ALBERT

Description: Background: In preclinical studies, eltrombopag has been associated to an increased incidence of cataract in mice and rats. No increased risk has been observed in randomized controlled trials in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients. During the eltrombopag extension study EXTEND, 28/302 patients developed or worsened cataract, i.e. 9.3% of the patients over a median duration of exposure of 2.4 years. Of note, 79% of these 28 patients had at least another risk factor of cataract. Real-life studies assessing the risk of cataract in ITP adult patients exposed to eltrombopag are lacking. Aim: To assess the risk of cataract with eltrombopag in a nationwide cohort of primary ITP adults. Methods: The population was the cohort of all incident primary ITP adult patients (≥18 years) in France from June 2010 (date of eltrombopag marketing in France) to June 2017. This cohort was identified within the national health insurance database using a validated algorithm combining drug exposures and international classification of diseases, version 10 (ICD-10) diagnosis codes (FAITH cohort; NCT03429660). A nested case-control study was conducted within the cohort. Cases were patients who had a surgery for cataract after ITP onset, identified using appropriate codes. Up to five controls for each case were matched on age and sex. Index date was the date of cataract surgery for cases, and the date of cataract surgery of the corresponding case for controls. Two analyses were conducted: one considering the exposure to eltrombopag as ever vs. never exposed; another considering the cumulative exposure to eltrombopag, categorized by never exposed, a 1-365 Defined Daily Dose (DDD) exposure, and a ≥365 DDD exposure. Covariables were the presence of diabetes mellitus, cumulative exposure to corticosteroids considered in prednisone equivalence dosage (by quartiles), and the presence of ophthalmological risk factors of cataract (including previous ophthalmological surgery, glaucoma and other anterior chamber risk factors). Conditional logistic regression models were used to compute adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The cohort included 8,502 incident primary ITP adults. During the follow-up (31,590 patient-years in total; mean follow-up: 44.4 months), 1,097 patients were exposed to eltrombopag, including 310 with a cumulative exposure ≥365 DDDs. Overall, 573 patients had a surgery of cataract; incidence: 1.90/100 person-years (95% CI: 1.75-2.06). Fifty-seven cases occurred in patients ever exposed to eltrombopag; incidence: 1.50/100 person-years (95%CI: 1.15-1.94) in this subgroup. The nested case-control study included the 573 cases and 2699 controls. Median age was 75 years and 50% were women; the median duration of disease was 24.8 months in cases and 24.2 months in controls; 57 (9.9%) cases and 314 (11.6%) controls were exposed to eltrombopag before the index date; 14 (2.4%) and 68 (2.5%) patients had cumulative exposure to eltrombopag ≥365 DDDs, respectively. Cases were more frequently exposed to corticosteroids (83.4% vs. 75.7%), with a higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids (median: 2800 vs. 2188 mg prednisone equivalent). Diabetes mellitus was present in 25.7% of cases vs. 25.1% of controls while ophthalmological risk factors were present in 5.4% and 2.8%, respectively. In the ever/never exposed analysis, the aOR for eltrombopag was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.58-1.07). In the cumulative exposure analysis, the aOR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.54-1.08) in the 1-365 DDD group as compared with the never exposed group, and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.49-1.59) in the ≥365 DDD group as compared with the never exposed group. Conclusions: This nationwide pharmacoepidemiological study did not identify an increased risk of cataract in primary ITP adult patients exposed to eltrombopag. Disclosures Moulis: Novartis pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Research Funding.

Description: Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is associated with an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis (VT and AT, respectively) as compared with the general population. However, the impact of thrombosis risk factors and of ITP treatments, particularly of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPORAs), is not well known in the routine clinical practice. Aim: The objective of this cohort study was to assess the risk factors of VT and AT in adults with primary ITP, including ITP treatments. Methods: The population was the cohort of all incident primary ITP adults in France during 2009-2015 built within the national health insurance database (French Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia - FAITH - cohort; NCT03429660). Incident ITP patients were identified using a validated algorithm combining drug exposures and diagnosis codes according to the international classification of diseases, version 10 (ICD-10). Risks of first hospitalization with a validated primary discharge diagnosis code of VT and AT (coded with the ICD-10) were assessed separately. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Variables included in multivariable models were: age, sex, history of AT and of VT, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, cancer; exposures to antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, antiplatelet, anticoagulant drugs and ITP treatments including splenectomy were modeled as time-dependent variables. Results: The cohort included 7225 adult patient with incident primary ITP: 3807 (52.7%) were ≥60 year-old, 3199 (44.3%) were males, 692 (9.6%) had a history of cardiovascular disease, 937 (13.0%) had diabetes. During the follow-up, 5737 (79.4%) were exposed to corticosteroids, 3364 (46.6%) to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), 995 (13.8%) to TPORAs, and 755 (10.4%) were splenectomized. During the follow-up (23 852 patient-years in total; mean follow-up: 39.5 months), 174 patients had a hospitalization with a primary discharge diagnosis of VT and 333 of AT, leading to incidences of 7.4 (95% CI: 6.4-8.6) and 14.4 (95% CI:12.9-16.0)/1000 patient-years, respectively. In multivariable Cox models, the most important risk factors for VT were higher age (≥60 years vs. 50 year-old, 14 (56.0%) were women, 6 (24.0%) were splenectomized, 9 (36.0%) were concomitantly exposed to corticosteroids and 3 (12.0%) to IVIg; only 3 women aged50 year-old, 15 (71.4%) were men, 8 (38.1%) were splenectomized, 5 (23.8%) were concomitantly exposed to corticosteroids and one to IVIg; only one 48-year-old man had no additional risk factor for AT. Conclusions: Baseline risk factors for VT and AT were highly associated with VT and AT occurrence in adults with primary ITP. Splenectomy, corticosteroids, IVIg and TPORAs were risk factors for VT. Most patients who had a thrombosis while treated by TPORA had additional risk factors. These findings help choosing a tailored treatment strategy for a given patient depending on his/her risk profile for VT and AT. Disclosures Christiansen: Amgen: Research Funding. Bahmanyar:Amgen: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: The association of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) occurrence has been shown. The risk of ITP with other vaccines is still not known. This study was aimed at assessing the association of recommended vaccinations in children with ITP occurrence. Methods: We conducted a population-based study in France including all children newly diagnosed for primary ITP between July 2009 and June 2015. This cohort was built using a validated algorithm in the nationwide French health insurance database (SNDS). We assessed the risk of ITP with MMR vaccine, all combined vaccines containing diphtheria, tetanus and poliomyelitis (DTP) vaccines, pneumococcal and meningococcal C vaccines. We used two self-controlled designs: a case cross-over and a self-controlled case series. For the case cross-over, we compared the frequency of exposure to vaccines during a 6-week period immediately preceding the event (case period) with the frequency of exposure during a previous time period (control period, having the same duration as the case period). We performed sensitivity analyses using 8- and 12-week periods. Analyses were adjusted for exposure to other drugs known as inducers of ITP and seasonality. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. For the self-controlled case series, we compared the ITP incidence within periods of risk (following vaccination, named exposure period) with the incidence within the control period of non-exposure. The exposure period was defined by the 6 weeks after the vaccine dispensing in the principal analysis (8 and 12 weeks in sensitivity analyses). We further excluded the 2 weeks prior to vaccine dispensing from the non-exposure period to address selective survival bias (healthy vaccinee effect). The observation period was censored at ITP occurrence, due to variation of vaccination probability after ITP diagnosis and to the impossibility to distinguish ITP relapses from chronic ITP in the database. Analyses were adjusted for seasonality. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and their 95% CI were calculated. We assessed the exposure to each vaccine, and conducted subgroup analyses in patients without any concurrent vaccination during case and control periods for the case cross-over study and exposure periods for the self-controlled case series study. We also calculated the number of ITP cases occurring during the 6 weeks after vaccination divided by the number of vaccine doses dispensed in the French children population during the study period. Results: We included 2,549 newly diagnosed primary ITP children. Among them, median age was 5.1 years and 46.5 % were females; 41.4% had been exposed to at least one studied vaccine before ITP onset. The results of the principal analysis are detailed in the Table. There was an increased occurrence of ITP following MMR vaccination (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.09-2.34; IRR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.95-1.80). Analyses excluding the patients with concurrent vaccination, notably meningococcal vaccination, led to similar results (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.02-2.71; IRR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.80-2.42). There was also an increased occurrence of ITP with the meningococcal C vaccine (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 0.95-3.86; IRR: 1.40, 95% CI: 0.86-2.29). Analyses conducted in patients without any concurrent vaccination, notably MMR vaccination, confirmed these results with wide 95% CI because of fewer patients included (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.57-4.71; IRR: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.69-3.86). No association was observed between other vaccines and ITP occurrence. The numbers of ITP cases occurring in the 6 weeks following vaccination per million doses dispensed were 8.2 for pneumococcal, 9.2 for DTP, 9.6 for meningococcal and 11.5 for MMR vaccines. Of note, these numbers overestimate the probability of vaccine-induced ITP. Indeed, they are ITP cases chronologically compatible with vaccine adverse reaction without any individual causality assessment (a worst-case scenario considering that all cases were triggered by vaccines). Conclusion: This study showed an increased occurrence of ITP after MMR and meningococcal C vaccines. It is reassuring for other vaccines. We cannot exclude temporal association with MMR and meningococcal C vaccines due to the peak of ITP incidence at 12 months of age in the general population. However, vaccine-induced ITP is a very rare event, which does not cast doubt on the interest of vaccination. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Introduction: Epidemiological studies suggest a risk of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) following viral infections, particularly influenza. Conversely, an increased risk of ITP following vaccination has been proven for some vaccines like Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine. However, the risk of ITP induced by influenza vaccine is debated. Two case-controls studies has been conducted, with contradictory results: in the Berlin Case-Control Surveillance Study, an increased risk has been found (odds ratio - OR: 3.8 [95% confidence interval - CI: 1.5- 9.1]. Conversely, the French PGRx study suggested the absence of risk of ITP after influenza vaccination [OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.4-2.1]. These studies were limited by the number of ITP patients included (169 and 198, respectively) and other limitations. Therefore, we aimed to assess the risk of ITP induced by influenza vaccine in a nationwide cohort in France. Methods: We conducted a population-based study in France within the FAITH cohort (NCT03429660). This cohort is built within the National Health Database that links sociodemographic, hospital and out-hospital data. The FAITH cohort includes all adult patients with incident ITP in France since 2009. Patients are identified using a validated algorithm combining diagnosis codes and drug exposures (with very high positive predictive values). We included in the present study all patients with incident primary ITP aged ≥65 years at ITP diagnosis (indication of influenza vaccination in the general population in France) between July 2009 and June 2015. We assessed the link between influenza vaccine and ITP onset using two designs: a case-control and a self-controlled case series designs. In the case-control design, ITP cases were matched with four controls from the general population for age, sex and place of residency. Index dates for controls were similar to index dates of their matched cases. Cases and controls were compared for exposure to influenza vaccine in the 6 weeks before the index date using conditional logistic regression models adjusted for exposure to other drugs known as inducers of ITP. In the self-controlled case series study, only vaccinated ITP cases were included. The analysis compared the incidence of ITP within periods of risk (6 weeks following vaccination) to the incidence of ITP within other periods of time. We further excluded the 2 weeks prior to vaccine dispensing from the analysis to address selective survival bias (healthy vaccinee effect). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) adjusted for seasonality were calculated. Results: We included 3,142 incident primary ITP patients aged ≥65 years matched with 12,528 controls in the case-control study. Overall, 147 cases (4.7%) and 579 controls (4.6%) were vaccinated with influenza vaccine during the 6 weeks prior to the index date (adjusted OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.80-1.23]). In the self-controlled case series study, 1,875 vaccinated ITP cases were included. Among them, 146 (7.8%) patients were diagnosed for ITP during one of the risk periods following vaccination. The adjusted IRR was 0.96 [95 CI%: 0.80-1.17]. Conclusion: This nationwide population-based study using two different designs showed no increased risk of ITP after influenza vaccination. Disclosures Moulis: Novartis pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Research Funding.