ALBERT

Description: Zooplankton samples were collected between 03/26/2018 and 04/27/2018 around the northern tip of the Antarctic Peninsula (63° 0' 1.843'' S, 60° 0' 16.901''W) onboard the RV Polarstern during the PS112 campaign in order to identify spatial distribution in response to environmental variables (CTD raw data files from POLARSTERN cruise PS112, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.895969) and the abundance of krill (Euphausia superba) and salps (Salpa thompsoni). Samples were taken using a Bongo net with a mesh size of 150 µm. The net was equipped with a flowmeter (HydroBios) to measure the filtered volume. On board, the net sample was sieved over a 2000 µm mesh in order to separate organisms 〉2000 µm. The smaller fraction (150 – 2000 µm) was homogenized in 200 mL 0.2 µm filtered seawater and equally split into 4 x 50 mL by using a Hensen-Stempel pipette. The mesozooplankton size range of 150 – 2000 µm was defined according to Atkinson et al. (2012). Two parts were then filtered on 47 mm GF/C Whatman filters (precombusted, acidified and weighed) for analysis of dry weight (DW), bulk carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content, while the third part was preserved in 4 % formalin for abundance, biovolume and size structure analysis. The C/N filters were sealed in tin capsules and analyzed using a CHN analyzer (Thermo, Flash EA 1112). Prior to the analysis, filters for particulate phosphorus were combusted at 450 °C for 5 hours. Particulate organic phosphorus (POP) was measured photometrically as orthophosphate (PO4) by molybdate reaction after sulfuric acid and heat digestion at 90 °C, modified after (Grasshoff et al., 2009). Another filter containing the 4th part served as a back-up. Mesozooplankton bulk stoichiometry data are shown in dataset one. The zooplankton subsamples for taxonomic analysis were scanned using the ZooScan digital imaging system (Model Biotom, Hydroptic Inc., France), a water-proof scanner with a resolution of 2400 dpi (Gorsky et al., 2010; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbp124). Prior to scanning, the formalin preserved samples were rinsed and five samples were further subdivided with a Motoda splitter to reduce the number of organisms per scan and avoid overlapping in the scanning frame. The splits were then placed on the scanner and overlapping organisms were separated manually. Subsequently, the obtained scanning image was processed with ZooProcess, a macro of the image processing software ImageJ (Rasband, 2012) to allow automated processing and measurement of images. These single object images and their metadata were uploaded to the web-based application EcoTaxa (https://ecotaxa.obs-vlfr.fr/prj/2529). Manual validation of the results was required to ensure correct classification. The images were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Prior to quantitative analysis of the obtained data, the image categories containing no zooplankton organisms such as “detritus”, “fiber”, “bubbles” etc. were removed. Abundance of zooplankton taxa was calculated based on the number of images per taxonomic category. Zooplankton organisms were identified to the lowest possible taxonomical level. Whenever identification to species level was not possible, the sample was identified to the next identifiable taxonomical category and assigned a putative species name. The abundance and biovolume data are shown in dataset two and three. The metadata of each image also contain the estimates for body size (body length: major axis of the best fitting ellipse; body width: minor axis) that were used to calculate the biovolume of each object. For the biovolume per size class, the biovolume (mm³/m³) was sorted in octave-scale size class intervals given as individual biovolume (mm3). The lowest limit of the first size class corresponded to the smallest detected ellipsoidal biovolume of 0.00025 mm³. Each size class was then doubled with respect to the previous one. Consequently, the resulting intervals were narrow for small body sizes and became progressively wider with increasing body size. The largest size class was determined by the largest individuals in each sample. As a result, the lower boundary of each size class equaled the interval width. The biovolume (mm³/m³) was then summed for each size class interval. The size distribution (mm³) with total biovolume (mm³/m³) per size bin is given in dataset four.

Description: Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, supports a valuable commercial fishery in the Southwest Atlantic, which holds the highest krill densities and is warming rapidly. The krill catch is increasing, is concentrated in a small area, and has shifted seasonally from summer to autumn/winter. The fishery is managed by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, with the main goal of safeguarding the large populations of krill-dependent predators. Here we show that, because of the restricted distribution of successfully spawning krill and high inter-annual variability in their biomass, the risk of direct fishery impacts on the krill stock itself might be higher than previously thought. We show how management benefits could be achieved by incorporating uncertainty surrounding key aspects of krill ecology into management decisions, and how knowledge can be improved in these key areas. This improved information may be supplied, in part, by the fishery itself.

Description: Over the last decades, it has been reported that the habitat of the Southern Ocean (SO) key species Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) has contracted to high latitudes, putatively due to reduced winter sea ice coverage, while salps as Salpa thompsoni have extended their dispersal to the former krill habitats. To date, the potential implications of this population shift on the biogeochemical cycling of the limiting micronutrient iron (Fe) and its bioavailability to SO phytoplankton has never been tested. Based on uptake of fecal pellet (FP)- released Fe by SO phytoplankton, this study highlights how efficiently krill and salps recycle Fe. To test this, we collected FPs of natural populations of salps and krill, added them to the same SO phytoplankton community, andmeasured the community’s Fe uptake rates. Our results reveal that both FP additions yielded similar dissolved iron concentrations in the seawater. Per FP carbon added to the seawater, 4.8 ± 1.5 times more Fe was taken up by the same phytoplankton community from salp FP than from krill FP, suggesting that salp FP increased the Fe bioavailability, possibly through the release of ligands. With respect to the ongoing shift from krill to salps, the potential for carbon fixation of the Fe-limited SO could be strengthened in the future, representing a negative feedback to climate change.

Description: Zooplankton community structure is often characterized by using traits as a function of environmental conditions. However, trait-based knowledge on Southern Ocean mesozooplankton is limited, particularly regarding size and elemental composition. Nine stations around the northern Antarctic Peninsula were sampled during austral autumn to investigate the spatial variability in mesozooplankton taxonomic composition, size structure and stoichiometry in relation to environmental predictors, but also to the abundance of Antarctic krill and salps. The mesozooplankton communities around the South Shetland Islands were dominated by small copepods, mainly Oithonidae and Oncaeidae, while stations along the frontal zones and the Weddell Sea revealed a higher proportion of larger organisms. Spatial differences in taxonomic composition and size structure were significantly altered by salp abundance, with stronger impact on small-sized copepods. Furthermore, taxonomic composition was significantly related to temperature and total carbon but not chlorophyll a, indicating reduced relevance of phytoplankton derived food during autumn. Bulk mesozooplankton stoichiometry, however, showed no significant relation to environmental conditions, mesozooplankton size structure or dominant taxa. Our results indicate that aside from bottom-up related drivers, top-down effects of salps may lead to mesozooplankton communities that are more dominated by larger size classes with potential consequences for trophic interactions and nutrient fluxes.

Description: In the Southern Ocean, several zooplankton taxonomic groups, euphausiids, copepods, salps and pteropods, are notable because of their biomass and abundance and their roles in maintaining food webs and ecosystem structure and function, including the provision of globally important ecosystem services. These groups are consumers of microbes, primary and secondary producers, and are prey for fishes, cephalopods, seabirds, and marine mammals. In providing the link between microbes, primary production, and higher trophic levels these taxa influence energy flows, biological production and biomass, biogeochemical cycles, carbon flux and food web interactions thereby modulating the structure and functioning of ecosystems. Additionally, Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) and various fish species are harvested by international fisheries. Global and local drivers of change are expected to affect the dynamics of key zooplankton species, which may have potentially profound and wide-ranging implications for Southern Ocean ecosystems and the services they provide. Here we assess the current understanding of the dominant metazoan zooplankton within the Southern Ocean, including Antarctic krill and other key euphausiid, copepod, salp and pteropod species. We provide an overview of observed and potential future responses of these taxa to a changing Southern Ocean and the functional relationships by which drivers may impact them. To support future ecosystem assessments and conservation and management strategies, we also identify priorities for Southern Ocean zooplankton research.

Description: Over the last decades, it has been reported that the habitat of the Southern Ocean (SO) key species Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) has contracted to high latitudes, putatively due to reduced winter sea ice coverage, while salps as Salpa thompsoni have extended their dispersal to the former krill habitats. To date, the potential implications of this population shift on the biogeochemical cycling of the limiting micronutrient iron (Fe) and its bioavailability to SO phytoplankton has never been tested. Based on uptake of fecal pellet (FP)- released Fe by SO phytoplankton, this study highlights how efficiently krill and salps recycle Fe. To test this, we collected FPs of natural populations of salps and krill, added them to the same SO phytoplankton community, andmeasured the community’s Fe uptake rates. Our results reveal that both FP additions yielded similar dissolved iron concentrations in the seawater. Per FP carbon added to the seawater, 4.8 ± 1.5 times more Fe was taken up by the same phytoplankton community from salp FP than from krill FP, suggesting that salp FP increased the Fe bioavailability, possibly through the release of ligands. With respect to the ongoing shift from krill to salps, the potential for carbon fixation of the Fe-limited SO could be strengthened in the future, representing a negative feedback to climate change.