ALBERT

Description: Introduction: Most of the knowledge about treatments and outcome of CML patients originates from clinical studies. To get new and unbiased insights in the epidemiology, treatment and outcome of CML, the EUTOS population-based registry of newly diagnosed CML patients was established, - as part of the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) for CML. The aim was to collect the data of all adults with newly diagnosed CML, irrespective of treatment and of enrolment in studies. Patients and Methods: The EUTOS population-based registry collected data of newly diagnosed CML patients, 18 years or older, over a specified period of time from 2008 till 2012 living in defined regions. The data were collected by 22 study groups in 20 European countries. Data were gathered via a web-based CRF-system. For comparison we used the already published data from five Company-sponsored registration studies IRIS (O’Brien et.all, NEJM, 2003), TOPS (Cortes et al, JCO, 2009) ENESTnd (Saglio et al, NEJM, 2010), DASISION (Kantarjian et al, NEJM, 2010) and BELA (Cortes et al, JCO, 2012), from three Investigator-sponsored studies GIMEMA (Castagnetti et al, JCO, 2010 and Gugliotta et al, Blood, 2011), French SPIRIT (Preudhomme et al, NEJM, 2010) and German CML IV (Hehlmann et al, JCO, 2011) and from two single referral centers HAMMERSMITH (De Lavallade et al, JCO, 2008) and MDA (Jain et al, Blood, 2013). Results: Till 15.05.2014 2978 patients were registered in the EUTOS Population-based registry. 94.3% of the patients were diagnosed in chronic phase (CP), 3.6% in accelerated phase (AP), and 2.2% in blastic phase (BP). For the calculation of the prognostic scores 361 patients had to be excluded because they were pretreated. For the comparison we used 2350 patients in Chronic Phase with laboratory values before any treatment. 54% of the patients in the EUTOS Population-based registry were male, less than in all studies (56.6 - 60.6%). The median age at diagnosis was 56 years, higher than in all studies (46 - 55). In EUTOS the proportion of patients more than 60 years and more than 65 years old was 40.4 % and 21.9 % respectively. Similar data were rarely reported in all other studies. Median value of the spleen size below costal margin was 0. 46.1% of the patients had a palpable spleen and 15.2% had a spleen size ≥ 10 (spleen size is always reported in cm under costal margin in this abstract). The % of palpable spleen is only reported by IRIS, 25.0% and by the FRENCH Spirit group, 49.8%. The median spleen is only reported by GIMEMA, 2.0. Spleen size ≥ 10 is reported by IRIS, 6.0%, ENESTnd, 12.4% and HAMMERSMITH 25.5%. While the median values for Platelets and Hemoglobin show no big differences, the median WBC in EUTOS is 83.9 x109/l and in the Company-sponsored registration studies: IRIS 18-20 x109/l , in ENESTnd 23-26 x109/l, in DASISION 23-25 x109/l , and in BELA 22-23 x109/l, in the Investigator-sponsored studies: GIMEMA 55 x109/l , in the FRENCH SPIRIT 83-104 x109/l , in the GERMAN CML IV 75-91 x109/l , and in the single referral center study HAMMERSMITH 140 x109/l, clearly indicating that in company-sponsored, registration studies, the reported values of the WBC were not recorded prior to any treatment. The median values for Blasts, Basophils and Eosinophils show also not so big differences. The % of Sokal low risk patients is in EUTOS with 34.5% lower than in all studies (35.2 - 60%) with the exception of HAMMERSMITH 28.9%. Discussion: The EUTOS Population-based registry provides the first European wide real-world series of patients with newly diagnosed Ph+, BCR-ABL+ CML. The age and sex distribution and some baseline characteristics such as Sokal Score as well as median WBC count in the EUTOS population-based registry are different from many prospective studies. This should be taken in due consideration before extrapolating the results of treatment studies to real life. Spleen size, which is known as an important value for prediction, is only very rarely reported in clinical studies. With further follow-up, this registry will provide a population-based insight on treatment, survival, and causes of death. Disclosures Baccarani: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hoffmann:Novartis: Research Funding. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Steegmann:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mayer:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zaritskey:Novartis: Consultancy. Clark:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Porkka:BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hehlmann:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Hasford:Novartis: Research Funding. Lindoerfer:Novartis: Research Funding.

Description: Background. The aim of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is not only effectiveness, but also safety. Long treatment duration makes the analysis of most significant complications very important. Pleural effusion (PE) is an important adverse event of dasatinib therapy with largely unclear cause. The optimal management of recurrent PE is unknown and the analysis of its treatment results is actual. Aim. To describe the characteristics of patients with recurrent PE at prolonged dasatinib treatment and to suggest the strategy of their management. Methods. Follow-up data of 23 CML late chronic phase patients at dasatinib therapy after imatinib failure in 2 clinical studies: phase II study comparing dasatinib 140 mg and imatinib 800 mg daily (N = 12) and phase III dasatinib dose-optimizing study in patients with imatinib-resistant or intolerant patients (N = 11). M:F ratio was 7:16. Median age at the beginning of dasatinib - 48 years (26-68), median CML duration - 11 years (4,1-19,2). The reason for TKI change was imatinib resistance: cytogenetic (N = 17) and hematological (N = 6). Results. Median duration of dasatinib treatment - 40 months (10-107); 13 patients (56,3%) are alive, 10 patients (43,5%) have died because of progression of CML. In 19 patients (82,6%) dasatinib treatment was stopped because of: blastic transformation - 6 (26,1%), hematological resistance - 3 (13,1%), cytogenetic resistance - 5 (21,7%), PE - 5 (21,7%). Four patients are still on dasatinib treatment with median duration 8,8 years (8,7-8,9), 3 of them retain complete/major molecular response. The best responses were: complete hematological response in 21 (91,3%), complete cytogenetic response - in 8 (34,8%), major molecular response - in 6 (26,1%) patients. Overall 8-year survival was 55,1%, progression-free survival - 55,4%, event-free survival - 26,1%. PE was observed in 11 (47,8%) patients, in 8 of them (72,7%) - recurrent. In one patient the prolonged PE was associated with fibrosis of adjacent lung and pleura. Median time to PE was 34 (6-83) months. In cases of PE dasatinib was interrupted (mean duration 21 d) and diuretics were started. Six patients (54,5%) also received corticosteroids. Five patients (45,6%) were treated with thoracocentesis. In recurrent PE the dasatinib dosage was decreased. The dasatinib discontinuation in 4 patients with recurrent PE has led to loss of major molecular response in 2 of them; in other 2 it is retained for 6,5 and 1,5 years. Event-free 8-year survival was 36,4% in patients with PE, 16,7% - without it. Discussion. The response rate in patients with PE was not worse, than in those without it. Most often PE begins at 3rd year of treatment; later events were only relapses. Among risk factors of PE 2 patients had arterial hypertension and hypercholesterinemia, 3 patients were 〉 65 yrs. The significantly high PE on rate (48%) was linked to high initial dasatinib dosage (〉 100 mg/d) and bid prescription. We have not observed cases of absolute lymphocytosis due to large granular lymphocytes proliferation. The continuation of treatment generally leads to recurrences of effusion. According to our experience, once arising PE tends to recur. The compensation can be maintained with continuous treatment with diuretics. The prolonged PE may lead to fibrosis of adjacent lung and pleura. Prolonged treatment interruptions and decreased doses can cause treatment failure. The role of corticosteroids is unclear. Conclusion. Our experience in recurrent PE management at dasatinib treatment allow to recommend the usage of alternative TKI in patients with poor treatment response, and discontinuation of treatment in patients with deep molecular response with close monitoring of residual disease by PCR. Disclosures Turkina: Novartis International AG: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

Description: Abstract 3768 Background: Data from the phase 3, randomized multicenter ENESTnd trial have demonstrated the superiority of nilotinib over imatinib after 24 months (mo) of follow-up, with significantly higher rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR), and significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC). The current subanalysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (Nil300) and nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (Nil400) in older (≥ 65 years [yrs] at study entry) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) with a minimum follow-up of 24 mo. Methods: In ENESTnd, 846 pts stratified by Sokal risk score were randomized 1:1:1 to Nil300 (n = 282), Nil400 (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (n = 283). Pts with impaired cardiac function or ECOG performance status 〉 2 were excluded. Rates of CCyR and MMR by 24 mo, progression to AP/BC on treatment, and safety were evaluated according to age group (〈 65 vs ≥ 65 yrs) in the 2 nilotinib arms. Safety data are reported for any pt who received ≥ 1 dose of nilotinib (n = 279, Nil300; n = 277, Nil400). Results: 36 pts (13%) and 28 pts (10%) were ≥ 65 yrs old in the Nil300 and Nil400 arms, respectively. Of the pts aged ≥ 65 yrs, 51/64 (80%) had an ECOG performance status of 0 at baseline and 60/64 (94%) had intermediate or high Sokal risk scores. Of the older pts, 8 (22%) on Nil300 and 6 (21%) on Nil400 had type 2 diabetes at baseline. CCyR rates by 24 mo were 83% and 68% among older pts treated with Nil300 and Nil400, respectively, and 87% for pts aged 〈 65 yrs in each nilotinib arm. By 24 mo, MMR was achieved by 72% and 61% of older pts on Nil300 and Nil400, respectively; in pts aged 〈 65 yrs, the respective rates were 71% and 67%. All 5 pts who progressed to AP/BC on treatment (2 on Nil300 and 3 on Nil400) were aged 〈 65 yrs. The frequency of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) was low in older pts; no pts had grade 3/4 neutropenia and only 1 older pt reported grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in each nilotinib arm (Table). Transient, asymptomatic lipase elevations were reported in 11% and 16% of older pts treated with Nil300 and Nil400, and 7% of younger pts in each arm. Hyperglycemia occurred in 23% and 16% of older pts on Nil300 and Nil400, respectively, and 4% of younger pts in each arm; regardless of age, no pt discontinued study due to hyperglycemia. Among the 12 older pts with grade 3/4 hyperglycemia (8 on Nil300; 4 on Nil400), 9 pts had type 2 diabetes at baseline. There were no QTcF increases of 〉 60 msec from baseline in older pts and 3 in nilotinib-treated pts 〈 65 yrs old (1 on Nil300; 2 on Nil400). QTcF prolongation of 〉 500 msec did not occur in any pt treated with nilotinib on study. Periodic echocardiograms were done, and there were no decreases of 〉 15% in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline in any pt treated with nilotinib on study. There were 4 cases of ischemic heart disease reported in older pts (1/35 [3%] on Nil300; 3/25 [12%] on Nil400) and 7 cases in pts 〈 65 yrs of age (4/244 [2%] on Nil300; 3/252 [1%] on Nil400). No sudden deaths occurred on study. Discontinuation occurred in approximately 25% of older and younger pts with Nil300, of which, 6% and 9%, respectively, were due to AEs/lab abnormalities. Discontinuation from study with Nil400 was 46% in older pts and 19% in younger pts; of which, 36% and 10% were due to AEs/lab abnormalities. Conclusions: Older pts treated with nilotinib demonstrated high rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses and low rates of progression. Nilotinib was generally well tolerated by older pts. In older pts, Nil300 had numerically higher rates of CCyR and MMR and was generally better tolerated (as evidenced by fewer AEs and discontinuations) vs Nil400. These data support the use of Nil300 in older pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Disclosures: Larson: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bunworasate:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Goldberg:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding. Dorlhiac-Llacer:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Saglio:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hochhaus:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hoenekopp:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blakesley:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Employment. Yu:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gallagher:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clark:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Background: ENESTop, an ongoing, single-arm, phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01698905), is the first trial specifically evaluating treatment-free remission (TFR; ie, stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI] treatment without a loss of response) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who achieved a sustained deep molecular response after switching from imatinib (IM) to nilotinib (NIL). Of 126 patients in ENESTop who were eligible to stop NIL, 57.9% (95% CI, 48.8%-66.7%) maintained TFR at 48 weeks. Here we present results from a subgroup analysis based on reasons for switching from IM to NIL, categorized as intolerance, resistance, and physician preference. Methods:Eligible patients were adults with CML-CP who received ≥ 3 years of total TKI therapy (〉 4 weeks of IM, followed by ≥ 2 years of NIL) and achieved a sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS]) on NIL therapy; patients with a documented MR4.5 at the time of switch from IM to NIL were not eligible. Enrolled patients continued NIL treatment in a 1-year consolidation phase, and those without confirmed loss of MR4.5 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS 〉 0.0032%) were eligible to stop NIL in the TFR phase. Patients with loss of major molecular response (MMR; ie, BCR-ABL1IS 〉 0.1%) or confirmed loss of MR4 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS 〉 0.01%) during the TFR phase reinitiated NIL treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained TFR (ie, no loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, or treatment reinitiation) at 48 weeks after stopping NIL. In this post hoc analysis, rates of TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL and a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of treatment-free survival (TFS; defined as the time from the start of TFR to the earliest occurrence of any of the following: loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, reinitiation of NIL due to any cause, progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis, death due to any cause) were evaluated in subgroups of patients who switched from IM to NIL due to intolerance, resistance, or physician preference. These categories were determined by grouping the reasons for switching from IM to NIL, as reported by the investigators, based on relatedness to safety (intolerance), loss of response/treatment failure (resistance), and the physician's clinical judgment (physician preference); individual reasons included within each category are presented in the Figure. Results:A total of 125 patients who entered the TFR phase were included in this analysis; 1 patient who was found to have had atypical transcripts was excluded. Among these 125 patients, the reasons for switching to NIL were categorized as intolerance in 51 patients (40.8%), resistance in 30 patients (24.0%), and physician preference in 44 patients (35.2%). The proportion of patients who maintained TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL was generally similar across the 3 subgroups: 30 of 51 (58.8%; 95% CI, 44.2%-72.4%) in the intolerance subgroup, 16 of 30 (53.3%; 95% CI, 34.3%-71.7%) in the resistance subgroup, and 27 of 44 (61.4%; 95% CI, 45.5%-75.6%) in the physician preference subgroup. KM analysis of TFS showed that in all 3 subgroups, the majority of TFS events occurred within the first 24 weeks after stopping NIL (Figure). There were no notable differences in the kinetics of TFS events among subgroups. The KM-estimated median duration of TFS was not reached by the data cutoff date in all 3 subgroups. Conclusion: Primary analysis from ENESTop showed that among patients with CML-CP who achieved a sustained MR4.5after switching from IM to NIL, 57.9% of those who stopped NIL maintained TFR at 48 weeks. In the present analysis, TFR was maintained at 48 weeks after stopping NIL by 〉 50% of patients in the intolerance, resistance, and physician preference subgroups, with generally similar results across subgroups. These findings suggest that the rate of successful TFR following second-line NIL does not differ based on the reasons for switching from IM to NIL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Hughes: Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG): Other: Chair of the CML/MPN Disease Group. Boquimpani:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Takahashi:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Shuvaev:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis pharma: Honoraria. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Lipton:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Moiraghi:BMS: Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau. Nicolini:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sacha:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adamed: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kim:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fellague-Chebra:Novartis: Employment. Acharya:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.: Employment. Krunic:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jin:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mahon:BMS: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria.

Description: Background: PF-114 is a 4th-generation oral tyrosine kinase-inhibitor (TKI) active against wild-type and mutated BCR-ABL1 isoforms including BCR-ABL1T315I. We present data from a phase-1 study in patients with chronic or accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) failing ≥2 TKIs or with BCR-ABL1T315I (NCT02885766) with ≥6 months therapy. Methods: 3+3 dose-escalation study to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary objectives included safety and efficacy based on haematological, cytogenetic, and molecular criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Results: 51 patients were enrolled. Daily doses were 50 mg (n=3), 100 mg (n=3), 200 mg (n=9), 300 mg (n=11), 400 mg (n=12), 500 mg (n=3), 600 mg (n=6), 750 mg (n=4) given continuously. Median age was 50 years (range, 29-82 years). Median CML duration pre-study was 10 years (range, 0.3-23 years). All patients had baseline ECOG performance scores 0-1. Twelve patients had BCR-ABL1T315I. Patients were heavily pre-treated: 25 received ≥3 prior TKIs; 5 patients with BCR-ABL1T315I received 1 prior TKI. Interim analysis was conducted at follow-up of ≥6 months (cut-off date January 16th 2019). Therapy was ongoing in 17 patients at doses 200 mg (n=4), 300 mg (n=9), 400 mg (n=3) and 600 mg (n=1) with median duration of exposure of 7,4 (range, 4,6-26), 9,2 (range, 7,4-26), 9,2 (range, 8,3-9,2) and 9,2 months. Other patients discontinued because of progression (n=18), adverse events (n=6), consent withdrawal (n=4), participation in another study (n=3) or other reasons (n=3). The MTD was 600 mg with the grade-3 psoriasis-like skin lesions the DLT, which occurred during the first 28 days of treatment. Reversible grade-3 skin toxicity occurred in 11 patients at doses ≥400 mg. There were no other drug-related non-hematologic grade-3 toxicities except 1 grade-3 toxic hepatitis at 400 mg and there were no detectable effects on ankle-brachial index or vascular occlusive events. The best safety/efficacy dose was 300 mg/d with 6 of 11 patients achieving a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and 4 of them - a major molecular response (MMR). Higher doses were less effective probably because of toxicity-related therapy interruptions and discontinuations. Five of 12 patients with BCR-ABL1T315I responded, 3 of which achieved a complete hematologic response and 4 achieved MCyR. Conclusion: PF-114 was safe and effective in patients with CML failing ≥2 TKIs or with BCR-ABL1T315I. The most effective dose was 300 mg/d. Five of 12 patients with BCR-ABL1T315I responded. A pivotal study is beginning. Disclosures Turkina: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; fusion pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Vinogradova:Novartis: Consultancy; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy. Lomaia:Novartis: Other: Travel Grant;Lecture fee; Pfizer: Other: Travel Grant. Shukhov:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Chelysheva:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy. Shikhbabaeva:Novartis: Consultancy; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy. Shuvaev:Fusion Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfize: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy. Ottmann:Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Fusion Pharma: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mikhailov:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Novikov:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Shulgina:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Chilov:Fusion Pharma: Consultancy.

Description: Background The experience of usage of second line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI2) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in routine clinical practice in Russian Federation is still limited. Therefore the information about long-term therapy results and adverse events (AEs) is very important. Aim To provide information about the results of TKI2 nilotinib treatment in patients with chronic phase (CP) CML. To evaluate the long-term hematological and non-hematological AEs. Materialsandmethods Follow-up data of 37 CML CP patients treated by nilotinib 2nd line after imatinib failure due to resistance (28 [76%]) or intolerance (9 [24%]) were obtained and analyzed. The patients formerly participated in clinical trial ENACT after which continued treatment in routine clinical practice. A median CML observation prior to the nilotinib treatment was 66 months (range 7.9 to 148.1). Hematological, cytogenetic and molecular responses and AEs were evaluated with a median follow-up of 40 months (range 1.2 to 76.7). Results At the moment of evaluation 15 (41%) of 37 patients continue nilotinib treatment, 12 of 15 have been treated by nilotinib for more than 5 years. Nilotinib dose is 800 mg daily for all but one patient with 400 mg dose daily reduced due to constitutional hyperbilirubinemia. Nilotinib was discontinued in 22 (59%) of 37 patients: in 4 of 22 due to cytogenetic resistance, in 9 of 22 due to hematologic relapse, in 7 of 22 due to AEs. Two of 22 patients with concomitant atherosclerosis and diabetes diagnosed before nilotinib treatment died because of cardiovascular events. Efficacy Complete hematological remission (CHR), major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) were obtained in 34 (92%), 26 (70%) and 18 (48%) consequently. Major molecular response (MMR) and complete molecular response (CMR) was achieved in 16 (43%) and 9 (24%) consequently. Currently 10 (27%) patients have stable CCyR, 5 of those 10 have stable CMR lasting more than 5 years in 2 of these 5. Disease progression No cases of progression to accelerated phase (AP) and blast crisis (BC) before treatment discontinuation were observed. Hematologic relapses were within CP. Deaths due to CML progression were not observed on nilotinib treatment. Hematological AEs Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 8 (22%) patients, grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 5 (14%) and grade 3 anemia was observed in 1 (3%) patient. Non-hematological AEs The most common AE was rash (12 [32%] patients), in some cases with pruritus and xerodermia. The hemorrhagic syndrome was observed in 4 (11%) patients, associated with grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia only in 2 patients. The other 2 patients had uterine bleeding with questionable connection to therapy. Neither QT prolongation nor other abnormalities were revealed by ECG. As to laboratory findings: hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 33 (89%) patients, mostly due to indirect fraction, 5 of those 33 had hyperbilirubinemia grade 3. ÀL” and AST elevation (all grades) was observed in 26 (70%) and in 20 (54%) patients respectively, grade 3-4 was observed in 3 (8%) patients. Grade 1 hyperglycemia occurred in 7 (19%) patients, grade 3 hyperglycemia was observed in 1 (3%) patient with concomitant type 2 diabetes. All AEs were manageable according to general rules. No life-threatening AEs were diagnosed. Summary The results of long-term nilotinib 2nd line therapy are satisfactory for patients who achieved stable CCyR. Low level of high grade toxicity AEs was observed on nilotinib treatment, no new kinds of AEs appeared during long-term treatment. Disclosures: Bykova: Federal State Budgetary Institution Hematology Research Center of Health Ministry of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation : Employment. Gusarova:Novartis International AG : Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Federal State Budgetary Institution Hematology Research Center of Health Ministry of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation : Employment. Chelysheva:Novartis International AG : Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Federal State Budgetary Institution Hematology Research Center of Health Ministry of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation : Employment. Turkina: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Description: Background Frontline nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID) provides superior efficacy vs imatinib in pts with CML-CP, with good tolerability. Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—Extending Molecular Reponses (ENESTxtnd) is evaluating the kinetics of molecular response to frontline nilotinib 300 mg BID in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP, as assessed in national and local laboratories, and is also the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nilotinib dose optimization (including dose re-escalation in pts who require dose reductions due to adverse events [AEs] and dose increase in pts with less than optimal response). Here, we present results of a preplanned, interim analysis (IA) based on the first 20% of pts who completed 12 mo of treatment or discontinued early. Methods ENESTxtnd (NCT01254188) is an open-label, multicenter, phase 3b clinical trial of nilotinib 300 mg BID in adults with CML-CP newly diagnosed within 6 mo of study entry. The primary endpoint is rate of MMR by 12 mo. Molecular responses were monitored by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) at local laboratories at baseline, at 1, 2, and 3 mo, and every 3 mo thereafter. Bone marrow cytogenetic analyses were performed locally at baseline, 6 mo, and end of study. Dose reductions were allowed for grade ≥ 2 nonhematologic AEs and grade 3/4 hematologic AEs. Pts with dose reductions could attempt to re-escalate (successful re-escalation defined as ≥ 4 wk on nilotinib 300 mg BID with no dose adjustments for any AE) and remain on study. Dose increase to nilotinib 400 mg BID was allowed in cases of BCR-ABL 〉 10% on the International Scale (BCR-ABLIS) at 3 mo or later, no major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.1%) at 12 mo, loss of MMR, or treatment failure. Results This IA includes 85 pts treated in 12 countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Lebanon, Mexico, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, Taiwan, and South Africa). Median age was 49 y (range, 19-85 y), and 58% of pts were male. Median time since diagnosis was 35 days (range, 2-157 days). Prior to study entry, 64 pts (75%) received hydroxyurea, and 3 pts (4%) received imatinib (all for ≤ 2 wk). At the data cutoff, 68 pts (80%) had treatment ongoing, and the remaining 17 had discontinued due to AEs/laboratory abnormalities (n = 8; nonhematologic AEs [n = 5], biochemical abnormalities [n = 2], and hematologic abnormalities [n = 1]), loss to follow-up (n = 2), administrative problems (n = 2), intolerance to the protocol-proposed dose (n = 2), suboptimal response (n = 1), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), or protocol deviation (n = 1). Median time on treatment was 13.8 mo (range, 1 day-18 mo). Median actual dose intensity of nilotinib was 597 mg/day (range, 165-756 mg/day), and 85% of pts had an actual dose intensity of 〉 400 mg/day to ≤ 600 mg/day. Of 30 pts with dose reductions due to AEs, 19 (63%) successfully re-escalated to nilotinib 300 mg BID. Nine pts (11%) dose escalated to nilotinib 400 mg BID due to lack of efficacy. The primary endpoint of MMR by 12 mo was achieved by 57 pts (67%; 99.89% CI, 49%-82%). Complete cytogenetic response by 6 mo was achieved by 48 pts (56%). Median BCR-ABLIS decreased over time, with a median value of 0.05% (range, 0.00%-41.36%) at 12 mo (Figure). Most pts (91%) achieved early molecular response (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 10% at 3 mo). Of the 8 pts (9%) with BCR-ABLIS 〉 10% at 3 mo (4 of whom were then dose escalated), 3 achieved MMR by 12 mo (1 of whom had been dose escalated). By the data cutoff, no pt had progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and there had been no deaths on study. Nilotinib was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that seen in other frontline studies. Drug-related nonhematologic AEs (≥ 10% of pts) were rash (31%), constipation (13%), and headache (13%). Newly occurring or worsening grade 3/4 hematologic or biochemical abnormalities (≥ 10% of pts) were neutropenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (17%), increased lipase (13%), and increased bilirubin (12%). Conclusions These results demonstrate that dose-optimized nilotinib affords high rates of molecular response in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Further, they support the feasibility of nilotinib dose re-escalation in pts who require temporary dose reductions due to AEs, with 63% of dose-reduced pts able to successfully re-escalate to nilotinib 300 mg BID and safely continue therapy. Disclosures: Lipton: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Meillon:Bayer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Louw:Novartis: Congress attendance support Other, Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Congress attendance support, Congress attendance support Other, Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Pavlovsky:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Jin:Novartis: Employment. Acharya:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL: Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Description: Background: Clinical trials demonstrate a safe discontinuation possibility of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with deep molecular response (MR). However reasons and indications for TKI cessation as a part of treatment process have not been studied. Aims: To evaluate the eligibility of long term TKI cessation in CML patients with deep and long lasting MR. To describe the reasons of stopping therapy, principles and terms of observation without treatment, preserving and restoring of MR. Methods: We summarized retrospectively and prospectively 25 TKI discontinuation cases in 2 clinics of Russian Federation (Moscow, St.Petersburg, 2008-2014). Inclusion criteria were: 1) Ph+CML 2) MR4 (BCR-ABL12 months confirmed by 〉2 consecutive analyses 3) discontinuation of TKI treatment. Chronic phase (CP)/accelerated phase (AP) at diagnosis was 24/1. Sokal score for CP patients was 15/8/1 for low/intermediate/high risl group. Therapy before discontinuation was the following: imatinib 1st line (n=16), 2nd generation TKI (TKI2) 2nd-3rd line (n=9): 5 dasatinib/ 4 nilotinib. Me TKI duration was 7,2 (range 2,5-13) years, Me MR4 duration was 50 (range 12-97) months. IFN before TKI was received by 13(52%) of 25 patients for Me 18 months (2-60 months). Results: We specify 2 reasons of TKI discontinuation: 1) adverse events (AE) of TKI (Toxicity Group), n=18 2) self decision of patients (Active Group), n=7 (Table 1). Table 1. Characteristics of CML patients according to reason of stopping TKI (n=25) Toxicity Group (n=18) Active Group (n=7) Ме of age, years (min-max) 55 (27-74) 36 (23-58) Ratio male/female (m:f) 9m:9f 3m:4f Ме duration of TKI therapy, years (min-max) 5,9 (2,5-13) 8,6 (4,4-10,1) Ме duration of МО4 at treatment cessation, months (min-max) 41 (12-97) 67 (33-79) In Toxicity Group therapy was stopped for 1) AE grade 1-3 in 5 of 18 patients: unstable angina (2), hepatotoxicity (1), acute renal failure (1), menstrual dysfunction and infections (1); 2) AE grade 1-2 in 13 of 18 patients including recurrent or long lasting: fatigue, edema, arthralgia, muscle cramps, diarrhea, recurrent pleural effusion. The key clinical decision was not to restart TKI after AE termination and to continue monitoring of BCR-ABL transcript levels by RQ-PCR. For Active Group self-made discontinuation was in 7 patients with long lasting MR4 due to knowledge of safe discontinuation (4) and for conception (3). In 6 of 7 patients BCR-ABL monitoring was performed, 1 patient refused from monitoring. Treatment was restarted at major molecular response (MMR) loss (BCR-ABL〉0,1%) or by decision of physician. In case of severe AE the patients were switched to alternative TKI. Thirteen (52%) of 25 patients were observed without treatment for Me 23 months (6-77 months), in 12 MR4 was maintained, 1 patient being off treatment for 54 months refused from monitoring (Active Group). Therapy was resumed in 10 patients with MMR loss and in 2 without MMR loss, by physician decision. All MMR loss cases occurred within first 6 months, no CML progression observed. Response restoration to MR4 was in 8 of 10 patients in 3-16 months, in other 2 it is early to estimate Summary/Conclusion: Observation without therapy may become an option in CML patients with mostly low/intermediate Sokal risk group, stable MR4 and recurrent/severe TKI toxicity. Self declared decisions of young patients with durable deep MR should be accompanied by regular RQ-PCR especially within first 6 months after TKI discontinuation. Resuming therapy at MMR loss shows to be safe. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Background: In the pivotal Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly Diagnosed Patients (ENESTnd) study, frontline NIL 300 mg and 400 mg twice daily (BID) resulted in higher rates of deep molecular response and lower rates of disease progression than imatinib in pts with CML-CP. In the ENEST-Extending Molecular Responses (ENESTxtnd) study, the kinetics of molecular response to NIL 300 mg BID and novel dose optimization strategies were evaluated. Methods: ENESTxtnd was a 24 months (mo), phase 3b study of de novo pts with CML-CP within 6 mo of diagnosis. Primary endpoint was rate of major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.1% on the International Scale [IS]) by 12 mo. Initial dose for all pts was NIL 300 mg BID. Dose escalation to NIL 400 mg BID was permitted for pts with suboptimal response (SoR) or treatment failure. Dose reduction to NIL 450 mg once daily (QD) was performed as required by the protocol; reescalation was permitted following adverse event (AE) improvement. Successful reescalation was defined as ≥ 4 weeks of NIL 300 mg BID with no dose adjustments for any AE. Rates of overall survival (OS; considering all deaths during the study) and progression-free survival (PFS; considering events during study treatment) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: A total of 421 pts (median age, 48 y; males, 53.7%) were enrolled. Median time on study treatment was 23.7 mo; 328 pts (77.9%) completed 24 mo of treatment, and 93 pts (22.1%) discontinued early due to AEs (n = 43), consent withdrawal (n = 7), disease progression (n = 6), protocol deviation (n = 6), loss to follow-up (n = 5), death (n = 4), pregnancy (n = 2), or other reasons (n = 20). Of the 92 pts (21.9%) dose-escalated, 88 (20.9%) were dose-escalated due to lack of efficacy (SoR, 83, 19.7%; treatment failure, 5, 1.2%) and 4 due to dosing error; 11 pts were dose-escalated at 3 mo. Of the dose-escalated pts, 5 and 9 pts discontinued due to SoR and treatment failure, respectively. A total of 144 pts (34.2%) had dose reductions, dose reduction due to AEs were reported in 74 pts; 106 pts attempted to reescalate to NIL 300 mg BID, and 92 successfully reescalated. Median duration of exposure of all pts was 23.2 mo and median actual dose intensity was 598.8 mg/d (range, 150-760 mg/d). At 12 mo, 306, 33, 16, and 7 pts were on NIL 300 mg BID, 400 mg BID, 450 mg QD, and other doses respectively; 59 pts had discontinued prior to 12 mo. Of the 306 pts on NIL 300 mg BID at 12 mo, 136 did not have any dose modification (interruption/reduction/escalation) prior to 12 mo and 170 had ≥1 dose modification. Of the 170 pts, 88 had ≥ 1 dose reduction followed by reescalation to 300 mg BID. Among the 16 pts on a reduced dose at 12 mo, 4 later re-escalated to NIL 300 mg BID. The cumulative MMR rate (95% CI) was 70.8% (66.2%-75.1%) by 12 mo and 81.0% (76.9%-84.6%) by 24 mo (figure). Of the 88 pts with dose escalation due to lack of efficacy, 63.6% achieved MMR by 24 mo (Table 1). Of the 144 pts with dose reduction, 75.7% achieved MMR by 24 mo, including 78 of 92 pts (85%) who successfully reescalated to NIL 300 mg BID (Table 2). The cumulative rate of complete cytogenetic response by 24 mo was 74.1 %. Ten pts had PFS events on treatment (progression, n = 6; death, n = 4), and 9 deaths were reported at any time on study and during follow-up 2 due to CML; 1 each due to cardiorespiratory arrest, intestinal infarction, acute leukemia, increased intracranial pressure, accident, suicide, and unknown). The estimated rates (95% CI) of PFS and OS at 24 mo were 97.0% (95.1%-98.8%) and 97.6% (96.1%-99.2%), respectively. The most common nonhematologic drug-related AEs of any grade were rash (15.4%), headache (10.5%), and nausea (10.2%), and new or worsening grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities were lipase abnormalities (14.5%), neutropenia (11.9%), and thrombocytopenia (10.5%). Cardiovascular events were observed in 19 pts (4.5%), including ischemic heart disease (n = 14), ischemic cerebrovascular events (n = 1), and peripheral artery disease (n = 5). Conclusion: Dose-optimized frontline NIL resulted in rapid reductions in BCR-ABL1IS levels andvery few progressions or deaths. Most pts achieved MMR by 24 mo, including 〉 60% of pts who were dose-escalated due to lack of efficacy and 〉 80% of pts who were successfully reescalated after dose reduction. The safety profile of NIL was consistent with previous studies. These results support the use of NIL 300 mg BID, with dose optimization as necessary, in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Disclosures Hughes: ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: The indicated label for newly diagnosed CML chronic phase patients is 300 mg twice daily. This abstract discusses modifications of this dose.. Salvino:Novartis: Research Funding. Shortt:Novartis, Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: Sponsorship to attend conferences, Speakers Bureau. Quach:Celgene Corp, ONYX, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pavlovsky:Novartis - Bristol: Speakers Bureau. Louw:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Unrestricted educational grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shih:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis International AG: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Meillon:Novartis, Bayer, BMS, Pfizer, AMGEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jin:Novartis: Employment. Khanna:Novartis: Employment. Dalal:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipton:Ariad: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.