ALBERT

Description: INTRODUCTION: Timely goals of care (GOC) discussions improve end-of-life (EOL) care for patients with solid malignancies. Although timely GOC discussions might also improve EOL care for patients with blood cancers, data are sparse regarding such discussions for this population. We studied the impact of timing and location of GOC discussions on quality of EOL care for a cohort of patients who died of blood cancers. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of blood cancer decedents from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. We included patients diagnosed with a blood cancer, who had ≥ 2 outpatient visits at the study institution, and who died between January 1 and December 31, 2014. Using the established definition from Mack et al, JCO 2012, we classified patients as having had a GOC discussion if there was any documentation in the medical record of a discussion involving resuscitation status, hospice, or preferred location of death. We abstracted content and location of the first documented GOC discussion. Next, we ascertained intensity of care near the EOL (i.e. chemotherapy ≤ 14 days before death, intensive care unit [ICU] admission ≤ 30 days before death, and hospital death) and hospice enrollment. Of note, decreased intensity of medical care and high rates of hospice enrollment are accepted indicators of quality EOL care. In univariable and multivariable models, we assessed the potential relationship between timing (〉 or ≤ 30 days before death) and location (outpatient or inpatient) of GOC discussions with intensity of medical care and hospice use near the EOL. RESULTS: Of the 384 eligible deceased patients, 39.1% had leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes, 37.2% had lymphoma, and 23.7% had myeloma. 40.6% had undergone a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). Overall, 235 (61.2%) had a documented GOC discussion. The median time between first documented discussion and death was 15 days, with 33.2% of first discussions occurring 〉 30 days before death, and the minority (36.2%) occurring in the outpatient setting. The most commonly discussed topic was resuscitation preferences (82.6%), followed by hospice (30.6%); preferred location of death was rarely discussed (3.4%). Of the entire cohort, 16.9% received chemotherapy ≤ 14 days before death, 21.6% had at least one ICU admission ≤ 30 days before death, and 38.0% died in the hospital. 49.5% of the study population experienced at least one indicator of high-intensity medical care near the EOL. The rate of hospice use was 24.2%. In univariable analyses among those who had EOL discussions (n=235), having the first GOC discussion 〉 30 days before death was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of ICU admission ≤ 30 days before death (14.1% vs. 40.8%, p

Description: Background Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is an analytical method that has been used to investigate the in vivo kinetics of chimeric receptor antigen (CAR) transgene following the infusion of tisagenlecleucel. B cell aplasia, likely an "on-target toxicity" of tisagenlecleucel, has been considered a measure of functional persistence. (Maude SL et al. Blood 2015;125(26):4017-4023) Although the CAR transgene can be detected in peripheral blood of tisagenlecleucel treated patients, it is unclear whether CAR transgene detection by qPCR could be reliably used to inform treatment decision in an individual patient. Methods Transgene levels in blood measured by qPCR from pivotal phase II studies in relapsed/refractory (r/r) pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients (pts) (ELIANA [NCT02435849, N=75]; ENSIGN [NCT02228096, N=29]) and adult diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) pts (JULIET [NCT02445248, N=93]) were used to investigate the relationship between transgene persistence and clinical response. Results To determine whether CAR qPCR measurements are associated with or predictive of response, CAR transgene levels and timing of peak levels were examined. In both ALL and DLBCL pts, there were detectable CAR transgene levels by qPCR in both responders and non-responders. The geometric mean maximal expansion (geo mean Cmax) was similar between responding and non-responding adult DLBCL pts, while 1.7 fold differences were observed in pediatric ALL pts (geo mean Cmax in copies/µg: responders, 32700, n=79; non-responders, 19500, n=10; Table 1). For both DLBCL and ALL pts, high inter-individual variability in transgene levels was noted. Similarly, higher CAR-T cell expansion from flow cytometry data pooled from responding pediatric ALL and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) pts were observed relative to non-responding pts (Mueller KT et al. Blood 2017;130(21):2317-2325), while the levels in DLBCL pts were comparatively lower in blood, likely due to partitioning of functional CAR-T cells to the target sites including lymph nodes. The median time to maximal transgene level ranged from 9-10 days in DLBCL responders and non-responders and pediatric ALL responders, while non-responding pediatric ALL pts showed delayed expansion with median Tmax of 20 days. The median time corresponding to last quantifiable transgene level (Tlast), an indicator of persistence, was higher in responding pts compared to non-responding pts, indicating a trend for longer persistence in both DLBCL and ALL pts with continued response (Table 1). Similarly, the half-life estimated from the terminal slope of the cellular kinetic profile, an additional indicator of persistence, was higher in responding pts relative to non-responding pts for both DLBCL and ALL (Table 1). Despite this general trend, in some cases, transgene levels were not detectable at later time points in pts with continued response. The swimmer plot for representative responder ALL (Figure 1a) and DLBCL pts (Figure 1b) with responses and transgene levels demonstrate that although the majority of responding pts show persistent transgene levels, some pts maintained a favorable clinical response despite a decline in transgene levels to below the level of quantification of 50 copies/µg. Conclusion In both ALL and DLBCL, CAR transgene is initially detected at high levels with high variability in both responders and non-responders. While the majority of responding pts tend to have persistent transgene levels, some pts maintain favorable clinical responses despite a lack of quantifiable transgene. These results indicate that qPCR testing for CAR transgene in blood of tisagenlecleucel treated pts should not be used for making treatment decisions for individual pts. In addition, the qPCR measurements in peripheral blood do not reflect on the trafficking of CAR positive cells to sites outside peripheral blood. The assessment by flow cytometry remains an important assay to distinguish high expression in responding vs non-responding pts in ALL and CLL, and further evaluation of target tissue is needed in DLBCL to understand the utility of CAR expression as a means to distinguish responder and non-responders. Also, further data are needed to improve our understanding of how CAR transgene levels relate to disease burden and duration of response and whether this information is clinically useful. Disclosures Awasthi: Exelixis: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research: Employment. Mueller:Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research: Employment; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Equity Ownership, Other: Patent pending. Tam:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Rives:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: advisory board ; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards ; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards ; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards . McGuirk:Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Other: speaker, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expenses, speaker ; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding. Pulsipher:Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jaeger:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda-Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda-Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baruchel:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations or expenses; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Myers:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Balke-Want:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria. Schuster:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stefanski:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bishop:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Juneau Therapeutics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; United Healthcare: Employment. Waldron:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anak:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Chakraborty:Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research: Employment. Bleickardt:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Wong:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bubuteishvili Pacaud:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Waller:Kalytera: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Travel Expenses, EHA, Research Funding; Cambium Medical Technologies: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Maude:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Background: The utility of reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RIC HSCT) for fit elderly patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is unclear. Methods: The MDS Transplant-Associated Outcomes Study, or "MDS-TAO," was a prospective longitudinal observational study at the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center designed to examine survival, quality of life, and other outcomes for RIC HSCT versus non-HSCT approaches for HSCT-eligible patients with advanced MDS ages 60 to 75. All patients who met eligibility criteria were approached in the leukemia or HSCT clinics; 96% agreed to enroll. Inclusion criteria included histologically-confirmed diagnosis of MDS or CMML, and (1) therapy-related disease or (2) Int-2/high IPSS (Greenberg, Blood, 1997), or (3) non-IPSS poor-risk cytogenetics (Haase, Blood, 2007), or (4) severe cytopenia/platelet or red cell transfusion-dependence. Exclusions were (1) comorbidities that in the judgment of the treating physician precluded HSCT eligibility (2) prior donor search and (3) patient unwillingness to consider HSCT. Considering time to transplant as a time-dependent variable, hazard ratio for ultimate HSCT was estimated using Cox regression analysis controlling for age, gender, ECOG performance status, IPSS, IPSS cytogenetic risk group, and year of consent. Landmark analyses at 5 months were conducted to present estimates of overall survival for patients who were alive for at least 5 months and received HSCT versus patients who did not (landmark cohort). Subgroup analyses (e.g., molecular characteristics) are also ongoing. Results: 290 patients were enrolled between May 2011 and May 2018; 24 had less than 1.5 months of follow up after consent and were excluded from this analysis. Of the remaining 266 patients, 143 were deceased at last follow up. Baseline characteristics are presented in the table. The median follow-up time among survivors was 31 months (range 1.9, 84). 102 patients received HSCT, of whom 45 subsequently died; of the 164 patients who have not undergone HSCT, 98 have died. The median time to HSCT among those transplanted (n=102) was 4.6 months. The median follow-up for patients alive and not yet transplanted (n=66) was 24 months (range 1.9, 82). Considering time to HSCT as a time-dependent variable (n=266), the hazard ratio for death in multivariable analysis was 0.63 (95% CI 0.42-0.96, p=0.03). Poor risk IPSS cytogenetic group was the only other factor associated with mortality, HR=1.86 (95% CI 1.15-3.00, p=0.006); age, gender, ECOG performance status, IPSS, and consent year were not. Five months was chosen for the landmark analysis given it was closest to the median time to HSCT. In the landmark cohort (N=229), HSCT patients were more likely to have Int-2/high IPSS at baseline (65% vs 35% for none, p=0.0003). No other baseline characteristics were different. Figure A shows Kaplan-Meier plots for the landmark cohort, comparing 54 who received HSCT ≤ 5 months versus 175 patients who did not receive a transplant within 5 months (log rank p=0.04). Figure B shows Kaplan-Meier plots for HSCT comparing 99 patients who received HSCT at any time during follow-up versus 130 patients who did not (log rank p=0.005). Conclusion: In this large cohort of fit elderly patients with advanced MDS, a treatment strategy that included HSCT was associated with better overall survival. Table Table. Disclosures Ho: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. DeAngelo:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Shire: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. Antin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Introduction Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important predictor of patient outcome following treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We assessed concordance between two MRD assays, with different assay sensitivities, to determine which MRD detection method could support early relapse detection. Immunoglobulin next generation sequencing (Ig NGS) and flow cytometry (FC) were tested in samples from two clinical trials ELIANA (NCT02435849) and ENSIGN (NCT02228096) for pediatric relapsed and refractory B-ALL patients treated with tisagenlecleucel. We also assessed whether using blood with Ig NGS would be comparable to BM testing with FC. Finally we analyzed whether clonal evolution, as detected by Ig NGS, occurred during of the course of therapy for both CD19+ and CD19- relapse patients. Methods In this analysis, bone marrow and peripheral blood specimens at screening (pre-tisagenlecleucel infusion), post-infusion and relapse were tested. Ig NGS was performed in 300 samples from 88 patients. 237 samples from 83 patients also had FC MRD results available. MRD was measured on fresh blood and bone marrow using a 3-tube FC assay (CD10, CD19, CD13, CD20, CD22, CD33, CD34, CD38, CD45, CD58, CD123). The FC MRD assay has a lower limit of sensitivity of 0.01% of white blood cells. Ig NGS detection of MRD was performed using the Adaptive Biotechnology's NGS MRD assay. MRD quantitative values, along with the qualitative MRD calls at each assay sensitivity level (10-4, 10-5 and 10-6) were reported. At baseline, 85 out of 88 samples had informative clones. Results and Conclusions To examine the comparability of flow cytometry and Ig NGS methods in assessing MRD, baseline and post-treatment samples were tested. Baseline samples, which had a high disease burden, showed 100% MRD concordance between both assays. However, post-treatment, where the leukemic burden was dramatically reduced, Ig NGS detected a greater number of MRD positive samples compared to FC, at each sensitivity level tested (10-4, 10-5 and 10-6). At the highest sensitivity level of 10-6, Ig NGS was able to detect 18% more MRD positive post-treatment samples. Importantly, Ig NGS was able to detect MRD positivity 1-4 months ahead of clinical relapse in a small number of relapsed patients, whether relapse was CD19+ or CD19-. This may provide an important window of opportunity for pre-emptive treatment while a patients' tumor burden is still low. In B-ALL, it has previously been described that MRD levels can be one to three logs lower in blood compared to bone marrow (VanDongen JJ et al. Blood 2015). Our results support these findings whereby MRD burden in bone marrow was higher than in blood using both FC and Ig NGS. We next set out to determine if the increased sensitivity afforded by the Ig NGS assay could provide a level of MRD detection in the blood comparable to FC in the bone marrow. In patients with matching data available, Ig NGS was able to detect more MRD positive blood samples than FC MRD positive bone marrow samples. This suggests that monitoring of MRD using Ig NGS in the blood holds the potential to be used as a surrogate for FC MRD in bone marrow. The relationship between MRD and prognosis was examined. Patients who were MRD negative by both Ig NGS and FC at the end of first month post-infusion had better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to those with detectable MRD. Tumor clonality will be further analyzed to understand sub-clone composition at baseline and clonal evolution following tisagenlecleucel treatment. Taken together, these results highlight the importance of using a highly sensitive assay, such as Ig NGS, when monitoring for MRD. MRD detection by Ig NGS holds the potential to identify early response/relapse in patients, which could provide a window of opportunity for additional intervention before morphological relapse. Ongoing studies with larger patient groups will provide further information on the applicability of Ig NGS MRD detection and its association with long-term outcome in tisagenlecleucel-treated pediatric r/r B-ALL patients. Disclosures Pulsipher: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Han:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Quigley:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Kari:Adaptimmune LLC: Other: previous employment within 2 years; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Rives:Shire: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards ; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: advisory board ; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards ; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards . Laetsch:Bayer: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy. Myers:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Qayed:Novartis: Consultancy. Stefanski:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baruchel:Shire: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations or expenses; Celgene: Consultancy. Bader:Cellgene: Consultancy; Riemser: Research Funding; Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Neovii: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Yi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Kalfoglou:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Robins:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Yusko:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Equity Ownership. Görgün:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Bleickardt:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Wong:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Grupp:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties.

Description: Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are neoplasms characterized by cytopenias, high risk of leukemic progression, and poor overall survival. Chemotherapy for MDS is not curative, and no new drugs have been approved for the treatment of MDS in over a decade. Clinical trials should be considered at any time during the management of patients with MDS, but enrollment criteria may be barriers that limit accrual. In this study, we extracted MDS clinical trial data from clinicaltrials.gov, and compared study indications and characteristics, including inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methods: We identified MDS clinical trials via clinicaltrials.gov (accessed: April 16, 2018). Studies were included if they allowed "MDS," "Myelodysplastic syndromes," "Preleukemia," and/or "Myelodysplasia," based on the pre-defined 'related terms' criteria in the database. We included interventional studies open in the United States that were listed as recruiting or not yet recruiting, for adults (age 18-64) and older adults (age 65+). We excluded studies that were observational in nature, involved a transplant-based intervention, or did not use a pharmacological intervention. We coded inclusion and exclusion criteria based on those provided by study authors in the database. Results: 83 interventional clinical trials enrolling patients with MDS were identified. Studies started enrollment between 4/1/2013 and 3/27/2018, and anticipated reaching the primary objective between 5/1/2017 and 6/1/2025. The median planned study duration was 38 mo (range 10-95). In total, studies sought to enroll 8866 patients over 273 study-years; the median study enrollment estimate was 1.7 patients/month, or across all trials 247 patients/month. Clinical trials could be exclusive to MDS patients (n=28), include MDS patients and other myeloid malignancies e.g. AML (n=44), or include MDS patients and other cancers including solid tumors (n=11). For clinical trials exclusive to MDS, the total enrollment goal was 1966 patients over 96 study-years, with a median rate of 1.4 patients/month (range 0.3-13.2) or total of 63 patients/month across all studies. 33 trials were phase 1 studies, 17 were phase 1/2, 26 were phase II, 1 trial was phase 2/3, and 6 were phase III studies. The primary endpoint was typically MTD (n=50) or ORR (n=22), while 5 studies had an OS endpoint. Most trials specified "higher risk" MDS (n=44); 8 specified "lower risk" MDS and 31 allowed all MDS risk or did not specify risk (Figure 1). Lower risk MDS studies were all exclusive to MDS patients. Inclusion criteria related to MDS risk varied significantly according to whether a study was MDS-specific or not (p=0.021): 82% of MDS-specific trials had risk exclusions, compared to 72% of myeloid trials, and only 36% of trials open across cancers. Of 52 trials specifying MDS risk, 20 included IPSS criteria, 24 included IPSS-R criteria, and 27 had blast count criteria. Lower risk MDS criteria was variably defined as IPSS low or INT-1 disease (n=3), IPSS-R very low or low risk (n=1), IPSS-R VL, L, or intermediate risk (n=4), or blast counts 〈 5% (n=1), 〈 10% (n=2), or 5% (n=12) or 〉10% blasts (n=12). Most studies specified exclusion of CNS disease, even though CNS involvement is exceptionally rare in MDS. 43 trials excluded concurrent cardiovascular disease; most often (n=18) requiring 6mo since a cardiovascular event. 46 trials had language excluding concurrent cancers, including 4 that did not allow any prior cancer, and 17 required ³24mo disease free. Exclusions for prior cancers did not vary according to primary outcome (MTD or PK, vs ORR/OS, p=0.16). 20 of 56 studies with MTD or early outcomes (e.g. PK) required cancer-free intervals of ³1y, while 7 allowed concurrent cancers if not on active therapy. Discussion: Currently enrolling MDS clinical trials show significant variation in their inclusion and exclusion criteria. Heterogeneous definitions of basic entry criteria, such as the definition of higher- and lower-risk MDS, may cause barriers to enrollment. Disclosures Brunner: Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Garcia:Celgene: Consultancy.

Description: Key Points Biomarker scores generated after 1 week of steroid treatment of GVHD are prognostic. Biomarkers reflect prognosis better than early clinical response to GVHD treatment.

Description: Genes encoding the alpha (GNAS) and beta (GNB1) subunits of the heterotrimeric G-protein complex are recurrently mutated in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Alterations in G-protein coupled receptors can affect signaling via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/MAPK pathways, suggesting that GNB1/GNAS mutations may function similarly to mutations in RAS and tyrosine kinases in myeloid disease progression. However, unlike RAS mutations, GNB1/GNAS mutations are among the most commonly affected genes in clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), suggestive of a distinct functional role in myeloid disease initiation. We evaluated 6343 unique patients who received gene panel sequencing at our institution as part of a diagnostic evaluation of known or suspected hematologic malignancy. We identified 68 patients that had at least 1 sample with a mutation in GNB1 (N =42), GNAS (N=24) or both (N=2) (Figure 1). Twenty-six patients had multiple samples (range 2-10) obtained at serial timepoints during the course of progression and treatment. GNB1 mutations affected codon 57 (K57E/M/N/T) in 38 out of 42 cases; the remaining were G53E, D76G, I81V, and K89R. GNAS mutations affected codon 201 (R201H/C) in 23 out of 24 cases. Forty patients had active myeloid neoplasms [AML (N=10), MDS (N=13), MPN (N=11), MDS/MPN (N=5), BPDCN (N=1)]. The distribution of myeloid diagnoses was similar among patients with GNB1 or GNAS mutations. Analysis of serial samples showed that GNB1/GNAS mutations were frequently acquired at the time of leukemic transformation and clinical progression. Among 5 patients with secondary AML, 2 patients acquired GNB1/GNAS mutations at the time of transformation from MDS to AML, and 3 patients were found to have GNB1/GNAS mutations in high-risk MDS prior to subsequent transformation to AML. After induction chemotherapy for AML, two patients had expanded or newly acquired GNB1 mutations at time of treatment failure. Notably, 15 out of the 40 (37.5%) patients with active myeloid disease had co-mutations in the MPN-associated genes JAK2, CALR, and MPL. Eleven of these patients had a clinical diagnosis of MPN, including myelofibrosis (n=5), essential thrombocytosis (n=3), polycythemia vera (n=2), and systemic mastocytosis (n=1). In the context of underlying oncogenic kinase alterations including JAK2 V617F, GNB1 mutations have been shown to promote resistance to kinase inhibitors in vitro. Fourteen out of fifteen patients had no history of ruxolitinib therapy, suggesting that these mutations arise during the course of disease progression in the absence of therapeutic selection pressures. The impact of GNB1/GNAS mutations on the clinical response to JAK inhibitors has not been evaluated. Twenty-eight patients in the cohort (41%) had no evidence of active myeloid disease, including 14 patients with a lymphoid malignancy [mature B-cell neoplasms (n=8), mature T cell neoplasms (n=3), plasma cell neoplasms (n=2), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=1)], 6 patients with AML in complete remission, and 8 patients without a clinical diagnosis of hematologic malignancy. Four of the AML patients had a GNAS or GNB1 mutation that was newly acquired or persistent at the time of complete remission following induction chemotherapy. All 4 patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT) based on disease risk at diagnosis and are alive with median follow up of 2.5 years. In 1 patient, a new GNB1 mutation was identified immediately after HSCT in the context of 100% donor chimerism, suggesting donor-engrafted CHIP. All 8 patients without hematologic malignancy were evaluated for cytopenias or cytoses at the time of the identification of the GNB1/GNAS mutation. GNB1 and GNAS are recurrently mutated in diverse clinical and genetic contexts. In patients with active myeloid disease, MPN-associated mutations were common and GNB1/GNAS mutations were newly acquired at the time of clinical progression, suggesting a functional role similar to other gene mutations that activate mitogenic signaling pathways. However, many GNB1 and GNAS mutations are seen as sole mutations in the absence of active myeloid disease, suggesting that unlike other signaling mutations they can drive initiation of clonal hematopoiesis. The diverse clinical spectrum of patients with GNB1/GNAS mutations suggests that these mutations have distinct, context dependent effects in hematopoietic cells. Disclosures Kim: Aushon Biosciences: Consultancy; LabCorp, Inc.: Consultancy; Papgene, Inc: Consultancy. Lane:N-of-one: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Description: BACKGROUND Tisagenlecleucel is an FDA approved chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy that reprograms T cells to eliminate CD19+ B cells. ELIANA (NCT02435849) is a phase 2 pivotal study of tisagenlecleucel in pediatric/young adult patients (pts) with CD19+ r/r B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the first global trial of a CAR-T cell therapy. The primary objective was met, with an overall remission rate (ORR) of 81% (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi]). Here we present an update of ELIANA, with additional pts and additional 11 mo follow-up from the previous report (Maude et al. N Engl J Med 2018). METHODS Eligible pts were aged ≥3 y at screening and ≤21 y at diagnosis and had ≥5% leukemic blasts in bone marrow. Tisagenlecleucel was centrally manufactured at 2 sites (Morris Plains, NJ, USA and Leipzig, Germany) by lentiviral transduction of autologous T cells with a vector encoding for a second generation 4-1BB anti-CD19 CAR and expanded ex vivo. Tisagenlecleucel was provided to pts at 25 study centers in 11 countries on 4 continents using cryopreserved apheresed mononuclear cells, central production facilities, and a global supply chain. The primary endpoint, ORR within 3 mo and maintained for ≥28 d among infused pts, was assessed by an independent review committee. Secondary endpoints included duration of remission (DOR), overall survival (OS), safety, and cellular kinetics. RESULTS As of April 13, 2018, 113 pts were screened and 97 enrolled. There were 8 manufacturing failures (8%) and 10 pts (10%) were not infused due to death or adverse events (AEs). Following lymphodepleting chemotherapy in most pts (76/79; fludarabine/cyclophosphamide [n=75]), 79 pts were infused with a single dose of tisagenlecleucel (median dose, 3.0×106 [range, 0.2-5.4×106] CAR-positive viable T cells/kg), and all had ≥3 mo of follow-up or discontinued earlier (median time from infusion to data cutoff, 24 mo [range, 4.5-35 mo]). Median age was 11 y (range, 3-24 y); 61% of pts had prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT). Among the 65 pts with CR/CRi, 64 (98%) were MRD- within 3 mo. Median DOR by K-M analysis was not reached (Figure): responses were ongoing in 29 pts (max DOR, 29 mo and ongoing); 19 pts relapsed before receiving additional anticancer therapy (13 died subsequently); 8 pts underwent SCT while in remission, 8 received additional anticancer therapy (non-SCT) and 1 discontinued while in remission. The probability of relapse-free survival at 18 mo was 66% (95% CI, 52%-77%). Median OS was not reached; OS probability at 18 mo was 70% (95% CI, 58%-79%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 77% of pts (grade [G] 3/4; 48%; graded using the Penn scale); 39% of pts received tocilizumab for treatment of CRS with or without other anti-cytokine therapies; 48% of pts required ICU-level care for CRS, with a median ICU stay of 7 d. All cases of CRS were reversible. Most common G 3/4 nonhematologic AEs (〉15%) other than CRS were neutropenia with a body temperature 〉38.3°C (62% within 8 wk of infusion), hypoxia (20%), and hypotension (20%). 13% of pts experienced G 3 neurological events, with no G 4 events or cerebral edema. Based on laboratory results, 43% and 54% of pts had G 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia not resolved by d 28; the majority of events resolved to G ≤2 by 3 mo. 25 post-infusion deaths were reported: 2 within 30 d (1 disease progression, 1 cerebral hemorrhage); 23 after 30 d of infusion (range, 53-859 d; 18 disease progression, 1 each due to encephalitis, systemic mycosis, VOD [hepatobiliary disorders related to allogeneic-SCT], bacterial lung infection, and an unknown reason after study withdrawal). Tisagenlecleucel expansion in vivo correlated with CRS severity, and persistence of tisagenlecleucel along with B-cell aplasia in peripheral blood was observed for ≥2.5 y in some responding pts. Analysis of B-cell recovery and correlation with relapse will be presented. CONCLUSIONS With longer follow-up, the ELIANA study continues to confirm the efficacy of a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel in pediatric and young adults with ALL without additional therapy. AEs were effectively and reproducibly managed globally by appropriately trained personnel at study sites. The achievement of high overall response rates and deep remissions, in combination with the median duration of response and overall survival not being reached, further corroborate previously reported results. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Grupp: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties. Maude:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rives:Shire: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards ; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards ; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Symposia, advisory boards ; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: advisory board . Baruchel:Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations or expenses; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy. Bittencourt:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bader:Riemser: Research Funding; Cellgene: Consultancy; Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Neovii: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Laetsch:Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy. Stefanski:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Myers:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Qayed:Novartis: Consultancy. Pulsipher:CSL Behring: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Martin:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nemecek:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Other: advisory boards. Boissel:Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leung:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Eldjerou:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Yi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Mueller:Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research: Employment; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Equity Ownership, Other: Patent pending. Bleickardt:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.

Description: Somatic mutations can have highly stereotyped positions in the myeloid clonal hierarchy and distinct patterns of co-occurring mutations. Gene mutations that cause aberrant activation of RAS/MAPK signaling are typically late events in myeloid disease progression and are closely associated with leukemic transformation. We hypothesized that the phenotypic output of oncogenic RAS signaling is dynamically reprogrammed during leukemogenesis based on evolving genetic and epigenetic context. To identify genetic alterations that may modulate RAS-mediated transformation, we evaluated 1273 adults with myelodysplastic syndrome, including 150 with mutations in NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11, CBL, RIT1, NF1, or FLT3. Somatic mutations in ASXL1 (q

Description: Background Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a collection of hematopoietic disorders with widely variable prognoses and treatment options. Pathologic diagnosis can be challenging and misdiagnosis can impact patient therapy and outcome. How commonly misdiagnosis occurs, and the severity of diagnostic errors, is not known. Here, we report interim analyses of patients (pts) with cytopenia and suspected MDS from the NHLBI National MDS Natural History Study (https://thenationalmdsstudy.net ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02775383) assessing MDS occurrence and rates of agreement on classification of MDS/MDS-related disorders by local and centralized review. Methods Pts with cytopenias and clinically suspected MDS were identified between 6/16 and 6/18 from 84 participating centers in this ongoing multi-Institutional Cooperative Group study, with a goal of recruiting 2000 MDS (WHO 2016 subcategories), MDS/MPN or low blast count acute myeloid leukemia (AML,