ALBERT

Beschreibung: Spectroscopic measurements of soil samples are reliable because they are highly repeatable and reproducible. They characterise the samples' mineral–organic composition. Estimates of concentrations of soil constituents are inevitably less precise than estimates obtained conventionally by chemical analysis. But the cost of each spectroscopic estimate is at most one-tenth of the cost of a chemical determination. Spectroscopy is cost-effective when we need many data, despite the costs and errors of calibration. Soil spectroscopists understand the risks of over-fitting models to highly dimensional multivariate spectra and have command of the mathematical and statistical methods to avoid them. Machine learning has fast become an algorithmic alternative to statistical analysis for estimating concentrations of soil constituents from reflectance spectra. As with any modelling, we need judicious implementation of machine learning as it also carries the risk of over-fitting predictions to irrelevant elements of the spectra. To use the methods confidently, we need to validate the outcomes with appropriately sampled, independent data sets. Not all machine learning should be considered ‘black boxes’. Their interpretability depends on the algorithm, and some are highly interpretable and explainable. Some are difficult to interpret because of complex transformations or their huge and complicated network of parameters. But there is rapidly advancing research on explainable machine learning, and these methods are finding applications in soil science and spectroscopy. In many parts of the world, soil and environmental scientists recognise the merits of soil spectroscopy. They are building spectral libraries on which they can draw to localise the modelling and derive soil information for new projects within their domains. We hope our article gives readers a more balanced and optimistic perspective of soil spectroscopy and its future.

Beschreibung: There was an error in the original publication [1] in ‘4.1. The Web Service Advantages and Limitations’, on page 18, in a sentence regarding Soil-Spec4GG. The sentence was incorrectly typed/inserted. The construction of the paragraph positioned the Soil-Spec in the wrong place, and gave a misinterpretation. The authors strongly state that Soil-Spec4GG is a confidently reliable project. Our idea in the texts was to emphasize the importance of this project, but our mistyping created the opposite. We humbly apologize and ratify that it was not an intentional error. We hope that this effort maintains the respect of the scientific community. A correction has been made to 4.1. The Web Service Advantages and Limitations. Replaced “…other ongoing global spectral community efforts (e.g., Soil-Spec4GG) are more vertical with researchers subsuming people’s spectral data without a data sharing policy that fully acknowledges and credits the user’s labor and costs of field data collection”. with “Other global spectral communities are also making similar efforts as our work which will increase the spectroscopy efforts (e.g., Soil-Spec4GG). On the other side, there are vertical groups with researchers subsuming people’s spectral data without a data sharing policy that fully acknowledges and credits the user’s labor and costs of field data collection”. Supplementary Materials, Table S1, indicated in the Materials and Methods. Consider the following footnotes to this material: The open access databases mentioned: Lucas and ICRAF are available in http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/lucas-2009-topsoil-data (accessed on 21 February 2022) and https://doi.org/10.34725/DVN/MFHA9C (accessed on 21 February 2022), respectively. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Beschreibung: Two identical high-sensitivity triaxial Rover fluxgate magnetometers (RoMag) are mounted on Zhurong Rover to detect the surface magnetic field on Mars. Although a rover magnetic compensation procedure was conducted to remove the magnetic interferences pre-launch [Du et al., 2020], due to the different state of the payloads and electric power system such as the solar panel, an along-track calibration of the magnetometer is necessary to obtain a more accurate Martian magnetic field. With efforts from the Zhurong Rover engineering team, two methods, mast yaw rotations, and Rover yaw rotations were utilized separately to determine the Martian horizontal magnetic components. Results show that the Martian horizontal magnetic components determined by the two methods are in good agreement, with the root mean square deviation ~ 2.0 nT. The vertical component was also constrained through the pitch movements of the mast when assuming the interferences field distributes like a dipole field. A linear correlation between magnetic field measurements and the solar array currents was derived to calibrate the body field during the regular exploration. We conclude that more accurate measurements could be made when applying the calibration results in the magnetic survey on the surface of Mars.

Beschreibung: Although many Soil Spectral Libraries (SSLs) have been created globally, these libraries still have not been operationalized for end-users. To address this limitation, this study created an online Brazilian Soil Spectral Service (BraSpecS). The system was based on the Brazilian Soil Spectral Library (BSSL) with samples collected in the Visible–Near–Short-wave infrared (vis–NIR–SWIR) and Mid-infrared (MIR) ranges. The interactive platform allows users to find spectra, act as custodians of the data, and estimate several soil properties and classification. The system was tested by 500 Brazilian and 65 international users. Users accessed the platform (besbbr.com.br), uploaded their spectra, and received soil organic carbon (SOC) and clay content prediction results via email. The BraSpecS prediction provided good results for Brazilian data, but performed variably for other countries. Prediction for countries outside of Brazil using local spectra (External Country Soil Spectral Libraries, ExCSSL) mostly showed greater performance than BraSpecS. Clay R2 ranged from 0.5 (BraSpecS) to 0.8 (ExCSSL) in vis–NIR–SWIR, but BraSpecS MIR models were more accurate in most situations. The development of external models based on the fusion of local samples with BSSL formed the Global Soil Spectral Library (GSSL). The GSSL models improved soil properties prediction for different countries. Nevertheless, the proposed system needs to be continually updated with new spectra so they can be applied broadly. Accordingly, the online system is dynamic, users can contribute their data and the models will adapt to local information. Our community-driven web platform allows users to predict soil attributes without learning soil spectral modeling, which will invite end-users to utilize this powerful technique.

Beschreibung: Ambiguity resolution (AR) is a core technology that helps to speed up convergence time and increase positioning accuracy for precise point positioning (PPP), and the performance of PPP-AR is based on the quality of ambiguity resolution products. Real-time PPP-AR becomes a reality as users can now obtain publicly accessible real-time observable-specific signal bias (OSB) products from the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES). Therefore, an analysis of the quality of OSB products and an evaluation of the performance of PPP-AR are required to promote the application of real-time positioning. For a total of 31 days between day of year (DOY) 121 and 151 in 2021, observation data were collected from 90 stations, and the OSB products were used to assess the experiments. As for the quality of the OSB products, the data availability (DA) of the GPS and Galileo satellites was greater than 97%, whereas that of BDS was less than 60%; the maximum fluctuation value (MAX) and standard deviation (STD) of the GPS, Galileo, and BDS satellites were 0.045 and 0.012; 0.081 and 0.028; and 0.292 and 0.085 cycles, respectively. In terms of ambiguity residuals using the OSB products, the wide-lane (WL) residual percentages within ±0.25 cycles for the GPS, Galileo, BDS-2, and BDS-3 systems were more than 92%, and the narrow-lane (NL) residual percentages within ±0.25 cycles for the four systems were 92%, 89%, 79%, and 60%, respectively. With regard to the performance of PPP-AR, the GPS+Galileo solution showed the best performance in the kinematic positioning mode, in which the mean root mean square (RMS) of positioning accuracy was 1.06, 1.27, and 2.85 cm for the east (E), north (N), and up (U) components, respectively, and the mean convergence time reached 9.6 min. In the static positioning mode, the mean convergence times of the GPS-only and GPS+Galileo solutions were 11.4 min and 8.0 min, respectively, and both of their mean RMS for positioning accuracy reached 0.79, 0.95, and 1.48 cm for the E, N, and U components, respectively. However, the addition of BDS did not further enhance the performance of multi-GNSS PPP-AR in either the kinematic or static positioning mode due to the poor quality of the real-time BDS products. More importantly, a prediction method was proposed to avoid re-convergence and to enhance the reliability of PPP-AR in the event of short-time missing real-time OSB products and to improve the positioning accuracy and the ambiguity fixed rate.