ISSN:
1573-5095
Keywords:
phenology
;
frost hardiness
;
absolute growth
;
relative growth
;
water use
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
Notes:
Abstract This one-time greenhouse study examined the phenology, morphology, frost hardiness and response to moisture stress of three Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) stocktypes from the same seed lot. The types were mini-plugTM transplants (MPT), 1+1 bareroot transplants (1+1), and 2+0 bareroot seedlings (2+0). In late summer and fall before lifting, 2+0 seedling set bud before 1+1 seedlings, 1+1 seedlings before MPT seedlings. The 2+0 seedlings appeared slowest to acquire frost hardiness in fall and seemed to deharden most rapidly in spring. Although the 2+0 seedlings were taller than the MPT stocktype, MPT and 2+0 seedlings were relatively similar in other morphological respects, but 1+1 seedlings were much larger. All stocktypes were potted on January 20, 1989, placed in a greenhouse, and subjected to 39%, 18%, 16%, or 6% soil water content (% dry weight) until the end of the experiment in mid-July 1990. The largest decrease in pre-dawn xylem water potential occurred with 16% and 6% soil water content; pre-dawn xylem water potential averaged over the three stocktypes generally declined 219% from low to high soil moisture stress. The 1+1 seedlings used more water than the other two stocktypes, and at maximum soil moisture stress, plant moisture stress increased in the order: MPT 〈2+0〈1+1. During the 6-month greenhouse experiment, the larger 1+1 stocktype showed the most absolute growth, but the smaller stocktypes grew more on a relative scale. Growth of the stocktypes appeared to be related to differences in morphology and water-use patterns as the seedlings competed for available water within each pot. The results show that MPT seedlings, a new stocktype, performed as well as the more traditionally used 2+0 and 1+1 seedlings and that stocktype selection is important in reforestation efforts.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00037468
Permalink