ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2014-09-13
    Description: This Perspective focuses on the future of the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (PIP) Framework, which was initially established to promote the fair sharing of public health-related pandemic influenza samples between countries. We examine the changes that need to be made to address the growing likelihood that genetic sequence data might be shared instead of physical virus samples, as well as the need to expand the PIP framework's scope and to improve its fairness.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Gostin, Lawrence O -- Phelan, Alexandra -- Stoto, Michael A -- Kraemer, John D -- Reddy, K Srinath -- New York, N.Y. -- Science. 2014 Sep 12;345(6202):1295-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1257622.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Author address: 〈/span〉O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC 20001, USA. ; Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA. ; O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC 20001, USA. Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA. ; President, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi 110070, India.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214618" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
    Keywords: Animals ; *Disaster Planning ; *Global Health ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/*genetics ; Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/*genetics ; *Influenza Vaccines ; Influenza in Birds/epidemiology/prevention & control ; Influenza, Human/epidemiology/*prevention & control/virology ; Intellectual Property ; Orthomyxoviridae Infections/prevention & control/virology ; Pandemics/*prevention & control/veterinary ; Poultry ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Swine
    Print ISSN: 0036-8075
    Electronic ISSN: 1095-9203
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Computer Science , Medicine , Natural Sciences in General , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
    Publication Date: 1985-06-14
    Description: 〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Ebert, J D -- Stoto, M A -- New York, N.Y. -- Science. 1985 Jun 14;228(4705):1260.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4001940" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
    Keywords: *National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economics ; United States
    Print ISSN: 0036-8075
    Electronic ISSN: 1095-9203
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Computer Science , Medicine , Natural Sciences in General , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 1986-06-13
    Description: The growth of university-industry research relationships in biotechnology has raised questions concerning their effects, both positive and negative, on universities. A survey of over 1200 faculty members at 40 major universities in the United States reveals that biotechnology researchers with industrial support publish at higher rates, patent more frequently, participate in more administrative and professional activities and earn more than colleagues without such support. At the same time, faculty with industry funds are much more likely than other biotechnology faculty to report that their research has resulted in trade secrets and that commercial considerations have influenced their choice of research projects. Although the data do not establish a causal connection between industrial support and these faculty behaviors, our findings strongly suggest that university-industry research relationships have both benefits and risks for academic institutions. The challenge for universities is to find ways to manage these relationships that will preserve the benefits while minimizing the risks.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Blumenthal, D -- Gluck, M -- Louis, K S -- Stoto, M A -- Wise, D -- 100A-83/PHS HHS/ -- New York, N.Y. -- Science. 1986 Jun 13;232(4756):1361-6.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3715452" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
    Keywords: Antibodies, Monoclonal ; *Biomedical Research ; DNA, Recombinant ; Federal Government ; Government ; *Industry ; Periodicals as Topic ; *Research Support as Topic ; Risk Assessment ; Teaching ; *Technology ; United States ; *Universities ; major U.S. universities concerning their research activities and funding by ; industrial sources. The survey findings suggest that university-industry ; biotechnology research relationships have both benefits and risks for the ; university. Faculty members receiving industry support tend to be more ; productive. They publish, patent, and earn more. They participate in more ; administrative and professional activities, while teaching as much as other ; faculty members. However, their research also leads to more unpublished trade ; secrets, and commercial considerations may influence their choice of projects. ; The authors recommend public as well as commercial funding of research, ; protection of the right to publish research results, and university-industry ; agreements that do not unduly restrict faculty behavior.
    Print ISSN: 0036-8075
    Electronic ISSN: 1095-9203
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Computer Science , Medicine , Natural Sciences in General , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Policy sciences 23 (1990), S. 1-23 
    ISSN: 1573-0891
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Political Science , Economics
    Notes: Abstract One of the central questions facing policy-makers is how to allocate limited federal funds among alternative AIDS research strategies. A rational answer requires judgments about both the prospects of scientific progress and the societal value of research outcomes. Using a decision-analytic approach, this paper examines the marginal returns from additional funding of basic biology, epidemiology and mathematical modeling, vaccine development and testing, treatment development and testing, and behavioral and social science. A survey of a recent Institute of Medicine Committee on AIDS was conducted to elicit scientific judgments on the prospects for scientific progress in each of the five areas. The scientists were quite capable of transcending their disciplinary orientation as reflected in the dominant sentiment in favor of more behavioral and social science research. A comparison of the actual FY 1987 AIDS research budget with the budgets recommended by the scientific experts also suggests that basic biological research deserves greater emphasis.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...