ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2022-10-26
    Description: Presented at Biology Department Summer Student Presentations, Woods Hole, MA, August 8, 2019
    Description: The ocean’s mesopelagic zone or “twilight zone” (200-1000m) has been understudied relative to other areas of the ocean, such as the surface waters, but mesopelagic fish are now thought to be highly abundant. Through diel vertical migrations (DVM) to consume prey in surface waters at night, these fish may contribute to ocean carbon sequestration, a valuable regulating ecosystem service. Apex predators from the surface waters are known to consume mesopelagic fish, establishing an important ecological connection. As overharvesting continues to deplete surface fisheries, especially on the high seas, some fishing interests have begun exploring the potential harvest of mesopelagic fish to supply fishmeal and fish oil markets. Off the US West Coast, where the mesopelagic extends into the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), the regional Pacific Fishery Management Council established in 2016 a moratori-um on the harvest of certain mesopelagic fish families. This study adapted a bioeconomic decision mod-el originally designed for the Pacific sardine fishery to examine the tradeoffs between the values gained from a hypothetical mesopelagic fishery with the potential values lost from declines in predators of mesopelagic fish facing a reduced prey source. Biological parameters from ecological relationships were obtained from a recent Ecopath model of the California Current system. Economic values comprised the net price of mesopelagic fish (in a fishmeal end use), the net price of commercially harvested predators, and estimates of the nonmarket demand for non-commercial predators. From an economic perspective, when considering only the potential lost values associated with commercial predators, a moratorium on mesopelagic fish would not be justified. When the lost values of noncommercial predators were also considered, a moratorium would be justified. The economic rationale for a moratorium is sensitive to the scale of the non-market values attributed to non-commercial predators as well as other parameters describing ecological relationships.
    Keywords: Fishmeal ; Forage fish ; Mesopelagic fish ; Moratorium ; Non-market value ; Valuable predators ; Willingness to pay
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Presentation
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2022-10-26
    Description: © The Author(s), 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Dowd, S., Chapman, M., Koehn, L., & Hoagland, P. The economic tradeoffs and ecological impacts associated with a potential mesopelagic fishery in the California Current. Ecological Applications, 32(4), (2022): e2578, https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2578.
    Description: The ocean's mesopelagic zone (200–1000 m) remains one of the most understudied parts of the ocean despite knowledge that mesopelagic fishes are highly abundant. Apex predators from the surface waters are known to consume these fishes, constituting an important ecological interaction. Some countries have begun exploring the potential harvest of mesopelagic fishes to supply fishmeal and fish oil markets due to the high fish abundance in the mesopelagic zone compared with overfished surface waters. This study explored the economic and ecological implications of a moratorium on the harvest of mesopelagic fishes such as lanternfish off the US West Coast, one of the few areas where such resources are managed. We adapted a bioeconomic decision model to examine the tradeoffs between the values gained from a hypothetical mesopelagic fishery with the potential values lost from declines in predators of mesopelagic fishes facing a reduced prey resource. The economic rationale for a moratorium on harvesting mesopelagics was sensitive both to ecological relationships and the scale of the nonmarket values attributed to noncommercial predators. Using a California Current-based ecological simulation model, we found that most modeled predators of mesopelagic fishes increased in biomass even under high mesopelagic harvest rates, but the changes (either increases or decreases) were small, with relatively few predators responding with more than a 10% change in their biomass. While the ecological simulations implied that a commercial mesopelagic fishery might not have large biomass impacts for many species in the California Current system, there is still a need to further explore the various roles of the mesopelagic zone in the ocean.
    Description: Sally Dowd acknowledges sponsorship from the WHOI Summer Student Fellowship and the Rausser College of Natural Resources Honors Program at UC Berkeley. This project would not have been possible without the guidance provided by Kama Thieler and Carl Boettiger. Porter Hoagland acknowledges funding from the Audacious Project, a collaborative endeavor, housed at TED and the J. Seward Johnson Fund in support of the Marine Policy Center at WHOI.
    Keywords: Bioeconomic model ; Fisheries ; Mesopelagic fishes ; Moratorium ; Nonmarket value ; Predators ; Rpath ; Willingness-to-pay values
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...