Publication Date:
1985-06-28
Description:
〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Holden, C -- New York, N.Y. -- Science. 1985 Jun 28;228(4707):1510-1.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4012304" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
Keywords:
Advisory Committees
;
Anesthetics/adverse effects
;
Depression/*therapy
;
*Electroconvulsive Therapy/adverse effects
;
Federal Government
;
Humans
;
Memory Disorders/etiology
;
Mentally Ill Persons
;
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
;
Risk
;
*Risk Assessment
;
Time Factors
;
United States
;
disfavor has led to calls for more research on all aspects of this controversial
;
treatment. A recent consensus conference sponsored by the National Institutes of
;
Health produced cautious approval of ECT to treat severe depression. After
;
reviewing existing research data and listening to testimony on ECT's effects,
;
especially effects on memory, the panel recommended that immediate research be
;
done on methods and effects of ECT, that ECT training be included in medical and
;
psychiatric education, and that more attention be paid to review and regulatory
;
mechanisms. Holden speculates that the persistent and fierce opposition to ECT
;
reflects the schism within psychiatry between biological and psychodynamic
;
treatment approaches, as well as the impact of public information gained largely
;
from overly harrowing portrayals of ECT.
Print ISSN:
0036-8075
Electronic ISSN:
1095-9203
Topics:
Biology
,
Chemistry and Pharmacology
,
Computer Science
,
Medicine
,
Natural Sciences in General
,
Physics