ALBERT

Description: Key Points The incidence of mutations within the MAPK pathway, the CRBN pathway, and TP53 is significantly increased in drug-refractory MM. Mutations in CRBN might contribute to IMiD resistance in drug-refractory MM.

Description: Purpose: Previous studies of patient-physician communication have noted that patients (pts) want to know “as much information as possible” about their diseases, but very little is known about successful ways to communicate this information. Patients and Methods: We report interim results of an ongoing, longitudinal study of patient-physician communication among people with hematologic malignancies. 83 pts seeing 15 physicians were studied at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), Boston, MA between 9/02-9/03. After informed consent, subjects were interviewed qualitatively and quantitatively prior to their consultations, the consultation was audiotaped, and pts were interviewed between 1–10 days after their consultations. 83/176 (47%) of invited patients participated. Results: Interim results from the pre-consultation and post-consultation interviews for evaluable pts (n=72) are presented. Overall, the population was well-educated (53% college graduates), married (74%), White (81%), and reported high social support and relatively little anxiety and depression. The median age was 58 yrs (range 20–80 yrs), 46% were female, and the median time from diagnosis to study was 69 days (range 7–1512 d). The primary diagnoses were non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (n=22, 31%) and multiple myeloma (n=21, 29%). Most wanted to be an equal partner in decision making (41%) or take primary responsibility for the decision (36%). Almost everyone wanted to discuss treatment options, treatment goals, and physician treatment recommendations (96–100%), but fewer wanted to discuss average patient survival (86%), likelihood of treatment success (70%), likelihood of cure (60%) or clinical trials (49%). 70% wanted prognostic information in percentages and 64% wanted to hear about previous pts, while fewer desired fractions (43%) or qualitative expressions of probability (44%). When asked to estimate prognosis (chance of cure and life expectancy) before the consultation, pts were much more optimistic compared to their physicians. After the consultation, most pts’ prognostic estimates were unchanged although a few (14–24%) became more optimistic and 7–19% became less optimistic. Most pts were satisfied with their consultations and “very likely” to recommend their physicians to other pts (88%). Pts were completely (69%) or somewhat (28%) satisfied with the amount of information they were given. Most reported the same or improved depression, anxiety and hope after their consultations. Conclusions: Patients in our study are interested in most but not all information about their diseases. In particular, they want information about treatment options and recommendations, but less information about the likely course of the disease. While physicians appear to be communicating with patients in ways that result in high degrees of satisfaction, maintain hope, and do not diminish patients’ sense of depression or anxiety, patients are retaining their overoptimistic prognostic expectations after their consultations.

Description: Background: The proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib (BTZ) is an efficient treatment option for both, newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Despite the effectiveness, most patients eventually acquire drug resistance for reasons not fully understood Materials and methods: To better understand BTZ resistance mechanism we used a CRISPR library (GeCKO V2) targeting 19052 human genes, trying to identify genes responsible for BTZ resistance. CRISPR sgRNAs targeting the ERN1-XBP1 pathway were used as positive controls. We first infected RPMI 8226 myeloma cell line expressing Cas9 with the CRISPR library packaged into lenti-vectors and selected for resistance to BTZ. Surviving cells were subjected to next generation sequencing. Based on the initial screen results we constructed a second CRISPR sgRNA library including 31 genes, each gene targeted with four sgRNAs. After the second round screening and subsequent sequencing, we selected the top 20 genes for individual validation. Results: Proteasome regulatory gene PSMC6 was identified as the only reproducible gene conferring BTZ resistance. Interestingly, the same gene was independently found by a second group using a CRISPR approach (Sheffer M et al. ASH Abstract 273, 2014). Resistance was reproducible using a PSMC6 knockout by three individual CRISPR sgRNAs targeting exonic regions and one pair of SgRNA targeting intron region flanking exon for the deletion of exon one. PSMC6 knockout was verified by PCR and Sanger sequencing. Sensitivity to BTZ was rescued by over expression of PSMC6 cDNA in RPMI 8226 cells harboring a deletion of PSMC6 exon 1. MM cells lacking PSMC6 also developed resistance against Carfilzomib. Resistance was reproduced on a second MM cell line, KMS11. We did not see any significant difference of toxicity in PSMC6 deleted cells for other chemicals tested (tunicamycin, staurosporine, dexamethasone and melphalan). We demonstrated that the sensitivity of chymotrypsin-like activity of proteasome against BTZ was significantly reduced in cells lacking PSMC6. Consequently, MM cells without the PSMC6 gene were relatively resistant to apoptosis induced by BTZ, which was verified by Western blot for caspase 8 degradation and luminescent assay for caspase 3/7 activities. Clinically we could not correlate the PSMC6 expression level with the outcome of BTZ treatment in BTZ naive patients using publically available gene expression data. We initially used CRISPR sgRNAs targeting ER stress pathway (ERN1 and XBP1) as a positive control. However we could not derive any resistant cells from the experiment. We also could not identify any sgRNAs targeting the ERN1-XBP1 pathway from our whole exome screen and next generation sequencing. Since this contradicts published data, we decided to knockout ERN1 and XBP1 genes individually. Clones of cells with successful knockout of ERN1 in three cell lines (RPMI 8226, KMS11 and JJN3) and XBP1 in two cell lines (RPMI 8226 and KMS11) were tested for response to BTZ and Carfilzomib , however we did not find any drug response difference between the knockout and parent cells. We also found that the ERN1-XBP1 knockout cells did not show difference in response to ERN1 specific inhibitors (4u8C and STF-038010) and ER stress inducers (tunicamycin and thapsigargin) compared to parental cells. Conclusions: Human multiple myeloma cells lacking the PSMC6 gene develop significant resistance to apoptosis induced by BTZ. We have however not found a correlation of PSMC6 expression levels with outcome to BTZ treatment in BTZ naïve patients. We are therefore currently investigating the PSMC6 mutation rate in relapsed MM patients after proteasome treatment. In contrast to previous reports showing that progenitor MM cells lacing XBP-1 or ERN-1 invoked BTZ resistance, we were not able to demonstrate a change in sensitivity after full CRISPR knock out of either ERN1 or XBP1. It has long been believed that ERN1-XBP1 pathway plays an important role for MM treatment, leading to the development of ERN1 specific inhibitors. However, we demonstrated that the toxicity of two ERN1-specific inhibitors appears independent of the ERN1-XBP1 pathway. We also demonstrated that the toxicity of two important ER stress inducers, tunicamycin and thapsigargin, is independent of the ERN1-XBP1 pathway. Disclosures Stewart: Celgene: Consultancy; Oncospire Inc.: Equity Ownership; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy.

Description: Background Bortezomib (BTZ) is highly effective in the treatment of multiple myeloma; however, emergent drug resistance is common. The underlying mechanisms of such proteasome inhibitor resistance are still incompletely understood. Methods To further understand its resistant mechanism, we generated eight multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines resistant to bortezomib (BTZ) by exposure to increasing drug concentration: five of them acquired novel PSMB5 mutations. Given the rarity of similar mutations in over 1,500 analyzed MM patients, we explored in depth the role of the proteasome on MM cell viability and BTZ sensitivity by systematically deleting the major proteasome targets of BTZ by CRISPR. Results We demonstrated that MM cell lines without PSMB5 were surprisingly viable (mutation corresponding yeast gene pre2 is lethal). PSMB5 mutated, BTZ resistant, MM cell lines were re-sensitized to BTZ when PSMB5 was experimentally deleted, implying that this mutation is activating in its drug resistance function. In contrast PSMB6 knockout was lethal to MM cell lines, which were efficiently rescued by re-introduction of wild type PSMB6. Interestingly, reduction in PSMB6 levels also prevented the splicing of the major catalytic subunits PSMB5, PSMB7, PSMB8 and PSMB10. PSMB6 engineered with no splicing function or catalytic activity, also restored viability, inferring that the contribution of PSMB6 to proteasome structure is more important than functional activity. Supporting this observation, BTZ sensitivity was restored in resistant MM cells line by introducing low level expression of mutated PSMB6 lacking splicing function. As with PSMB6, PSMB7 knockout was lethal to MM cell lines. In contrast, loss of immunoproteasome subunits PSMB8 and PSMB9 was neither lethal nor restored sensitivity to BTZ. Our results demonstrate that expression of the three constitutive proteasome subunits PSMB5, PSMB6 and PSMB7 is highly co-dependent. This dependence is relying on the structure, but not the function, of PSMB5 and PSMB6. Conclusions In summary, PSMB5 and PSMB6, but not PSMB8 and PSMB9, are highly relevant for BTZ sensitivity in MM. Absence of PSMB6 or PSMB7, but not PSMB5, was lethal in MM cell lines. Expression of PSMB5, PSMB6 and PSMB7 was highly co-dependent. Together these findings suggest that the modulation of expression rather than function of PSMB5, PSMB6 or PSMB7 may be a new therapeutic strategy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Introduction: We employed a customized Multiple Myeloma (MM) specific Mutation-Panel (M3 P) to screen a homogenous cohort of refractory MM (rMM) patients in a timely and cost-effective manner. rMM was defined as progressive disease (PD) during therapy or within 60 days after discontinuation of therapy. The M3 P provides a practical alternative to whole genome/exome sequencing approaches and includes 88 genes selected for being either actionable targets, potentially related to drug response or part of known key pathways in MM biology. Patients and Methods: Tumor and germline samples of 50 rMM patients were screened using M3 P. Patients received a median of five lines of treatment at the time of tumor sampling (range 2-15 lines). All patients received at least one immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitor (PI), and 88%, 76% and 66% were refractory to either an IMiD, PI or both. All patients had received lenalidomide and bortezomib, 48% and 34% were additionally exposed to pomalidomide and thalidomide and 18% to carfilzomib at any time prior to sampling. The majority of patients had a progressive and refractory disease immediately prior to sampling (82% and 78%), with 43% of them being IMiD-refractory and 46% being PI-refractory in the most recent line of therapy. Cytogenetic data at time of sampling were available from 78% of patients. Adverse cytogenetics were detectable in 82% of patients with gain 1q21 〉 2 copies (62%), deletion 17p (33%), t(4;14) (13%) and t(14;16) (8%) being the most common. Results: An average sequencing depth of 750x was obtained across the samples. Our screening revealed an increased prevalence of mutations in the MAPK pathway (72%), including 34% of KRAS, 26% of NRAS, 18% of BRAF (with one patient carrying two BRAF mutations and 8% in actionable p.V600E). Additionally, two mutations (4%) were found in RASA2, a RAS inhibitor. Other potentially actionable mutations were seen in p.R132H IDH1 and p.R248C FGFR3 (2% each). Most prominently, the CRBN pathway was found mutated in 22% of cases, including CRBN (12%, one case with concomitant CUL4B mutations), CUL4B (4%), IRF4 (4%) and IKZF1 (2%). In CRBN we found four cases with mutations leading to a truncated protein (frameshift, nonsense and splicing) and two cases with missense mutations located within the thalidomide-binding domain, suggesting a causal effect on IMiD resistance. All CRBN mutated patients and 91% of the CRBN pathway mutated patients were at least once unresponsive to IMiD based treatment. In one patient with IRF4 mutation sensitivity to IMiDs remained unknown. A majority of patients were also resistant to PI treatment (76%), however mutations in proteasome subunits (PSMD1 and PSMB8) and XBP1 wererare (4%), but only a limited number of this gene family were represented in our panel. Other recurrently mutated genes were TP53 (26%), FAM46C (12%), ATM (10%) and TRAF3 (8%). Notably, DIS3 mutations were identified in only 6% of cases. As previously reported, TP53 mutations were associated with deletion 17p (8/13 cases, 62%). A correlation between the absolute number of mutations and previous lines of treatment was not observed (r=0.05, p=0.73). Conclusion: Targeted sequencing on a homogenous cohort of heavy pretreated rMM patients gives key insights in the landscape of the rMM genome, uncovering an increasing frequency of MAPK, TP53 and CRBN mutations. Importantly, this is the first study showing recurrent mutations in CRBN in patients unresponsive to IMiD treatment, supporting a potential association with resistance to IMiD based therapies. Disclosures Mai: Onyx: Other: Travel Grant; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Grant; Celgene: Other: Travel Grant; Mundipharma: Other: Travel Grant. Merz:Janssen: Other: Travel grants; Celgene: Other: Travel grants. Hillengass:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Stewart:Oncospire Genomics: Research Funding.

Description: The Fourth Law of Humanics Nature 535, 7612 (2016). doi:10.1038/535460a Author: Ian Stewart Small steps to freedom.