ALBERT

Description: The olfactory response of the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster to food odor is modulated by starvation. Here we show that this modulation is not restricted to food odors and their detecting sensory neurons but rather increases the behavioral response to odors as different as food odors, repellents and pheromones. The increased behavioral responsiveness is paralleled by an increased physiological sensitivity of sensory neurons regardless whether they express olfactory or ionotropic receptors and regardless whether they are housed in basiconic, coeloconic, or trichoid sensilla. Silencing several genes that become up-regulated under starvation confirmed the involvement of the short neuropeptide f receptor in the starvation effect. In addition it revealed that the CCHamide-1 receptor is another important factor governing starvation-induced olfactory modifications. Scientific Reports 3 doi: 10.1038/srep02765

Description: Article Foraging is energetically demanding for animals like hawkmoths that feed while flying. Here, Haverkamp et al . show that Manduca sexta has an innate preference for feeding on species of Nicotiana whose flower corolla length best matches the length of their proboscis, which allowed more efficient foraging and yielded the highest caloric gain. Nature Communications doi: 10.1038/ncomms11644 Authors: Alexander Haverkamp, Julia Bing, Elisa Badeke, Bill S. Hansson, Markus Knaden

Description: Scientific Reports 3 doi: 10.1038/srep01495

Description: Background: Survival of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) decreases with increased age (Pulte, Oncologist, 2011). In addition, MM pts with advanced disease who have exhausted treatment (Tx) with novel agents have a poor prognosis (Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide (POM) is a new oral agent with antimyeloma, stromal cell inhibitory, and immune modulatory effects (Quach, Leukemia, 2010; Mark, Leuk Res, 2014). In the pivotal MM-003 trial, POM in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits vs. high-dose dexamethasone, with a tolerable safety profile in refractory or relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM; Dimopoulos, Blood, 2013). In MM-003, significant PFS and OS benefits with POM + LoDEX Tx were seen in different age groups; tolerability and dose intensity were not affected by age (Weisel, Blood, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, European, phase 3b trial to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in a large pt population. This analysis examines outcomes by age (≤ 65 vs. 〉 65 yrs, and ≤ 70 vs. 〉 70 yrs). Methods: Eligible pts had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (progressive disease [PD] during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), having previous BORT and LEN failure and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to the last prior Tx line. Pts with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 〉 2 were excluded. Pts received 28-day cycles of POM 4 mg D1-21 + DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged 〉 75 yrs) once weekly. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent based on clinical recommendations. Tx continued until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety; the secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Outcomes were analyzed by pt age at baseline (≤ 65 vs. 〉 65 yrs, and ≤ 70 vs. 〉 70 yrs). Results: As of March 17th, 2014, a total of 456 pts have been enrolled, and 452 had received POM + LoDEX; 48% were aged ≤ 65 yrs, 52% were 〉 65 yrs, 71% were ≤ 70 yrs, and 29% were 〉 70 yrs. Pts were heavily pretreated (median 4-5 prior Tx depending on age subgroup). Median follow-up was 6.8 mos. Younger pts (≤ 65 yrs) were more likely to have better renal function (creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min; 80%) than those aged 〉 65 (49%). Median relative dose intensity was similar independent of age (range, 0.95-0.97 mg/day). The most common grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across age groups were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and pneumonia (Table). Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with prophylaxis was 1% in each subgroup. Discontinuations of POM due to TEAEs were low in pts aged ≤ 65 (0.9%), 〉 65 (3.0%), ≤ 70 (1.3%), and 〉 70 (3.8%) yrs. Outcomes by age are summarized in the Table. ORR was consistent for pts aged ≤ 65 (38%), 〉 65 (32%), ≤ 70 (35%), and 〉 70 (34%) yrs; DORs were 5.1, 6.8, and 5.8 mos and not estimable (NE) in these pt populations, respectively. Median PFS and median OS were similar across all age groups (PFS range, 4.0-4.9 mos, OS range, 10.6-11.5 mos). Conclusions: The data reported here further demonstrate the tolerability and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM in the age subgroups analyzed (≤ 65 vs. 〉 65 yrs and ≤ 70 vs. 〉 70 yrs). Safety profiles were consistent, while dose intensity was similar across age groups. PFS, OS, and response rates were comparable with those previously reported in trials of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and reinforce 4 mg POM as an appropriate starting dose irrespective of age. These data support POM + LoDEX as a standard Tx option for pts with refractory or RRMM regardless of age. Table 1. Age ≤ 65 yrs (n = 215) Age 〉 65 yrs (n = 237) Age ≤ 70 yrs (n = 319) Age 〉 70 yrs (n = 133) Grade 3-4 TEAEs, % Neutropenia Anemia Thrombocytopenia Pneumonia 38 30 22 13 41 24 16 10 38 29 21 11 44 23 15 11 Grade 3-4 EOI, % DVT/PE PN 1

Description: Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable but treatment sensitive plasma cell cancer with an average survival of 2-5 years following diagnosis, depending on age and stage. Few studies report real-world data in MM, with limited estimations of incidence and prevalence. The Health Outcome and Understanding of Myeloma - a multi-national real-world evidence (HUMANS) study utilized real-world data from nationwide registers in Sweden and Denmark, with almost complete population coverage, to estimate the incidence and prevalence of MM. Methods This population-based, retrospective, observational, cohort study used linked, secondary data from national healthcare registers in Sweden (National Patient Register [NPR], Cancer Register [CR], Cause of Death [COD], and Prescription Drug Register [PDR]) and Denmark (NPR and CR) from 2005-2018. Patients with MM diagnosis recorded in the NPR and/or CR treated and untreated with MM specific drugs were included. The NPR in both countries is a hospital discharge register, in which patients receive an ICD-10 diagnosis each time they visit outpatient or inpatient care as the main reason for the hospital visit. The CR is manually reported by physicians when a cancer diagnosis is confirmed. In Denmark, the CR is automatically connected to the NPR, thereby obliging physicians to register whether a diagnosis is confirmed upon first NPR ICD-10 code registration of a cancer diagnosis. The Swedish CR requires active registration of a pathologist or treating hematologist to confirm the diagnosis. To determine the completeness of registration in each respective CR, treatments from the Swedish PDR and Danish NPR from 2010-2018 were used to assess incident NPR cases. Treated patients registered in the NPR, but not in the CR (NPR+/CR-) were compared with treated patients registered in both (NPR+/CR+) to assess any systematic reasons for lack of CR registration. Final inclusion criteria were determined for best estimate of incidence/prevalence of MM. Prevalence was defined as the number of non-deceased patients with MM recorded during each calendar year, as assessed from the COD register. Incidence and prevalence rates were calculated as the crude incident and prevalent cases, divided by the patients at risk (total population minus prevalent population) for each year and multiplied by 100,000. Results In Sweden, data for 13,523 unique patients with registered MM was collected. Of these, 4,563 and 874 fulfilled the inclusion criteria of NPR+/CR+ and NPR+/CR-, respectively. In the comparative analysis, NPR+/CR+ and NPR+/CR- patients had a similar frequency of treatment at a hematology department (57% of NPR+/CR+ and 53% of NPR+/CR- patients had ≥1 visit ), and had a similar share of patients with autologous stem cell transplant (22% for NPR+/CR+ and 18% for NPR+/CR-), and of MM pharmacological treatment type (53% for NPR+/CR+ and 47% for NPR+/CR- had ≥1 prescription of lenalidomide). Both university hospitals and general hospitals had a high share of NPR+/CR- patients. As no systematic difference was found for patients registered in the CR or not, we considered the estimate of incidence to be a sum of NPR+/CR+ treated AND untreated + NPR+/CR- treated. In Denmark, data for 6331 unique patients with registered MM were collected. Of these, 3,680 met inclusion criteria for NPR+/CR+ and 233 for NPR+/CR-. Patients registered as NPR+/CR- were 33% more commonly not visiting a hematology department versus NPR+/CR+. Thus, a systematic skew in CR misregistration could not be excluded. We propose the best estimate of incidence and prevalence of MM in Denmark to be patients registered in the NPR and CR (treated or untreated). In Sweden and Denmark, incidence and prevalence were higher in patients aged ≥70 versus

Description: Introduction A triplet combination including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an IMiD has shown significant efficacy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. A role for maintenance therapy with the PI bortezomib has been suggested in non-head to head comparisons. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy and feasibility of an oral regimen including induction therapy with ixazomib in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by a randomization between maintenance therapy with ixazomib or placebo in elderly non-transplant eligible (nte) NDMM. We here report the final analysis of induction therapy and preliminary results of the randomization phase of the study. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR4910. Methods In this prospective multicenter phase II trial nte-NDMM 143 patients were treated with 9 28 day-cycles consisting of ixazomib 4 mg (day 1, 8, 15), thalidomide 100 mg (day 1-28) and dexamethasone 40 mg (day 1, 8, 15, 22) followed by randomization between either ixazomib or placebo (both day 1, 8, 15/28 days) until progression. Primary objectives were comparison of progression free survival (PFS) between maintenance therapy with ixazomib or placebo (hypothesized hazard ratio (HR) 0.39) and to determine the overall response rate (ORR) of induction therapy. Frailty was assessed by a modification of the IMWG frailty index based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the WHO performance as a proxy for (instrumental) Activities of Daily Living (scoring WHO 0 as 0 points, WHO 1 as 1 point, and WHO 2-3 as 2 points). High risk cytogenetics was defined as del17p, t(4;14) and/or t(14;16). Results The median follow up (FU) from registration is 26.4 months (range 0.9-41.0 months). Patient characteristics are presented in table 1. Following induction treatment ORR (i.e. ≥PR) was 81% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74-87%), ≥ VGPR 47% (95% CI 38-55%) and ≥ CR 9% (95% CI 5-15%). Age ≥76 years, frailty (unfit or frail) or high cytogenetic risk did not affect the rate and quality of response. Median PFS from registration for all patients was 14.3 months (95%-CI 11.8-16.8). Frailty did not affect PFS. The median PFS for high risk and standard risk disease was comparable; 12.4 months (95%-CI 7.3-20.0) versus 14.6 months (95%-CI 11.5-17.4) respectively. The OS from registration at 18 months was 85% (95% CI 77-90). This was 90% (95% CI 72-97), 92% (95% CI 78-97) and 74% (95% CI 61-84) for fit, unfit and frail patients respectively. Seventy-eight patients (55%) were randomized. The reasons for not being randomized were toxicity (17% [24/143]), progressive disease (15% [21/143]), death (3% [5/143]) and other reasons (10% [15/143]). Median FU from randomization is 18.6 months (range 9.0-31.5 months). Baseline characteristics of randomized patients separately are presented in table 1. Upgrade of response occurred in 13% of patients receiving placebo and 10% of patients receiving ixazomib. The median PFS from randomization was 8.4 months (95%-CI 3.0-13.8) in the placebo arm and 10.1 months (95%-CI 5.6-24.1) in the ixazomib arm (p=0.47, figure 1). The OS from randomization at 18 months was 92% (95%-CI 77-97) in the placebo arm and 100% in the ixazomib arm (p=0.85). Toxicity is presented in table 2. The incidence of neuropathy was low; 8% grade 3 (mainly during thalidomide treatment; 5%) and no grade 4. There was no new onset neuropathy during ixazomib maintenance. During induction 24/143 (17%) patients discontinued therapy due to toxicity; 11 thalidomide-related neurotoxicity, 3 infection, 3 skin toxicity, 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity and 5 other. During maintenance 4/38 (11%) in the placebo (3 neurotoxicity and 1 other) versus 4/39 (10%) in the ixazomib arm (3 neurotoxicity and 1 GI) discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Discontinuation due to toxicity was comparable across age and frailty groups. Conclusion Induction treatment with 9 cycles of ITd in nte NDMM results in a high ORR of 81%, with 47% ≥ VGPR, independent of age, frailty status and cytogenetic risk. Our placebo controlled randomized phase II trial did not show an improvement in response and PFS with ixazomib maintenance therapy until progression. Ixazomib maintenance did not result in additional toxicity as compared to placebo. Disclosures Zweegman: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schjesvold:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Levin:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. van de Donk:Janssen Pharmceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Sonneveld:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Abildgaard:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Description: Key Points In a multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial, MPR-R was not superior over MPT-T with respect to response rate, PFS, and OS. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity requiring growth factor support occurred with MPR-R vs clinically significant neuropathy with MPT-T.

Description: Background Ixazomib is the first orally administered PI studied in the clinic. The feasibility of combining ixazomib weekly and lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in the first all-oral PI- and immunomodulatory drug-containing triplet regimen was evaluated in a phase 1/2 trial of 65 pts with newly diagnosed MM. Results indicated a 90% ORR (62% ≥VGPR) using ixazomib 4 mg (recommended phase 2/3 dose), with a manageable safety profile, including 14% gr ≥3 skin/subcutaneous tissue disorders and limited (4% gr 3) peripheral neuropathy (PN) (Kumar et al, Lancet Oncol 2014). These data provided the rationale for phase 3 investigation of IRd vs placebo-Rd in pts with RRMM in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicenter study. Methods Adults with RRMM after 1-3 prior lines of therapy who were not refractory to prior lenalidomide or PI-based therapy were randomized 1:1 to receive ixazomib 4 mg or matching placebo weekly on d 1, 8, and 15, plus lenalidomide 25 mg PO on d 1-21 (dose reduced for renal impairment per local label/practice) and dexamethasone 40 mg PO on d 1, 8, 15, and 22, in 28-d cycles. Randomization was stratified by number of prior therapies (1 vs 2/3), PI exposure (naïve vs exposed), and ISS disease stage (I/II vs III). Cycles were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was PFS as assessed by an independent review committee blinded to treatment, per IMWG criteria. Key secondary endpoints were OS and OS in high-risk pts with del(17). Sample size was determined to provide 80% power for the OS endpoint and adequate power to test PFS. Three interim analyses (IAs) and a final analysis were planned to test PFS and OS; here, we report data from the first IA, the final analysis for PFS. Results 722 pts were randomized (360 IRd; 362 Rd). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups; overall median age was 66 yrs (30-91), 70% were PI-exposed, 88% were ISS stage I/II, 59% had received 1 prior therapy, and 77%/11%/11% were relapsed/refractory/relapsed and refractory, with 6% primary refractory. Based primarily (97%) on central laboratory evaluation, 19% had high-risk cytogenetics by FISH (del(17), t(4;14), or t(14;16)), including 10% del(17). Prior therapies included 69% bortezomib, 45% thalidomide, and 12% lenalidomide. The study met the primary endpoint at the first IA (median follow-up 14.8 vs 14.6 mos with IRd vs Rd), demonstrating a 35% improvement in PFS with IRd vs Rd (HR 0.742; p=0.012; Table). In pts with high-risk cytogenetics, the PFS HR was 0.543 with IRd vs Rd (HR 0.596 in pts with del(17)), with a median PFS similar to the overall IRd group, indicating ixazomib may overcome the negative impact of cytogenetic alterations. OS data were not yet mature. Key response data are shown in the Table. Pts received a median of 13 (1-26) vs 12 (1-25) cycles of IRd vs Rd; 55% and 52% of pts remained on treatment. With IRd vs Rd, 68% vs 61% of pts had gr ≥3 AEs (driven by thrombocytopenia), 40% vs 44% had serious AEs, 13% vs 11% discontinued all study drugs due to AEs, and 3% vs 5% died on treatment. AEs observed with IRd were consistent with reported safety profiles for the individual agents. Common gr ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (19% vs 16%), anemia (9% vs 13%), thrombocytopenia (13% vs 5%), and pneumonia (6% vs 8%). Gastrointestinal events included 42% vs 36% diarrhea (6% vs 2% gr 3), 26% vs 21% nausea (2% vs 0% gr 3), and 22% vs 11% vomiting (1% vs

Description: Background: Treatment (Tx) with novel agents, including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), has extended survival of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM); however, pts who have relapsed on or become refractory to Tx have significantly shortened overall survival (OS) and poorer outcomes (Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Renal impairment (RI) occurs frequently, in approximately 20% to 40% of MM pts (Kastritis, Haematologica, 2007), and is a leading cause of death in this pt population (Korbet, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006). In the phase 3 MM-003 trial, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs. high-dose dexamethasone in pts in whom BORT and LEN Tx failed, including those with moderate RI (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 〈 60 mL/min; Weisel, Blood, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, European, phase 3b trial to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with refractory or relapsed and refractory MM (N = 456), including those with moderate RI. Methods: Pts must have had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (progressive disease [PD] during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), at least 2 prior therapies, BORT and LEN failure after ≥ 2 cycles of each (alone or in combination), and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to their last line of Tx; pts with CrCl 〈 45 mL/min were excluded. POM was administered 4 mg D1-21/28-day cycle and LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg for pts aged 〉 75 yrs) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 until PD or unacceptable toxicity. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent based on clinical recommendations. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. For this analysis, pts were retrospectively grouped by baseline CrCl (〈 60 mL/min vs. ≥ 60 mL/min). Results: A total of 456 pts have been enrolled, of whom 452 received POM + LoDEX and 165 (36%) had moderate RI (CrCl 〈 60 mL/min). After a median follow-up of 6.8 mos, the most frequently reported grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in pts with moderate RI vs. without moderate RI (CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min) were neutropenia (39% vs. 40%), anemia (33% vs. 24%), and thrombocytopenia (19% vs. 19%); the most common Gr 3-4 nonhematologic TEAEs were pneumonia (12% vs. 11%), fatigue (6% vs. 4%), and hypercalcemia (4% vs. 4%), respectively. Only 2% of pts in each respective renal subgroup discontinued POM due to Tx-related TEAEs. Gr 3-4 renal toxicities were similar in both subgroups: acute renal failure occurred in 3% of pts with moderate RI and 2% of pts without moderate RI; blood creatinine increased in 2% and 1% of pts, respectively. Overall, Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and peripheral neuropathy (PN) were infrequent independent of renal status (Table). Median relative POM dose intensity was similar between subgroups (0.95 in pts with moderate RI vs. 0.96 in pts without moderate RI). In pts with moderate RI vs. without moderate RI, ORR was 35% vs. 34%, median DOR was 5.8 mos vs. 6.5 mos, median PFS was 3.7 vs. 4.6 mos, and median OS was 9.3 vs. not reached, respectively (Table). The 1-yr OS was 33% for pts with moderate RI vs. 53% for pts without moderate RI. Conclusions: POM + LoDEX has acceptable safety and efficacy profiles comparable to those observed in the pivotal MM-003 trial. Tolerability was consistent across renal function subgroups, with few discontinuations due to adverse events. In addition, responses to POM + LoDEX were similar between pts, irrespective of renal function. POM is currently being prospectively evaluated in pts with severe RI in the MM-008 (US) and MM-013 (EU) trials. Table.With Moderate RICrCl 〈 60 mL/min (n = 162)Without Moderate RICrCl ≥ 60 mL/min(n = 290)Grade 3-4 TEAEs, %Neutropenia Anemia Thrombocytopenia Pneumonia39 33 19 1240 24 19 11Grade 3-4 EOI, %DVT/PE PN2 20 1Efficacy(n = 165)(n = 291)ORR (≥ PR), % (95% CI) Median DOR (95% CI), mos Median PFS (95% CI), mos Median OS (95% CI), mos35 (27.9-43.0) 5.8 (3.7-NE) 3.7 (2.9-5.2) 9.3 (6.3-11.5)34 (28.9-40.1) 6.5 (4.7-7.9) 4.6 (3.7-5.6) NR (10.9-NR) EOI, events of interest; NE, not estimable, NR, not reached. Disclosures Weisel: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Noxxon: Consultancy. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ocio:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Delforge:Celgene Corp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Miller:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Peluso:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene : Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.