ISSN:
1572-9583
Keywords:
Rational consequence
;
non-monotonic logic
;
uncertain reasoning
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Linguistics and Literary Studies
,
Computer Science
Notes:
Abstract The notion of the rational closure of a positive knowledge base K of conditional assertions θ $$i$$ |∼ φ $$i$$ (standing for if θ $$i$$ then normally φ $$i$$ ) was first introduced by Lehmann (1989) and developed by Lehmann and Magidor (1992). Following those authors we would also argue that the rational closure is, in a strong sense, the minimal information, or simplest, rational consequence relation satisfying K. In practice, however, one might expect a knowledge base to consist not just of positive conditional assertions, θ $$i$$ |∼ φ $$i$$ , but also negative conditional assertions, θi φ $$i$$ (standing for not if θ $$i$$ then normally φ $$i$$ . Restricting ourselves to a finite language we show that the rational closure still exists for satisfiable knowledge bases containing both positive and negative conditional assertions and has similar properties to those exhibited in Lehmann and Magidor (1992). In particular an algorithm in Lehmann and Magidor (1992) which constructs the rational closure can be adapted to this case and yields, in turn, completeness theorems for the conditional assertions entailed by such a mixed knowledge base.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008261123028
