ALBERT

Description: Patients referred to tertiary care centers occasionally may have their diagnostic procedures repeated and have a final diagnosis that differs from that of the referring center. The aim of this study was to evaluate discordance rates and their clinical implications in the diagnosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) referred to a tertiary center. We analyzed 915 patients with MDS who were referred to M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between September 2005 and December 2009. Discordance in the diagnosis was documented in 109 (12%) patients, with a majority reclassified as having higher-risk disease by French-American-British (67%) or by International Prognostic Scoring System (77%) with implications for therapy selection and prognosis calculation. These results demonstrate the complexity of the diagnosis of MDS and highlight the need for confirmation of diagnosis when in doubt.

Description: Human pentraxins are a family of proteins with a unique pentameric structure. Unlike C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid P (SAP) and pentraxin-3 (PTX3) play an opposite role in tissue remodeling. PTX3 induces whereas SAP inhibits the differentiation of CD14+ monocytes into fiborcytes. While in patients with CLL CRP levels are high and were found to be associated with poor overall survival (OS) (Herishanu et al. Ann Med 2017), little is known about the plasma levels or clinical significance of other pentraxins in CLL. Therefore, we obtained plasma sample from 36 randomly chosen treatment-naïve CLL patients and 12 age-matched healthy individuals and, using an enzyme linked immuno-sorbent assay, found that PTX3, CRP and SAP plasma levels were significantly higher in CLL patients than in healthy individuals (P

Description: INTRODUCTION: Most clinical trials exclude patients with poor performance, organ dysfunction, and presence of other active malignancies or comorbidities. Although some of these criteria are based on clinical reasoning, patients with such clinical features have dismal expected outcomes and limited therapeutic options and could therefore have a more favorable risk/benefit ratio if treated with a low intensity investigational intervention. The current study was designed to test whether it is feasible to treat patients not eligible for conventional studies in a clinical trial. METHODS: We conducted an initial Bayesian designed single-arm study and a subsequent randomized study for patients with AML or higher-risk MDS (intermediate-2 or high risk by IPSS) with either ECOG performance status (PS) ≥3, creatinine or bilirubin ≥2mg/dL, presence of other malignancy or other comorbidities. Primary endpoint was survival at day 60. The study included stopping rules for survival, response and toxicity. All patients received azacitidine 75mg/m2 sc daily for 5 days. Patients in the single-arm study and in the combination arm of the randomized study also received vorinostat 200mg tid for 5 days. Cycles could be repeated every 3-8 weeks. Responses were evaluated following the revised 2006 IWG criteria for patients with MDS and the IWG 2003 recommendations for patients with AML. Comorbidities were evaluated using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) index. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v4 criteria. Overall survival (OS) was censored at the time of transplant. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time interval between treatment start and date of resistance, progression or death. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients (16 with MDS, 14 with AML) were enrolled in the initial single-arm study. Patient characteristics and inclusion criteria are detailed in Table 1. Median age was 73 years (44-83). Median follow-up was 7.4 months (0.3-29). Sixty-day survival was 83%. Median number of cycles administered was 3.5 (1-12). The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% with 8 (27%) patients achieving CR, 4 with AML and 4 with MDS. Median OS was 7.8 months (0.3-29, CI 7.54-8.03) (Figure 1A) and median EFS was 5.1 months (0.3-15.9, CI 4.87-5.37) (Figure 1B). Stopping rules for survival and response were not met. Main adverse events (AEs) where grade 1-2 gastrointestinal toxicities. Mortality at 4 and 8 weeks was 10 and 20% respectively. A total of 79 patients were enrolled in the subsequent randomized study: 27 to azacitidine (A) and 52 to azacitidine and vorinostat (A+V). Patient characteristics and inclusion criteria are also shown in Table 1. Median age was 70 years (30-90). Forty-seven (59%) patients had MDS and 32 (41%) had AML. Median follow-up was 22.7 months (12.6-47.5). Sixty-day survival rates were 67% (A) and 85% (A+V), respectively (p=0.07). No differences in ORR (48% vs 46%, p=0.87), OS (6.1 vs 7.6 months, p=0.49) (Figure 1C) or EFS (3 vs 5.5 months, p=0.05) (Figure 1D) were observed between groups. Main AEs included grade 1-2 gastrointestinal toxicities with a higher proportion of AEs with A+V (81 vs 56%). Mortality at 4 and 8 weeks was 10% (A: 4, A+V: 4) and 19% (A: 9, A+V: 6) respectively. By univariate analysis neither PS ≥3, creatinine or bilirubin ≥2mg/dL nor presence of other malignancy were predictive for 60-day survival, OS or EFS. There were no significant differences in survival between patients with ACE-27 scores of 0-1 compared to 2-3 both in the single-arm (6.3 vs 7 months, HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.41-1.91, p=0.75) and the randomized phase of the study (A: 13.5m vs 6.1m, HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.27-3.17, p=0.9 and A+V: 12.1m vs 7.4m, HR 1.38, 95% CI 0.61-3.14, p=0.4). CONCLUSION: Most enrolled patients met the study's primary endpoint of survival at 60 days without major toxicity. Patients obtained clinical benefit with acceptable responses and survival despite their high comorbidity burden. Our results support the feasibility of treating patients with MDS or AML not eligible to other clinical trials due to poor performance status, comorbidities or organ dysfunction, with low intensity therapies within a clinical trial. These findings suggest relaxation of such criteria may likely increase the pool of clinical trial patient candidates and allow access to potential beneficial therapies for patients with otherwise dismal prognosis. Table 1 Table 1. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jabbour: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. DiNardo:Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Wierda:Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Konopleva:Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding. Jain:Novimmune: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Description: Background. Lenalidomide (Len) is an immunomodulatory drug with single agent activity in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve (TN) CLL, (overall response rate (ORR) 56-65%, Chen JCO 2011, Ferrajoli Blood 2011). Given the encouraging results of the combination of Len and rituximab (R) in relapsed CLL, we explored this combination as initial therapy. TN pts could derive greater benefit than relapsed pts from Len + R given their less compromised immune function. Methods. Fifty-eight pts were enrolled between 01/2012 and the present time. All patients had treatment indications per IWCLL 2008 criteria, WHO performance status ≤2 and adequate hepatic and renal function. Patients with HIV, hepatitis B or C infection were excluded. Treatment consisted of R 375 mg/m2 IV given weekly for 4 weeks then monthly during months (mo) 3-12 and Len 10 mg PO/day from day 9 for 24 mo. Allopurinol 300 mg PO daily was given for the first 2 weeks. No pts received antibiotic or DVT prophylaxis. Use of growth factors was allowed according to ASCO guidelines. Responses were assessed (2008 IWG criteria) at mo 3, 6 and every 6mo thereafter. Results. Forty-eight patients are evaluable for response and toxicity (8 too early, 1 lost to follow-up and 1 diagnosed with metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma within 1 week of study entry). Median age was 66 yrs (42-79). 29 (59%) pts were ≥age 65. 22 pts (46%) had Rai stage III-IV disease. Median β2M level was 3.8 mg/dL (1.4-10.5). 24/37 pts (65%) had unmutated IGHV gene and 31 pts (65%) expressed ZAP-70. 4 pts (8%) had del(17p) and 15 pts (32%) del(11q). Forty pts responded (ORR 83%). 7 pts (14.6%) achieved CR (1 MRD negative) and 33 (68.8%) achieved PR (including 7 nodular PRs). Median time to CR was 11mo (range 5-27). 5 pts discontinued therapy before the 3mo evaluation (4 due to toxicity and 1 due to unrelated co-morbidities). Six pts discontinued between 3 and 6mo (4 for refractory disease and 2 for toxicity after achieving PR). ORR was similar for patients with mutated and unmutated IGHV gene (85 vs 83%, p=0.96), age ≥65 and

Description: Introduction. In the context of chemoimmunotherapy, complete remission (CR) is more common and is associated with improved survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). CR is less frequent in CLL patients treated with ibrutinib, and the prognostic significance of achieving CR with ibrutinib is indeterminate. Methods. We prospectively analyzed 208 CLL patients treated on a phase 2 study (NCT02007044) of first-line (deletion 17p only; n=27) or salvage ibrutinib (n=181), with or without rituximab, between 12/2013 and 01/2018. Response was assessed by international workshop on CLL 2018 guidelines. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from treatment initiation to disease progression and/or death, and Kaplan-Meier curves compared using the log-rank test. A landmark analysis at median time of CR achievement (best response) was performed for PFS. Results. After a median follow-up of 34 months (range, 3-48 months), response was evaluable in 194 patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 99%, and CR rate was 24%, with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) in 3% of patients; median time to response was 10 months (range, 3-45 months) and median time to CR was 21 months (5-45 months). None of the patients' baseline characteristics associated with achievement of CR (Table). Among the 47 patients in CR, 7 (15%) discontinued treatment, after a median time from treatment initiation of 19 months (range, 10-39); the main cause of discontinuation was toxicity (5 patients), with second cancer (metastatic melanoma) and disease progression prompting treatment discontinuation only in 2 patients. Among the 145 patients in PR, 50 (34%) discontinued treatment, after a median time from treatment initiation of 14 months (range, 4-45 months); while the main cause of discontinuation was again toxicity (26 patients), 2nd cancers and progressive disease prompted treatment discontinuation in 5 and 14 patients, respectively. Remaining causes of treatment discontinuation among patients in PR were loss to follow-up (3 patients) and consolidation therapy (2 patients). Median PFS was not reached and 28 patients (13%) progressed and/or died. Achievement of CR significantly associated with prolonged PFS (4-year PFS 98% vs 78%, p=0.03)(Figure). The association between CR and prolonged PFS was also confirmed on a landmark analysis (21 months)(p=0.05). Among baseline characteristics shown in the Table, the only factor associated with prolonged PFS was absence of complex karyotype (4-year PFS 80% vs 40%, p=0.05). Median OS has not been reached and 16 (8%) patients have died; of these, only 1 patient was in CR (and cause of death was metastatic melanoma), whereas the remaining 15 were in PR. Among patients in PR, causes of death were: infections in 7 patients, 2nd cancers in 2 patients, Richter transformation in 2 patients and other in 4 patients (small bowel obstruction, colon perforation, intracranial hemorrhage, bradyarrhythmia). Conclusions. This is the first study showing that achievement of CR is a desirable endpoint for patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib, associating with prolonged PFS. Our results support the development of future combination studies, aimed at achieving higher rates of CR in patients treated with ibrutinib. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Wierda: AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Jain:Infinity: Research Funding; Novimmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologioes: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologioes: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novimmune: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Description: MG-0103 is a novel non-hydroxamic acid inhibitor of human histone deacetylases (HDACs), with selectivity for the cancer-associated isoforms of class I HDACs. Deacetylation of histones by HDACs is postulated to inactivate tumour suppressor genes leading to neoplastic transformation, and therefore inhibition of this enzyme may result in antineoplastic activity. To study the safety and activity of MG-0103, we have developed a phase I open-label dose escalation study of MG-0103 administered orally, three-times weekly in patients with leukemia or MDS, with the primary endpoints being the determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of MG-0103. Eligibility criteria included appropriate performance status and renal and hepatic functions. Patients with relapsed/refractory leukemia or MDS and older patients with untreated AML/MDS were eligible. Eight patients have been enrolled at two dose levels (20 &40 mg/m2) so far. Their characteristics are: median age 70 years (range 33–79); all patients so far treated have AML; median number of prior therapies is 1 (range 0–3). All patients had complex cytogenetics including one elderly patient with t(8;21) that had not achieved CR with high dose ara-C-based therapy. MG-0103 has been well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. No drug-related adverse events (AEs) 〉= Grade (Gr) 3 have been observed. The only Gr 2 drug-related AE has been heartburn (1 patient). All other drug-related AEs were grade 1. No cardiac abnormalities have been observed so far. Two of 3 patients at the first dose level have been treated for 3 or more cycles. PK evaluations are shown in the table below. Analysis of peripheral blood cell HDAC activity indicates that HDAC inhibition occurs in a dose-dependent manner. Enrolment is currently proceeding at a dose of 80 mg/m2. In summary, MG-0103 is a well-tolerated HDAC inhibitor in patients with AML at doses and exposures that result in target inhibition in peripheral blood. Dose 20 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 Pharmacokinectic characteristics AUC (0-∞) ng.hr/ml 260 +/− 10.8 528 +/−275 T 1/2 h 8.09 +/− 2.98 6.24 +/− 0.373