ALBERT

Description: Despite advances in understanding of the biology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), cure remains elusive for the majority of patients. Pro-survival molecules of BCL-2 family play critical roles in leukemia transformation and chemoresistance. The anti-leukemia potency of selective BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (ABT-199/GDC-0199) has been demonstrated in AML models (Pan et al. Cancer Discovery 2014). However, venetoclax is often associated with resistance due to its poor inhibition of MCL-1. RAF/MEK/ERK (MAPK) pathway is commonly activated in AML, and can stabilize anti-apoptotic MCL-1 and inactivate the pro-apoptotic BIM. In this study, we evaluated the anti-leukemia effects of concomitant BCL-2 and MAPK blockade by venetoclax in combination with MEK1/2 inhibitor GDC-0973 (cobimetinib). First, anti-leukemia activity of cobimetinib and venetoclax was examined in 18 primary AML samples with diverse genetic alterations. The combination significantly enhanced cell death, as compared to the single agent treatment (Fig 1A). Cobimetinib inhibited cell proliferation in the majority of AML cases (34.2 ± 23.7%) and the cell growth suppression was more profound in the combination group (60.2 ± 28.8%, p

Description: Introduction: The Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) is a hallmark of CML and is also present in a subset of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Lymphoid blast phase (CML-BP) and Ph+ ALL almost always affect B cell lineage. In this report, we present the clinical characteristics of the rare subset of patients with Ph+ ALL or CML-BP with T-cell lymphoid phenotype. Methods: We reviewed the institutional database for all patients with blast phase CML (n=498) and de novo T-ALL (n=150) diagnosed since 07/1997. All clinical characteristics at the time of the diagnosis of BP or Ph+ ALL were collected. Seven patients with Ph+ T-cell lymphoid leukemia were identified. Results: Among the total of 498 CML-BP patients, 5 patients had T-cell lymphoid CML-BP (0.01%); in addition 2 patients with de novo Ph+ T-ALL were identified among 150 patients with T-ALL seen during the same time period (1.3%). Median age of the seven patients was 57 years (range 31-72 years); 71% were male. Among patients with CML-BP, all were in BP at the time they were referred to MDACC (one had progressed from an initial diagnosis in CP, 1 from accelerated phase, and 3 were in BP at initial diagnosis). Only 2 patients with CML-BP received prior TKI therapy; the 2 patients with T-ALL were previously untreated at the time of referral. Immunophenotype included 2 cortical, 3 early T-cell and 2 early T-cell precursor; 2 patients were negative and one was dim positive for TdT (summarized in Table-1). Extramedullary disease at initial presentation was seen in all patients [2 with lymphadenopathy alone, 2 with mediastinal involvement (one also with lymphadenopathy and the other with splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy), 2 with pleural effusion (1 with lymphadenopathy and another with splenomegaly) and 1 patient with splenomegaly alone]. None had CNS involvement at initial presentation, but one patient developed CNS involvement at first relapse. One patient had variant Ph+ and 2 had complex karyotype. Three patients had lymphoblastic lymphoma and 4 patients had T-ALL. Five patients died (3 from disease progression, one from complications of SCT, and one from intestinal obstruction and sepsis) and 2 are alive (25 and 49 months from BP diagnosis). The median survival for all patients was 13 months (range 1-49 months). Five patients received hyper-CVAD based therapy as an induction regimen: 3 of them received hyper-CVAD alone - one achieved CR then underwent a SCT but died due to complications of SCT, another achieved PR and was given imatinib followed by dasatinib which he did not tolerate; he was subsequently lost to follow up; and one patient had no response. The other 2 patients received hyper-CVAD with dasatinib - one achieved PR, then underwent allo-SCT and achieved CR but later had a CNS relapse and progressed; the other patient developed nodal progression 9 months after achieving CR with HCVAD-dasatinib which was later found to represent metastatic prostate cancer in the lymph nodes with no T-ALL recurrence and is currently on dasatinib with major molecular response. Two patients never received any TKI therapy and progressed on chemotherapy alone. Two patients received nelarabine as first salvage - one as a single agent (no response) and another with dasatinib (with PR). Conclusions: Ph+ T-cell lymphoid leukemias are very rare and have clinical features similar to those of de novo T-ALL. Induction with a combination of HCVAD and TKIs may achieve prolonged remission in some patients. Disclosures Jabbour: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: MRD positivity after induction/consolidation therapy in pts with de novo ALL has been shown to carry a very negative impact on outcome. However, the significance of MRD status in the salvage setting has not been extensively studied. Methods: We evaluated 130 pts with R/R B-cell ALL pts who received first (n=68), or second (n=62), salvage therapy between 2010 and 2015. Salvage therapies included single agent inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO; n=75), blinatumomab (n=20), or INO in combination with mini-hyper-CVD (n=35) [Jabbour E et al; EHA 2015]. Of the 130 pts treated, 78 (60%) responded and were assessed for MRD by six-color flow cytometry on marrow samples with a sensitivity of 0.01%. Morphologic responses were defined as follows, complete response (CR); disappearance of all disease with neutrophils ≥ 1.0 X 109/L, platelet 〉 100 X 109/L and blasts ≤ 5%, CRp; CR without platelet recovery, CRi; CR without platelet and/or neutrophil recovery. Results: The clinical characteristics of the 78 responding pts with R/R ALL are summarized in Table 1. Overall, MRD negativity was achieved at response in 41 pts (53%). Among the 41 pts who responded to single agent INO (12 CR, 26 CRp, 3CRi), 17 (41%) achieved a negative MRD status. Among the 11 pts who responded to blinatumomab (9 CR, 2Cri), 8 (73%) achieved a negative MRD status. Among the 26 pts who responded to INO in combination with mini-HCVD (21 CR, 4 CRp, 1CRi), 16 (62%) achieved a negative MRD status. Forty-four pts received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT): of those, 21 pts were MRD negative and 23 pts were MRD positive at the time of response. Median follow-up was 19 months (2-55). Overall, there was a trend for more durable morphologic responses in MRD negative pts compared with MRD positive pts: the median complete remission durations (CRD) were 17 months and 8 months, with a 2-year CRD rate of 47% and 28% respectively (Table 2). The median event-free survival (EFS) was 12 and 6 months, respectively; the 2-year EFS rates were 32% and 8%, respectively. Similarly, there was a trend for better overall survival (OS) with a median of 17 months and 9 months for pts with negative and positive MRD, respectively; the 2-year OS rates were 36% and 27%, respectively. No difference in outcome was reported whether pts were censored or not at the time of ASCT. Conclusion: In pts with R/R ALL, the achievement of negative MRD in addition to the morphologic response confers an improvement, although not statistically significant, in response duration and survival. Larger number of pts with longer follow-up is needed to validate these findings.Table 1.Clinical Characteristics of Pts (n=78)N (%)/Median [range]Age (years)38 [18-87]Sex (Male)50 (64)Performance Status1 [1-3]WBC (x 109/L)3 [0.3-38]% PB Blasts0 [0-83]% BM Blasts60 [8-97]CytogeneticsDiploid20 (26)t(9;22)4 (5)t(4;11)7 (9)Miscellaneous39 (50)Not done/ Insufficient metaphases8 (10)SalvageInotuzumab Ozogamicin41 (53)Blinatumomab11 (14)Inotuzumab Ozogamicin + mini-HCVD26 (33)Number of prior therapies1 prior therapy46 (59)2 prior therapies32 (41) Table 2. Response Rates and Survival by MRD Status MRD Negative (n=41) MRD Positive (n=37) p CR 24 18 n/a CRp 16 14 n/a CRi 1 5 n/a CRD, median (m) 17 8 0.63 2-year CRD rate (%) 47 28 EFS, median (m) 12 6 0.06 2-year EFS rate (%) 32 8 OS, median (m) 17 9 0.18 2-year OS rate (%) 36 27 Disclosures Cortes: Teva: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy. DiNardo:Novartis: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: CD22 is widely expressed on leukemic lymphoblasts in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, has shown significantly higher remission rates than standard of care (SC) chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory B-cell (R/R) ALL, independently of CD22 expression level. Here we report safety outcomes by CD22 expression in patients with R/R ALL receiving InO (vs SC) as salvage therapy in the INO-VATE trial (NCT01564784). Methods: Adults with CD22-positive ALL in 1st or 2nd salvage were randomized to InO (n=164; starting dose 1.8 mg/m2/cycle [0.8 mg/m2 on day 1; 0.5 mg/m2 on days 8 and 15 of a 21-28 day cycle for ≤6 cycles]) or SC (n=162; fludarabine/high-dose (HD) cytarabine (Ara-C)/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, Ara-C plus mitoxantrone, or HD Ara-C).The InO dose was reduced to 1.5 mg/m2 per cycle in patients who achieved complete remission [CR] or CR with incomplete hematologic recover [CRi]. Last patient visit was January 4, 2017. Central flow cytometry was used to assess CD22 expression, which was quantified as % leukemic blasts CD22-positive and as Molecules of Equivalent Soluble Fluorochrome (a quantitative measure of receptor density on leukemic blasts [MESF]). Outcomes were reported in patients by baseline leukemic blast positivity (≥90% vs

Description: Background: The Hyper-CVAD regimen is safe and effective in the frontline treatment of B-ALL. The addition of rituximab to the Hyper-CVAD regimen (HCVAD-R) improved the 3-year overall survival (OS) to 60% in pts with B-ALL. Ofatumumab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that binds to the small extracellular loop of the CD20 molecule and has greater in vitro potency and increased complement-mediated cell lysis compared to rituximab. We hypothesized that ofatumumab plus Hyper-CVAD may increase the rates of complete remission (CR) and measurable residual disease negativity (MRD-) and improve survival by decreasing relapse rates. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had newly diagnosed untreated or minimally treated (≤ 1 cycle) Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative CD20+ B-ALL. CD20 positivity was defined as ≥ 1% positive B-ALL cells. Pts received 8 alternating cycles of Hyper-CVAD and high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine (MTX/AraC). Ofatumumab was administered on days 1 and 11 of cycles 1 and 3; and days 1 and 8 of cycles 2 and 4. Pts then received POMP maintenance on cycles 1-5, 8-17 and 20-30 and late intensifications on cycles 6-7 and 18-19 (Hyper-CVAD + ofatumumab followed by MTX + peg-asparaginase). Pts received a total of 8 intrathecal injections of MTX and AraC for CNS prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and secondary endpoints include CR rates, MRD negativity rates and OS. On a subset of 27 patient samples, transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed to identify translocations and RNA expression signature for Ph-like ALL. We also performed a comprehensive detection of fusions and mutations reported in Ph-like ALL on RNA from these 27 samples using a multiplex fusion and mutation detection assay (Archer® FusionPlex® ALL). Results: Between August 2011 and May 2017, 69 pts were enrolled, including 4 already in CR at baseline after receiving 1 cycle of chemotherapy. Pts characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 41 years (18-71) and 48% pts were in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) age category (18-39 year-old). 7 of the 27 pts (26%) who had RNA-seq had Ph-like ALL gene expression signature. Among the 7 pts; 5 had Ph-like ALL fusions identified by Archer and/or RNA-seq-based fusion detection, including 2 P2RY8-CRLF2, 1 IGH-CRLF2, 1 BCR-FGFR1, and 1 ATF71P-PDGFRB. One patient had high CRLF2 expression with an unknown fusion partner. The remaining case lacked a fusion by either platform. Pts with Ph-like ALL had a higher median WBC of 41 x 109/L (range, 2 - 184). 43 pts (62%) had CD20 expression on ≥20% of the leukemic cells. 10/44 tested pts (23%) had TP53 mutation and 10/37 (27%) had CRLF2 overexpression by flow cytometry (4/5 CRLF2 rearrangement confirmed by Archer). 4 pts (6%) had low-hypodiploidy / near triploidy (Ho-Tr) and 2 (3%) pts had complex karyotype (CK). All but 1 pt (98%) achieved CR (2 after 2 cycles); only 1 pt (2%) died during induction. The MRD- rate was 65% after cycle 1 and 93% overall. These rates were 14% and 71%, respectively for pts with Ph-like ALL. The median time to MRD- was 0.7 month (range, 0.4-8 months) overall and 3 months (range, 0.7-6.5 months) for pts with Ph-like ALL. A total of 13 pts (19%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation for adverse-risk cytogenetics (CK or Ho-Tr), Ph-like ALL (n=1/7), or persistent MRD+. The most common non-hematologic grade 3-4 toxicity was infection which occurred in 56% and 81% of pts, during induction and consolidation, respectively. With a median follow-up of 44 months, 46 pts (64%) are alive, including 37 pts (54%) in CR1. The median RFS and OS were 52 months (95% CI, 43 - NR) and not reached (95% CI, 65 - NR), respectively. The estimated 4-yr RFS and OS rates were 60% (95% CI, 49 - 73%) and 68% (95% CI, 58 - 81%), respectively (Figure 1A-1B). For AYA pts, the 4-yr OS rate was 74% (95% CI, 60 - 91%) (Figure 2A). The 4-yr OS rates were 54% (95%, 26 - 100%) for pts with Ph-like ALL compared to 74% (95% CI, 57 - 97%) for pts without Ph-like ALL (Figure 2B). There was no difference in OS according to the CD20 expression level (20% cut-off; p = 0.31). Using historical control pts, there was a trend towards improved OS with HCVAD-O versus HCVAD-R for pts with CD20 ≥ 20% (4-yr OS rate 63% vs 49%, p = 0.16) and HCVAD-O versus HCVAD alone for pts with CD20 1-19% (4-yr OS rate 73% vs 62%, p = 0.46). Conclusion: HCVAD-O is a safe and highly effective regimen in pts with CD20+ Ph-negative B-ALL. This regimen achieves excellent outcomes in the AYA population. Disclosures Kantarjian: BMS: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Konopleva:Agios: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Ablynx: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cellectis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ravandi:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding; Menarini Ricerche: Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Research Funding; Macrogenix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Selvita: Research Funding. Jain:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Short:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Cortes:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy. Sasaki:Otsuka: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kadia:Celgene: Research Funding; Bioline RX: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. DiNardo:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; medimmune: Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; daiichi sankyo: Honoraria; notable labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Verstovsek:Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Protaganist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma Corp: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Pharma Essentia: Research Funding. Mullighan:Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel, Research Funding; Illumina: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored travel; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: speaker, sponsored travel. O'Brien:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Aptose Biosciences, Inc: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Vaniam Group LLC: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jabbour:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cyclacel LTD: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ofatumumab is not approved by the FDA for treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Description: Patients referred to tertiary care centers occasionally may have their diagnostic procedures repeated and have a final diagnosis that differs from that of the referring center. The aim of this study was to evaluate discordance rates and their clinical implications in the diagnosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) referred to a tertiary center. We analyzed 915 patients with MDS who were referred to M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between September 2005 and December 2009. Discordance in the diagnosis was documented in 109 (12%) patients, with a majority reclassified as having higher-risk disease by French-American-British (67%) or by International Prognostic Scoring System (77%) with implications for therapy selection and prognosis calculation. These results demonstrate the complexity of the diagnosis of MDS and highlight the need for confirmation of diagnosis when in doubt.

Description: Key Points This analysis demonstrates the universality of the early response in CML, regardless of the treatment modality used. Factors correlating with poor cytogenetic responses at 3-mo assessment in a multivariate analysis across all 4 TKIs.

Description: Notch1-mutated T-ALL is an aggressive hematologic malignancy lacking targeted therapeutic options. Genomic alterations in Notch1-gene and its activated downstream pathways are associated with metabolic stress response and heightened glutamine (Gln) utilization to fuel oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) (Kishton at al., Cell Metabolism 2016, 23:649, Herranz at al., Nat Med, 2015, 21(10): 1182-1189). Hence, targeting NOTCH1-associated OxPhos and/or Gln dependency could constitute a plausible therapeutic strategy for T-ALL. In this study we examined metabolic vulnerabilities of NOTCH1-driven T-ALL and tested pre-clinical efficacy of novel mitochondrial complex I (OxPhosi) IACS-010759 and of glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 (GLSi) in T-ALL models including Notch1-mutated T-ALL cell lines, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and primary T-ALL cells. We have previously reported and confirmed in this expanded study the anti-leukemia efficacy of IACS-010759 (EC50s 0.1-15 nM) (Molina at al., Nat Med, 2018, 24: 1036; Baran at al., Blood, 2018, 132:4020). Metabolic characterization demonstrated that OxPhosi caused striking dose-dependent decrease in basal and maximal oxygen consumption rate (OCR), ATP and NADH generation in T-ALL cell lines and primary T-ALL samples (p

Description: Background: We have previously shown that CMR predicts better outcomes in Ph+ ALL. The lack of achievement of CMR and particularly major molecular response (MMR) at 3 months may confer poor outcomes. We sought to investigate the outcomes of pts who did not achieve CMR at 3 months as best response in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the role of allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) in this population. Methods: We reviewed 204 pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL treated at our institution between January 2001 and June 2019 with the combination of Hyper-CVAD plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI); dasatinib (n=88, 43%), ponatinib (n=72, 35%) and imatinib (n= 44, 22%). PFS was defined from the start of therapy to relapse or death. OS was defined from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Backward multivariate Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors for PFS and OS after variable selection at a p-value cutoff of 0.200. Time to ASCT was handled as a time-dependent variable. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Landmark analysis at the median time to ASCT was analyzed to evaluate the impact of ASCT. Results: We identified 94 pts (46%) who did not achieve 3-month CMR. Of pts treated with imatinib, 29 (66%) did not achieve 3-month CMR and 16 pts (36%) achieved 3-month MMR. Of pts treated with dasatinib, 42 (48%) did not achieve 3-month CMR and 29 pts (33%) achieved 3-month MMR. Of pts treated with ponatinib, 23 (32%) did not achieve 3-month CMR and 17 pts (24%) achieved 3-month MMR. Patient characteristics are summarized in table 1. Median age was 54 years (range: 21-80). The TKI administered was dasatinib, imatinib and ponatinib in 42 (45%), 29 (31%) and 23 (24%) pts, respectively. Overall, ASCT was performed in 28 pts (30%); 21 out of 62 pts (34%) with 3-month MMR, and 7 out of 32 pts (22%) who did not achieve MMR, within a median time of 5 months (range, 2.3-12.3). After a median follow-up of 97 months, median PFS was 21 months and median OS was 46 months. There was no difference in survival by TKI choice. The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 52% and 23% (p=0.001) (Figure 1A), and 58% and 26% (p=0.001) (Figure 1B) for pts with and without 3-month MMR, respectively. In multivariate analysis (table 2), 3-month MMR predicted longer PFS (p