Publication Date:
1990-02-02
Description:
In the News & Comment article "Super Collider advocates tangle with cost cutters" by Mark Crawford (12 Jan., p. 152), the collision energy of the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) was incorrectly described as being two orders of magnitude greater than that of the Tevatron. The SSC's collision energy is supposed to be 40 trillion election volts-20 times that of the Tevatron. In addition, the $7.2-billion cost estimate for the project is based on inflated dollars, not constant dollars, as was stated.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Siekevitz, P -- New York, N.Y. -- Science. 1990 Feb 2;247(4942):516.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2300808" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
Keywords:
*Ethics, Professional
;
*National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
;
*Research Support as Topic
;
United States
Print ISSN:
0036-8075
Electronic ISSN:
1095-9203
Topics:
Biology
,
Chemistry and Pharmacology
,
Computer Science
,
Medicine
,
Natural Sciences in General
,
Physics
