagal reaction (VVR) compromises donor safety and reduces the subsequent return rates. Performing applied muscle tension (AMT) during phlebotomy may reduce the incidence of VVR. However, the effectiveness of performing AMT after phlebotomy to reduce delayed VVR remains unclear. With ethics approval, 12 young, first-time donors (YFTD) were recruited to study the effects on stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) while performing AMT from needle insertion to end of recovery. Measurements from 12 matched control YFTD were used for comparison. Pre-donation anxiety and VVR severity were assessed. Compared to controls, donors who performed AMT had higher SV (Control: 57 mL vs. AMT: 69 mL, p = 0.045), higher CO (Control: 3.7 L·min−1 vs. AMT: 5.2 L·min−1, p = 0.006) and lower SVR (Control: 1962 dyn·s·cm−5 vs. AMT: 1569 dyn·s·cm−5, p = 0.032) during mid-phlebotomy. During recovery, the AMT group retained higher SV, higher CO and lower SVR than the control, but not reaching statistical significance. Practicing AMT during recovery resulted in sustained haemodynamic improvements beyond the donation period, despite the reduction in delayed VVR was insignificant compared to the control group. A larger sample size is needed to validate the effectiveness of performing AMT after donation to mitigate delayed VVR.