ALBERT

Description: The AML1-ETO fusion protein, generated by the t(8;21) chromosomal translocation, is causally involved in nearly 20% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. In leukemic cells, AML1-ETO resides in and functions through a stable protein complex, AML1-ETO–containing transcription factor complex (AETFC), that contains multiple transcription (co)factors. Among these AETFC components, HEB and E2A, two members of the ubiquitously expressed E proteins, directly interact with AML1-ETO, confer new DNA-binding capacity to AETFC, and are essential for leukemogenesis. However, the third E protein, E2-2, is specifically silenced in AML1-ETO–expressing leukemic cells, suggesting E2-2 as a negative factor of leukemogenesis. Indeed, ectopic expression of E2-2 selectively inhibits the growth of AML1-ETO–expressing leukemic cells, and this inhibition requires the bHLH DNA-binding domain. RNA-seq and ChIP-seq analyses reveal that, despite some overlap, the three E proteins differentially regulate many target genes. In particular, studies show that E2-2 both redistributes AETFC to, and activates, some genes associated with dendritic cell differentiation and represses MYC target genes. In AML patients, the expression of E2-2 is relatively lower in the t(8;21) subtype, and an E2-2 target gene, THPO, is identified as a potential predictor of relapse. In a mouse model of human t(8;21) leukemia, E2-2 suppression accelerates leukemogenesis. Taken together, these results reveal that, in contrast to HEB and E2A, which facilitate AML1-ETO–mediated leukemogenesis, E2-2 compromises the function of AETFC and negatively regulates leukemogenesis. The three E proteins thus define a heterogeneity of AETFC, which improves our understanding of the precise mechanism of leukemogenesis and assists development of diagnostic/therapeutic strategies.

Description: Stress-induced angiogenesis enormously contributes to both normal development and pathogenesis of various diseases including cancer. Among many stress response pathways implicated in regulation of angiogenesis, the amino acid response (AAR) and the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathways are closely interconnected, as they converge on the common target, eIF2α, which is a key regulator of protein translation. Two kinases, namely Gcn2 (Eif2ak4) and Perk (Eif2ak3), are responsible for transducing signals from AAR and UPR, respectively, to phosphorylation of eIF2α. Even though numerous studies have been performed, this close interconnection between AAR and UPR makes it difficult to clearly distinguish different contributions of these two pathways in regulation of angiogenesis. In this study, we generated a zebrafish angiogenic model harboring a loss-of-function mutation of the threonyl-tRNA synthetase (tars) gene. Tars belongs to a family of evolutionarily conserved enzymes, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), which control the first step of protein translation through coupling specific amino acids with their cognate tRNAs. Deficiencies of several aaRSs in zebrafish have been shown to cause increased branching of blood vessels, and this angiogenic phenotype has roughly been explained by activation of AAR and UPR; however, it is unclear whether both AAR and UPR are required and to what extent they contribute to this process. To address this issue, we first performed RNA-seq analyses of Tars-mutated and control zebrafish embryos, as well as those with knockdown of either Gcn2 or Perk in both genotypes. We found that the AAR target genes are dramatically activated in the Tars-mutants, whereas the genes associated with the three UPR sub-pathways (i.e., Perk-, Ire1- and Atf6-mediated pathways) remain inactive, except for very few genes (e.g., Atf3, Atf4, Asns and Igfbp1) that are shared in both AAR and UPR, thus suggesting activation of AAR, but not UPR, in the Tars-mutants. In support of this notion, knockdown of the AAR-associated kinase Gcn2 in the Tars-mutants largely represses the activated genes, while the Perk knockdown shows very little effect. Nonetheless, in contrast to the apparently dispensable role of Perk in Tars-mutants, knockdown of Perk in control embryos leads to specific gene expression alterations, suggesting that Perk effectively functions in homeostatic states (i.e., controls), but, in the stress condition (i.e., Tars-mutants), its function is largely overwhelmed by activation of the Gcn2-mediated AAR. To validate these observations, we investigated the angiogenic phenotypes of the zebrafish models upon genetic and pharmacological interference with the AAR and UPR pathways. A transgenic zebrafish line, Tg(flk1:EGFP), was crossed with the Tars-mutants to visualize angiogenesis in vivo. We observed increased branching of blood vessels in the Tars-mutants, which is rescued by tars mRNA but not an enzymatically dead version. Importantly, knockdown of Gcn2 in the Tars-mutants rescues this phenotype. In contrast, knockdown of Perk, or knockdown of two other known eIF2α kinases, Hri (Eif2ak1) or Pkr (Eif2ak2), shows no effect. Furthermore, knockdown of either one of two major factors downstream to eIF2α, namely Atf4 and Vegfα, or inhibition of Vegf receptor with the drug SU5416, also rescue the phenotype. Thus, these results confirm that AAR, but not UPR, is required for the Tars-deficiency-induced angiogenesis. Taken together, this study demonstrates that, despite being closely interconnected and even sharing a common downstream target, the Gcn2-mediated AAR and the Perk-mediated UPR can be activated independently in different conditions and differentially regulate cellular functions such as angiogenesis. This notion reflects the specificity and efficiency of multiple stress response pathways that are evolved integrally to benefit the organism by ensuring sensing and responding precisely to different types of stresses. This study also provides an example of combining systematic gene expression profiling and phenotypic validations to distinguish activities of such interconnected pathways. Further clarification of the mechanisms shall advance our understanding of how the organisms respond to diverse stresses and how the abnormalities in these regulatory machineries cause cellular stress-related diseases such as cancer, diabetes and immune disorders. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: SETD2, the histone H3 lysine 36 methyltransferase, previously identified by us, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of hematologic malignancies, but its role in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) has been unclear. In this study, low expression of SETD2 correlated with shortened survival in patients with MDS, and the SETD2 levels in CD34+ bone marrow cells of those patients were increased by decitabine. We knocked out Setd2 in NUP98-HOXD13 (NHD13) transgenic mice, which phenocopies human MDS, and found that loss of Setd2 accelerated the transformation of MDS into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Loss of Setd2 enhanced the ability of NHD13+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to self-renew, with increased symmetric self-renewal division and decreased differentiation and cell death. The growth of MDS-associated leukemia cells was inhibited though increasing the H3K36me3 level by using epigenetic modifying drugs. Furthermore, Setd2 deficiency upregulated hematopoietic stem cell signaling and downregulated myeloid differentiation pathways in the NHD13+ HSPCs. Our RNA-seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation–seq analysis indicated that S100a9, the S100 calcium-binding protein, is a target gene of Setd2 and that the addition of recombinant S100a9 weakens the effect of Setd2 deficiency in the NHD13+ HSPCs. In contrast, downregulation of S100a9 leads to decreases of its downstream targets, including Ikba and Jnk, which influence the self-renewal and differentiation of HSPCs. Therefore, our results demonstrated that SETD2 deficiency predicts poor prognosis in MDS and promotes the transformation of MDS into AML, which provides a potential therapeutic target for MDS-associated acute leukemia.

Description: The leukemogenic AML1-ETO fusion protein is produced by the t(8;21) translocation, which is one of the most common chromosomal abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In leukemic cells, AML1-ETO resides in and functions through a stable protein complex, AETFC, that contains multiple transcription factors and cofactors. Among these AETFC components, E2A (also known as TCF3) and HEB (also known as TCF12), two members of the ubiquitously expressed E proteins, directly interact with AML1-ETO, confer new DNA (E-box) binding capacity to AETFC, and are functionally essential for leukemogenesis. However, we find that the third E protein, E2-2 (also known as TCF4), is specifically silenced in AML1-ETO-expressing leukemic cells, suggesting E2-2 as a negative factor of leukemogenesis. Indeed, ectopic expression of E2-2 selectively inhibits the growth of AML1-ETO-expressing leukemic cells, and this inhibition requires the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) DNA-binding domain of E2-2. Gene expression profiling and ChIP-seq analysis reveal that, despite some overlap, the three E proteins differentially regulate many target genes. In particular, consistent with the fact that E2-2 is a critical transcription factor in dendritic cell (DC) development, our studies show that E2-2 both redistributes AETFC to, and activates, some genes associated with DC differentiation, and that restoration of E2-2 triggers a partial differentiation of the AML1-ETO-expressing leukemic cells into the DC lineage. Meanwhile, E2-2, but not E2A or HEB, represses MYC target genes, which may also contribute to leukemic cell differentiation and apoptosis. In AML patients, the expression of E2-2 is relatively lower in the t(8;21) subtype, and an E2-2 target gene, THPO, is identified as a potential predictor of relapse. In a mouse model of human t(8;21) leukemia, E2-2 suppression accelerates the development of leukemia. Taken together, these results reveal that, in contrast to HEB and E2A, which facilitate AML1-ETO-mediated leukemogenesis, E2-2 compromises the function of AETFC and negatively regulates leukemogenesis. The three E proteins thus define a molecular heterogeneity of AETFC, which merits further study in different t(8;21) AML patients, as well as in its potential regulation of cellular heterogeneity of AML. These studies should improve our understanding of the precise mechanism of leukemogenesis and assist development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: While hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) can sustain the production of all types of mature blood cells throughout the life, there also exists HSC-independent hematopoiesis, which partially supports embryonic hematopoiesis and generation of specific types of adult hematopoietic cells (e.g., macrophages). Examples of the HSC-independent hematopoiesis include (i) the primitive wave of hematopoiesis that produces unipotent progenitors for erythrocytes, megakaryocytes or macrophages, and (ii) the "pro-definitive" hematopoiesis that produces multipotent erythro-myeloid progenitors (EMPs). Given that HSCs and HSC-independent progenitors are both derived from endothelial cells in distinct or overlapping hematopoietic sites, tracing their developmental origins and clarifying the regulatory mechanism will enhance our understanding of the profound difference between them and may improve in vitro generation of HSCs. Human HSCs have been refined based on the expression of CD49f (ITGA6). In combination with other HSC markers (CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD43+CD90+), high expression of CD49f identifies long-term multilineage engrafting HSCs, whereas the cells with low CD49f represent a subtype of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) that possess transient engrafting activity. Meanwhile, CD49f has also been shown to be heterogeneously expressed in hemogenic endothelial cells (HECs), which give rise to both HSCs and EMPs via endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition (EHT). Thus, determining the changes (i.e., persistence, gain or loss) of CD49f expression during EHT is a key step in tracing the origins of HSCs and HSC-independent HPCs. In this study, using an in vitro system of HSC differentiation from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), we observed that, while CD49f is highly expressed in all hESCs, only a portion of HECs express CD49f. Importantly, live cell imaging analysis revealed that CD49f expression persists during EHT, which is accompanied by initiating CD43 expression. To test whether the differential CD49f expression is associated with HSC versus HPC functions, we sorted the CD49fhigh and CD49flow cells and performed colony forming assay and gene expression profiling. The results showed that the CD49fhigh cells have multilineage potential, whereas the CD49flow cells lack lymphoid potential but show a strong erythroid preference. Gene expression analysis confirmed that the CD49fhigh and CD49flow cells represent HSCs and erythroid-biased HPCs, respectively, and that the Wnt and Notch signaling pathways may play a role in their functions. Collectively, these observations suggest that the CD49fhigh and the CD49flow cells are concurrently derived from the CD49fhigh and CD49flow HECs, thus modeling the in vivo generation of HSCs and HSC-independent HPCs. Based on the in vitro observations, we proposed that CD49f in vivo may also specify the distinct HSPCs emerged at different developmental stages/sites. To test this hypothesis, we isolated mouse primitive HPCs, EMPs and definitive HSCs, as well as their parental HECs, from yolk sac, embryo, and aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) of different embryonic stages and determined their CD49f expression. The results showed that the primitive erythroid progenitors have lowest, whereas the definitive AGM HSCs have highest, CD49f levels; this trend was also observed in the related HECs isolated from various stages/sites. Thus, it is likely that the embryonic hematopoiesis is recapitulated, at least partially, by the in vitro system in terms of the sequential emergence of HSPCs ranging from unipotent erythroid progenitors to multipotent definitive HSCs, and this may also underlie the situation that EMPs and HSCs can be produced at the same stage/site but independently from different HECs. In summary, using the in vitro HSC differentiation system, we found that the differential expression of CD49f discriminates HSCs and HSC-independent progenitors, which are concurrently emerged from HECs. The persistent CD49f expression during EHT suggests that the fates of HSCs and HSC-independent HPCs are pre-defined in their parental HECs. Combining our in vivo data, the differential expression of CD49f also provide a possible regulatory mechanism for the multi-wave hematopoiesis. Further exploring the function and mechanism of CD49f in these regulations should be important for fully understanding the precisely regulated HSC generation and activities. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.