ALBERT

Description: The phase 3 trial HOVON-50 was designed to evaluate the effect of thalidomide during induction treatment and as maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma who were transplant candidates. A total of 556 patients was randomly assigned to arm A: 3 cycles of vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone, or to arm B: thalidomide 200 mg orally, days 1 to 28 plus adriamycin and dexamethasone. After induction therapy and stem cell mobilization, patients were to receive high-dose melphalan, 200 mg/m2, followed by maintenance with α-interferon (arm A) or thalidomide 50 mg daily (arm B). Thalidomide significantly improved overall response rate as well as quality of the response before and after high dose melphalan. Best overall response rate on protocol was 88% and 79% (P = .005), at least very good partial remission 66% and 54% (P = .005), and complete remission 31% and 23% (P = .04), respectively, in favor of the thalidomide arm. Thalidomide also significantly improved event-free survival from median 22 months to 34 months (P 〈 .001), and prolonged progression free from median 25 months to 34 months (P 〈 .001). Median survival was longer in the thalidomide arm, 73 versus 60 months; however, this difference was not significant (P = .77). Patients randomized to thalidomide had strongly reduced survival after relapse. This trial was registered on www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN06413384.

Description: The randomised, open-label, phase III trial HOVON-50 was designed to evaluate whether the addition of Thalidomide to AD and HDM would prolong event-free survival (EFS) in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Patients with Salmon & Durie stage II or III, age 18–65 years inclusive were randomly assigned to arm A: 3 cycles of VAD or to arm B, the same regimen but with Thalidomide 200 orally, days 1–28 instead of Vincristine (TAD). Thalidomide was started at day 1 of the first TAD cycle and was stopped 2 weeks before stem cell mobilization was started. Patients in arm B received thrombosis prophylaxis consisting of subcutaneously Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH). Stem cells were mobilized using the CAD regimen, including cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2 iv day 1, and G-CSF. After induction therapy all patients were to receive 1 or 2 courses of high dose Melphalan (HDM) 200 mg/m2 with autologous stem cell rescue followed by maintenance therapy with ƒÑ-Interferon (3 „e 106 IU, thrice weekly, arm A) or Thalidomide 50 mg daily (arm B). Between November 27, 2001 and May 31, 2005, 556 patients were randomised of which 18 patients were not eligible, while from 2 patients data were incomplete. EFS was defined as time from randomisation to induction failure, progression, or death from any cause. Patients (n=109) who received a non-myeloablative allogeneic transplant after HDM 1 before progression, were censored at the date of allo-SCT; those patients were usually entered into the HOVON-54 trial. Both arms were comparable with regard to age, myeloma stage and prognostic factors. Best responses achieved on protocol were significantly higher in the patients randomized to thalidomide: Minimal PR rates were 87% and 79 % (p

Description: Abstract 3125 The median progression free survival (PFS) for younger, fitter patients with multiple myeloma is between 3 and 4 years, however some patients respond very poorly and relapse within a year of autologous transplantation. These patients then go on to receive relapse chemotherapy often with novel agents and, surprisingly, some have a longer remission with second line therapy. The prognostic factors which describe such patients are not well understood, and identifying and treating these patients remains a challenge. To characterise these patients further and describe prognostic markers, we have utilised 2 datasets (1081 patients) comprising 619 patients from the Myeloma IX trial and 462 patients from the Royal Marsden database (RMH). All patients were initially treated with high dose melphalan and peripheral blood stem cell support. Patients were then divided into two groups: early relapse (12 months after transplant or disease free at last follow up). The Myeloma IX trial consisted of 147 patients (23.7%) in the early relapse group compared to 472 patients (76.3%) in the late relapse group, with a median PFS1 of 7.6 vs. 27.8 months (P

Description: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplasm that exhibits a broad heterogeneity in both biological behavior and clinical presentation. Specific copy number abnormalities (CNAs) such as hyperdiploidy, 1p loss, 1q gain, 13q loss and 17p loss (including the TP53 gene), and IGH translocations, such as t(4;14)(p16;q32) and t(14;16)(q32;q23), provide important information regarding prognosis and treatment response. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on enriched plasma cells, currently used in clinical diagnostics of MM, is a targeted test aimed at specific genomic loci. However, it is laborious and provides only genetic information of the probe targets. Microarray-based genomic profiling is a high-resolution tool that enables genome-wide analyses for copy number alterations (CNA), including focal CNA (

Description: Background: Novel agents such as IMIDs and proteasome inhibitors have substantially changed the therapeutic landscape in the first line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Better response rates and prolonged progression-free survival have lead to an improvement in overall survival (OS) with median values well beyond 5 years. Therefore to assess whether first line therapy strategies have an impact on the prognosis for patients with MM, long-term results of clinical trials with follow up covering 〉10 years are necessary. Methods: The HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 study is a prospective randomized trial testing bortezomib+adriamycin+dexamethasone (PAD) for 3 cycles as induction prior to high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation compared to vincristine+adriamycin+dexamethasone (VAD) in the control arm. After one (HOVON) or two (GMMG) HDT maintenance was given for 2 years consisting of bortezomib every 2 weeks in the PAD arm and thalidomide 50 mg daily in the VAD arm. The study results were initially reported in 2012 (1) and with a median follow up of 91 months in 2018 (2). In this analysis we present OS results after a median follow up of 137 months. All hazard ratios (HR) are given with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Overall survival at 12 years was 32% (CI 27-37%) in the VAD arm versus 36% (CI 31-41%) in the PAD arm without significant difference in the univariate Cox model (HR 0.87, CI 0.73 - 1.03, p=0. 11 or in multivariate Cox model including ISS stage and treatment arm (HR 0.87, CI 0.73 - 1.04, p=0.12; the primary analysis) as specified in the study protocol. When other factors including age, sex, ISS stage, WHO performance status, Immunoglobulin-type, Durie and Salmon-stage, LDH, del 13q, study group and renal impairment (RI, defined as serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dl) were added to the Cox model, treatment in the PAD arm was a significant factor for improved OS (HR 0.84, CI 0.7 - 1.0, p=0.048). Of the remaining factors age (HR 1.02, CI 1.01 - 1.03, p=0.002), female sex (HR 0.83, CI 0.69 - 0.99, p=0.044), ISS stage (HR 1.19, CI 1.04 - 1.35, p=0.01), WHO performance status (HR 1.32, CI 1.17 - 1.48, pULN (HR 1.44, CI 1.14 - 1.82, p=0.002), del 13q (HR 1.42, CI 1.17 - 1.73, p

Description: The benefit of high-dose therapy for multiple myeloma has been demonstrated in phase lI/lII studies. HOVON started a randomized multicenter trial to compare the efficacy of intensified treatment followed by myelo-ablative therapy with intensified treatment alone in newly diagnosed patients. We now report the results of the final analysis in 441 eligible patients with stage II (22%) and stage III (78%) disease. The median age was 55 years (range 31–65 ). Remission induction consisted of 3–4 cycles of VAD. 63 patients who had an HLA identical sibling were candidates for an allogeneic transplantation. After VAD, patients were randomized to receive melphalan 140 mg/m2 divided in 2 doses of 70 mg/m2 (IDM) without stem cell rescue (arm A) or the same regimen followed by myelo-ablative treatment with cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) and TBI with stem cell transplantation (ASCT, arm B). Peripheral stem cells were mobilized by cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and G-CSF after VAD. Interferon-a -2a was given as maintenance therapy in both arms. Of 441 registered patients, 303 were eligible for randomization. Patient characteristics with regard to sex, age, stage of disease, Ig isotype, and b2-M were not different between the two arms. The median follow-up from randomization was 56 months. 81% of patients received both cycles of IDM (79% in arm A and 83% in arm B) and 79% of patients actually received myeloablative therapy followed by ASCT in arm B. Median duration of Interferon-a-2a maintenance treatment was 12 months (arm A) vs 7 months (arm B). CR rate was significantly better in Arm B (28% vs 13%, p=0.002), while the overall response rate (PR + CR) was not different (90% vs 86%, p=0.23). Median event-free survival (EFS) from randomization was 22 months (arm B) vs 20 months (arm A) (logrank p=0.014). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in patients treated with double intensification (24 vs 23 months, logrank p=0.032). Time to Progression (TTP) was significantly worse in arm A (median 25 vs 33 months, logrank p=0.001). The difference for EFS, PFS and TTP between the 2 treatment arms became only evident after 4 years of follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was not different between both treatments (median 55 months vs 50 months, logrank p=0.39). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment arm A, higher age, hemoglobin 〉 6.21 mmol/l, stage 3 and high serum LDH were significant adverse prognostic factors for EFS. Cytogenetic analysis in 151 patients was abnormal in 37% (45% del 13/13q-, 51% abnormal 1p/q, 33% del 6q, 89% complex abnormalities). Cox regression analysis showed that 1p/q was an independent unfavourable prognostic factor for OS, EFS, PFS and TTP (p 3 mg/L with del13/13q- and 1p/q, prognostic groups were defined with a significant impact on OS (p

Description: Background: AL amyloidosis is generally caused by a kappa or lambda light-chain producing plasma cell clone in the bone marrow. High-dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is effective in AL amyloidosis. Pretreatment of these patients with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) may have a rapid and additive effect on the underlying plasma cell clone. Objective: To study the feasibility and efficacy of VAD followed by HDM and ASCT in AL amyloidosis. Patients and Methods: In a prospective multicenter phase II study, the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) studied the effect of three courses of VAD followed by HDM with ASCT on hematological and clinical response rates and overall survival in AL amyloidosis. Untreated patients aged ≤ 65 years with proven AL amyloidosis and monoclonal gammopathy or multiple myeloma stage I were included. Patients with recent prior malignancy, other types of amyloidosis, and severe other diseases not related to AL amyloidosis were excluded. High risk was defined as cardiac septum ≥ 15 mm, cardiac ejection fraction ≤ 55%, creatinine 〉 177 μmol/L, or bilirubin 〉 34 μmol/L (Dispenzieri et al, J Clin Oncol2001; 19:3350–6). All patients were treated with VAD or dose-modified VAD and after the third course re-evaluated. Patients were judged eligible for stem cell collection and ASCT if WHO performance status 0–2, NYHA class 1–3, cardiac ejection fraction 〉45%, and no severe other disease. Hematological response was defined as complete response (disappearance of monoclonal protein in blood and urine, and no clonal excess of plasma cells in bone marrow), partial response (greater than 50% reduction in serum and urine monoclonal proteins), persistence, and progression (doubling of monoclonal protein in serum or urine). Clinical response was defined as organ response, stabilization, or progression (Gertz et al, Am J Hematol2005; 79:319–28). Results: Sixty-nine newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis were included between September 2000 and January 2006: 37 men and 32 women with a median age of 55 years and WHO performance status 0–2. Organ involvement was renal in 58 (84%), cardiac in 32 (46%), hepatic in 12 (17%), and neuropathic in 18 (26%); 15 patients (22%) had involvement of 3 or 4 organs. Thirty-seven (54%) could be classified as high-risk patients. Forty-six patients (67%) could proceed to HDM (140–200 mg/m2) after VAD induction. The transplants were performed in tertiary referral centres. Median haematological recovery time of ANC 〉 1.0 × 109/L and platelets 〉 50 × 109/L was 17 and 21 days, respectively. End of survey was November 2007. Overall hematological response was 39% including 16% with a complete response. Overall clinical response was 26% and stabilization in 35%. In 43% of patients only the clinical response could be assessed. Overall survival of all patients was median 60 months and had not been reached for the transplanted patients (Figure). Nine patients died from TRM (11%), 7 during VAD and 2 following HDM. Side effects CTC grade ≥ 2 were recorded in 46% of patients during VAD induction and in 87% of patients after HDM; infections CTC grade ≥ 2 were recorded in 13% and 65%, respectively. Conclusions: VAD induction followed by HDM and ASCT for AL amyloidosis is feasible, has acceptable TRM, and results in a remarkable prolonged survival. This two-step approach of induction with non-intensive chemotherapy in all patients followed by HDM with ASCT in eligible patients is now recommended as standard treatment by HOVON for newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis who are eligible for high-dose therapy. Figure Figure

Description: Background The role of up-front consolidation for newly diagnosed, transplant eligible MM (NDMM) patients (pts) has not yet been prospectively addressed in the novel agents era. Methods The EMN02/HO95 trial was designed to randomly (R) compare (R1) 4 cycles of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) vs high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), either single or double, as intensification therapy after induction with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) (M Cavo et al, ASCO 2016, abstract #8000). A second randomization to consolidation therapy with 2 cycles of VRD vs no consolidation (R2) was performed after intensification, to be followed by lenalidomide maintenance (lenalidomide 10 mg continuously) until progression or toxicity in both arms. (VRD: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously days 1, 4, 8, 11; lenalidomide 25 mg orally days 1 - 21; dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 of a 28 days cycle). Primary study end points were progression-free survival (PFS) from R1 and PFS from R2. A first planned interim analysis for R2 was performed in July 2016 when at least 33% (= 172) of the required events for PFS had been observed. Results From February 2011 to April 2014, 1510 pts aged ≤ 65 years with symptomatic MM were enrolled, of whom 1499 were eligible. Of these, 1211 were randomized (stratification by ISS stage) to VMP (505 pts) or HDM (1 or 2 ASCT) (706 pts). For R2 903 eligible patients were randomized to consolidation (459 pts) or no consolidation (444 pts). Median follow up from R2 was 25 months (maximum 53). Response status at time of R2 was ≥ CR (23%), ≥ VGPR (67%), ≥ PR (93%), and will be updated for status at start of maintenance. At the time of analysis, 258 events for PFS after R2 had been reported. 3-year. PFS from R2 was 62% in all patients, i.e., 60% without consolidation and 65% in patients with consolidation, and median PFS had not yet been reached. PFS from R2 with adjustment for R1 was prolonged in pts randomized to VRD (HR=0.78; 95% CI=0.61-1.00; P=0.045), a benefit retained across predefined subgroups with revised ISS stage III (HR=0.67; P=0.26) and in patients randomized in R1 to VMP (HR=0.76; P=0.19) and to HDM (HR=0.79; P=0.13). The benefit of consolidation was observed in patients with low-risk cytogenetics (HR=0.68; P=0.03), but not in patients with high-risk cytogenetics (del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16); HR=1.03; P=0.91). At 3 years OS from R2 was 86% and 87%, respectively. Toxicity from VRD was limited with 5% CTCAE grade 4, mainly hematological. Conclusions Consolidation treatment with VRD followed by Lenalidomide maintenance until progression or toxicity shows promising results as compared to maintenance alone for younger NDMM pts, but further study follow-up is needed. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR 2528, EudraCT 2009-017903-28 This trial was supported by unrestricted grants from Celgene and Janssen. Disclosures Sonneveld: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Carella:Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Ludwig:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Driessen:janssen: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Mundipharma-EDO: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gay:Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. Mellqvist:Mundipharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zweegman:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schjesvold:Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Takeda: Employment, Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.

Description: Abstract 40 Introduction: This independent trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of bortezomib (B) during induction and maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM, who were candidates for high-dose therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 cycles of standard VAD (arm A) or PAD (Arm B); PAD was dosed as B 1.3 mg/m2, days 1,4,8,11, doxorubicin 9 mg/m2, days 1–4, dexamethasone 40 mg, days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20). Patients received one (HOVON) or two (GMMG) high-dose melphalan (HDM) 200 mg/m2 with ASCT. Maintenance consisted of thalidomide (T) 50 mg daily (arm A) or B 1.3 mg/m2, 2-weekly (arm B) for 2 years. Primary endpoint was PFS, other endpoints were complete response (CR) (EBMT), immunofixation positive CR (nCR), VGPR pre-and post HDM and survival (OS). The protocol specified analysis was intention-to-treat and censored for patients who received allo-SCT after HDM1 (n=46). We report the analysis of the first 626 randomized patients. The final analysis of all patients will be presented at the meeting. Results: 13 patients were excluded (7 not eligible, 6 not evaluable). The two arms (A:n=305;B:n=308) were well balanced for age, Salmon/Durie stage II/III, renal failure (11%), and serum B2M. Medium follow-up is 40 months. 89% of patients completed induction and HDM1. In GMMG after HDM1 80% of patients received 2nd HDM. Full dose B could be administered in 82% of patients. Polyneuropathy (PNP) WHO gr 3+4 occurred in 7% (arm A) and 16% (arm B). 204 (67%, arm A) and 174 (57%, arm B) patients started maintenance. 64% of patients tolerated full dose B and 27% reduced dose. 47% of patients on B maintenance went off protocol because of toxicity (9%), progression (29%) or other (9%). In contrast 64 % on T maintenance went off protocol because of toxicity (31%), progression (31%) or other (2%). nCR/CR rates were 7/9% (arm A) vs 9/21% (arm B) at 3 months after HDM-1 and 12/26% (arm A) vs 12/38% (arm B) on protocol. ≥VGPR in arm-A vs arm-B were 40% vs 60% after HDM-1 and 61% vs 75% on protocol. PFS was superior in arm B (HR 0.81, p=0.047; adjusted for ISS: HR 0.81, p=0.056). PFS at 36 months was 42% (arm A) vs 46% (arm B). Multivariate Cox regression showed treatment arm (p=0.037), IgA (p=0.007), ISS stage (p=0.007), WHO Performance Status (p

Description: Introduction and background The treatment of patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) with relapse or progressive disease after bortezomib, lenalidomide and high-dose therapy represents an important challenge. In the EMN02 collaborative trial newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM were randomized to receive VCD induction followed by HDM/ASCT or VMP, followed by a second randomization for VRD consolidation or no consolidation, followed by lenalidomide maintenance until progression (Cavo et al, ASH2017, abstract #397; Sonneveld et al, EHA2018, abstract #108). The present Phase 2 trial was designed for patients with refractory disease or first progression after inclusion in EMN02 in order to evaluate a salvage treatment with next generation proteasome inhibition and IMId, i.e., Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone. The primary endpoints were response and progression-free survival (PFS). This trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR5349 and EudraCT 2013-003265-34. Methods Patients who were included received four 28-days re-induction cycles of KPd, i.e. Carfilzomib (20/36mg/m2, days 1,2,8,9,15,16) with Pomalidomide (4 mg days 1-21) and Dexamethasone (20mg days 1,2,8,9,15,16). In patients who had not previously received HDM/ASCT, HDM(200 mg/m2) was administered followed by autologous stem cell transplantation with stem cells harvested during after induction therapy in the EMN02 trial. Consolidation consisted of 4 additional cycles of KPd, identical to the induction cycles. Patients with stable disease or better received Pomalidomide 4mg w/o Dexamethasone in 28 days cycles until progression. Results At the time of this first planned interim analysis 82 patients were registered and this analysis was performed in the first 60 patients. 48% were randomized prior HDM/ASCT and 42% VMP, and 10% were not randomized. Prior best responses in the EMN02 trial were 35% CR/sCR , 75% ≥VGPR, 97% ≥PR. The median follow-up from inclusion in EMN02 was 43 months (range 21 - 62 months). In 44 patients cytogenetic risk were known, 15 (34%) of them had high-risk FISH (del17p, t(14;16) or t(4;14)). 57 fifty-seven (95%) of patients had progressed during lenalidomide maintenance, 3 patient's data are not yet available. In the present trial 38 (63%) of patients achieved normal completion of treatment according to of the protocol. Twenty patients received their first HDM plus ASCT. Median time on therapy was 14 months. Full dose re-induction treatment according to protocol could be administered in 68% (for Carfilzomib) and 64% (for Pomalidomide) of patients respectively, while for consolidation this was 62% for both Carfilzomib and Best response on protocol was 31% CR/sCR, 65% ≥VGPR, 87% ≥PR, respectively, with no difference according to response on initial treatments. Median time to response (≥PR) was 2 months. At a median follow-up of 16.3 months (range 3 - 32 months) median PFS was 18 months with better outcome in standard risk cytogenetics (HR=0.27 (0.09, 0.83) 95% CIs vs NR) and in patients with prior VMP treatment (HR=0.49 (0.21, 1.16) 95% CIs vs NR). 48 (80%) of patients are alive and in follow-up. KPd-emerging non-hematologic grade 3 and 4 adverse events included cardiovascular (5%), respiratory (5%), infections (20%) and neuropathy (3%). There were 3 fatal SAEs not related to progression (1 patient cardiac failure, 2 patients pneumonia). KPd-emerging hematological toxicity grade 3 and 4 occurred in 30% of patients. Discussion This Phase 2 clinical trial demonstrates that KPd is a feasible, effective and safe triple drug regimen in RRMM patients who have been previously treated and/or are refractory to bortezomib and refractory to lenalidomide. A 87% overall response rate including 31% CR/sCR is clinically relevant in this population. Since median OS has not been reached, longer follow-up is needed. Acknowledgments This trial was conducted as an investigator sponsored trial in EMN and supported by independent grants and drug supply from Amgen and Celgene. Disclosures Sonneveld: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zweegman:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cavo:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Corradini:Roche: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Sandoz: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Lecturer; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer. Patriarca:Janssen: Other: Advisory role; Celgene: Other: Advisory Role; Travel, accommodations, expenses; Jazz: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; MSD Italy: Other: Advisory Role; Medac: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses. Minnema:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy. Costa:celgene: Employment. Iskander:amgen: Employment. Boccadoro:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.