ALBERT

Description: Abstract 331 Background and aims: Systemic peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are malignancies responding poorly to conventional therapy. To evaluate the efficacy of a dose-dense approach consolidated by upfront high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in PTCL, the Nordic Lymphoma Group conducted the, so far, largest PTCL-restricted prospective phase II study in previously untreated systemic PTCL. This is the final report of the NLG-T-01 study with a 5-years median follow up. Methods: Patients with previously untreated systemic PTCL aged 18–67 years were included. ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cases were excluded. An induction regimen of six cycles of bi-weekly cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristin and prednisone (CHOEP) was given. Age-based (〉60 yrs) omission of etoposide was recommended. If in complete or partial remission, patients received high-dose chemotherapy with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan/cyclophosphamide (BEAM/BEAC) followed by HDT/ASCT. Results: A total of 166 patients with previously untreated PTCL were enrolled. Of these, 160 were histopathologically confirmed and included the following subtypes: PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (n=62; 39%), ALK-negative ALCL (n=31; 19%), angioimmunoblastic lymphoma (AIL) (n=30; 19%), enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n=21; 13%), panniculitis-like (n=6; 4%), T/NK nasal-type (n=5; 3%), and hepatosplenic (n=5; 3%). The M/F ratio was 2.0 and the median age 57 yrs (range 22–67 yrs). The majority of the cases presented with advanced-stage disease (81%), B-symptoms (59%) and elevated s-LDH (62%). Nevertheless, 71% of all patients had a good performance score (PS) (WHO 0–1) at inclusion. With regard to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), risk factor distribution was as follows: 1 factor n=45 (28%), 2 factors n=52 (32%), 3 factors n=30 (19%), 4–5 factors n=33 (21%). Of the 160 patients, a total of 114 (71%) underwent HDT/ASCT with 90 in complete remission at 3 months post-transplant. Early failures occurred in 26% of the patients. The treatment related mortality was low (4%). At a median follow-up of 60 months, 83 patients were alive. The median follow-up for deceased patients (N=77) was 9 months. The consolidated 5-yr overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) values for the entire cohort were 51% and 44%, respectively. Best results were obtained in ALK-negative ALCL with 5-yr OS and PFS of 70% and 61%, respectively. IPI was a useful overall prognostic discriminator for the low/low-intermediate vs. intermediate-high/high groups with regard to 5-yr OS (p=0,047) and 5-yr PFS (p=0,029). If applied separately to each of the four major subtypes, IPI had a predictive value for OS in AIL (p=0,02) and for PFS in both AIL (p=0,02) and PTCL-NOS (p=0,03). The clinicopathological parameters that showed a significant impact on OS and PFS were: female gender (correlated with a better outcome), age (analyzed as continuous variable), PS≥2 (correlated with adverse outcome), and cytotoxic phenotype (correlated with adverse outcome in AIL). All these parameters retained their prognostic value at multivariate level, except for cytotoxic phenotype, where multivariate analysis could not be performed because of too small numbers. Conclusions: Dose-dense induction followed by HDT/ASCT is well tolerated and leads to long-term PFS in 44% of patients with systemic PTCL. This represents an encouraging outcome, particularly considering the high median age and adverse risk profile of the present study population. Therefore, based on these results, dose-dense induction and HDT/ASCT should be considered in transplant-eligible PTCL patients. Disclosures: Jantunen: Genzyme: Honoraria.

Description: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is considered incurable. Intensive immunochemotherapy with stem cell support has not been tested in large, prospective series. In the 2nd Nordic MCL trial, we treated 160 consecutive, untreated patients younger than 66 years in a phase 2 protocol with dose-intensified induction immunochemotherapy with rituximab (R) + cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone (maxi-CHOP), alternating with R + high-dose cytarabine. Responders received high-dose chemotherapy with BEAM or BEAC (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan/cyclophosphamide) with R-in vivo purged autologous stem cell support. Overall and complete response was achieved in 96% and 54%, respectively. The 6-year overall, event-free, and progression-free survival were 70%, 56%, and 66%, respectively, with no relapses occurring after 5 years. Multivariate analysis showed Ki-67 to be the sole independent predictor of event-free survival. The nonrelapse mortality was 5%. The majority of stem cell products and patients assessed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after transplantation were negative. Compared with our historical control, the Nordic MCL-1 trial, the event-free, overall, and progression-free survival, the duration of molecular remission, and the proportion of PCR-negative stem cell products were significantly increased (P 〈 .001). Intensive immunochemotherapy with in vivo purged stem cell support can lead to long-term progression-free survival of MCL and perhaps cure. Registered at www.isrctn.org as #ISRCTN 87866680.

Description: Abstract 932 The Nordic Lymphoma Group has since 1996 conducted three consecutive phase II trials for front-line treatment of MCL patients ≤ 65 years of age. The first protocol (MCL1) 1996-2000 introduced high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (unpurged or ex vivo purged) as consolidation after 4 cycles of intensified CHOP (maxi-CHOP). The results were disappointing, as the majority of patients relapsed. 1 Being in CR pre-transplant was the most important factor for outcome. Hence, in the second trial (MCL2) 2000-2006 induction therapy was intensified by adding high-dose Ara-C and rituximab to the regimen. Compared to MCL1 this led to significant improvement of event-free and overall survival, and the rate of PCR negative stem cell grafts and bone marrow samples.2 Again, responders in less than CR pre-transplant had a significantly poorer outcome. We therefore made a further intensification for the MCL3 study (2006-2009) by adding 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) to the high-dose BEAC/BEAM to responders not in CR. Methods: As in the MCL1 and 2 studies newly diagnosed stage II-IV MCL patients ≤ 65 years were included. Induction treatment was identical to that of the MCL2 study with alternating cycles of maxi-CHOP-rituximab (3 cycles) and Ara-C-rituximab (3 cycles). Response evaluation was done after cycle 5. PET/CT was recommended, but could not influence the response evaluation, which was done according to the International Workshop criteria. Responders underwent in vivo purged harvest of stem cells after cycle 6 (Ara-C + 2 doses of rituximab). Patients in CRu or PR received a standard dose 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan (0.4 mCi/kg) one week prior to the BEAM/BEAC, CR patients received BEAM/BEAC alone. Patients are followed by CT-scans, bone marrow and blood samples, including PCR for minimal residual disease or molecular relapse. For molecular relapse preemptive treatment with 4 standard doses of rituximab, as in the MCL2 study3, is given. Results: The planned accrual of 160 patients was reached in June 2009. The patient characteristics are similar to those of the MCL2 trial with a median age of 57 years (28-65), the majority male (80%) and in stage IV (89%) with bone marrow involvement (74%). The response rates pre-transplant so far compare favorably with data from MCL2 with 50% in CR, 18% in CRu, and 28% in PR. Only 4 out of 128 evaluable patients did not respond (3%) and there was one case (1%) of treatment-related mortality during induction therapy. While it is still too early to assess the impact of the 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan on the progression-free survival, the side effects were similar to those of the MCL2 study including a treatment related mortality of 4%. Fifty-five patients in CRu or PR have so far been treated with 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan, with no indication of any added toxicity. Only 12 out of 133 patients (10%) have not undergone transplant, 5 due to stem cell harvest failure, 3 due to toxicity and 4 due to non response to induction treatment. PET-scan prior to transplant was positive in 2% of CR patients, 20% of CRu patients and 54% of PR patients. Patients with a positive PET-scan pre-transplant had a 36% chance of achieving a molecular remission post-transplant, compared to 92% of cases with a negative PET-scan (p

Description: Introduction: In the Nordic Lymphoma Group trial NLG T-01, patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) were treated with six courses of CHOEP (up to 60 yrs) or CHOP (61-67 yrs) followed by high-dose chemotherapy (BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). At 5 years median follow-up, the progression-free survival of the trial cohort was 44%. On this background, the NLG-T01 treatment strategy has become the recommended first-line treatment for younger fit patients in the Nordic countries and in the latest ESMO guidelines for PTCL. Despite this intensive approach with up-front ASCT a fraction of patients still relapses. In an attempt to find factors predictive for survival after up-front ASCT we aimed to analyze the impact of radiologic response at the first interim evaluation on long-term survival. Methods: All NLG T-01 patients (TrialP) with "nodal" PTCL, i.e. anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-negative (ALCL), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL NOS), that actually received the planned ASCT were included. Using national (Sweden and Denmark) or site-specific (Finland and Norway) registries, additional patients (RegP) who received the same treatment schedule, but off-protocol, were identified, and data for these patients was collected retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of stem cell reinfusion until death from any cause. The first interim computed tomography (iCT) scan was performed after 3 cycles of chemotherapy. Response assessment in the NLG-T-01 trial was based on the 1999 International Working Group criteria for response, which allowed for complete remission unconfirmed and these patients have been grouped with CR in the present analysis. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as increase of ≥25% of any lesion. Results: Altogether, 132 patients were included in the present study (TrialP n= 92; RegP n=40). The clinical characteristics are presented in the Table. The 5-year OS among all the patients was 58%. Response at iCT was CR, partial remission (PR) and SD in 44%, 53% and 3% respectively. Of the four patients with SD at iCT, all four patients attained PR after completing six cycles of chemotherapy prior to ASCT. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS are illustrated in the Figure and the 5-year OS was identical, 61%, for patients in CR and PR but 0%for patients with SD. Using log-rank comparisons patients achieving SD at iCT had a significantly worse survival compared to patients with CR or PR (p=.01). Discussion: This study is to our knowledge the first to analyze whether interim treatment response can predict long-term OS in "nodal" PTCL patients treated with CHOEP or CHOP consolidated by up-front ASCT. Patients with SD after three cycles of chemotherapy had a very poor survival compared to patients with PR or CR. This was an expected finding, and it confirms the importance of chemo-sensitive disease as a necessary pre-requisite in order to benefit from up-front high-dose consolidation. Using CT, there was no survival difference between patients with CR or PR at the first interim evaluation. A larger cohort might reveal further differences in subgroups, particularly if PET/CT based remission evaluation should confirm itself as a useful tool also in nodal PTCL. At present our study indicates that failure to achieve PR after three cycles of CHOEP/CHOP identifies patients at high risk of relapse/progression that are in need of a different therapeutic strategy than continuing with CHOEP/CHOP towards an ASCT. Table Table. Figure Figure. Disclosures Mannisto: Gilead: Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel expenses; Novartis: Other: Travel expenses; Amgen: Other: Travel expenses; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Pfizer: Honoraria; SOBI: Honoraria.

Description: Abstract 4110 Background: The ACT trial (ACT-1 and −2) tests the addition of alemtuzumab (ALZ) to 6 courses of bi-weekly CHOP (A-CHOP-14) followed, in younger patients (ACT-1), by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) in newly diagnosed primary systemic peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). To date, the trial has accrued a total of 131 patients (ACT-1 n=72; ACT-2 n=59). Here, we present the first planned interim safety analysis of the ACT-1 trial based on the first 51 randomized patients. Aims: The aim of the present analysis is to report on the feasibility of a dose-dense chemo-immunotherapy schedule combining ALZ and bi-weekly CHOP followed by HDT/ASCT in ‘de novo' PTCL patients. Results: Results contain two data subsets corresponding to ALZ dose levels prior and subsequent to a dose-reduction amendment tapering ALZ dose from 360 mg (30 mg on days 1 and 2 of each CHOP course) to 120 mg (30 mg on day 1 of CHOP courses 1–4), respectively. Of the 51 randomized patients, 43 had a complete set of evaluable data and represent the background for the present set of results. Of these, 5 received the higher ALZ dose, 17 the lower and 21 belonged to the antibody-void control arm. Treatment arms were well balanced with regard to histological subtypes, IPI sub-groups, and single prognostic factors. Neither of the two treatment cohorts, and for the experimental one irrespective of ALZ dose level, showed significant treatment delay. The median duration of chemotherapy (calculated for 5 bi-weekly cycles of an expected cumulative duration of 70 days) for non-ALZ vs. ALZ-treated patients was 73 vs. 81 days, respectively. No suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) were reported. Grade 3–4 leucopenia and anemia were more frequent in ALZ-treated patients (71% vs 29% and 47% vs 14%, respectively), whereas no difference was seen in terms of thrombocytopenia (17% vs 18%). Non-hematological toxicity unrelated to infectious complications was similar in the two groups. At the higher ALZ dose level, two cases of systemic fungal infection were reported, of which one (verified as being aspergillosis) with fatal outcome in a patient with pre-existing type II diabetes and steroid-requiring chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These two events prompted the ALZ dose-reduction amendment, which led to a significant drop in the number of serious adverse events (SAEs) for ALZ-treated patients (SAE/patient pre-amendment: 2.6, post-amendment: 0.76) to a level comparable with the control arm (SAE/patient pre-amendment: 0.67, post-amendment: 0.44). With regard to the types of infection (≥grade 2), there was a similar frequency in reported fungal infections between the two treatment cohorts, bacterial infections were more often reported in the standard treatment arm (55% vs 46%), while the opposite was observed for viral infections (29% vs. 35%). Among the latter, there were 8 cases of cytomegalovirus reactivation among ALZ-treated patients, of which only two were clinically symptomatic and regressed upon specific treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, the early-on impression of a SAE decrease subsequent to the ALZ dose-reduction amendment (applied on both ACT-1 and ACT-2) has been further confirmed by a larger cohort of patients treated at the lower ALZ dose level. The number of adverse events in the two study arms is now fairly comparable and adds further useful information to the previous reports on feasibility of stem cell harvest (Blood 2010;116: 2395) and hematopoietic recovery (Ann Oncol 2011;22(s4): 476) in ‘de novo' PTCL patients treated with a dose-dense ALZ-CHOP regimen followed by HDT/ASCT. Disclosures: Walewski: 4SC AG: Consultancy. Jantunen:Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has a heterogeneous clinical course. The recently proposed Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) predicted the survival of MCL better than the International Prognostic Index in MCL patients treated with conventional chemotherapy, but its validity in MCL treated with more intensive immunochemotherapy has been questioned. Applied here to 158 patients of the Nordic MCL2 trial of first-line intensive immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, the MIPI and the simplified MIPI (s-MIPI) predicted survival significantly better (P 〈 .001) than the International Prognostic Index (P 〉 .004). Both the MIPI and the s-MIPI mainly identified 2 risk groups, low and intermediate versus high risk, with the more easily applied s-MIPI being just as powerful as the MIPI. The MIPIB (biological), incorporating Ki-67 expression, identified almost half of the patients as high risk. We suggest that also a simplified MIPIB is feasible. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.org as #ISRCTN 87866680.