ALBERT

Beschreibung: Key Points Whole-genome integrative analyses in FL reveal that genes strongly influenced by copy number are highly enriched for NF-kB pathway regulators. Subsignatures of the NF-kB targets predict transformation in FL.

Beschreibung: SGN-30 is a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD30 antigen expressed on some hematologic malignancies. Based on encouraging phase I data, a multicenter phase II study was conducted treating patients with refractory or recurrent CD30-positive ALCL with an ECOG performance status of ≤ 2. Thirty-nine patients (24M, 15F) with ALCL were enrolled, with a median age of 57 (range 23–82) and a median of 3 prior therapies (range 2–5). Nine patients had previously received a stem cell transplant. Eighty-five percent of tumors were negative for ALK, a poor prognostic factor. SGN-30 was administred at 6 mg/kg/wk (90 minute infusion, premedications were not required) for 6 consecutive weeks. After 24 patients were enrolled, the dose was escalated to 12 mg/kg/wk in subsequent patients. (Patients with stable disease or objective response were eligible to receive additional cycles of SGN-30. Five patients received ≥ 2 cycles of SGN-30.) Response assessments, as determined by CT scans, were performed 2 weeks after the last infusion. Best response is shown below: CR PR SD PD Pending Eval ORR *Both CRs have ongoing durations of 〉365 days; both patients received additional cycles of SGN-30. **PRs had durations of 27, 53, 139 and 167 days; two additional patients have ongoing durations of 86+ and 25+ days. ***Three SDs have ongoing durations of 96+, 365+, and 365+ days. Two additional patients had SD for 71 and 174 days. 2* 6** 5*** 24 2 21% Three drug-related toxicities ≥ Grade 3 were reported (each was considered possibly related to SGN-30): 1) lymphopenia, 2) catheter related infection and 3) urticaria. No other significant hematologic or biochemical toxicities have been observed. There was one definitely related serious adverse event (Grade 2) in a patient who experienced a transient exacerbation of his cutaneous lesions after 2 doses of SGN-30 but achieved a partial response after continuing on study. This phase II study represents one of the largest prospectively designed trials in relapsed/refractory ALCL and demonstrates good tolerability and clinically meaningful antitumor activity of SGN-30, especially in ALK negative patients who have a particularly poor prognosis.

Beschreibung: Abstract 331 Background and aims: Systemic peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are malignancies responding poorly to conventional therapy. To evaluate the efficacy of a dose-dense approach consolidated by upfront high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in PTCL, the Nordic Lymphoma Group conducted the, so far, largest PTCL-restricted prospective phase II study in previously untreated systemic PTCL. This is the final report of the NLG-T-01 study with a 5-years median follow up. Methods: Patients with previously untreated systemic PTCL aged 18–67 years were included. ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cases were excluded. An induction regimen of six cycles of bi-weekly cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristin and prednisone (CHOEP) was given. Age-based (〉60 yrs) omission of etoposide was recommended. If in complete or partial remission, patients received high-dose chemotherapy with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan/cyclophosphamide (BEAM/BEAC) followed by HDT/ASCT. Results: A total of 166 patients with previously untreated PTCL were enrolled. Of these, 160 were histopathologically confirmed and included the following subtypes: PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (n=62; 39%), ALK-negative ALCL (n=31; 19%), angioimmunoblastic lymphoma (AIL) (n=30; 19%), enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n=21; 13%), panniculitis-like (n=6; 4%), T/NK nasal-type (n=5; 3%), and hepatosplenic (n=5; 3%). The M/F ratio was 2.0 and the median age 57 yrs (range 22–67 yrs). The majority of the cases presented with advanced-stage disease (81%), B-symptoms (59%) and elevated s-LDH (62%). Nevertheless, 71% of all patients had a good performance score (PS) (WHO 0–1) at inclusion. With regard to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), risk factor distribution was as follows: 1 factor n=45 (28%), 2 factors n=52 (32%), 3 factors n=30 (19%), 4–5 factors n=33 (21%). Of the 160 patients, a total of 114 (71%) underwent HDT/ASCT with 90 in complete remission at 3 months post-transplant. Early failures occurred in 26% of the patients. The treatment related mortality was low (4%). At a median follow-up of 60 months, 83 patients were alive. The median follow-up for deceased patients (N=77) was 9 months. The consolidated 5-yr overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) values for the entire cohort were 51% and 44%, respectively. Best results were obtained in ALK-negative ALCL with 5-yr OS and PFS of 70% and 61%, respectively. IPI was a useful overall prognostic discriminator for the low/low-intermediate vs. intermediate-high/high groups with regard to 5-yr OS (p=0,047) and 5-yr PFS (p=0,029). If applied separately to each of the four major subtypes, IPI had a predictive value for OS in AIL (p=0,02) and for PFS in both AIL (p=0,02) and PTCL-NOS (p=0,03). The clinicopathological parameters that showed a significant impact on OS and PFS were: female gender (correlated with a better outcome), age (analyzed as continuous variable), PS≥2 (correlated with adverse outcome), and cytotoxic phenotype (correlated with adverse outcome in AIL). All these parameters retained their prognostic value at multivariate level, except for cytotoxic phenotype, where multivariate analysis could not be performed because of too small numbers. Conclusions: Dose-dense induction followed by HDT/ASCT is well tolerated and leads to long-term PFS in 44% of patients with systemic PTCL. This represents an encouraging outcome, particularly considering the high median age and adverse risk profile of the present study population. Therefore, based on these results, dose-dense induction and HDT/ASCT should be considered in transplant-eligible PTCL patients. Disclosures: Jantunen: Genzyme: Honoraria.

Beschreibung: Background Despite the advent of rituximab (R)-based chemoimmunotherapy, outcome for patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) continues to be suboptimal, and the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression is high. In a previous Nordic phase II study with dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy followed by systemic CNS prophylaxis, the CNS progression rate was lower than expected (4.5%), but all events occurred within 6 months after initiation of therapy (Holte et al., Ann Oncol 2013). Hence, in the present study, systemic CNS prophylaxis was moved to the beginning of therapy and CNS targeted therapy was further intensified by adding intrathecally administered liposomal AraC. Methods Inclusion criteria are age 18-65 years, primary DLBCL or grade 3B follicular lymphoma without clinical or radiological signs of CNS disease and cytology negative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), age adjusted IPI 2-3, WHO performance score ≤3, and/or site specific risk factors for CNS recurrence. Treatment consists of two courses of high dose (HD)-Mtx in combination with R-CHOP14, four courses of R-CHOEP14 and a course of HD-AraC with R. In addition, liposomal AraC is administered intrathecally in courses 1, 3 and 5. All courses are administered with support of pegfilgastrim. Indications for radiotherapy are bulky masses at diagnosis and localized PET positive residual disease not eligible for biopsy. Primary endpoints are failure-free survival at 3 years, and CNS progression rate at 18 months. A secondary aim is to elucidate if CSF cytology negative/flow cytometry (FC) positive cases carry an increased risk of CNS progression with the present regimen. Results Of the accrued 84 patients by July 22, 2013, 70 had a complete set of baseline data. Median age was 55 years (range 20-64). The majority presented with DLBCL (96%), advanced-stage disease (94%), elevated LDH (94%), B-symptoms (67%), and 49% with 〉1 extranodal site. Seven CSF-samples were FC positive. Data on toxicity, response and relapse rates were registered for 45 patients. One toxic death due to pneumonia was reported. Grade 4 hematological toxicity and infections were observed in 78% and 11% of the patients, grade 3-4 mucositis and gastrointestinal toxicity in 27% and 42%, and grade 3 arachnoiditis in 2.2% of the patients. CR, CRu, PR and PD rates at the end of chemoimmunotherapy were 69.0%, 14.3%, 14.3% and 2.4 %, respectively. After a median follow up time of 19 months, four patients have relapsed, two of whom with fatal CNS manifestations. Conclusions Preliminary results indicate highly satisfactory response rates and reasonable toxicity despite intensive therapy. HD-Mtx in combination with R-CHOP in the beginning of therapy and further intensification of treatment with CNS targeted liposomal AraC seem feasible and safe. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01325194 Disclosures: Leppa: Amgen: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Holte:Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Beschreibung: Abstract 794 Introduction/Purpose: The optimal treatment schedule and best order of therapies are not well established for patients (pts) with indolent lymphoma. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of adding interferon-alpha (IFN) to first-line rituximab (R) monotherapy, with extended dosing, in pts with CD20+indolent lymphoma and to define pts with no need of initial chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Pts with symptomatic, advanced indolent lymphoma (previously untreated or at first relapse after a short course of chlorambucil) were randomized to R (MabtheraR) 375 mg/m2 once-weekly for 4 consecutive weeks or R with 5 weeks IFN (Roferon-AR) as priming. Patients achieving either a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or a minor response (MR) at evaluation 6 weeks after last R in this first cycle, were planned to receive a second cycle with four infusions of R alone or combined with IFN, according to the initial randomization. Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as the time period from randomization to one of the following events: progressive disease during treatment, death of any cause or initiation of new therapy. Results: In total, 313 patients were randomized. The median age was 59 years, 51% were females, 90% Ann Arbor stage III or IV and 31% showed elevated LDH. The clinical characteristics were well-balanced between the treatment groups. Pathology review showed 127 follicular lymphoma (FL) grade I, 110 grade II and 9 grade IIIA. In total, 4 pts in each arm did not fulfill inclusion criteria: 5 DLBCL/ transformed, 2 MCL and one Hodgkin. Most patients were previously untreated, but 10 pts in the R group and 13 with R+IFN had had a previous response to chlorambucil and 18 and 9 had had local radiotherapy. respectively. After cycle 1, response rates among all 313 randomized pts were 8.6 % CR/CRu, 47.9 % PR, 22.4 % MR and 16.9 % of pts were considered resistant (SD/PD). In total 244 pts were qualified for cycle 2. Overall response rates after cycle 2 were 82% and 74%, in the R+IFN- and the R-group, respectively (n.s), but the CR/CRu rates were higher with the combination (41% vs 22.4%, p〈 0.01). Also pts with FLIPI 3–5 (45% of all pts) showed a deeper response with R+IFN (CR/Cru 38.0% compared to 23.1%). More patients in the combination arm improved their responses from PR/MR in cycle 1, to CR after cycle 2. In the intention–to treat (ITT) population (n=313), median time to TTF was 21 and 28 months in the R and R+IFN group, respectively. Most events consisted of initiation of new therapy including chlorambucil, COP or CHOP, but in 7 patients in the R group, relapse treatment was single R (in one case with the addition of IFN) and in the R+IFN group 10 pts had R (3 with IFN). Two pts in the R-group and 12 pts in the R+IFN group had late relapses treated with local irradiation. After a median follow-up time of 60.7 months, for surviving pts, 35 % of the ITT patients were still event-free with 90% survivors, but with no difference between the treatment groups. Patients with FL grade II and IIIA showed a longer TTF than pts with grade I (p=0,05). Conclusion: This randomized phase III trial demonstrates that extended rituximab therapy is safe and effective as first-line therapy in patients with symptomatic low-grade B-cell lymphoma, with improved responses and a delayed time to early failure if combined with IFN. The long term FU suggests that more than 1/3 of this patient population does not need initial chemotherapy, but predictive markers for response to R and new biological combinations are needed. Disclosures: Kimby: Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Beschreibung: Abstract 3565 Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (ETCL) is a rare lymphoma often, but not always, associated with celiac disease and characterized by poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy. In previous studies long-term survival has been achieved in only 10–20% of the patients. Limited data is available on the feasibility and efficacy of intensive induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem transplantation (ASCT) in this rare lymphoma entity. We therefore specifically analysed the outcome of ETCL patients included in a large prospective phase II study (NLG-T-01) performed by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. The NLG-T-01 study included 160 patients with systemic alk-negative peripheral T-cell lymphoma over the period 2002–2007. The patients received CHOEP-14 × 6 followed by ASCT after BEAM or BEAC in responsive patients. The study included altogether 21 patients (13 %) with ETCL. There were 16 males and 5 females with a median age of 55 years (32-65) at diagnosis. Eighteen patients (86 %) had advanced disease, three patients (14 %) had a bulky tumour, nine patients (43 %) presented with B symptoms and four (19%) with elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase. Response status after three and six courses was CR or CRu in 67 % patients. Fourteen patients (67 %) received BEAM or BEAC supported by blood stem cell graft (median number of stem cells infused 5.4 × 106/kg). Of these, 6 patients relapsed with a median of 219 days from ASCT. Of the 7 patients (33%), who did not reach ASCT because of refractory/progressive disease, 5 died early due to lymphoma. At a median follow-up of 45 months, 10 patients (45 %) are alive. The progression-free survival is 40 %. One patient (5%) died due to early transplant-related cause (disseminated candidiasis). In this prospective study, intensive induction chemotherapy followed by ASCT was feasible in the majority of younger patients with EATL. In a subset of patients, who should clinically and biologically be further characterized, long-term outcome seems promising when compared to historical controls. Whether addition of other chemotherapeutic agents, antibodies such as alemtuzumab or other biologicals may further improve long-term outcome remains to be studied. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Beschreibung: Abstract 1557 Background: The aim was to compare differentially expressed exons and splicing variants between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, who had relapsed or remained in remission after dose dense chemoimmunotherapy. Design and methods: We performed genome-wide exon array analysis from four DLBCL cell lines and 38 tumor tissues from young (1) disease. The patients were treated in a Nordic phase II protocol with six courses of R-CHOEP-14 followed by systemic central nervous system prophylaxis with one course of high dose methotrexate and high dose cytarabine. At the time of the analysis, median follow up was 34 months, predicted 3-year progression free survival (PFS) 78% and overall survival (OS) 79%. RNA for quantitative PCR validation was available from 20 patients. Two DLBCL cell lines and eight patient samples were further analyzed with high throughput RNA sequencing. In addition, microarray data set from 233 DLBCL patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy (Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP)) was utilized for validation. Results: Differentially expressed exons between relapsed and non-relapsed patients were screened using criteria of p ≤ 0.05 and fold change ≥1.6 converting to 566 differentially expressed genes, of which 131 coded proteins. One of the identified genes with possible alternative splicing was TUBB2B, which encodes therapeutic target of taxanes and vinca alkaloids. The expression of TUBB2B, and specifically the expression of exon 3, was found to be suppressed in relapsed patients in comparison to patients remaining in remission. Differential expression of TUBB2B whole transcript and exon 3 was confirmed with RNAseq and quantitative PCR. Studies in lymphoma cell lines provided further support for the existence of different TUBB2B isoforms. According to Kaplan Meier estimates the patients with high (〉median) expression levels of TUBB2B exon 3 had better 3-year PFS and lymphoma related OS rates than the patients with low expression levels (95% vs. 61%, p=0.015 for PFS, 100% vs. 75%, p=0.024 for OS). The prognostic significance of TUBB2B gene expression was validated in LLMPP data set (3-year OS 80% vs. 67%, p=0.040). Conclusions: The results provide evidence that differential expression and splicing of TUBB2B gene can discriminate the outcome of homogenously treated high risk DLBCL patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Beschreibung: Background: Tisagenlecleucel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy that is approved for adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). In the phase 2 JULIET trial, pts could receive bridging therapy (BT), when needed, to permit flexibility in scheduling and maintain disease control. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) was started 5-14 days prior to CAR-T cell infusion. Here we present baseline characteristics, efficacy/safety outcomes, and cellular kinetics by BT and type of LDC used in the JULIET trial. Methods: Pts were categorized based on BT or no BT, as well as LDC (cyclophosphamide/fludarabine [Cy/Flu; 250 and 25 mg/m2 IV daily for 3 doses, respectively] or bendamustine [90 mg/m2 IV daily for 2 days]) or no LDC, received prior to tisagenlecleucel infusion. Cy/Flu was the proposed regimen for LDC, followed by bendamustine (if the pt experienced previous grade [G] 4 hemorrhagic cystitis with Cy or demonstrated resistance to a previous Cy-containing regimen). LDC was not required if white blood cell count was 8 weeks to ≤1 year post-infusion, 〉1 year post-infusion, and any time after infusion were generally consistent across BT and LDC groups for prolonged cytopenias, neurological events (NE), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and infection (Table). Of note, among pts who did not receive BT, only 1 G3 CRS and 1 G3 NE were reported, and no G4 CRS or NE were reported. Additionally, the rate of cytopenias not resolved by day 28 post-infusion was lowest among pts who did not receive BT (1/11 pts). However, cytopenias resolved to ≤G2 by month 3 or month 6 in the majority of pts. Cmax, Tmax, and exposure (AUC0-28d) were similar between LDC groups (Table). Cmax and AUC0-28d were also similar between pts who received BT and those who did not. Additional analyses of subgroups will be presented at the congress. Conclusions: The majority of pts enrolled in the JULIET trial received BT and LDC, indicating high tumor burden and aggressive disease in this pt population with r/r DLBCL. Although the sample size is small (n=11), pts not requiring BT appeared to have less aggressive disease, achieved high response rates, and had no G4 CRS or NE. Pts who did not receive LDC (n=8) seemed to have low response rates, suggesting either the impact of prior therapy, the importance of LDC, or both. Further evaluation of the impact of BT and LDC on clinical outcomes on larger patient population will be possible with the availability of registry data. Clinical trial information: NCT02445248 Table Disclosures Andreadis: Genentech: Consultancy, Employment; Merck: Research Funding; Roche: Equity Ownership; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Tam:BeiGene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Borchmann:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jaeger:Novartis, Roche, Sandoz: Consultancy; AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Takeda Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eisai, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Takeda Millennium, MSD, BMS, Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene, Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, AbbVie, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McGuirk:Astellas: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; ArticulateScience LLC: Other: Assistance with manuscript preparation; Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Holte:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board. Waller:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Cerus Corporation: Other: Stock, Patents & Royalties; Chimerix: Other: Stock; Cambium Oncology: Patents & Royalties: Patents, royalties or other intellectual property ; Amgen: Consultancy; Kalytera: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Bishop:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Foley:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Westin:Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Unum: Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Fleury:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Ho:Novartis: Other: Trial Investigator meeting travel costs; La Jolla: Other: Trial Investigator meeting travel costs; Janssen: Other: Trial Investigator meeting travel costs; Celgene: Other: Trial Investigator meeting travel costs. Mielke:DGHO: Other: Travel support; IACH: Other: Travel support; EBMT/EHA: Other: Travel support; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and speakers fee (via institution), Speakers Bureau; GILEAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel (via institution), Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support (via institution), Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support (via institution), Speakers Bureau; ISCT: Other: Travel support; Bellicum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel (via institution). Teshima:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Salles:Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Servier, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Kite, MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events. Schuster:Novartis: Patents & Royalties: Combination Therapies of CAR and PD-1 Inhibitors (royalties to Novartis); i3Health, Dava Oncology, Novartis, OncLive, PER Oncology: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Acerta, Celgene, DTRM Bio, Genentech, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Portola, TG therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, Nordic Nanovector, Pfizer: Other: steering committee; Acerta, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Juno, LoxoOncology, Novartis: Other: advisory board; i3Health, Acerta, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Dava Oncology, Juno, LoxoOncology, Novartis, Nordic Nanovector, OncLive, PER Oncology, Pfizer: Honoraria. Bachanova:Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; GT Biopharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maziarz:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Van Besien:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Izutsu:Eisai, Chugai, Zenyaku: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin, Eisai, Takeda, MSD, Chugai, Nihon Medi-physics, Janssen, Ono, Abbvie, Dainihon Sumitomo, Bayer, Astra Zeneca, HUYA Japan, Novartis, Bristol-Byers Squibb, Mundi, Otsuka, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas, Asahi Kasei: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Eisai, Symbio, Chugai, Zenyaku: Research Funding; Chugai, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Eisai, Symbio, Ono, Bayer, Solasia, Zenyaku, Incyte, Novartis, Sanofi, HUYA Bioscience, MSD, Astellas Amgen, Abbvie, ARIAD, Takeda, Pfizer: Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Corradini:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Jazz Pharmaceutics: Honoraria; KiowaKirin: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; BMS: Other: Travel Costs. Tiwari:Novartis: Employment. Awasthi:Novartis: Employment. Lawniczek:Novartis: Employment. Eldjerou:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Kersten:MSD: Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Janssen/Cilag: Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Kite: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Celgene: Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Gilead: Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Amgen: Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Roche: Other: Travel grants, honorarium, or advisory boards; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Beschreibung: From 9/98 to 11/99, 126 patients with symptomatic previously untreated or first relapse (〈 6 months of chlorambucil and/or local radiotherapy) CD20+ low-grade lymphoma, were included in a multicenter randomised phase II study. The treatment consisted of a first cycle of rituximab 375 mg/sqm q wk x 4. Pts in CR at week 14 were observed with no further treatment until symptomatic relapse, while pts with SD or PD went off study. Pts with PR or minor response were randomised to receive either a second cycle of rituximab 375 mg/sqm q wk x 4 or interferon-alpha-2a (IFN) 3 MIU/day sc (wk 1), 4,5 MIU/day (wk 2–5) in combination with rituximab 375 mg/sqm q wk (w 3–6). The clinical data from this study has previously been reported (Kimby E, et al. Ann Oncol2002;13 (Suppl 2):85). 38 patients (30%) fulfilled the criteria for CR, and were eligible for analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD). 14 more patients achieved CR at a time point later than first follow up after end of treatment. Per protocol, these patients are not included in the present analysis. By standard DNA-based PCR, presence of either a t(14;18) fusion transcript (MCR/mbr) or a clonal rearrangement of the Ig heavy chain (CDR3) could be detected in the diagnostic bone marrow and blood sample from 23 patients. These patients have now been studied for MRD, with a median follow-up time of 62 months. In dilution experiments the sensitivity of the assays was between 1:10−3 and 1:10−4. A given sample was considered negative if the PCR reaction was negative in three independent experiments, using up to 2 μg of template DNA. Patients were tested in blood and bone marrow at 10–16 weeks, 38–40 weeks and 52 weeks following treatment. A total of 175 samples, including 49 samples from patients in continued CR up to 5 years after treatment, have been analysed. Of 72 paired blood and bone marrow samples, only three showed inconsistency between blood and bone marrow, all three being positive in bone marrow and negative in blood. The frequency of MRD negativity 10–16 weeks after treatment was 4/9 (44%) in patients who received 1 cycle of rituximab, 3/5 (66%) in patients who received two cycles of rituximab and 7/9 (77%) in patients who received two cycles of rituximab with IFN priming. This trend towards a dose-response relation was however not significant, due to the small number of patients in each treatment group. The median duration of CR in patients who were negative at all three timepoints during the first year (n=14) was 62 months, compared to 21 months in patients (n=9) with one or more positive samples (p

Beschreibung: Systemic PTCL, with the exception of alk-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), have a poor prognosis. ASCT has been shown to have a favourable impact on relapsed PTCL. Therefore, the NLG designed a prospective multicenter phase II study to evaluate the impact of a dose-intensified induction schedule (6 courses of two-weekly CHOEP) consolidated in 1st PR/CR with high-dose therapy (BEAM) followed by ASCT in previously untreated systemic PTCL. This is the largest prospective PTCL-specific trial published so far. Newly diagnosed non-primary cutaneous PTCL cases aged 18–67 yrs were eligible for enrollment. Cases of alk-positive ALCL were excluded. From Oct 2001 to Feb 2006, 99 histologically confirmed PTCL cases were included in the study: PTCL unspecified (n=41), alk-neg ALCL (n=24), AILT (n=15), enteropathy-type (n=12), panniculitis-like (n=3), T/NK nasal-type (n=2), hepatosplenic (n=2). The M/F ratio was 1.8 and the median age 55 yrs (range 20–67 yrs). Although almost 2/3 of the cases presented with advanced-stage disease (62%), B-symptoms (61%) and/or elevated s-LDH (63%), the majority of them (65%) had a good performance score (WHO 0–1) at diagnosis. Of the 77 patients, where information was available for all 6 induction courses, 68 (88%) were in CR (31) or PR (37) after the 3rd and 66 (86%) after the 6th course. A total of 58 patients (75%) went through ASCT indicating that at least a fourth of this younger patient cohort has a primary refractory disease and fails therapy before reaching the transplant. Treatment-related toxicity after both induction and high-dose treatment was manageable. Of the 58 transplanted patients, 50 (86%) were still in remission at re-evaluation short after transplant. In 39 patients follow-up data one year post-transplant were available: 30 are still in CR and 9 have relapsed, suggesting that post-transplant relapses probably account for another 25% of the original patient cohort. In conclusion, the present data indicate that a time- and dose-intensified schedule is feasible and effective in previously untreated systemic PTCL. Continuous remissions are not uncommon, but a longer follow-up is needed to further characterize long-term remission rates and evaluate their impact on time-to-treatment failure and overall survival.