ALBERT

Description: Introduction: Tenalisib (RP6530) is a novel, highly specific, dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor with nano-molar inhibitory potency at the enzyme and cellular level. PI3K plays a critical role in T-cell development and activation and several studies have validated the PI3K-AKT pathway as a potential therapeutic target in T cell lymphomas. Preliminary results of the ongoing Phase 1/1b T-cell lymphoma (TCL) study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with encouraging clinical activity in relapsed/refractory TCL (Oki, ASCO 2018 and Iyer, ASH 2018). We now present the final results of the study (NCT02567656). Methods: This study comprised of four-dose escalation cohorts, followed by two dose expansion cohorts at MTD enrolling 20 patients each in PTCL and CTCL cohorts. Patients had histologically confirmed TCL, ECOG PS ≤2, and had received ≥1 prior therapy. Patients received Tenalisib [200 mg BID-800 mg BID (fasting), 800 mg (fed only)] orally until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to determine the MTD and pharmacokinetic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Responses were evaluated for PTCL and CTCL based on IWG criteria (Cheson 2007) and mSWAT respectively. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in study, 19 in dose escalation and 39 in dose expansion (28 PTCL and 30 CTCL). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-15). Safety assessment of 58 patients receiving at least one dose of Tenalisib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Treatment related Grade≥3 AEs were elevated ALT/AST (21%), rash (5%), and hypophosphatemia (3%). These events were reversible and managed by withholding study drug. Additionally, in few patients (N=9), steroids were used to manage elevated ALT/AST. There were six treatment related serious adverse events, none of these led to fatal outcome. At end of the study, four (3 CTCL; 1 PTCL) patients who completed minimum 8 cycles of therapy were rolled over to a compassionate use study (NCT03711604) and were followed up. Efficacy assessments demonstrated an ORR of 46% (3 CR and 13 PR) and clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) of 77%. Subset efficacy analysis showed an ORR in PTCL of 47% (3 CR; 4 PR) and in CTCL of 45% (9 PR). The median time to initial response was 1.8 months and was similar in both sub-types. The overall median DOR was 4.91 months (range 0.9-26.6); in PTCL patients the DOR was 6.53 months, (range: 0.97-21.0) and 3.8 months (range: 1.67-25.67) in CTCL patients. In 3 PTCL patients who achieved CR, the median DOR was 19.5 months (range 7.5-21). Conclusion: Tenalisib demonstrated promising clinical activity and an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed/ refractory TCL. Currently, a phase I/II combination study to further evaluate safety and efficacy with romidepsin is ongoing in this target population. Disclosures Iyer: Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Huen:Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction Tenalisib (RP6530) is a next generation, oral, selective, PI3Kδ/g inhibitor with nanomolar inhibitory potency. Besides its apoptotic and anti-proliferative activity, Tenalisib modulates the tumor microenvironment resulting in reprogramming of tumor associated-macrophages (TAMs) from a protumor M2 phenotype to an antitumor M1 phenotype and a marked reduction of angiogenesis in pre-clinical models. Tenalisib has demonstrated activity in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies (Carmelo, ASH 2016 and Oki, ASCO 2018). Since there are concerns over long-term safety of PI3K δ or PI3K dual δ/g inhibitors with respect to immune-mediated toxicities (e.g. transaminitis, colitis and pneumonitis), cytopenias, and infections, a pooled safety analysis across two Phase I studies in patients treated with Tenalisib was performed. Methods Safety data was pooled from two Phase I Tenalisib monotherapy trials (NCT02017613 and NCT02567656) with similar key eligibility criteria. Patients had R/R lymphoid malignancies with ≥1 prior therapy. Responses were evaluated in lymphoid malignancies using IWG criteria (Cheson et al., 2007) and in CTCL using the modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT). Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results A total of 93 patients were included in the analysis. Among these patients, 34% were PTCL, 32% CTCL, 16% HL, 6% DLBCL and 12% were other lymphomas. Patients received a median of 5 prior therapies. 53 % of patients received Tenalisib for ≤ 3 months, 21% for 3-6 months and 26% for 〉 6 months. The overall incidence of related AEs and ≥G3 AEs were 58% and 29% respectively (Table 1). Very few AEs were seen with exposures 〉6 months and mainly included single cases of diarrhea, anemia, edema, and abdominal pain. There were no incidences of late onset toxicities such as colitis and pneumonitis and most of the AEs happened during the initial three months of therapy. No treatment discontinuations due to AE's were seen in patients exposed to 〉 6 months of treatment. Efficacy response assessments of the 66 evaluable patients demonstrated an ORR of 45% in TCL (44% in PTCL (8/18, 3 CR, 4 PR) & 45% in CTCL (9/20, 9 PR)), 29% (4/14; 1CR; 3PR) in HL, and 13% (1/6; 1CR) in DLBCL. Conclusion In this pooled safety analysis with long term follow-up, Tenalisib exhibited an improved safety profile when compared to other investigational/marketed PI3K inhibitors. The incidence of transaminitis was low and occurred within the first two to three cycles of therapy. In particular, there were no occurrences of pneumonitis or colitis in patients that had been on treatment for 〉 3 months and beyond. Incidence of neutropenia/thrombocytopenia and infections was limited. Tenalisib can therefore be safely combined with a diverse array of other agents active in lymphoid malignancies. Tenalisib is currently being studied in combination with Pembrolizumab and Romidepsin and as a monotherapy in a Phase II trial in indolent NHL. Disclosures Haverkos: Viracta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ramchandren:Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Devata:Affimed: Research Funding. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment. Carlo-Stella:Boehringher Ingelheim Italia: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; MSD Italia: Speakers Bureau; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Genenta Science: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau.

Description: Background: GMI-1271 is a potent, specific E-selectin antagonist which targets interactions between cancer cells and the bone marrow niche thereby increasing tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy; avoids HSC mobilization; and inhibits thrombosis without increasing bleeding risk. Delayed inflammatory cell recruitment into the vein wall post thrombus induction indicates a possible decrease in leukocyte activation, which may be crucial in treating both acute and cancer associated thrombosis. Here we report first-in-human evaluation of GMI-1271 for safety (including bleeding), PK, and biomarker data for effects on adhesion and mobilization. Methods: Two Phase I single dose escalation DBRCT in healthy subjects evaluated 2, 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg IV doses of GMI-1271. Study 1 is complete and unblinded (GMI-1271 vs placebo). Study 2 is ongoing, remains blinded (GMI-1271 vs placebo) with open-label positive control (Lovenox), and is reported in aggregate. In both studies, assessments included safety (adverse events [AEs], clinical labs, bleeding time, PT/PTT, vitals, and exam); PK (drug levels in plasma and urine); and biomarkers (plasma soluble E-selectin [sEsel], sPsel, sICAM-1 levels; and blood CD34+ counts). Only sEsel and CD34+ are reported for Study 1; sEsel, sPsel, sICAM-1 for Study 2. Comparisons to baseline were made by ANOVA and paired t-test models; PK analyses were for total clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vz), elimination half-life (t½), fraction excreted (Fe), and renal clearance (CLr). Results: Forty-six subjects enrolled; 30 received GMI-1271 (10 each at 2 and 5 mg/kg; 6 at 10 mg/kg; and 4 at 20 mg/kg) and 16 received control (13 placebo, 3 Lovenox). Safety: All subjects completed the studies; labs, vitals, and exam were unremarkable. Bleeding times and PT/PTT were unaffected by E-selectin inhibition. No serious AEs were seen. For Study 1, AEs were seen in 12/18 (66.7%) of those on GMI-1271 and 5/10 (50%) on placebo. AEs were mostly mild events at the infusion site (i.e. tenderness or erythema), and occurred in both groups. One moderate AE occurred (vasovagal reaction) in the 2 mg/kg GMI-1271 cohort. Three AEs were possibly related to drug: 2 in the 2 mg/kg cohort (infusion site bruise, lightheaded), and 1 in the 5 mg/kg cohort (metallic taste). For Study 2, AEs were seen in 12/15 (80%) of those on GMI-1271/placebo and 3/3 (100%) on Lovenox. All AEs were mild. In GMI-1271/placebo group, all AEs were considered unrelated to study drug; 3 were infusion site bruise (1 per dose level). In the Lovenox group, AEs were bruise at injection site (related) and blood in urine (possibly related). PK: Plasma levels, Cmax, and AUC increased in a consistent dose-related manner in both studies (figure). CL, Vz, and t½ were not dose dependent; the latter averaged ~2.3 hours. ~66% of the dose was excreted unchanged in the urine independent of dose level, and CLr averaged 86 mL/min, less than estimated CrCl, suggesting tubular reabsorption is one component of CLr. Biomarkers: In Study 1, the absolute CD34+ and %CD34+ cell counts were normal across all cohorts. There was no dose-response for changes in peripheral CD34+ counts after administration of GMI-1271 (doses 2-10 mg/kg). Plasma concentrations of sEsel were relatively constant in the placebo and GMI-1271 2 mg/kg cohorts, with significant reduction (vs baseline, p=0.012) at 48hrs post-2mg/kg dose only. In the 5 and 10 mg/kg cohorts sEsel decreased significantly post-dose (p

Description: Background: Diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma (DLCBL) is a heterogeneous disease. Current prognostic models have limitations, but emerging research utilizing the cell of origin and host immune factors, such as the absolute monocyte count (AMC) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), may improve risk stratification in these patients. In the rituximab era, the majority of relapses are observed within the first 24 months following treatment. Therefore, event free survival at 24 months (EFS24) is a reliable surrogate for overall survival in DLBCL [Maurer et. al., J Clin Oncol, 2014 Apr 1; 32(10): 1066-73]. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the ALC/AMC ratio predicts EFS24 in DLBCL risk-stratified by the cell of origin (COO). Methods: Patients with de novo DLBCL who were evaluated at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center between 1997 and 2011 and had archived diagnostic tissue available were eligible for participation in this retrospective study. We identified 243 eligible patients. The ALC and AMC were obtained from a complete blood count with differential at the time of diagnosis. Immunohistochemical staining for CD10, Bcl-6 and IRF4/MUM1 was performed and cases independently scored in a blinded fashion by up to three hematopathologists. A consensus opinion was obtained in order to determine the cell of origin (COO) using the Hans algorithm. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 61 years with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Among the 218 patients for whom the revised IPI could be calculated, 46% were high risk (IPI 3-5). Most patients received rituximab based chemoimmunotherapy (88%), largely R-CHOP (81%). The median ALC/AMC ratio for the entire cohort was 2 (interquartile range: 1-3). The ALC/AMC ratio was analyzed as a continuous variable on univariate analysis and was associated with inferior EFS (hazard ratio (HR) =0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.93, p=0.003). A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated utilizing EFS24 to establish the optimal cut-off point for the ALC/AMC ratio. An ALC/AMC ratio of 1.6 was best able to risk-stratify patients for EFS24. The 24-month EFS for patients with an ALC/AMC ≥1.6 was 73% and for ALC/AMC

Description: Background: All-Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA, Tretinoin, Vesinoid, Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, North Wales, PA) serves as a uniform backbone in the care and management of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). While first investigated as a salvage therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory disease, current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines call for its early use in patients suspected of having APL even prior to the genetic confirmation of the disease. Because ATRA can significantly mitigate disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), one of the early complications of APL, the NCCN and ELN guidelines support the prescription of ATRA as soon as there is a clinical suspicion of the diagnosis. As a regional referral center for the care of patients with advanced myeloid malignancies, we receive numerous requests for the transfer of care for patients suspected of having APL. Yet many of the referring centers have not instituted treatment with ATRA, typically due to a lack of access to the medication in the referring hospital’s formulary. Therefore, we conducted an exploratory analysis of the clinical availability of ATRA for patients with a suspected diagnosis of APL and also to explore the potential hurdles limiting the availability of this drug. Methods: We divided the United States into six geographical regions: Northwest, Southwest, Central, Southeast, Northeast, and the Great Lakes. A state from each of these regions was selected (Washington, Arizona, Missouri, Georgia, Massachusetts, and Michigan). To select the 120 hospitals, an online hospital directory – American Hospital Directory (ahd.com) was utilized. We went to each state’s specific hospital list page and assigned a number to all hospitals with a bed capacity of greater than 100. We then entered these numbers into a random number generator and selected the first 20 hospitals to be generated (excluding repeats). We then asked the following set of questions to the inpatient pharmacist of the hospital: 1. Does your hospital treat Acute Leukemia or do they refer to other hospitals; 2. Do you have All Trans Retinoic Acid (oral) – 10 mg tablets on the formulary or available in stock as a non-formulary request; 3. If no, why not. Results: Based upon the responses we received, ATRA was available in less than half of the hospitals queried (46%) (Table 1). There were no identifiable differences in the percentages based upon hospital size (inpatient beds) or academic versus non-academic status of the hospital. Interestingly, of the hospitals that refer to other institutions for the care of their leukemia patients, only 19% (8/43) had ATRA on their formulary or available in stock as a non-formulary request that could act as a bridge prior to the transfer. The analysis identified three common barriers to the availability of ATRA in these hospitals including: a) that it has not been recently requested by a physician and therefore was not available, b) the inpatient pharmacist had never heard of the drug, and c) that the hospital relied on associated hospitals or cancer centers to provide the drug to the patient. Table 1 Clinical Availability of All-Trans Retinoic Acid in Participating Hospitals Region State Percentage of Hospitals Possessing ATRA Northwest Washington 65% Southwest Arizona 45% Midwest Missouri 35% Great Lakes Michigan 58% Southeast Georgia 35% Northeast Massachusetts 40% Conclusion: While national guidelines support the rapid introduction of ATRA as soon as there is a morphologic consideration for APL, the majority of hospitals caring for these patients can not rapidly institute therapy due to a lack of availability of the medication. Moreover, only 19% (8/43) of hospitals that we studied that refer patients to tertiary care centers can provide ATRA as a bridge prior to their transfer. While much has been written about the early 30-day mortality seen in patients with APL, we can not specifically comment on the impact of these findings on the rates of mortality of APL patients treated in hospitals without ready access to ATRA versus those with the medication available on formulary. However, we propose that these findings should spur an investigation of this possibility together with a call by hematologists nationwide to their formulary committees to ensure that this lifesaving medication is available to patients in as timely a manner as possible. Disclosures Off Label Use: All Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) is indicated for the use in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) who are refractory to, or who have relapsed from, anthracycline chemotherapy, or for whom anthracycline based chemotherapy is contraindicated. We will be discussing the availability of ATRA for the use in patients with newly diagnosed APL..

Description: Introduction: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a devastating disorder with protean clinical manifestations caused by the overproduction of T-cell derived cytokines. Cytokine-dependent activation of the Janus family kinases (JAK) is a hallmark of the final common pathway in HLH pathogenesis. Therefore, we initiated a single center, open-label, investigator-initiated trial to assess the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in adult patients with secondary HLH. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) who fulfilled 5 of 8 diagnostic criteria were eligible. Patients with CNS involvement or an active malignancy were ineligible. Patients who had received any prior systemic therapy (excluding corticosteroids) within 7 days of treatment were ineligible. Patients with normal renal function received oral ruxolitinib 15 mg twice daily on a continuous, 28-day cycle. Dose reductions for renal insufficiency and toxicity are permitted. Treatment was continued indefinitely until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any other conditions for treatment discontinuation were met. The first patient was enrolled in February, 2016 and enrollment is ongoing. The primary endpoint is overall survival at 2 months. Secondary endpoints include the response rate, duration of response, progression-free and overall survival. Adverse events were graded and attributed in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Guidelines for the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Disease parameters evaluable for response included all quantifiable signs and laboratory abnormalities included in the diagnostic criteria for HLH. A complete response (CR) required normalization of all signs and laboratory abnormalities. At least 25% improvement in two or more signs/laboratory abnormalities was required for a partial response (PR). At least a 50% worsening in two or more signs/laboratory abnormalities was considered progressive disease (PD), while failure to fulfill any of these criteria was considered stable disease (SD). Results: A total of 4 patient have been enrolled, all of whom fulfilled at least 5 of 8 diagnostic criteria for HLH. Hemophagocytosis, a pathologic hallmark of HLH, was observed in every patient. At the time of treatment initiation, all patients were anemic [median hemoglobin 7.1 g/dL (range: 6.2-7.5 g/dL)] and thrombocytopenic [median platelet count 47 K/uL (range: 14-107 K/uL)]. Three patients were neutropenic [median ANC 0.95 K/uL (range: 0-1.9 K/uL)]. HLH was secondary to an autoimmune disorder (n=3), infection (n=1), and a homozygous mutation in the STXBP2 gene, recently identified as a causative defect in primary HLH, was observed in one patient. Cytopenias significantly improved within the first week of treatment in all patients. On day +7, the mean increase in hemoglobin was 1.88 g/dL (0.2-3 g/dL), in ANC was 1.53 K/uL (range 0.1-5.3 K/uL) and platelet count was 74 K/uL (range 17-116 K/uL). Neutropenia resolved by day +40 and thrombocytopenia resolved by day +47 in all patients. Three of four patients became transfusion independent within 2 days of treatment initiation. Three of four patients received corticosteroids prior to and after initiation of ruxolitinib. The mean corticosteroid (prednisone equivalent) dose prior to treatment initiation was 225 mg/day (range: 60-391 mg/day) and was 38 mg/day (range: 0-75 mg/day) on day +30. Within 47 days of treatment initiation, corticosteroids were discontinued in 2 patients, and were discontinued in all patients by day +54. Significant improvements in ferritin and sIL-2R were also observed with a median 92.6% decrease in ferritin by day +30 (range 86.4-92.6%) and 86% median decrease in sIL-2R by day +30 (range 66.6-92.7%). All patients achieved at least a PR, and 2 patients remain on treatment (〉2 months, 〉8 months). Two patients discontinued treatment, one for progressive disease (due to recurrent symptoms), and another for drug intolerance (neuropathic foot pain). No severe adverse events have been observed. In addition to the patients enrolled in this study, two additional patients who met eligibility criteria were similarly treated (off study) at another institution. Both of these patients achieved at least a PR and remain on treatment (〉8 months, 〉14 months). Conclusions: Ruxolitinib led to rapid and durable responses and was well tolerated in adult patients with secondary HLH. Disclosures Devata: Affimed: Research Funding. Phillips:Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Sood:Bayer: Research Funding. Wilcox:Incyte, Corp: Research Funding.

Description: Background AFM13 is a bispecific, tetravalent NK cell-engaging antibody construct binding to CD30 on CD30+ tumor cells and CD16A on NK cells. By engaging CD16A-positive NK cells, AFM13 leads to NK cell-mediated killing of CD30-positive lymphoma cells (Reusch et al., 2014) making it an attractive agent to target classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody which has shown high single-agent response rates in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory HL (RRHL; Armand et al., 2016, Chen et al., 2017). AFM13 has shown clinical activity in RRHL as a single agent in a preceding Phase 1 study (Rothe et al., 2015). Preclinical in vivo data of the combination of AFM13 with PD-1 blockade showed synergistic activity and the potential for induction of cross-talk between innate and adaptive immunity (Zhao et al., 2016). We hypothesize that the combination of the two agents could improve outcomes in pts with RRHL. Methods This Phase 1b study is evaluating the safety and tolerability of the combination of AFM13 with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) as salvage therapy after failure of standard therapies including brentuximab vedotin (BV) in HL (NCT02665650). Pts receive escalating doses of AFM13 in combination with pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg flat administered every 3 weeks following a classical 3+3 design, followed by enrollment into an extension cohort at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum administered dose (MAD). Response assessment is performed every 12 weeks by PET/CT according to the Lugano Classification (Cheson et al., 2014). The main objectives of the study is to ascertain the MTD/MAD along with the preliminary efficacy of the combination. Results As of June 29, 2018, 30 pts have been enrolled into the study. The median age is 34 years (range, 18-73), with a median of 4 (range 3-7) prior lines of therapy. All pts had relapsed or refractory disease (43% relapsed, 57% refractory) and had failed standard treatments including BV and 43% of pts (13/30) had BV as their latest therapy. Thirty seven percent (11/30) had undergone prior autologous stem cell transplantation. All 30 pts have completed the 6-week dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation period. Twelve pts were enrolled into the dose escalation cohorts (Cohorts 1 (n=3), 2 (n=3), and 3 (n=6)) and 18 into the Extension Cohort, with a total of 24 patients treated at the MAD (dose level 3). One DLT was observed in Cohort 3 (missing ≥25% of AFM13 during the DLT period) and another observed in the Extension Cohort (G4 infusion-related reaction; IRR). The most common related adverse events (AEs) were IRRs (80%), rash (30%), pyrexia (23%), nausea (23%), diarrhea (20%), fatigue (17%), headache (17%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (13%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (10%). Treatment related G3/4 AEs included IRRs (13%), elevated AST (3%), gastritis (3%), hypotension (3%), nausea (3%), neutropenia (3%), and vomiting (3%). The majority of IRRs were manageable with standard of care measures and did not lead to treatment discontinuations. Included in the efficacy analysis were the best response from 29 evaluable pts who had at least one post-baseline disease assessment as of the data cutoff on June 29, 2018. The overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate for evaluable pts treated at the dose and schedule chosen for expansion (n=23; Cohort 3 and Extension Cohort) were 87% and 35% by the investigator-confirmed assessment, respectively. Independent assessment resulted in an ORR of 87% and CR rate of 39% for these pts. Updated data for all 30 patients will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions The combination of AFM13 and pembrolizumab is a well-tolerated salvage therapy in pts with RRHL. IRRs were the most frequently observed adverse events; however, most of these events were of mild or moderate severity and manageable. Both the ORR and CR rate compare favorably to monotherapy pembrolizumab in a similar RRHL population (Chen et al., 2017). The combination of AFM13 and pembrolizumab could be a potential new therapeutic option for HL patients. Disclosures Bartlett: Immune Design: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; ImaginAB: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chen:Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech Inc.: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck & Co., Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Domingo-Domenech:Affimed: Research Funding. Forero-Torres:Affimed: Research Funding. Garcia-Sanz:Affimed: Research Funding. Devata:Affimed: Research Funding. Rodriguez Izquierdo:Affimed: Research Funding. Lossos:Affimed: Research Funding. Reeder:Affimed: Research Funding. Sher:Affimed: Research Funding. Choe-Juliak:Affimed: Employment. Prier:Affimed: Research Funding. Schwarz:Affimed: Employment. Strassz:Affimed: Employment. Alland:Affimed: Employment. Ansell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Description: Background : Selectins, among other adhesion-mediated functions, facilitate and augment thrombosis; standard anticoagulants address thrombosis but also increase bleeding risk. Previous work in animal models showed inhibiting E-selectin decreases venous thrombosis (VTE) and vein wall inflammation without adverse bleeding events, making E-selectin inhibition a favorable therapeutic candidate for VTE. GMI-1271 is a potent, specific E-selectin antagonist. Here we report final analysis of safety, PK, biomarker and bleeding risk profile for GMI-1271 in 2 phase 1 studies of healthy subjects. Methods: The first study was a blinded single ascending dose (SAD) evaluation of 2, 5, 20, or 40mg/kg of GMI-1271 (n=4/cohort), vs placebo control saline (n=4) or active control Lovenox 1mg/kg (n=4). The second was an open-label multiple ascending dose (MAD) study of 10 (n=3) or 20mg/kg (n=3) of GMI-1271 QD d 1-5 vs Lovenox 1mg/kg (n=2) d 1-5. Assessments included safety (adverse events [AEs], clinical labs, bleeding time, PT/PTT, vitals, exam); PK (plasma and urine); and biomarkers. Biomarkers included ELISAs (CRP, D-dimer, IL-10, MPO, Prothrombin fragment 1.2, soluble E-selectin (sEsel), soluble P-selectin (sPsel), sICAM, Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), Tissue Factor (TF), TNFα, VWF activity, and sCD40L); PicoGreen Assay for circulating DNA; flow cytometry (Platelet Monocyte Aggregates (PMA), Mac-1, LFA-1, and CD44) and Thromboelastography (TEG). See Table 1 for functional description. SAD remains blinded to GMI-1271 or placebo (GMI-1271/p). In SAD, we measured biomarker values at baseline, 8 and 24 h after dosing. Analysis was performed of biomarkers at each dose level and then pooled by GMI-1271/p vs Lovenox. In MAD, we measured biomarker values at baseline and day 4. Comparisons were made using unpaired t-test. Results: In total, 32 subjects enrolled and received GMI-1271/placebo (GMI-1271/p; 20), GMI-1271 (6) or Lovenox (L; 6). Safety: All subjects completed dosing uneventfully. Safety findings for GMI-1271/p were unremarkable. No moderate or serious AE were seen. AE overall were as expected in healthy volunteers. In SAD, only 1/20 GMI-1271/p subjects experienced an AE possibly related to study drug (mild transient headache); 0/6 in MAD. In the L group we saw expected mild transaminitis and injection site bruising. In all studies, GMI-1271 had no effect on bleeding time, PT, or PTT. PK: Plasma levels, Cmax, and AUC increased in a linear manner. Cl, Vz, and t ½ were not dose dependent; no accumulation was seen with multiple dosing (Fig 1 and 2). TEG: In SAD, there was a tendency to increase R, K, and decrease A and MA with no change in % lysis in L vs GMI-1271/p. In MAD, we saw a similar trend as SAD except for an increase in % lysis in L. In the pooled SAD analysis, there was a statistically significant difference between GMI-1271/p and L (higher values) for R (p

Description: In relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL), immunotherapies such as the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab have demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and are playing an increasingly prominent role in treatment. The CD30/CD16A bispecific antibody AFM13 is an innate immune cell engager, a first-in-class, tetravalent antibody, designed to create a bridge between CD30 on HL cells and the CD16A receptor on NK cells and macrophages, to induce tumor cell killing. Early studies of AFM13 have demonstrated signs of efficacy as monotherapy for patients with R/R HL and the combination of AFM13 with pembrolizumab represents a rational new treatment modality. Here, we describe a Phase 1b, dose-escalation study to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of AFM13 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with R/R HL. The primary objective was estimating the MTD; the secondary objectives were to assess safety, tolerability, anti-tumor efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. In this heavily pre-treated patient population, the combination of AFM13 and pembrolizumab was generally well tolerated, with similar safety profiles compared to the known profiles of each agent alone. AFM13 plus pembrolizumab demonstrated objective response rates of 88% at the highest treatment dose, with an 83% ORR for the overall population. Pharmacokinetic assessment of AFM13 in the combination treatment revealed a half-life of up to 20.6 hours. This proof-of-concept study holds promise as a novel immunotherapy combination worthy of further investigation. This Phase 1b study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02665650.

Description: Background: Resistance to conventional anthracycline-based regimens (CHOP/CHOEP) and the emergence of primary refractory disease remains a clinical challenge in PTCL, and is observed in ≈25% of patients. Outcomes in the setting of primary refractory disease, particularly for those patients who fail to achieve a remission with second-line chemotherapy, are poorly described and the optimal therapeutic strategy for these patients remains uncertain. Patients and Methods: We identified 159 patients with PTCL who received multi-agent, anthracycline-based treatment from 1988 to 2011 in the PTCL database at our institution. Primary refractory disease, defined as disease progression during initial therapy or relapse within 6 months of its completion, was observed in 58 (36%) of patients. Results: The median age at diagnosis with primary refractory PTCL was 49 years (range, 18.8-77.1). Median follow up was 2.7 years among surviving patients (95% CI, 1.2-6.3). Median overall survival (OS) was 1.1 years (95% CI, 0.7-1.9). The median number of lines of therapy underwent by patients was 3 (range, 1-9). PTCL, NOS (n=24), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=6), and ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n=7) accounted for the majority (63.8%) of these patients. No difference in OS was observed between patients who failed to respond to initial therapy and those who relapsed within 6 months after a first remission (median OS 0.9 [95% CI, 0.6-1.9] vs. 1.3 [95% CI, 0.5-6.3], p=0.6). After developing primary refractory disease, 48.3% of patients received aggressive, multi-agent salvage regimens (ICE, n=16; DHAP, n=3; ESHAP, n=6; other, n=3), 29.3% of patients received other systemic therapies (HDAC inhibitor, n=1; gemcitabine-based therapies, n=5; pralatrexate, n=3; other, n=8), and 22.4% of patients received no systemic therapies. Patients who received no systemic salvage therapy had reduced OS compared to both patients who received aggressive regimens and patients who received other types of systemic therapies (median OS 0.3 [95% CI, 0.2-1.1] vs. 1.7 [95% CI, 0.8-11.7] vs. 1.3 [95% CI, 0.4-8.6], respectively, p