ALBERT

Description: Introduction: Most of the knowledge about treatments and outcome of CML patients originates from clinical studies. To get new and unbiased insights in the epidemiology, treatment and outcome of CML, the EUTOS population-based registry of newly diagnosed CML patients was established, - as part of the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) for CML. The aim was to collect the data of all adults with newly diagnosed CML, irrespective of treatment and of enrolment in studies. Patients and Methods: The EUTOS population-based registry collected data of newly diagnosed CML patients, 18 years or older, over a specified period of time from 2008 till 2012 living in defined regions. The data were collected by 22 study groups in 20 European countries. Data were gathered via a web-based CRF-system. For comparison we used the already published data from five Company-sponsored registration studies IRIS (O’Brien et.all, NEJM, 2003), TOPS (Cortes et al, JCO, 2009) ENESTnd (Saglio et al, NEJM, 2010), DASISION (Kantarjian et al, NEJM, 2010) and BELA (Cortes et al, JCO, 2012), from three Investigator-sponsored studies GIMEMA (Castagnetti et al, JCO, 2010 and Gugliotta et al, Blood, 2011), French SPIRIT (Preudhomme et al, NEJM, 2010) and German CML IV (Hehlmann et al, JCO, 2011) and from two single referral centers HAMMERSMITH (De Lavallade et al, JCO, 2008) and MDA (Jain et al, Blood, 2013). Results: Till 15.05.2014 2978 patients were registered in the EUTOS Population-based registry. 94.3% of the patients were diagnosed in chronic phase (CP), 3.6% in accelerated phase (AP), and 2.2% in blastic phase (BP). For the calculation of the prognostic scores 361 patients had to be excluded because they were pretreated. For the comparison we used 2350 patients in Chronic Phase with laboratory values before any treatment. 54% of the patients in the EUTOS Population-based registry were male, less than in all studies (56.6 - 60.6%). The median age at diagnosis was 56 years, higher than in all studies (46 - 55). In EUTOS the proportion of patients more than 60 years and more than 65 years old was 40.4 % and 21.9 % respectively. Similar data were rarely reported in all other studies. Median value of the spleen size below costal margin was 0. 46.1% of the patients had a palpable spleen and 15.2% had a spleen size ≥ 10 (spleen size is always reported in cm under costal margin in this abstract). The % of palpable spleen is only reported by IRIS, 25.0% and by the FRENCH Spirit group, 49.8%. The median spleen is only reported by GIMEMA, 2.0. Spleen size ≥ 10 is reported by IRIS, 6.0%, ENESTnd, 12.4% and HAMMERSMITH 25.5%. While the median values for Platelets and Hemoglobin show no big differences, the median WBC in EUTOS is 83.9 x109/l and in the Company-sponsored registration studies: IRIS 18-20 x109/l , in ENESTnd 23-26 x109/l, in DASISION 23-25 x109/l , and in BELA 22-23 x109/l, in the Investigator-sponsored studies: GIMEMA 55 x109/l , in the FRENCH SPIRIT 83-104 x109/l , in the GERMAN CML IV 75-91 x109/l , and in the single referral center study HAMMERSMITH 140 x109/l, clearly indicating that in company-sponsored, registration studies, the reported values of the WBC were not recorded prior to any treatment. The median values for Blasts, Basophils and Eosinophils show also not so big differences. The % of Sokal low risk patients is in EUTOS with 34.5% lower than in all studies (35.2 - 60%) with the exception of HAMMERSMITH 28.9%. Discussion: The EUTOS Population-based registry provides the first European wide real-world series of patients with newly diagnosed Ph+, BCR-ABL+ CML. The age and sex distribution and some baseline characteristics such as Sokal Score as well as median WBC count in the EUTOS population-based registry are different from many prospective studies. This should be taken in due consideration before extrapolating the results of treatment studies to real life. Spleen size, which is known as an important value for prediction, is only very rarely reported in clinical studies. With further follow-up, this registry will provide a population-based insight on treatment, survival, and causes of death. Disclosures Baccarani: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hoffmann:Novartis: Research Funding. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Steegmann:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mayer:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zaritskey:Novartis: Consultancy. Clark:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Porkka:BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hehlmann:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Hasford:Novartis: Research Funding. Lindoerfer:Novartis: Research Funding.

Description: Background. The aim of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is not only effectiveness, but also safety. Long treatment duration makes the analysis of most significant complications very important. Pleural effusion (PE) is an important adverse event of dasatinib therapy with largely unclear cause. The optimal management of recurrent PE is unknown and the analysis of its treatment results is actual. Aim. To describe the characteristics of patients with recurrent PE at prolonged dasatinib treatment and to suggest the strategy of their management. Methods. Follow-up data of 23 CML late chronic phase patients at dasatinib therapy after imatinib failure in 2 clinical studies: phase II study comparing dasatinib 140 mg and imatinib 800 mg daily (N = 12) and phase III dasatinib dose-optimizing study in patients with imatinib-resistant or intolerant patients (N = 11). M:F ratio was 7:16. Median age at the beginning of dasatinib - 48 years (26-68), median CML duration - 11 years (4,1-19,2). The reason for TKI change was imatinib resistance: cytogenetic (N = 17) and hematological (N = 6). Results. Median duration of dasatinib treatment - 40 months (10-107); 13 patients (56,3%) are alive, 10 patients (43,5%) have died because of progression of CML. In 19 patients (82,6%) dasatinib treatment was stopped because of: blastic transformation - 6 (26,1%), hematological resistance - 3 (13,1%), cytogenetic resistance - 5 (21,7%), PE - 5 (21,7%). Four patients are still on dasatinib treatment with median duration 8,8 years (8,7-8,9), 3 of them retain complete/major molecular response. The best responses were: complete hematological response in 21 (91,3%), complete cytogenetic response - in 8 (34,8%), major molecular response - in 6 (26,1%) patients. Overall 8-year survival was 55,1%, progression-free survival - 55,4%, event-free survival - 26,1%. PE was observed in 11 (47,8%) patients, in 8 of them (72,7%) - recurrent. In one patient the prolonged PE was associated with fibrosis of adjacent lung and pleura. Median time to PE was 34 (6-83) months. In cases of PE dasatinib was interrupted (mean duration 21 d) and diuretics were started. Six patients (54,5%) also received corticosteroids. Five patients (45,6%) were treated with thoracocentesis. In recurrent PE the dasatinib dosage was decreased. The dasatinib discontinuation in 4 patients with recurrent PE has led to loss of major molecular response in 2 of them; in other 2 it is retained for 6,5 and 1,5 years. Event-free 8-year survival was 36,4% in patients with PE, 16,7% - without it. Discussion. The response rate in patients with PE was not worse, than in those without it. Most often PE begins at 3rd year of treatment; later events were only relapses. Among risk factors of PE 2 patients had arterial hypertension and hypercholesterinemia, 3 patients were 〉 65 yrs. The significantly high PE on rate (48%) was linked to high initial dasatinib dosage (〉 100 mg/d) and bid prescription. We have not observed cases of absolute lymphocytosis due to large granular lymphocytes proliferation. The continuation of treatment generally leads to recurrences of effusion. According to our experience, once arising PE tends to recur. The compensation can be maintained with continuous treatment with diuretics. The prolonged PE may lead to fibrosis of adjacent lung and pleura. Prolonged treatment interruptions and decreased doses can cause treatment failure. The role of corticosteroids is unclear. Conclusion. Our experience in recurrent PE management at dasatinib treatment allow to recommend the usage of alternative TKI in patients with poor treatment response, and discontinuation of treatment in patients with deep molecular response with close monitoring of residual disease by PCR. Disclosures Turkina: Novartis International AG: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

Description: Background. About 70% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients achieve early molecular response (BCR-ABLIS2 10% at 3-months) that lead to 5-years overall survival close to 95%. However, CML patients remain heterogeneous group and several studies in recent years were aimed to personalize treatment based on individual patients' characteristics. Our group previously put forward a hypothesis about the prognostic value of individual BCR-ABL declinerate in the first three months of CML therapy1,2. The ratio BCR-ABL at 3 months to baseline had chosen as 0.1 as best cut-off value to predict MMR at 12 months. The aims of this study were to validate our prognostic method in larger group of patients and compare these results according to CML prognostic scores. Patients and methods. Fifty-five patients (median age, 52 years; range 19-84; 24 male and 31 female) with chronic phase CML were included in the study. Patients' distribution for Sokal risk groups were as follows: low-30 / intermediate-15 / high-10. Six patients had EUTOS high-risk. Forty-two patients started treatment with Imatinib 400 mg/day, 12 patients started with Nilotinib 600 mg/day and 1 patient started with Dasatinib 100 mg/day. Median BCR-ABL transcript levels was 41.38% at diagnosis, range 3.39-3185.36% (IS). The ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to baseline for each patient was calculated. In addition, we calculated ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to BCR-ABL levels at 1 month for 13 patients. Comparison was made of the predictive sensitivity to achieve early molecular response at 3 months (10% by IS) and according to prognostic CML scores (Sokal and EUTOS). We also assessed positive likelihood ratio (LR) value for the probability of achieving MMR between patients' stratification methods. Statistical analysis was conducted with Fisher exact test and sensitivity-specificity analyses. Results. Twenty-six out of 34 patients (76.5%) with ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to baseline below than 0.1 achieved MMR at 12 months, while only 9 of 21 patients (42.9%) with ratio more than 0.1 had optimal response (LR = 1.86 (1.05 - 3.29); p=0.003). Ratio of BCR-ABL levels at 3 months to 1 month showed much better results with the same (0.1) cut-off value - 5 out of 6 patients (83.3%) with ratio BCR-ABL at 3 months to 1 month below than 0.1, while only 1 patient (14.3%) with ratio more than 0.1 achieved optimal response (LR = 5.83 (0.92 - 37.08); p=0.05), respectively. Application of early molecular response at 3 months (10% by IS) yielded worse discrimination results: 34 of 47 (72.3%) patients with BCR-ABL level ²10% at 3 months, whereas 2 of 8 (25%) patients with BCR-ABL 〉10% had MMR at 1 year (LR = 1.38 (1.01 - 1.89); p=0.78), respectively. CML prognostic scores results had the following sensitivity-specificity results: for Sokal - low-risk 23 of 30 (76.7%), intermediate-risk 9 of 15 (60%) and 3 of 10 (30%) high-risk patients achieved MMR at 1 year (LR (low+intermediate)/high = 1.41 (1.00 - 1.97); p=0.03); for EUTOS-score - low-risk 34 of 49 (69.4%) and only 1 of 6 (16.7%) high-risk patients had achieved MMR at 12 months (LR = 1.30 (1.00 - 1.68); p=0.02). Furthermore, application of our ratio cut-off value among patients with BCR-ABL level ²10% at 3 months allowed us to revealed additional 6 high-risk patients have not reached MMR at 1 year of therapy (Table 1). Conclusion. Our study showed that individual rates of BCR-ABL decline from baseline to 3 months and to 1 month had better LR than CML prognostic scores (Sokal, EUTOS) or early molecular response achievement (BCR-ABL levels ²10% at 3 months) and might be useful as an optimized predictors of outcome for CML patients (MMR at 1 year of treatment). 1 Fominykh M., ShuvaevV., Martynkevich I. et al. ELN Frontiers Meeting ÇWhere science meets clinical practiceÈ 16-19 October, 2014, Berlin, Germany. Abstract book: 11. 2 Shuvaev V., Fominykh M., Martynkevich I. et al. Blood (56th ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), 2014; 124 (21): 5529. Figure 1. The patient numbers of achieving MMR at 12 months of therapy in various stratification groups with sensitivity-specificity characteristics Figure 1. The patient numbers of achieving MMR at 12 months of therapy in various stratification groups with sensitivity-specificity characteristics Disclosures Chelysheva: Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Turkina:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy.

Description: Abstract 3768 Background: Data from the phase 3, randomized multicenter ENESTnd trial have demonstrated the superiority of nilotinib over imatinib after 24 months (mo) of follow-up, with significantly higher rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR), and significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC). The current subanalysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (Nil300) and nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (Nil400) in older (≥ 65 years [yrs] at study entry) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) with a minimum follow-up of 24 mo. Methods: In ENESTnd, 846 pts stratified by Sokal risk score were randomized 1:1:1 to Nil300 (n = 282), Nil400 (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (n = 283). Pts with impaired cardiac function or ECOG performance status 〉 2 were excluded. Rates of CCyR and MMR by 24 mo, progression to AP/BC on treatment, and safety were evaluated according to age group (〈 65 vs ≥ 65 yrs) in the 2 nilotinib arms. Safety data are reported for any pt who received ≥ 1 dose of nilotinib (n = 279, Nil300; n = 277, Nil400). Results: 36 pts (13%) and 28 pts (10%) were ≥ 65 yrs old in the Nil300 and Nil400 arms, respectively. Of the pts aged ≥ 65 yrs, 51/64 (80%) had an ECOG performance status of 0 at baseline and 60/64 (94%) had intermediate or high Sokal risk scores. Of the older pts, 8 (22%) on Nil300 and 6 (21%) on Nil400 had type 2 diabetes at baseline. CCyR rates by 24 mo were 83% and 68% among older pts treated with Nil300 and Nil400, respectively, and 87% for pts aged 〈 65 yrs in each nilotinib arm. By 24 mo, MMR was achieved by 72% and 61% of older pts on Nil300 and Nil400, respectively; in pts aged 〈 65 yrs, the respective rates were 71% and 67%. All 5 pts who progressed to AP/BC on treatment (2 on Nil300 and 3 on Nil400) were aged 〈 65 yrs. The frequency of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) was low in older pts; no pts had grade 3/4 neutropenia and only 1 older pt reported grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in each nilotinib arm (Table). Transient, asymptomatic lipase elevations were reported in 11% and 16% of older pts treated with Nil300 and Nil400, and 7% of younger pts in each arm. Hyperglycemia occurred in 23% and 16% of older pts on Nil300 and Nil400, respectively, and 4% of younger pts in each arm; regardless of age, no pt discontinued study due to hyperglycemia. Among the 12 older pts with grade 3/4 hyperglycemia (8 on Nil300; 4 on Nil400), 9 pts had type 2 diabetes at baseline. There were no QTcF increases of 〉 60 msec from baseline in older pts and 3 in nilotinib-treated pts 〈 65 yrs old (1 on Nil300; 2 on Nil400). QTcF prolongation of 〉 500 msec did not occur in any pt treated with nilotinib on study. Periodic echocardiograms were done, and there were no decreases of 〉 15% in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline in any pt treated with nilotinib on study. There were 4 cases of ischemic heart disease reported in older pts (1/35 [3%] on Nil300; 3/25 [12%] on Nil400) and 7 cases in pts 〈 65 yrs of age (4/244 [2%] on Nil300; 3/252 [1%] on Nil400). No sudden deaths occurred on study. Discontinuation occurred in approximately 25% of older and younger pts with Nil300, of which, 6% and 9%, respectively, were due to AEs/lab abnormalities. Discontinuation from study with Nil400 was 46% in older pts and 19% in younger pts; of which, 36% and 10% were due to AEs/lab abnormalities. Conclusions: Older pts treated with nilotinib demonstrated high rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses and low rates of progression. Nilotinib was generally well tolerated by older pts. In older pts, Nil300 had numerically higher rates of CCyR and MMR and was generally better tolerated (as evidenced by fewer AEs and discontinuations) vs Nil400. These data support the use of Nil300 in older pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Disclosures: Larson: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bunworasate:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Goldberg:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding. Dorlhiac-Llacer:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Saglio:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hochhaus:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hoenekopp:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blakesley:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Employment. Yu:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gallagher:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clark:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Abstract 4272 The incidence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Europe is still difficult to estimate, due to insufficient information. Currently, it is believed to range between 8 and 22 cases per million people per year, age adjusted. Prior to the introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib the annual death rate was about 10% for the first 2 to 3 years, and about 20% from the 4th year on, with less than 10% of patients alive after 10 years. Interferon-alfa treatment and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were very effective treatments but only in a minority of patients. Following the introduction of IM, and of the second generation TKI nilotinib and dasatinib the annual death rate has decreased to less than 5%, and more than 75% of patients are projected to be alive 10 years after diagnosis. Based on these figures, the prevalence of the disease is expected to double every 5 years and the management of the disease will rapidly become an important social and pharmacoeconomic issue. To govern this progress it is necessary to improve the level of information on the epidemiology of CML, on the treatment of CML in clinical practice, and on the outcome of treatment outside prospective, controlled clinical trials on which current outcome estimates are based. With that purpose, the European Leukemia Network (ELN) has established a registry of all new cases of Ph+ CML. In a public private partnership with Novartis Oncology Europe this registry has been expanded to also include treatment and quality controlled outcome (European Treatment and Outcome Study [EUTOS] for CML). The infrastructure of the registry is based on a EUTOS Central Scientific Headquarter (Dpt. Hematology-Oncology “L. and A. Seràgnoli”, University of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy) and a EUTOS Central Data Center (Dpt. For Medical Informatics, Biometric and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany), interacting with each national hub. Registry is population-based, covers completely most European countries with less than 12 millions inhabitants (Portugal, Belgium, Sweden, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Hungary, Austria, Greece, Cyprus), and covers partially (for larger countries, only sub-regions with roughly 10 millions inhabitants have been selected) most of the countries with more than 12 millions inhabitants, including Spain, the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Germany, Poland, France, Romania, Russia and Italy. About 2500 newly diagnosed cases are planned to be registered over one year and to be followed for treatment and outcome including cytogenetic response, molecular response, and BCR-ABL KD mutations. Moreover, flanking projects have been implemented in the EUTOS frame: a network of standardized laboratories across Europe, to provide a molecular monitoring with quality controlled data, a central facility for imatinib blood level testing, soon in many European countries, and an educational effort (symposia, training workshops, internet platform). The EUTOS registry joins epidemiological and outcome data: its implementation requires considerable efforts and resources, but in the long run CML could become a model for epidemiologi and management of other cancers. Disclosures: Hasford: Novartis Pharma: Research Funding.

Description: Background: Panobinostat (LBH589) is a novel, high potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor, which acetylates HSP90 and promotes degradation of its client proteins, such as BCR-ABL. It induces degradation of wild-type, as well as BCR-ABL with the T315i and E255K mutations in BaF3 cells. Based on this encouraging data, we initiated a Phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral panobinostat in patients (pts) with chronic phase (CP) CML who had received at least 2 prior BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Methods: This was a single arm, 3-stage, open-label, multicenter, Phase II study. The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of pts attaining major cytogenetic response (MCyR). Complete hematologic response (CHR) was one secondary objective. All patients received panobinostat orally 20 mg/day on a thrice weekly, consecutive weekly schedule. If ≥3 confirmed MCyRs were observed among 25 pts in Stage 1, Stage 2 was planned to be opened with a total of 32 pts. Dose reduction to 10 and 5 mg/day for toxicity and re-escalation to 20 mg/day was allowed. Dose escalation beyond 20 mg/day for poor response was not foreseen. Results: 29 pts were enrolled in Stage 1 between February and November 2007. Median age was 56 years (yrs) (range 31–75). Time since diagnosis of CML was ≥5 yrs in 69% and 500 ms (Gr 3) in another pt required study drug discontinuation. 5 serious AEs were reported as possibly related to study drug: pulmonary embolism and the QTcF prolongation (see above) in 1 pt, and sepsis, followed by multiple organ failure with fatal outcome in a second pt. SAEs considered as non-related to study drug included: 1 case each of DVT, lung infection, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, and cardiac failure. To date, 452 post baseline ECGs were assessed: minimal QTcF prolongations (30–60 ms) were seen in 4 and 〉60 ms in 1 pt. Gr 3/4 hematologic lab abnormalities were: anemia and neutropenia in 4 pts each and thrombocytopenia in 3 pts. Nonhematologic lab abnormalities were: Gr 4 hypokalemia (1), Gr 3 hyponatremia (1), hyperkalemia (1), and hypermagnesemia (2). Conclusions: No MCyR but 1 CHR with eradication of the T315i mutation were observed in 29 TKI-resistant CP CML pts, treated orally with 20 mg/day panobinostat, thrice weekly. Since the number of MCyRs required by the protocol was not seen, Stage 2 of the study was not opened. Safety/tolerability were comparable to what was reported for the same dose/schedule in other panobinostat studies, and no new safety findings were identified. The explanation that no more CRs were seen might be 2-fold: a dosing issue considering encouraging responses reported with oral, thrice weekly ≥40 mg/day single-agent panobinostat in pts with refractory Hodgkin’s disease and AML1 and quite early hematologic progression in many pts, not allowing for longer exposure to panobinostat in this more resistant population.

Description: Background: ENESTop, an ongoing, single-arm, phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01698905), is the first trial specifically evaluating treatment-free remission (TFR; ie, stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI] treatment without a loss of response) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who achieved a sustained deep molecular response after switching from imatinib (IM) to nilotinib (NIL). Of 126 patients in ENESTop who were eligible to stop NIL, 57.9% (95% CI, 48.8%-66.7%) maintained TFR at 48 weeks. Here we present results from a subgroup analysis based on reasons for switching from IM to NIL, categorized as intolerance, resistance, and physician preference. Methods:Eligible patients were adults with CML-CP who received ≥ 3 years of total TKI therapy (〉 4 weeks of IM, followed by ≥ 2 years of NIL) and achieved a sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS]) on NIL therapy; patients with a documented MR4.5 at the time of switch from IM to NIL were not eligible. Enrolled patients continued NIL treatment in a 1-year consolidation phase, and those without confirmed loss of MR4.5 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS 〉 0.0032%) were eligible to stop NIL in the TFR phase. Patients with loss of major molecular response (MMR; ie, BCR-ABL1IS 〉 0.1%) or confirmed loss of MR4 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS 〉 0.01%) during the TFR phase reinitiated NIL treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained TFR (ie, no loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, or treatment reinitiation) at 48 weeks after stopping NIL. In this post hoc analysis, rates of TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL and a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of treatment-free survival (TFS; defined as the time from the start of TFR to the earliest occurrence of any of the following: loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, reinitiation of NIL due to any cause, progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis, death due to any cause) were evaluated in subgroups of patients who switched from IM to NIL due to intolerance, resistance, or physician preference. These categories were determined by grouping the reasons for switching from IM to NIL, as reported by the investigators, based on relatedness to safety (intolerance), loss of response/treatment failure (resistance), and the physician's clinical judgment (physician preference); individual reasons included within each category are presented in the Figure. Results:A total of 125 patients who entered the TFR phase were included in this analysis; 1 patient who was found to have had atypical transcripts was excluded. Among these 125 patients, the reasons for switching to NIL were categorized as intolerance in 51 patients (40.8%), resistance in 30 patients (24.0%), and physician preference in 44 patients (35.2%). The proportion of patients who maintained TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL was generally similar across the 3 subgroups: 30 of 51 (58.8%; 95% CI, 44.2%-72.4%) in the intolerance subgroup, 16 of 30 (53.3%; 95% CI, 34.3%-71.7%) in the resistance subgroup, and 27 of 44 (61.4%; 95% CI, 45.5%-75.6%) in the physician preference subgroup. KM analysis of TFS showed that in all 3 subgroups, the majority of TFS events occurred within the first 24 weeks after stopping NIL (Figure). There were no notable differences in the kinetics of TFS events among subgroups. The KM-estimated median duration of TFS was not reached by the data cutoff date in all 3 subgroups. Conclusion: Primary analysis from ENESTop showed that among patients with CML-CP who achieved a sustained MR4.5after switching from IM to NIL, 57.9% of those who stopped NIL maintained TFR at 48 weeks. In the present analysis, TFR was maintained at 48 weeks after stopping NIL by 〉 50% of patients in the intolerance, resistance, and physician preference subgroups, with generally similar results across subgroups. These findings suggest that the rate of successful TFR following second-line NIL does not differ based on the reasons for switching from IM to NIL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Hughes: Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG): Other: Chair of the CML/MPN Disease Group. Boquimpani:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Takahashi:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Shuvaev:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis pharma: Honoraria. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Lipton:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Moiraghi:BMS: Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau. Nicolini:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sacha:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adamed: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kim:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fellague-Chebra:Novartis: Employment. Acharya:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.: Employment. Krunic:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jin:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mahon:BMS: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria.

Description: Introduction. Implementation of target therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) treatment allowed saving life for majority of CML patients. First and second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) usage experience showed that part of patients can achieve deep molecular responses. Clinical trials of treatment cessation in CML patients with deep molecular response demonstrated that substantial proportion of patients can be free from drug with predictable relapse risk and safe treatment re-initiation. This approach is interesting due to sustained increasing number of CML patients and avalanche like increment of budget burden because of continuous expensive TKI therapy. The aim of our study was to assess potential budget impact of successful TKI cessation in CML patients with long-lasting deep molecular response. Materials and methods. Pharmacoeconomical modelling of CML diagnostic and treatment process including treatment free remission (TFR). Markov chain approach was implemented to construct models for non-stop therapy and TFR in patients with sustained molecular response 4 logs (MR4.0) (Fig 1). Treatment re-initiation was considered in case of major molecular response loss. The total number of CML patients in Russia was 6500; annual rate of newly diagnosed CML cases was 800 (in accordance with Russian CML Registry data). The patient consent rate to TFR inclusion was assumed as 80%. Transition rates were chosen from clinical trials and own experience. Cost-utility analysis of first and second generation TKI apply was performed. Simulation of clinical and economical consequences was done on national level. Five-year (2015-2020) time horizon was used. To simplify presentation of our results we recalculated costs to US dollars. Results. Our analysis showed that by year 2020 the estimated total CML patient number in Russia will be about 11000 patients with total direct yearly CML cost 109 mln $. TFR approach can decrease budget burden from 109 to 95 mln $ yearly and the total evaluated money saving during years 2015-2020 period in Russia will be 67 mln $ with complement cost-utility data (Fig 2). Conclusion. Annual CML cost will increase due to increment of CML patients number. Nevertheless, TFR strategy in CML patients with long-lasting deep molecular response under continuous molecular monitoring can significantly decrease the healthcare budget burden. TFR approach has the advantage over sustained therapy on financial cost and efficacy of its use. Disclosures Turkina: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy.

Description: Background: PF-114 is a 4th-generation oral tyrosine kinase-inhibitor (TKI) active against wild-type and mutated BCR-ABL1 isoforms including BCR-ABL1T315I. We present data from a phase-1 study in patients with chronic or accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) failing ≥2 TKIs or with BCR-ABL1T315I (NCT02885766) with ≥6 months therapy. Methods: 3+3 dose-escalation study to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary objectives included safety and efficacy based on haematological, cytogenetic, and molecular criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Results: 51 patients were enrolled. Daily doses were 50 mg (n=3), 100 mg (n=3), 200 mg (n=9), 300 mg (n=11), 400 mg (n=12), 500 mg (n=3), 600 mg (n=6), 750 mg (n=4) given continuously. Median age was 50 years (range, 29-82 years). Median CML duration pre-study was 10 years (range, 0.3-23 years). All patients had baseline ECOG performance scores 0-1. Twelve patients had BCR-ABL1T315I. Patients were heavily pre-treated: 25 received ≥3 prior TKIs; 5 patients with BCR-ABL1T315I received 1 prior TKI. Interim analysis was conducted at follow-up of ≥6 months (cut-off date January 16th 2019). Therapy was ongoing in 17 patients at doses 200 mg (n=4), 300 mg (n=9), 400 mg (n=3) and 600 mg (n=1) with median duration of exposure of 7,4 (range, 4,6-26), 9,2 (range, 7,4-26), 9,2 (range, 8,3-9,2) and 9,2 months. Other patients discontinued because of progression (n=18), adverse events (n=6), consent withdrawal (n=4), participation in another study (n=3) or other reasons (n=3). The MTD was 600 mg with the grade-3 psoriasis-like skin lesions the DLT, which occurred during the first 28 days of treatment. Reversible grade-3 skin toxicity occurred in 11 patients at doses ≥400 mg. There were no other drug-related non-hematologic grade-3 toxicities except 1 grade-3 toxic hepatitis at 400 mg and there were no detectable effects on ankle-brachial index or vascular occlusive events. The best safety/efficacy dose was 300 mg/d with 6 of 11 patients achieving a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and 4 of them - a major molecular response (MMR). Higher doses were less effective probably because of toxicity-related therapy interruptions and discontinuations. Five of 12 patients with BCR-ABL1T315I responded, 3 of which achieved a complete hematologic response and 4 achieved MCyR. Conclusion: PF-114 was safe and effective in patients with CML failing ≥2 TKIs or with BCR-ABL1T315I. The most effective dose was 300 mg/d. Five of 12 patients with BCR-ABL1T315I responded. A pivotal study is beginning. Disclosures Turkina: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; fusion pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Vinogradova:Novartis: Consultancy; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy. Lomaia:Novartis: Other: Travel Grant;Lecture fee; Pfizer: Other: Travel Grant. Shukhov:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Chelysheva:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy. Shikhbabaeva:Novartis: Consultancy; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy. Shuvaev:Fusion Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfize: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy. Ottmann:Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Fusion Pharma: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mikhailov:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Novikov:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Shulgina:Fusion Pharma: Employment. Chilov:Fusion Pharma: Consultancy.