ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2023-07-21
    Description: Late Paleozoic (Variscan) magmatism is widespread in Central Europe. The Lusatian Block is located in the NE Bohemian Massif and it is part of the Saxothuringian Zone of the Variscan orogen. It is bordered by two major NW-trending shear zones, the Intra-Sudetic Fault Zone towards NE and the Elbe Fault Zone towards SW. The scarce Variscan igneous rocks of the Lusatian Block are situated close to these faults. We investigated 19 samples from Variscan plutonic and volcanic rocks of the Lusatian Block, considering all petrological varieties (biotite-bearing granites from the Koenigshain and Stolpen plutons, amphibole-bearing granites from three boreholes, several volcanic dykes, and two volcanites from the intramontane Weissig basin). We applied whole-rock geochemistry (18 samples) and zircon evaporation dating (19 samples). From the evaporation data, we selected six representative samples for additional zircon SHRIMP and CA–ID–TIMS dating. For the Koenigshain pluton, possible protoliths were identified using whole-rock Nd-isotopes, and zircon Hf- and O-isotopes. The new age data allow a subdivision of Variscan igneous rocks in the Lusatian Block into two distinct magmatic episodes. The spatial relation of the two age groups to either the Elbe Fault Zone (298–299 Ma) or the Intra-Sudetic Fault Zone (312–313 Ma) together with reports on the fault-bound character of the dated intrusions suggests an interpretation as two major post-collisional faulting episodes. This assumption of two distinct magmatic periods is confirmed by a compilation of recently published zircon U–Pb CA–ID–TIMS data on further Variscan igneous rocks from the Saxothuringian Zone. New geochemical data allow us to exclude a dominant sedimentary protolith for the Koenigshain pluton as supposed by previous investigations. This conclusion is mainly based on new O- and Hf-isotope data on zircon and the scarcity of inherited zircons. Instead, acid or intermediate igneous rocks are supposed as the main source for these I-type granitoids from the Koenigshain pluton.
    Description: Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg (3135)
    Keywords: ddc:551 ; Geochronology ; Zircon ; Variscan granites ; Lusatian block
    Language: English
    Type: doc-type:article
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2019-08-01
    Description: The Variscan granites from the Western Erzgebirge were repeatedly dated by various methods, but no consensus has been reached about their exact intrusion ages. This study presents a multi-dating approach for the four largest intrusions from the Western Erzgebirge (Aue-Schwarzenberg, Bergen, Eibenstock, Kirchberg). We analysed several samples from each pluton/suite with zircon U–Pb CA-ID-TIMS (chemical abrasion-isotope dilution-thermal ionization mass spectrometry) to obtain robust temporal information on their age and tempo of intrusion. These data enable us for the first time to define three intrusive episodes of 1–2 Ma each, separated by quiet periods of several Ma. The Aue-Schwarzenberg suite represents the oldest granites that intruded at ~323–322 Ma followed by the granites from Bergen and Kirchberg 2–4 Ma later. The highly evolved ore-bearing granites from the Eibenstock pluton intruded after a time lag of ~5 Ma at ~315–314 Ma. The new data show that there is a resolvable age difference between the two known granite groups. Granite group 2 (also assigned as younger igneous complex, represented by the Eibenstock pluton) is ≥5 Ma younger than granite group 1 (assigned as older igneous complex, represented by granites from Aue-Schwarzenberg, Bergen and Kirchberg).Protracted magmatism and late-/post-magmatic fluid flow partly reset the U–Pb system of these granites to variable degrees, making a precise and accurate dating of their intrusion ages challenging. Pb loss in zircons is often combined with high common Pb (Pbc). SHRIMP/SIMS (sensitive high mass resolution ion microprobe/secondary ion mass spectrometry) and LA-ICP-MS (laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry) on non-CA zircons document that Pb loss and high Pbc is quite variable within zircon grains and may be located in micro-fractures. We demonstrate that chemical abrasion (CA) clearly minimizes or removes both Pb loss and Pbc. Results from prior LA-ICP-MS and SHRIMP dating on non-CA zircons from the same samples considerably helped the interpretation of the CA-ID-TIMS data when Pb loss was not completely erased by CA. In such cases we often had to choose the oldest analyses for mean age calculation in contrast to the common practice of the CA-ID-TIMS community to choose the youngest dates.Rb–Sr and Ar–Ar dating systems revealed age differences between the older group and the younger ore-bearing granites albeit with diverging absolute ages. Most Ar–Ar ages are identical with CA-ID-TIMS ages and would imply rapid cooling. However, samples from the older group have excess Ar that could have led to too old ages. In contrast, Rb–Sr ages for the older granites are 0–7 Ma younger than their intrusions. Fluid induced alteration led to the formation of Li-mica, fluorite and cassiterite (greisenization). For the youngest granite (Eibenstock), Li-mica was used to date the first greisenization. Samples without visible hydrothermal overprint yielded identical Ar–Ar and Rb–Sr ages as severely greisenized samples. This implies re-equilibration due to the hydrothermal overprint for all Ar–Ar and Rb–Sr ages from the Eibenstock pluton. According to Ar–Ar dating, the first ore formation (~315 Ma) is coeval with the CA-ID-TIMS intrusion age of the Eibenstock granite while it is delayed by ~6 (±3) Ma according to Rb–Sr dating (308 ± 3 Ma).
    Print ISSN: 0009-2541
    Electronic ISSN: 1872-6836
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Geosciences
    Published by Elsevier
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2021-08-12
    Description: Late Paleozoic (Variscan) magmatism is widespread in Central Europe. The Lusatian Block is located in the NE Bohemian Massif and it is part of the Saxothuringian Zone of the Variscan orogen. It is bordered by two major NW-trending shear zones, the Intra-Sudetic Fault Zone towards NE and the Elbe Fault Zone towards SW. The scarce Variscan igneous rocks of the Lusatian Block are situated close to these faults. We investigated 19 samples from Variscan plutonic and volcanic rocks of the Lusatian Block, considering all petrological varieties (biotite-bearing granites from the Koenigshain and Stolpen plutons, amphibole-bearing granites from three boreholes, several volcanic dykes, and two volcanites from the intramontane Weissig basin). We applied whole-rock geochemistry (18 samples) and zircon evaporation dating (19 samples). From the evaporation data, we selected six representative samples for additional zircon SHRIMP and CA–ID–TIMS dating. For the Koenigshain pluton, possible protoliths were identified using whole-rock Nd-isotopes, and zircon Hf- and O-isotopes. The new age data allow a subdivision of Variscan igneous rocks in the Lusatian Block into two distinct magmatic episodes. The spatial relation of the two age groups to either the Elbe Fault Zone (298–299 Ma) or the Intra-Sudetic Fault Zone (312–313 Ma) together with reports on the fault-bound character of the dated intrusions suggests an interpretation as two major post-collisional faulting episodes. This assumption of two distinct magmatic periods is confirmed by a compilation of recently published zircon U–Pb CA–ID–TIMS data on further Variscan igneous rocks from the Saxothuringian Zone. New geochemical data allow us to exclude a dominant sedimentary protolith for the Koenigshain pluton as supposed by previous investigations. This conclusion is mainly based on new O- and Hf-isotope data on zircon and the scarcity of inherited zircons. Instead, acid or intermediate igneous rocks are supposed as the main source for these I-type granitoids from the Koenigshain pluton.
    Print ISSN: 1437-3254
    Electronic ISSN: 1437-3262
    Topics: Geosciences
    Published by Springer
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: In this study, we present a new 87 Sr/ 86 Sr isoscape map of Central and NE Germany. This area is characterized by an alternation of sedimentary basins and mountainous regions with a very variable lithology. Since lithology and rock age have a major impact on the isotopic composition of biologically available strontium, Central and NE Germany should reveal highly variable 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios. From lithological characteristics, particularly high ratios are expected in the mountainous regions of the Erzgebirge/Fichtelgebirge and the Harz Mountains. In contrast to these predictions, published 87 Sr/ 86 Sr isoscape maps of Central and NE Germany record rather uniform and low 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios. From this observation, we suspected that existing isoscape maps might be computed from an insufficient database, with mountainous regions being underrepresented. Our goal was to gather 87 Sr/ 86 Sr baselines for each major lithology of Central and NE Germany and to produce an accurate isoscape map of Central and NE Germany. In the first step, we evaluated the suitability of stream water and groundwater as a proxy for biologically available strontium. In a selected watershed, we present mixing relationships and a stream network model. We show that groundwater is prone to very local geologic and anthropogenic influences and should thus be avoided. Instead, we focussed our further sampling on stream water. Altogether, we used 119 new measurements of groundwater and stream water and a set of 23 auxiliary variables as a database for our new isoscape map of Central and NE Germany. Due to a sampling strategy that focussed on covering each major lithology, our measurements and the final isoscape map show a clear contrast between sedimentary basins and mountainous regions. For regions that have been sufficiently sampled, a direct comparison of the isoscape map with published and new data shows good agreement. Although Central and NE Germany were part of published isoscape maps, our new map is the first that predicts 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios in mountainous regions with high accuracy.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2020-12-11
    Description: The Tajik basin and southwestern Tian Shan constitute the northwestern tip of the India‐Asia collision zone. Basin inversion formed the thin‐skinned Tajik fold‐thrust belt, outlined by westward convex fold trains, underlain by a décollement in Jurassic evaporites. The belt's leading edge—the Uzbek Gissar—and its transpressional northern lateral margin—the Tajik Gissar—constitute the thick‐skinned foreland buttresses. Apatite fission‐track data indicate ~40‐ to 15‐Ma reheating by sediment burial in the Tian Shan. In the Gissar and the Tajik fold‐thrust belt, apatite fission‐track and (U,Th)/He ages date the major phase of shortening/erosion between ~12 and 1 Ma, with exhumation to 2‐ to 3‐km crustal depths within a few Myr after onset of shortening. Shortening spread immediately across the fold‐thrust belt, typical for belts floored by a detachment in ductile rocks, and into the foreland buttresses. Reactivation concentrated in the internal (eastern) fold‐thrust belt with the thickest evaporates. The youngest ages (~6.6–1.6 Ma) occur along the Vakhsh thrust, the active erosional front of the fold‐thrust belt in the northeastern Tajik basin, where it narrows between the converging Tian Shan and Pamir. Our study links major events in the Pamir hinterland with the Tajik basin and Tian Shan foreland. In the late Eocene–early Miocene, the advancing Pamir‐plateau crust loaded the foreland, inducing subsidence, reheating, and early shortening. Basin inversion and major shortening/transpression in the foreland buttresses from ~12 Ma onward were synchronous with the subcrustal indentation of Indian lithosphere into the Tajik‐Tarim basin lithosphere and the onset of its rollback beneath the Pamir.
    Language: English
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...