ALBERT

Description: Techniques for detection, evaluation, and prediction of pore pressures in low-permeability rocks and equations for fluid-pressure computations in most integrated basin-modeling software are based on relationships between porosity and effective stress in shales. However, recent data show that overpressured shales in the North Sea do not exhibit higher porosities than the normally pressured shales of the same formation at similar depths. To further evaluate the existence of porosity vs. effective stress relationships in shales, fluid-flow simulations and porosity modeling in a typical high-pressure and high-temperature well in the North Sea were undertaken. The parameters in the permeability and porosity equations were adjusted until a satisfactory fit was achieved between the observed and modeled porosity and fluid pressure at present. However, the modeled porosity and pore pressure vs. depth history of the sediments deviated significantly from known porosity and pore pressure vs. depth relationships that have been observed in North Sea shales and elsewhere today. Because the results from basin modeling based on porosity-stress relationships were unacceptable, irrespective of parameter choices, and the well data from the North Sea show no signs of elevated porosities in the overpressured shales, it is inferred that effective stress-driven compaction alone has not generated the hard overpressures observed in deeply buried North Sea shales. These conclusions are suggested to be generally applicable to shales with low porosities and hard overpressures worldwide, both because of the physics involved and because similar results can be extracted from published modeling in the Niger Delta. Hege M. Nordgård Bolås received her M.Sc. degree in petroleum geology from the Norwegian Institute of Technology in Trondheim. She joined Esso Norge A.S. in Stavanger, Norway, in 1985 and worked there as an explorationist until 1992. Her research work includes basin modeling at the Institute for Continental Shelf Research in Trondheim from 1992 until 1994, and since then she has worked on hydrocarbon trapping mechanisms at Statoil's Research Center.Christian Hermanrud is currently project leader at Statoil's Research Center. He has an M.Sc. degree in applied mathematics from the University of Bergen, Norway, and a Ph.D. in geological sciences from the University of South Carolina, Columbia. His background includes 20 years of hydrocarbon exploration and exploration-related research. Gunn M. G. Teige received her M.Sc. degree in 1990 in petroleum geology from the Norwegian Institute of Technology in Trondheim, Norway. She joined Statoil in 1991 and worked as an explorationist and petrophysicist for three years before joining Statoil's Research Center in 1994. Her major research interests are sealing analysis and leakage processes.

Description: A cap rock's capacity to seal hydrocarbons depends on its wettability and the sizes of the pore throats within the interconnected pore system that the leaking hydrocarbons must penetrate. These critical pore throat sizes are often poorly constrained in hydrocarbon exploration, partly because measurements of pore throat sizes have not been performed, and partly because pore throat measurements on a few individual samples in the cap rock may not be representative for the seal capacity of the top seal as a whole. To the contrary, the presence of formation overpressure can normally be estimated in drilled exploration targets. The presence of overpressure in reservoirs testifies to small pore throats in the cap rocks, as large pore throats will result in sufficiently high cap rock permeability to bleed off the overpressure. We suggest a stepwise procedure that enables quantification of top seal capacities of overpressured traps, based on subsurface pressure information. This procedure starts with the estimation of cap rock permeabilities, which are consistent with observed overpressure gradients across the top seals. Knowledge of burial histories is essential for these estimations. Relationships between pore throat size and permeability from laboratory experiments are then applied to estimate critical pore throat diameters in cap rocks. These critical pore throat diameters, combined with information of the physical properties of the pore fluids, are then used to calculate membrane seal capacity of cap rocks. Estimates of top seal capacity based on this procedure are rather sensitive to the vertical fluid velocity, but they are also to some extent sensitive to inaccuracies of the pore throat/permeability relationship, overpressure gradient, interfacial tensions between pore fluids, hydrocarbon density and water viscosity values. Despite these uncertainties, applications of the above-mentioned procedure demonstrated that the mere presence of reservoir overpressures testifies to sufficient membrane seal capacity of cap rocks for most geological histories. Exempt from this statement are basins with rapid and substantial sediment compaction in the recent past. © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Description: Methods for detection of pore fluid overpressures in shales from seismic data have become widespread in the oil industry. Such methods are largely based on the identification of anomalous seismic velocities, and on subsequent determination of pore pressures through relationships between seismic velocities and the vertical effective stress (VES). Although it is well known that lithology variations and compaction mechanisms should be accounted for in pore pressure evaluation, a systematic approach to evaluation of these factors in seismic pore pressure prediction seems to be absent. We have investigated the influence of lithology variations and compaction mechanism on shale velocities from acoustic logs. This was performed by analyses of 80 wells from the northern North Sea and 24 wells from the Haltenbanken area. The analyses involved identification of large-scale density and velocity variations that were unrelated to overpressure variations, which served as a basis for the analyses of the resolution of overpressure variations from well log data. The analyses demonstrated that the overpressures in neither area were associated with compaction disequilibrium. A significant correlation between acoustic velocity and fluid overpressure nevertheless exists in the Haltenbanken data, whereas the correlation between these two parameters is weak to non-existing in the North Sea shales. We do not presently know why acoustic velocities in the two areas respond differently to fluid overpressuring. Smectitic rocks often have low permeabilities, and define the top of overpressures in the northern North Sea when they are buried below 2km. As smectitic rocks are characterized by low densities and low acoustic velocities, their presence may be identified from seismic data. Smectite identification from seismic data may thus serve as an indirect overpressure indicator in some areas. Our investigations demonstrate the importance of including geological work and process understanding in pore pressure evaluation work. As a response to the lack of documented practice within this area, we suggest a workflow for geological analyses that should be performed and integrated with seismic pore pressure prediction. © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.