ALBERT

Description: The Arctic Ocean region plays, and has played in the geological past, a key role for Earth’s climate and oceanic circulation and their evolution. Studying the Lomonosov Ridge, a narrow submarine continental ridge in the central Arctic Ocean, is essential to answer fundamental questions related to the complex tectonic evolution of the Arctic basins, the glacial history, and the details of known paleoceanographic changes in the Cenozoic. In this study, we present a new seismic dataset that provides insights into the sedimentary structures along the ridge, their possible origin, age and formation. We compare the structure and stratigraphy of the deeper parts of the ridge between 83°N and 84°30′N to its conjugate, the Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago at the Eurasia margin. We propose that some sediment sequences directly underlying the prominent HARS (High Amplitude Reflector Sequence) formed well before the ridge separated from the Barents and Kara shelves and represent a prolongation of the North Kara Terrane, most likely part of the Neoproterozoic Timanide orogen. Towards Siberia along the Lomonosov Ridge, we interpret the HARS to be underlain by Upper Proterozoic-Lower Paleozoic metasedimentary material that is correlated to metamorphic complexes exposed on Bol’shevik Island. Northward, this unit descends and gives way to a foreland sedimentary basin complex of presumed Ordovician/ Devonian age, which underwent strong deformation during the Triassic/Jurassic Novaya Zemlya orogeny. The transition zone between these units might mark a conjugate continuation of the Eurasian margin’s Bol’shevik- Thrust Zone. A prominent erosional unconformity is observed over these strongly deformed foreland basins of the Eurasian and Lomonosov Ridge margins, and is conceivably related to vertical tectonics during breakup or a later basin-wide erosional event.

Description: The sedimentary stratigraphy along the conjugate Australian-Antarctic continental margins provide insights into their tectonic evolution as well as changes in paleoceanographic conditions in the Southern Ocean. A comprehensive network of multichannel seismic reflection data as well as geological information from drill cores have been used to interpret the stratigraphic evolution of these margins. However, a number of alternative seismic interpretations exist for the Antarctic side, particularly due to sparse drill core information. A prominent high-amplitude reflector observed along the margin, extending from the continental shelf to the foot-of-slope, is at the centre of debate. Recently, two major hiatuses (from 33.6 - 47.9 Ma and 51.06 - 51.9 Ma) were recovered by the IODP drill core U1356A offshore Wilkes Land and correlated to this prominent reflector. Previous seismic stratigraphic investigations interpreted this structure as an erosional unconformity and proposed different events as a possible cause for this formation, including first arrival of the continental glaciation at the coast at about 34 Ma, increase in spreading rate between Australia and Antarctica at about 45 Ma and drastic global sea level drop of 70 m at about 43 Ma. However, such a large-scale erosion must consequently lead to a re-deposition of a significantly large amount of sediment somewhere along the margins, but, to date, no such deposition is observed in the seismic reflection data. Here, we present an alternative seismo-stratigraphic interpretation based on correlation to the sedimentary structures along the Australian margin.We argue that the prominent unconformity is formed due to non-deposition of sediment between �47.8 and �33.6 Ma. The sedimentary units underlying this unconformity show strong similarities in structure, seismic characteristics and variation along the margin with sequences that are partly exposed to the seafloor at the foot of the Australian slope. On the Australian flank, the age of these exposed sediment sequences ranges from �65 Ma to �45 Ma. Low to no sedimentation from 45 Ma to the present-day offshore Australia has been interpreted to explain the exposure of these old sediment units. We propose that non-deposition occurred along both margins from �45 Ma, until large-scale glacial deposition started at 33.6 Ma along the Antarctic margin. Using our new interpretation, we create paleo-bathymetric reconstructions using the software BALPAL at �83 Ma, �65 Ma and �45 Ma. The resulting paleo-bathymetric maps provide essential information, e.g. for paleo–oceanographic and –climatic investigations in the Southern Ocean.

Description: The Lomonosov Ridge is seen as a relict of continental crust, which drifted from its original Eurasian shelf-edge location into the central Arctic Ocean during the formation of the Eurasian Basin by sea-floor spreading. With a total length of 1800 km, widths between 50 and 220 km and submarine elevations of 3 km above the abyssal plain the Lomonosov Ridge has dimensions of an Alpine mountain chain. Seismic lines indicate that large areas of the ridge are covered by well-stratified undisturbed Cenozoic sediments of more than 400 m in thickness. This may suggest that the ridge is in a relatively stable tectonic setting and exposed to hemi-pelagic deposition over long time scales. However, there is now a growing number of evidence that the crest and upper slopes of the ridge are characterized by widespread mass wasting. Kristoffersen et al. (2007) described major sediment disruptions on the slopes associated with slide scars on the crest of the Lomonosov Ridge between 87°30' and 88°N as a local phenomenon. Since the expedition of RV "Polarstern" in 2014, which explored the Lomonosov Ridge from near the pole to the Eurasian margin, we now know that similar mass wasting has been common probably along the entire ridge. Detailed bathymetric mapping between 81° and 84°N exhibit numerous amphitheatre-like slide scars, under which large amounts of Cenozoic sediments were remobilized into mass-wasting features on both the Makarov and Amundsen sides of the ridge. Sub-bottom seismic profiling discovered at least three generations of debris-flow deposits near the ridge, which were generated by the slides. Underneath the slide scars escarpments of up to 400 m in height were formed, which exposed Cenozoic sediments at the sea floor. Sediment cores from these locations recovered unconformities related to the youngest erosional event, which are overlain by undisturbed sediments accumulated during Marine Isotope Stages (MIS) 1 to 6. An age of MIS-6 is also suggested for the uppermost debris flow. Extrapolations of the age models of sediment cores suggest that earlier submarine landslides have occurred during the Middle Pleistocene. Some areas of the Lomonosov Ridge, where landslides have occurred, are characterized by Mega-Scale Glacial Lineations (MSGL). Typically, several generations of parallel or slightly curved streamlined bedforms are oriented in a SW-NE direction in areas shallower than 1000 m present water depth. They indicate that dynamically flowing ice masses (ice rise within an Arctic Ocean ice shelf) grounded on the Lomonosov Ridge during Pleistocene glaciations and eroded older sediments. MSGL end abruptly at slide scares and were last formed during MIS-6. At the present state of the study we can only speculate on the causes of mass wasting. This includes erosion in the context of glacial loading and seismicity (e.g. earthquakes), as well as slope failure related to gas. Kristoffersen, Y., Coakley, B.J., Hall, J.K., Edwards, M. (2007) Mass wasting on the submarine Lomonosov Ridge, central Arctic Ocean. Mar. Geol. 243, 132-142.

Description: Since about 15 years a growing number of evidence is found in water depth up to more than 1000 m of the Arctic Ocean that grounding of ice has occurred in various places including the "Beringian" continental margin north of the present Chukchi and East-Siberian seas and the Lomonosov Ridge. These landforms include moraines, drumlinized features, glacigenic debris flows, till wedges, mega-scale glacial lineations (MSGL), and iceberg plough marks (Polyak et al. 2001, Niessen et al. 2013, Dove et al. 2014, Jakobsson et al. 2014). They suggest that thick ice has occurred not only on nearly all margins of the Arctic Ocean but also covered pelagic areas. In a recent paper, Jakobsson et al. (2016) present more evidence of ice-shelf groundings on bathymetric highs in the central Arctic Ocean, thereby revitalising an old modelling concept of a kilometre-thick ice shelf extending over the entire central Arctic Ocean (Hughes et al. 1977) now dated to Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 6. Other (including our) studies, however, suggest that the pattern, and, in particular, the timing of these glaciations is more complex. Most recent discoveries on the Lomonosov Ridge have not only gained different information on Pleistocene glaciations but also allowed for the first time to reconstruct upper Miocene Arctic Ocean sea-ice and SST conditions. This became possible since submarine sliding (likely associated with ice grounding) led to removal of younger sediments from steep headwalls and thus exhumation of Miocene to early Quaternary sediments close to the seafloor, allowing the retrieval and analysis of such old sediments by gravity coring (Stein et al. 2016). Submarine glacial landforms from the western and central Arctic Ocean were discovered and investigated during the cruises of RV "Polarstern" in 2008 and 2014, and RV "Araon" in 2012 and 2015. Orientations of some of these landforms suggest that thick ice has flown north into the deep Arctic Ocean from the continental margin of the East Siberian Sea repeatedly (Niessen et al. 2013), thereby grounded on plateaus and seamounts of the Medeleev Ridge. In addition, hydro-acoustic data is presented from the Lomonosov Ridge (Siberian side to close to the North Pole), which support the hypothesis of widespread grounding of ice in the Arctic Ocean, of which the sources are still difficult to determine. The data suggest that thick ice-shelves could have developed from continental ice sheets on a nearly circum-arctic scale, which disintegrated into large icebergs during glacial terminations. On the slopes of the East Siberian Sea and/or on the Arlis Plateau, three northerly-directed ice advances occurred, which are dated by sediment cores using the chronology of brown layers (B1 to B7) as suggested by Stein et al. (2010). According to our age model, the latest advance is slightly older than B2 (MIS-3/4), which has been interpreted as MIS-6 by Jakobsson et al. (2016). A larger well-constrained glaciation has occurred during MIS-4, of which an ice shelf grounded to 900 m on the Arlis Plateau. In the western Arctic Ocean, the oldest datable ice advance has an intra-MIS-5 age. In our data, the chronology of older ice advances along the East Siberian margin are not well constrained but may extend back as far as MIS-16. In contrast, cores from the southern and central Lomonosov Ridge indicate that the youngest ice grounding there has occurred during MIS-6. This grounding was less intense than previous ice-shelf groundings in the area, of which the chronology remains speculative until longer cores become available. Along the Lomonosov Ridge, detailed bathymetric mapping between 81° and 84°N exhibit numerous amphitheatre-like slide scars, under which large amounts of Cenozoic sediments were remobilized into mass-wasting features on both the Makarov and Amundsen sides of the ridge. In areas shallower than 1000 metres, slide scars appear to be associated with streamlined glacial lineations, whereby some of the bedforms have been removed by sliding. It appears that at least some of the mass-wasting events have been triggered by moving and/or loading of grounded ice. Sub-bottom seismic profiling discovered at least three generations of debris-flow deposits near the ridge, which were generated by the slides. In places, the nearly randomly distributed slide scars and debris-flow deposits make it hard to interpret past ice-flow directions from landforms and re-deposited sediments. The pattern allows interpretation of both directions off East Siberia (e.g. Jakobsson et al. 2016) and off Eurasia (e.g. Polyak et al. 2001) towards the central Arctic Ocean. Underneath the slide scars escarpments of up to 400 m in height were formed. Near the southern end of the Lomonosov Ridge the last exhumation of old sediments has occurred during MIS-6. Some of the old sediments recovered in 2014 were studied in more detail (Stein et al., 2016). We can show for the first time that the mid/late Miocene central Arctic Ocean was relatively warm (4-7°C) and ice-free during summer, but sea ice occurred during spring and autumn/winter. A comparison of our biomarker proxy data with Miocene climate simulations seems to favour relatively high late Miocene atmospheric CO2 concentrations. References Dove, D., Polyak, L. & Coakley, B., 2014. Widespread, multi-source glacial erosion on the Chukchi margin, Arctic Ocean. Quat. Sci. Rev. 92, 112–122 Hughes, T. J., Denton, G. H. & Grosswald, M. G., 1977. Was there a late-Würm Arctic ice sheet? Nature, 266, 596–602 Jakobsson, M. et al., 2014. Arctic Ocean glacial history. Quat. Sci. Rev. 92, 40-67 Jakobsson, M., et al., 2016. Evidence for an ice shelf covering the central Arctic Ocean during the penultimate glaciation. Nat. Comm., 7, 10365, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10365, 1-10 Niessen, F. et al., 2013. Repeated Pleistocene glaciation of the East Siberian continental margin. Nat. Geosci. 6, 842–846 Polyak, L., Edwards, M. H., Coakley, B. J. & Jakobsson, M., 2001. Ice shelves in the Pleistocene Arctic Ocean inferred from glaciogenic deep-sea bedforms. Nature 410, 453–459 Stein, R., Matthiessen, J., Niessen, F., Krylov, A., Nam, S., Bazhenova, E., 2010. Towards a better (litho-) stratigraphy and reconstruction of Quaternary paleoenvironment in the Amerasian Basin (Arctic Ocean), Polarforschung, 79 (2), 97-121 Stein, R., K. Fahl, Schreck, M., Knorr, G., Niessen, F., Forwick, M., Gebhardt, C., Jensen, L., Kaminski, M., Kopf, A., Matthiessen, J., Jokat, W., and Lohmann, G., 2016. Evidence for ice-free summers in the late Miocene central Arctic Ocean. Nature Communications 7:11148, doi:10.1038/ncomms11148.